Citations

Background: The study of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) can yield insight into the mechanisms underlying the complex trait of cardiac hypertrophy. To date, most genetic variants associated with HCM have been found in sarcomeric genes. Here, we describe a novel HCM-associated variant in the noncanonical Wnt signaling interactor WTIP (Wilms tumor interacting protein) and provide evidence of a role for WTIP in complex disease. Methods: In a family affected by HCM, we used exome sequencing and identity-by-descent analysis to identify a novel variant in WTIP (p.Y233F). We knocked down WTIP in isolated neonatal rat ventricular myocytes with lentivirally delivered short hairpin ribonucleic acids and in Danio rerio via morpholino injection. We performed weighted gene coexpression network analysis for WTIP in human cardiac tissue, as well as association analysis for WTIP variation and left ventricular hypertrophy. Finally, we generated induced pluripotent stem cell–derived cardiomyocytes from patient tissue, characterized size and calcium cycling, and determined the effect of verapamil treatment on calcium dynamics. Results: WTIP knockdown caused hypertrophy in neonatal rat ventricular myocytes and increased cardiac hypertrophy, peak calcium, and resting calcium in D rerio . Network analysis of human cardiac tissue indicated WTIP as a central coordinator of prohypertrophic networks, while common variation at the WTIP locus was associated with human left ventricular hypertrophy. Patient-derived WTIP p.Y233F-induced pluripotent stem cell–derived cardiomyocytes recapitulated cellular hypertrophy and increased resting calcium, which was ameliorated by verapamil. Conclusions: We demonstrate that a novel genetic variant found in a family with HCM disrupts binding to a known Wnt signaling protein, misregulating cardiomyocyte calcium dynamics. Further, in orthogonal model systems, we show that expression of the gene WTIP is important in complex cardiac hypertrophy phenotypes. These findings, derived from the observation of a rare Mendelian disease variant, uncover a novel disease mechanism with implications across diverse forms of cardiac hypertrophy.

11509 Background: uLMS is an aggressive sarcoma subtype of smooth muscle origin. Chemotherapy provides limited benefit for advanced disease. 18-25% of uLMS harbor deleterious alterations in homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair genes. uLMS exhibits high levels of replicative stress. These findings prompted a phase 2 study of O+T in pretreated uLMS where O+T demonstrated activity: ORR 27%, mPFS 6.9 mos (Ingham M. et. al. ASCO 2021: #11506) Methods: NCI protocol #10250 is a single-arm, multicenter, phase 2 trial evaluating O+T in advanced uLMS pts with progression on ≥1 prior line. Pre-treatment (Pre) and on-treatment (On) biopsies were collected from 22 pts. In prespecified analysis, we evaluated for a relationship between clinical outcomes and HR gene alterations by whole exome sequencing (WES), SLFN11/MGMT expression by RNAseq, and RAD51 foci formation (functional assay). HRD scores were calculated from WES using scarHRD. Gene expression was evaluated using a Spearman rank-order correlation analysis to identify genes associated with PFS (p < 0.01) and overexpressed in sensitive (S: PFS > 240d) or resistant (R: PFS < 240d) pts. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed (q = FDR-adjusted p value). Pts with available results: WES/RNAseq (16), Pre HRD score (13), Pre RAD51 foci (12). Results: 31% (5/16) pts had a mutation (Mut) or homozygous deletion (Hd) in the HR panel: ATRX Mut (2), ATR Mut, PALB2 Hd, RAD51B Hd. Pts with PALB2 and RAD51B Hd had longest PFS on study. Recurrent alterations also occurred in TP53 (56%) and RB1 (19%). Median HRD score in Pre samples was 51 (range 36-66) and 10/13 had HRD scores ≥ 42. Pre and On SLFN11 and MGMT RNA expression were not correlated with ORR/PFS. 6/13 Pre samples were HR-deficient by the RAD51 foci assay. Of pts with PFS ≥ 200d, 4/6 were HR-deficient. In Pre samples, 81 genes were overexpressed in S pts and 73 in R pts. In On samples, 146 genes were overexpressed in S pts and 127 in R pts. In On samples, GSEA identified the epithelial-mesenchymal transition enriched in S pts (q = 3.38e-7) and cell cycle pathways (E2F targets, G2M checkpoint) in R pts (q = 7.43e-4). Only 2 genes, CXCL10 and PCDH15, were differentially expressed between paired Pre and On samples (both increased in On). Gene expression signatures for replicative stress showed borderline association with worse PFS. Conclusions: Most uLMS tumors exhibit HR defects as measured by HRD scores. A subset of pts with greater benefit from O+T were identified by WES for HR genes and the RAD51 assay. There was no correlation between SLFN11 and MGMT expression and outcomes. GSEA identified pathways differentially expressed in S and R pts in On samples. O+T induced CXCL10 which has been associated with T-cell trafficking to tumors. A randomized phase 3 trial of O+T versus investigator’s choice is planned. These results provide insight into which pts may benefit most from this novel drug combination. Clinical trial information: NCT03880019.

10009 Background: The NCI-Children’s Oncology Group (COG) Pediatric Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (MATCH) trial assigns patients, age 1-21 years, with relapsed or refractory solid tumors, lymphomas, and histiocytic disorders to phase 2 treatment arms based on genetic alterations detected in their tumor. Arm C evaluated the EZH2 inhibitor tazemetostat in patients whose tumors harbored EZH2 hotspot mutations or SMARCB1 or SMARCA4 loss by immunohistochemistry. Methods: Tazemetostat 1200 mg/m2/dose PO BID was administered to the first 13 patients; after study amendment due to second malignancy noted in the pediatric phase 1 trial, the dose for patients with non-CNS tumors was reduced to 520 mg/m2/dose PO BID. Patients were treated for 28-day cycles until PD or intolerable toxicity (max 26 cycles); response assessments occurred every 2-3 cycles. Primary and secondary endpoints were ORR and PFS, respectively. Results: Twenty eligible and evaluable patients (median age 5 years; range 1-21) were enrolled between Nov 2017 and Sept 2020. SMARCB1 loss was detected in 16/20 (80%) tumors: atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (ATRT, n = 8), malignant rhabdoid tumor (MRT, n = 4), epithelioid sarcoma (ES, n = 2), renal medullary carcinoma (RMC, n = 1) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, n = 1). EZH2 mutations were identified in 3/20 (15%) tumors: Ewing sarcoma (n = 2), ependymoma (n = 1). One patient with Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) had SMARCA4 loss. Centrally reviewed, one objective response (PR) was observed (LCH [SMARCA4], 26 cycles at 1200 mg/m2/dose BID). Five other patients had a best response of stable disease (ES [SMARCB1], 26 cycles, 520 mg/m2/dose BID; ATRT [SMARCB1], 13 cycles,1200 mg/m2/dose BID; RMC [SMARCB1], 12 cycles, 520 mg/m2/dose BID; ES [SMARCB1], 9 cycles,1200 mg/m2/dose BID; ATRT [SMARCB1], 6 cycles, 1200 mg/m2/dose BID). No other patients received > 2 cycles. Six-month PFS was 35% (95% CI 15.7%, 55.2%); OS was 45% (95% CI 23.1%, 64.7%). Treatment-related adverse events were consistent with AEs previously reported with tazemetostat, including anemia, thrombocytopenia, elevated LFTs, abdominal pain, dyspnea, infection, and intracranial hemorrhage. Three patients had bromide elevations. Conclusions: In this cohort of children with relapsed tumors harboring EZH2 mutations or loss of SMARCB1 or SMARCA4, tazemetostat did not produce significant objective responses (ORR: 5%, 90% CI 1%, 20%). However, we observed prolonged stable disease of > 6 months (range: 6-26 cycles) in 33% of patients across different histologic diagnoses, including two patients who received the full two years of study therapysuggesting a potential effect of tazemetostat on disease stabilization. Future studies will incorporate tazemetostat in combination with chemotherapy or immunologic agents for patients with these aggressive and difficult to treat tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT03213665.

e19583 Background: Brexucabtagene autoleucel (BA) is an FDA approved therapy for relapsed/refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), based on results from ZUMA-2 study. We report the safety and efficacy of BA in standard of care practice among centers in the US Lymphoma CAR-T Consortium. Methods: 16 centers participated in this retrospective study. Patients (pts) who underwent leukapheresis by 12/31/2021 with an intent to manufacture BA were included. Baseline clinical characteristics, bridging therapy, adverse events after BA infusion, and post-infusion outcome data were collected. Eligibility for ZUMA-2 was retrospectively determined. Survival outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: At the data cut-off date, 189 pts underwent leukapheresis, among whom 167 (88%) completed BA infusion, 22 (12%) did not receive infusion. The median age was 67 years. 16% had high risk simplified MIPI, 57% had Ki-67≥50%, 41% had aggressive histology, 49% had TP53 alteration, 51% with POD24 and 10% had CNS involvement. The median number of prior lines of therapy was 3 (range 1-10). 86% had prior BTKi treatment (89% refractory). 130 (78%) pts would not have met ZUMA-2 eligibility criteria. 113 (68%) pts received bridging therapy, which included BTKi, venetoclax, chemotherapy. Median time from leukapheresis to lymphodepletion chemotherapy: 28 days (range 17-140). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) rate was 90% (8% grade ≥3; 1 grade 5), and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) rate was 61% (32% grade ≥3). Grade 5 ICANS (n = 0). Medications used to manage CRS and ICANS were 125 (76%) for tocilizumab, 112 (68%) for corticosteroid, and 27 (16%) for anakinra. 32 (20%) pts required ICU admission, 18 pts required vasopressors, and 5 pts required mechanical ventilation. Day 30 response was evaluable in 155 pts (89% ORR, 70% CR). The best ORR was 89%, with 80% CR, 9% PR. The ORR/CR rates were 88%/79% for aggressive histology, 89%/77% for high Ki-67% (> 50%), 90%/72% for TP53 altered, 81%/75% for CNS involved, 89%/79% for BTKi-exposed, 91%/83% for BTKi-naïve, and 89%/78% for those not meeting ZUMA-2 eligibility criteria. The median duration of response was not reached and at 6-month was 67% (95% CI 57-75). With a median follow-up of 5.6 months (range 0.2-15.3), median PFS was not reached, the 6-month PFS rate was 63% (95% CI 54-71), and median OS was 15.3 months and the 6-month OS rate was 85% (95% CI 77-90). Conclusions: This multicenter retrospective study demonstrated encouraging safety and efficacy data of BA in R/R MCL in the real-world practice. Despite 78% of the pts being ineligible for ZUMA-2, the responses, CRS, ICANS and outcomes were comparable to ZUMA-2 data. Long term safety and efficacy will be reported.

7571 Background: In clinical trials of CAR T-cell therapies and real-world studies published to date, there is a paucity of data on outcomes by race and ethnicity. Here, we examined outcomes by race and ethnicity among LBCL pts who received axi-cel in the real-world setting. Methods: A total of 1389 pts with LBCL were identified from a non-interventional post-authorization safety study with pts receiving commercial axi-cel between 10/2017 and 08/2020. Race (African American or Asian vs White) and ethnicity (Hispanic vs non-Hispanic) were self-reported by pts. Pts with rescinded consent, enrolled in trials, having prior non-HCT cellular therapy, primary CNS lymphoma, unknown comorbidity or data in query were excluded. Median follow-up was 12.7 mo. Outcomes included ORR, CR rate, DOR, PFS and OS, grade ≥ 3 CRS (Lee 2014 criteria) and ICANS (ASTCT consensus grade). ORR and CR were evaluated in pts with ≥ 180 days of follow-up. Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated for PFS and OS. Multivariable analyses comparing race and ethnicity were conducted via logistic and Cox regression. Results: Among all, 1127 (81%) were White, 70 (5%) African American and 81 (6%) Asian; 152 (11%) were Hispanic including 104 White, 2 Black, and 1 Asian Hispanic. African Americans, compared to White, were younger (median age 55.5 vs 62.8 years), more likely to have pulmonary impairment (41% vs 28%) and tended to have longer time from diagnosis (≥ 12 mo 71% vs 59%). Hispanic pts were younger (median age 58.5 vs 62.6 years) than non-Hispanic pts. ORR was 74% (CR 57%, 12-mo PFS and OS 48% and 63%) for White, 57% (CR 45%, 12-mo PFS and OS 36% and 62%) for African American, 67% (CR 53%, 12-mo PFS and OS 55% and 65%) for Asian and 73% (CR 55%, 12-mo PFS and OS 50% and 65%) for Hispanic pts. Grade ≥ 3 CRS and ICANS occurred in 7% and 18% of African American, 10% and 19% of Asian, and 8% and 27% of White pts, respectively. Hispanic pts had lower rates of grade ≥ 3 CRS and ICANS (4% and 15%) vs non-Hispanic (9% and 27%). African American race was associated with inferior ORR (OR 0.40; 95% CI, 0.24-0.69) and CR rate (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.32-0.93) vs White. Asian pts had favorable DOR compared to both White (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.24-0.87) and African American (HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.17-0.88). No statistical differences were found in OS and PFS across races, nor in any efficacy outcome between Hispanic and non-Hispanic pts. Asian (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.29-0.96 vs White) and Hispanic pts (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.31-0.85 vs non-Hispanic) had lower risk of grade ≥ 3 ICANS. Conclusions: Overall, axi-cel showed favorable OS, PFS and safety profile regardless of race and ethnicity in the real-world setting. No notable differences in outcomes were observed for Hispanic or Asian pts. Lower response rates in African American pts noted here warrant further investigation including any underrepresentation not explained by a lower incidence rate for DLBCL (SEER), access to care, and disease burden.

3009 Background: The NCI-Children’s Oncology Group (COG) Pediatric Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (MATCH) trial assigns patients age 1 to 21 years with relapsed or refractory solid tumors, lymphomas, and histiocytic disorders to phase 2 treatment arms of molecularly-targeted therapies based on genetic alterations detected in their tumor. Arm J evaluated the ERK1/2 inhibitor ulixertinib (BVD-523FB) in patients whose tumors harbored activating alterations in the MAPK pathway ( ARAF, BRAF, HRAS, KRAS, NRAS, MAPK1, MAP2K1, GNA11, GNAQ hotspot mutations; NF1inactivating mutations; BRAF fusions). Methods: As there were no prior pediatric data, ulixertinib was initially tested in a dose escalation cohort using a rolling 6 design to establish the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) before proceeding with enrollment to the phase 2 cohort. Ulixertinib was administered at 260 mg/m2/dose PO BID (dose level 1, DL1, n = 15) or 350 mg/m2/dose PO BID (dose level 2, DL2, n = 5). Patients were treated on continuous 28-day cycles for up to 2 years, until disease progression or intolerable toxicity; response assessment occurred every 2-3 cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate; secondary endpoints included safety/tolerability and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Twenty patients (median age 12 years; range 5-20) were enrolled between November 2018 and March 2021. All patients were evaluable for response. High-grade glioma (HGG, n = 7) was most common, with CNS tumors comprising 55% (11/20) of diagnoses; all CNS tumors except one (HGG with KRAS and NF1 mutations) harbored BRAF fusions or V600 mutations. Rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 5) was the most frequent non-CNS diagnosis, with NRAS mutations detected in 4 tumors. DL1 was declared the RP2D after first-cycle dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred in 1/6 DLT-evaluable patients at DL1 and 2/5 patients at DL2 in the dose escalation cohort. Any-cycle DLTs in 8 patients in the dose escalation and primary cohorts included fatigue, anorexia, rash, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dehydration, increased creatinine, hypoalbuminemia, hypernatremia, and hip fracture. No objective responses were observed. Six-month PFS was 37% (95% CI: 17%, 58%). Three patients with CNS tumors achieved stable disease > 6 months (HGG with BRAF fusion, 15 cycles; glioneuronal tumor with BRAF V600E, 9 cycles; low-grade glioma with BRAF fusion, 7 cycles). Analyses of correlative studies, including pharmacokinetics and circulating tumor DNA, are ongoing. Conclusions: The pediatric RP2D of ulixertinib was established as 260 mg/m2/dose PO BID. There were no objective responses in this cohort of children and young adults with treatment-refractory tumors with activating MAPK alterations. Clinical benefit of prolonged disease control was observed in 3 patients with BRAF-altered gliomas and glioneuronal tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT03698994.

TPS2676 Background: Solid tumors comprise > 90% of cancers. Metastatic colorectal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, and pancreatic cancer are among the leading causes of cancer-related mortality (5-year overall survival: 14%, 6%, and 3%, respectively) (ACS. 2021). Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has demonstrated clinical efficacy in hematologic malignancies (Neelapu S. et al. N Engl J Med. 2017). Translating engineered T-cell therapies to solid tumors has proven to be challenging due to a lack of tumor-specific targets that can discriminate cancer cells from normal cells. Previous studies using carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) T-cell receptors and mesothelin (MSLN) CARs resulted in dose-limiting on-target, off-tumor toxicities (Parkhurst M, et al. Mol Ther. 2011; Tanyi J. Cellicon Valley '21). To create a therapeutic safety window, Tmod CAR T-cell therapy utilizes dual-signaling receptors to create a robust NOT logic gate capable of killing tumor cells, while leaving healthy cells intact (Hamburger A, et al. Mol Immunol. 2020). The 2 receptors in Tmod CAR T-cell therapy comprise an activator that recognizes an antigen on the surface of tumor cells that may also be present on normal cells, such as CEA and MSLN, and a blocker that recognizes a second surface antigen from an allele lost only in tumor cells. The frequency of HLA LOH among advanced GI solid tumor cancers in the Tempus real-world dataset is 16.3% with a range of 15.6%-20.8% between colorectal, pancreatic, and gastroesophageal tumors (Hecht R. et al. ASCO-GI 2022. Abstract #190). As such, HLA LOH offers a definitive tumor versus normal discriminator target for CAR T-cell therapy. Different activator/blocker combinations can be engineered with the Tmod platform technology and may be applied to T cells and natural killer cells in autologous and allogeneic settings. BASECAMP-1 is a currently enrolling observational study with key objectives of 1) To identify patients with somatic HLA LOH eligible for Tmod CAR T-cell therapy, and 2) To obtain leukapheresis and feasibility for the future EVEREST Tmod CAR T-cell trial. Methods: BASECAMP-1 (NCT04981119) patient eligibility has 2 parts: 1) Patients will be initially screened to identify germline HLA-A*02 heterozygosity by central NGS. If HLA-A*02 heterozygosity is confirmed, primary archival tumor tissue will be analyzed for somatic mutations by xT-Onco NGS testing. 2) If the tumor demonstrates HLA-A*02 LOH and the patient is eligible after screening, the patient will undergo leukapheresis. Banked T cells will be available for the autologous EVEREST Tmod CAR T-cell therapy interventional study to reduce waiting time at relapse. Clinical trial information: NCT04981119.

Abstract Clinical question In adults with low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels >1.8 mmol/L (>70 mg/dL) who are already taking the maximum dose of statins or are intolerant to statins, should another lipid-lowering drug be added, either a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor or ezetimibe, to reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events? If so, which drug is preferred? Having decided to use one, should we add the other lipid-lowering drug? Current practice Most guidelines emphasise LDL cholesterol targets in their recommendations for prescribing PCSK9 inhibitors and/or ezetimibe in adults at high risk of experiencing a major adverse cardiovascular event. However, to achieve these goals in very high risk patients with statins alone is almost impossible, so physicians are increasingly considering other lipid-lowering drugs solely for achieving LDL cholesterol treatment goals rather than for achieving important absolute cardiovascular risk reduction. Most guidelines do not systematically assess the cardiovascular benefits of adding PCSK9 inhibitors and/or ezetimibe for all risk groups across primary and secondary prevention, nor do they report, in accordance with explicit judgments of assumed patients’ values and preferences, absolute benefits and harms and potential treatment burdens. Recommendations The guideline panel provided mostly weak recommendations, which means we rely on shared decision making when applying these recommendations. For adults already using statins, the panel suggests adding a second lipid-lowering drug in people at very high and high cardiovascular risk but recommends against adding it in people at low cardiovascular risk. For adults who are intolerant to statins, the panel recommends using a lipid-lowering drug in people at very high and high cardiovascular risk but against adding it in those at low cardiovascular risk. When choosing to add another lipid-lowering drug, the panel suggests ezetimibe in preference to PCSK9 inhibitors. The panel suggests further adding a PCSK9 inhibitor to ezetimibe for adults already taking statins at very high risk and those at very high and high risk who are intolerant to statins. How this guideline was created An international panel including patients, clinicians, and methodologists produced these recommendations following standards for trustworthy guidelines and using the GRADE approach. The panel identified four risk groups of patients (low, moderate, high, and very high cardiovascular risk) and primarily applied an individual patient perspective in moving from evidence to recommendations, though societal issues were a secondary consideration. The panel considered the balance of benefits and harms and burdens of starting a PCSK9 inhibitor and/or ezetimibe, making assumptions of adults’ average values and preferences. Interactive evidence summaries and decision aids accompany multi-layered recommendations, developed in an online authoring and publication platform ( www.magicapp.org ) that also allows re-use and adaptation. The evidence A linked systematic review and network meta-analysis (14 trials including 83 660 participants) of benefits found that PCSK9 inhibitors or ezetimibe probably reduce myocardial infarctions and stroke in patients with very high and high cardiovascular risk, with no impact on mortality (moderate to high certainty evidence), but not in those with moderate and low cardiovascular risk. PCSK9 inhibitors may have similar effects to ezetimibe on reducing non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke (low certainty evidence). These relative benefits were consistent, but their absolute magnitude varied based on cardiovascular risk in individual patients (for example, for 1000 people treated with PCSK9 inhibitors in addition to statins over five years, benefits ranged from 2 fewer strokes in the lowest risk to 21 fewer in the highest risk). Two systematic reviews on harms found no important adverse events for these drugs (moderate to high certainty evidence). PCSK9 inhibitors require injections that sometimes result in injection site reactions (best estimate 15 more per 1000 in a 5 year timeframe), representing a burden and harm that may matter to patients. The MATCH-IT decision support tool allows you to interact with the evidence and your patients across the alternative options: https://magicevidence.org/match-it/220504dist-lipid-lowering-drugs/ . Understanding the recommendations The stratification into four cardiovascular risk groups means that, to use the recommendations, physicians need to identify their patient’s risk first. We therefore suggest, specific to various geographical regions, using some reliable risk calculators that estimate patients’ cardiovascular risk based on a mix of known risk factors. The largely weak recommendations concerning the addition of ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors reflect what the panel considered to be a close balance between small reductions in stroke and myocardial infarctions weighed against the burdens and limited harms. Because of the anticipated large variability of patients’ values and preferences, well informed choices warrant shared decision making. Interactive evidence summaries and decision aids linked to the recommendations can facilitate such shared decisions. The strong recommendations against adding another drug in people at low cardiovascular risk reflect what the panel considered to be a burden without important benefits. The strong recommendation for adding either ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors in people at high and very high cardiovascular risk reflect a clear benefit. The panel recognised the key uncertainty in the evidence concerning patient values and preferences, namely that what most people consider important reductions in cardiovascular risks, weighed against burdens and harms, remains unclear. Finally, availability and costs will influence decisions when healthcare systems, clinicians, or people consider adding ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors.

In America, Black adults are 30% more likely to die from cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared to White adults, and more than half of this racial disparity in CVD‐related mortality may be attributed to the substantially greater prevalence of high blood pressure (BP) in Black adults. Furthermore, compared to White adults with hypertension, Black adults with hypertension are less likely to exhibit a nocturnal reduction in BP (i.e., “dipping”). Importantly, non‐dipping BP is associated with target organ damage and increased CVD risk. However, it is unclear whether young and apparently healthy Black adults exhibit reduced BP dipping compared to their White peers. PURPOSE Therefore, the purpose of this preliminary investigation was to determine whether there are racial differences in BP dipping using ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), including 24‐hour‐, daytime‐, and nighttime‐BP, in young and apparently healthy Black and White adults. METHODS We obtained clinical BP and 24‐hour ABPM readings in 10 self‐identified White adults (5M/5F; age: 21.6±4.4 yrs; BMI: 23.8±2.9 kg/m 2 ; Mean±SD) and 7 self‐identified Black adults (3M/4F; age: 21.7±3.5 yrs; BMI: 25.1±2.8 kg/m 2 ). The ABPM monitors were programmed to record BP every 20 and 30 minutes during each participants daytime‐ and nighttime‐period, respectively. True daytime‐ and nighttime‐BP periods were adjusted during analysis based upon participant activity logs. We defined “non‐dipping” as a failure to achieve a dipping ratio of <0.90 (night‐to‐day BP ratio). BP data were compared using independent t‐tests and the Fisher’s exact test was used to compare dipping frequency between races (α=0.05). RESULTS Clinically measured BP (systolic/diastolic) was not different (P>0.05) between White (117±9/67±6 mmHg) and Black (124±12/70±9 mmHg) adults. There was also no difference (P>0.05) in 24‐hour‐BP between White (117±11/66±7 mmHg) and Black (114±14/63±7 mmHg) adults. Likewise, daytime‐BP was not different (P>0.05) between White (122±12/71±8 mmHg) and Black (116±14/66±8 mmHg) participants, nor was there a difference in nighttime‐BP (P>0.05) between White (102±9/51±4 mmHg) and Black (105±13/54±7 mmHg) adults. However, systolic BP dipping was attenuated (P=0.04) in Black (0.90±0.05) compared to White (0.84±0.07) adults. Non‐dipping of systolic BP was observed in 5 of 7 Black participants and 2 of 10 White participants (P=0.06). Diastolic BP dipping in Black adults was 0.79±0.06 and White adults was 0.73±0.09 (P=0.05). Non‐dipping of diastolic BP was observed in 1 of 7 Black participants and 1 of 10 White participants (P=1.00). CONCLUSIONS These preliminary data suggest that despite similar clinical and 24‐hour ambulatory BP compared to White adults, young and apparently healthy Black adults exhibit impaired BP dipping, which may contribute to increased likelihood of CVD.

Insufficiency or irregularity in sleep is associated with high blood pressure (BP) and aortic stiffness, both of which are independent predictors of all‐cause and cardiovascular mortality. The cardiovascular ramifications of short and irregular sleep are well documented in shift workers, but the health implications of possible differences between sleep duration on workdays (WD) and free days (FD) in non‐shift workers is less clear. PURPOSE We sought to examine associations between WD and FD sleep duration, and then to inspect for relationships between WD and FD sleep duration, as well as the difference between WD and FD sleep duration (i.e., sleep irregularity), with BP and indices of arterial stiffness in apparently healthy young adults. We hypothesized 1) participants would sleep less on WD than FD, and 2) that participants with short WD sleep duration would exhibit higher BP and arterial stiffness, and 3) those with greater sleep irregularity would exhibit higher BP and arterial stiffness. METHODS 16 apparently healthy young adults (21.8±4.0 yrs; 24.4±2.9 kg/m 2 ; Mean±SD) participated in this study. All participants completed the Munich ChronoType Questionnaire to assess self‐described WD and FD sleep‐wake behavior. WD and FD sleep duration were determined, and sleep irregularity was quantified as the absolute value of the difference between WD and FD sleep duration. Following 10‐min of supine rest, we used an automated oscillometric device (SphygmoCor XCEL) to measure BP and augmentation index (AIx), an indirect measure of arterial stiffness. Aortic stiffness was then assessed using carotid‐femoral pulse wave velocity (cf‐PWV). WD and FD sleep duration were compared using a paired t‐test and associations between sleep with BP and indices of arterial stiffness were assessed using Pearson correlations, or the non‐parametric equivalent for sleep irregularity. RESULTS WD sleep duration was 492±85 min, FD sleep duration was 480±83 min, and sleep irregularity was 53±49 min. Systolic BP was 120±10 mmHg, diastolic BP was 68±7 mmHg, AIx was 10.9±9.8 %, and cf‐PWV was 5.8±0.7 m/s. WD sleep duration was significantly greater (P<0.01) than FD sleep duration, and WD sleep duration was not associated (P>0.05) with systolic BP (r=0.10), diastolic BP (r=0.10), AIx (r=0.07), or cf‐PWV (r=‐0.18). FD sleep duration was inversely correlated with cf‐PWV (r=‐0.65; P=0.01), but was not associated (P>0.05) with systolic BP (r=‐0.12), diastolic BP (r =‐0.08), or AIx (r=0.25). Sleep irregularity was not associated (P>0.05) with systolic BP (r=0.37), diastolic BP (r=0.45), AIx (r=0.08), or cf‐PWV (r=0.14). CONCLUSIONS Contrary to our hypothesis, FD, but not WD, sleep duration was associated with aortic stiffness in apparently healthy young adults. Average sleep duration of our cohort exceeded the recommended minimum of 7 hours per night and sleep irregularity was small (i.e., <60 min on average), thus potentially masking elevations in BP and arterial stiffness seen with short and/or irregular sleep such as in shift workers.