Citations

Background: The use of progressive tension sutures has been shown to be comparable to the use of abdominal drains in abdominoplasty. However, the use of barbed progressive tension sutures (B-PTSs) in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap donor-site closure has not been investigated. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on patients with DIEP flap reconstruction in a 3-year period at 2 institutions by 2 surgeons. Patients were compared by method of DIEP donor-site closure. Group 1 had barbed running progressive tension sutures without drain placement. Group 2 had interrupted progressive tension closure with abdominal drain placement (PTS-AD). Group 3 had closure with only abdominal drain placement (AD). Data collected included demographics, perioperative data, and postoperative outcomes. Results: Seventy-five patients underwent DIEP reconstruction (25 B-PTS, 25 PTS-AD, and 25 AD). Patient characteristics—age, body mass index, comorbidities, smoking status, and chemotherapy—were not significantly different between groups. Rate of seroma was 1.3% (B-PTS = 0%, PTS-AD = 4%, AD = 0%), wound dehiscence 16% (B-PTS = 8%, PTS-AD = 16%, AD = 24%), and umbilical necrosis 5.3% (B-PTS = 0%, PTS-AD = 0%, AD = 16%). No hematomas were observed in any patients. No statistically significant difference was found between complication rates across groups. Conclusions: Use of B-PTSs for abdominal closure after DIEP flap harvest can obviate the need for abdominal drains. Complication rates following this technique are not significantly different from closure using progressive tension suture and abdominal drain placement. This practice can prevent the use of abdominal drains, which can promote patient mobility, increase independence upon discharge, and contribute to patient satisfaction.

Abstract Many cancer researchers are currently generating heterogeneous genomic data sets containing mRNA expression, array based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), and other information from multiple patients. In the near future, data sets will likely include proteomics, methylomics, and high throughput sequencing data. Analytical tools that integrate these different data types to prioritize genes for further study have lagged, however. With this in mind, we have implemented a standalone software application that integrates CGH and mRNA expression profiling data. This application implements several different methods to generate ranked lists of genes and genomic regions based on breakpoint frequency, aberration frequency, and the impact of copy number changes on mRNA expression. The software is Java GUI based, with abstracted object models that can be extended as new genomic data types and annotations become available. We used this application to analyze aCGH datasets generated from 22 primary pancreatic tumor xenografts and mRNA expression datasets from 16 of the 22 samples. Genes which were located near a putative breakpoint and whose expression levels were high in a majority of the xenografts samples were considered putative targets. Preliminary IHC analysis of pancreas primary tumor tissue microarrays confirms one of these putative targets, Chemokine (CXC motif) Ligand 5 (CXCL5). By allowing cancer researchers to correlate genomic aberrations with expression data, we believe that this application will generate more meaningful targets for further biomarker identification and/or drug target discovery. Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8(12 Suppl):A30.