Xu, Hairong

AbstractAxicabtagene ciloleucel (axi‐cel) in trials has demonstrated favorable efficacy compared with historical controls after ≥2 lines of therapy for the treatment of relapsed or refractory (R/R) large B cell lymphoma (LBCL). Herein, we compared the real‐world effectiveness of axi‐cel with efficacy and effectiveness of chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) in patients aged ≥65 years and patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 2. A total of 1146 patients treated with commercial axi‐cel for R/R LBCL with ≥2 lines of prior therapy were included from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplantation Research prospective observational study, and 469 patients treated with CIT for R/R LBCL after ≥2 lines of prior therapy were included from SCHOLAR‐1 (an international, multicohort, retrospective study). After propensity score matching, at a median follow‐up of 24 months for patients receiving axi‐cel and 60 months for patients receiving CIT, 12‐month overall survival rates were 62% and 28%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.24–0.37]). Objective response rate (ORR) was 76% (complete response [CR] rate 58%) in patients receiving axi‐cel versus 28% (CR rate 16%) for those receiving CIT. A 57% difference in ORR (55% difference in CR rate) favoring axi‐cel over CIT was observed among patients aged ≥65 years. Increased magnitude of benefit in response rates for axi‐cel versus CIT was also observed among patients with ECOG PS = 2. These findings further support the broader use of axi‐cel in older patients and patients with ECOG PS = 2 with R/R LBCL.

Background: Axi-cel is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) LBCL. ZUMA-12 (NCT03761056) is a Phase 2, multicenter, single-arm study of axi-cel as part of first-line treatment in patients with high-risk LBCL. In the primary efficacy analysis (n=37; median follow-up of 15.9 months), axi-cel demonstrated a high rate of investigator-assessed complete response (CR; 78%; 95% CI, 62-90) and an 89% objective response rate (ORR; 95% CI, 75-97). Axi-cel also had a manageable safety profile, with no new safety signals observed in the first-line setting (Neelapu et al. Nat Med. 2022). Here, we report updated efficacy and safety outcomes from ZUMA-12 in all patients treated with axi-cel after a median follow-up of ≥40 months. Methods: Eligible adults had high-risk LBCL, with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements (double- or triple-hit histology) per investigator or an International Prognostic Index (IPI) score ≥3, plus a positive interim PET per Lugano classification (Deauville score 4/5) after 2 cycles of an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and anthracycline-containing regimen. Patients underwent leukapheresis, followed by lymphodepleting chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide and fludarabine) on Days -5, -4, and -3, and a single axi-cel infusion of 2×10 6 CAR T cells/kg on Day 0. Per investigator discretion, non-chemotherapy bridging could be administered. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed CR rate per Lugano classification (Cheson et al. J Clin Oncol. 2014). Secondary endpoints included ORR, duration of response (DOR), event-free survival (EFS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and levels of CAR T cells in blood and cytokines in serum. Results: As of May 3, 2023, 42 patients were enrolled and 40 were treated with axi-cel, with a median follow-up of 40.9 months (range, 29.5-50.2). In total, 37 patients were evaluable for response (centrally confirmed double- or triple-hit histology or IPI score ≥3). The CR rate was 86% (95% CI, 71-95), and 92% (95% CI, 78-98) of patients had an objective response. Patients with centrally confirmed double- or triple-hit histology (n=10) had a CR rate of 90%. Responses were ongoing in 73% of response-evaluable patients at data cutoff. Medians for DOR, EFS, PFS, and OS were not reached. The 36-month estimates for DOR, EFS (Figure 1), PFS, and OS (Figure 2) were 82%, 73%, 75%, and 81%, respectively. All treated patients (n=40) experienced adverse events (AEs) of any grade and 88% of patients had grade ≥3 AEs. Similar to the primary analysis, the most common any-grade AEs were pyrexia (100%), headache (70%), and neutrophil count decreased (55%). No new cases of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or neurologic events of any grade occurred since the prior data cut and all cases of CRS and neurologic events reported were resolved by data cutoff. Prolonged cytopenias of any grade (present Day ≥30 post-infusion) occurred in 9 patients (n=7 neutrophil count decreased) and were resolved by data cutoff. There were 8 deaths due to progressive disease (n=5) and other causes not related to axi-cel (1 COVID-19, 1 esophageal adenocarcinoma, 1 septic shock on Days 350, 535, and 287 post axi-cel infusion, respectively). Two of the 8 deaths (1 progressive disease and 1 esophageal adenocarcinoma) occurred after the primary analysis. Among treated patients, post-infusion CAR T-cell expansion by peak and area under the curve was 36.9 cells/µL and 368.0 cells/µL×days, respectively, in those with ongoing responses at data cutoff (n=17), 45.1 cells/µL and 413.4 cells/µL×days in those who relapsed (n=6), and 34.7 cells/µL and 566.8 cells/µL×days in non-responders (n=3). Conclusion: In this updated analysis of ZUMA-12 with a median follow-up of ≥40 months, axi-cel demonstrated a high rate of durable responses and no new safety signals. Axi-cel may benefit patients exposed to fewer prior therapies and those with high-risk LBCL, a population with high unmet need and poor outcomes after standard first-line chemoimmunotherapy.

7571 Background: In clinical trials of CAR T-cell therapies and real-world studies published to date, there is a paucity of data on outcomes by race and ethnicity. Here, we examined outcomes by race and ethnicity among LBCL pts who received axi-cel in the real-world setting. Methods: A total of 1389 pts with LBCL were identified from a non-interventional post-authorization safety study with pts receiving commercial axi-cel between 10/2017 and 08/2020. Race (African American or Asian vs White) and ethnicity (Hispanic vs non-Hispanic) were self-reported by pts. Pts with rescinded consent, enrolled in trials, having prior non-HCT cellular therapy, primary CNS lymphoma, unknown comorbidity or data in query were excluded. Median follow-up was 12.7 mo. Outcomes included ORR, CR rate, DOR, PFS and OS, grade ≥ 3 CRS (Lee 2014 criteria) and ICANS (ASTCT consensus grade). ORR and CR were evaluated in pts with ≥ 180 days of follow-up. Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated for PFS and OS. Multivariable analyses comparing race and ethnicity were conducted via logistic and Cox regression. Results: Among all, 1127 (81%) were White, 70 (5%) African American and 81 (6%) Asian; 152 (11%) were Hispanic including 104 White, 2 Black, and 1 Asian Hispanic. African Americans, compared to White, were younger (median age 55.5 vs 62.8 years), more likely to have pulmonary impairment (41% vs 28%) and tended to have longer time from diagnosis (≥ 12 mo 71% vs 59%). Hispanic pts were younger (median age 58.5 vs 62.6 years) than non-Hispanic pts. ORR was 74% (CR 57%, 12-mo PFS and OS 48% and 63%) for White, 57% (CR 45%, 12-mo PFS and OS 36% and 62%) for African American, 67% (CR 53%, 12-mo PFS and OS 55% and 65%) for Asian and 73% (CR 55%, 12-mo PFS and OS 50% and 65%) for Hispanic pts. Grade ≥ 3 CRS and ICANS occurred in 7% and 18% of African American, 10% and 19% of Asian, and 8% and 27% of White pts, respectively. Hispanic pts had lower rates of grade ≥ 3 CRS and ICANS (4% and 15%) vs non-Hispanic (9% and 27%). African American race was associated with inferior ORR (OR 0.40; 95% CI, 0.24-0.69) and CR rate (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.32-0.93) vs White. Asian pts had favorable DOR compared to both White (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.24-0.87) and African American (HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.17-0.88). No statistical differences were found in OS and PFS across races, nor in any efficacy outcome between Hispanic and non-Hispanic pts. Asian (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.29-0.96 vs White) and Hispanic pts (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.31-0.85 vs non-Hispanic) had lower risk of grade ≥ 3 ICANS. Conclusions: Overall, axi-cel showed favorable OS, PFS and safety profile regardless of race and ethnicity in the real-world setting. No notable differences in outcomes were observed for Hispanic or Asian pts. Lower response rates in African American pts noted here warrant further investigation including any underrepresentation not explained by a lower incidence rate for DLBCL (SEER), access to care, and disease burden.