Citations

Abstract Background: A recent exploratory subgroup analysis pooling data from over 1000 patients (pts) in MONARCH 2 (final analysis) and MONARCH 3 (interim analysis) demonstrated that pts with clinical characteristics that predict for worse outcome (e.g. liver metastases, progesterone receptor [PgR]-negative status, high-grade tumors) received the largest benefit from the addition of abemaciclib to endocrine therapy (ET). There is also interest in determining the extent to which abemaciclib improves progression-free survival (PFS) in pts with favorable prognostic factors (e.g. bone-only disease, long treatment-free interval [TFI]). Here we present an update of the subgroup analyses of the MONARCH 3 study using data from the preplanned final PFS analysis. Methods: Enrollment criteria and study designs were previously described (Sledge et al. J Clin Oncol. 2017; Goetz et al. J Clin Oncol. 2017). An exploratory pooled analysis was conducted using data from MONARCH 2 (NCT02107703) and the MONARCH 3 (NCT02246621) preplanned final PFS analysis to identify significant prognostic factors regardless of therapy received. Using the updated MONARCH 3 data, PFS and objective response rate (ORR) (in pts with measurable disease) were examined within the prognostic subgroups that had been previously identified as being statistically significant. Additionally, subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot (STEPP) methodology was used to evaluate the association between TFI following adjuvant ET and outcomes of NSAI alone or with abemaciclib. Results: Assessment of clinical factors from MONARCH 2 and MONARCH 3 (final PFS data) confirmed that the following factors remained significantly prognostic regardless of treatment received: bone-only disease, liver metastases, tumor grade, PgR status, and ECOG performance status. In MONARCH 3, prognosis was poor in pts with liver metastases, PgR-negative tumors, and high-grade tumors. While all subpopulations benefited from the addition of abemaciclib to ET regardless of prognosis, pts with these three poor prognostic factors received substantial benefit from abemaciclib, with PFS hazard ratios (HR) ranging from 0.4 to 0.5 and with differential improvement in ORR typically >30%. Furthermore, STEPP analysis of TFI (on the MONARCH 3 pts who had received adjuvant ET) demonstrated that pts who had a shorter TFI had a worse prognosis and received relatively greater benefit from abemaciclib plus NSAI than did pts with a longer TFI. Patients with bone-only disease or a long TFI also received benefit from abemaciclib, but to a relatively lesser extent (HR ranging from approximately 0.6 to 0.8). Conclusions: This exploratory analysis of the preplanned final PFS data from MONARCH 3 confirms previous findings that pts with poor prognostic factors may receive relatively greater benefit from the addition of abemaciclib to ET. Citation Format: Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Matthew P. Goetz, George W. Sledge, Miguel Martin, Yong Lin, Tammy Forrester, Ian C. Smith, Angelo Di Leo, Stephen Johnston. The benefit of abemaciclib in prognostic subgroups: An update to the pooled analysis of MONARCH 2 and 3 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT099.

Abstract Despite recent advances in cancer therapy, options for central nervous system metastasis (CM) remain limited and patient outcomes are dismal. The lack of tumor models that reflect the heterogeneity and complexity of human CM tumors is a barrier to understanding the underlying biology and to developing novel therapies. Here, we report the development and characterization of 39 patient derived xenograft (PDX) models of CM tumors with histological subtypes representing the disease spectrum. The PDX models successfully grew both in the flank and brains of mice, and retained their histology regardless of the site of implantation. Brain metastasis also formed in 5/12 models after intra-cardiac injection. Multi-omic analysis of the PDX tumor and the patient-matched CM tumor showed that PDXs largely retained the molecular profiles of the tumor from which they were derived, including the retention of aberrations in key driver genes and signaling pathways. PDXs differed primarily from the ungrafted patient tumors by a downregulation in immunity-related pathways, which was expected due to the use of an immuno-compromised host, arguing for the validity of using the flank as a site of implantation. Integrated analysis of mutations and gene expression changes in CM revealed an upregulation of neuronal signaling and DNA damage response, and downregulation of calcium signaling and inflammation. We also assessed the clonal evolution of the PDX from the original patient CM by tracing variant allele frequencies in copy number neutral regions. We found that the PDX tumors were heterogeneous and comprised of multiple tumor clones that were either unique or in common with the original tumor, and displayed evidence of clonal expansion. Two PDXs that underwent phylogeny assessment showed evidence of minor clone expansion. One such PDX was a tumor from a Her2+ breast cancer (CM13), which largely did not molecularly resemble its matched patient tumor but was confirmed to have some shared expressed variants. The PDX was nearly copy number neutral, which included loss of the Her2 amplicon, and had few mutations compared with its parent tumor. Most noteworthy, is that CM13 displayed unique molecular patterns, aggressive growth and was highly metastatic in vivo. From the flank, it led to multiple metastases, including micrometastasis in the brain. This suggests that minor clone takeover may confer tumor aggressiveness and potentiate brain metastasis. The large and diverse repertoire of PDXs developed and characterized in this study provides a new set of tools that will help deepen our understanding of CM and improve preclinical testing for CM therapies. Our data also show that expansion of minor clones could confer aggressive tumor behavior and may be important in tumor evolution in PDX models and human cancers. Citation Format: Ben Yi Tew, Christophe Legendre, Tim Triche, Gerald C. Gooden, Kyle N. Johnson, Rae Anne Martinez, Emanuel F. Petricoin, Mariaelena Pierobon, Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Cindy Osborne, Mark A. Schroeder, Daniel J. Ma, Mark Bernstein, Jann N. Sarkaria, Steven A. Toms, Bodour Salhia. Development and characterization of patient derived xenografts from central nervous system metastasis reveal minor clone expansion linked with aggressive tumor behavior [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 991.

Abstract Purpose: Preplanned exploratory analyses were performed to identify biomarkers in circulating tumor cells (CTC) predictive of response to the topoisomerase 1 inhibitor etirinotecan pegol (EP). Experimental Design: The BEACON trial treated patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with EP or treatment of physician's choice (TPC). Blood from 656 of 852 patients (77%) was processed with ApoStream to enrich for CTCs. A multiplex immunofluorescence assay measured expression of candidate response biomarkers [topoisomerase 1 (Top1), topoisomerase 2 (Top2), Ki67, RAD51, ABCG2, γH2AX, and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase–mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL)] in CTCs. Patients were classified as Top1 low (Top1Lo) or Top1 high (Top1Hi) based on median CTC Top1 expression. Correlation of CTC biomarker expression at baseline, cycle 2 day 1 (C2D1), and cycle 4 day 1 with overall survival (OS) was investigated using Cox regression and Kaplan–Meier analyses. Results: Overall, 98% of samples were successfully processed, of which 97% had detectable CTCs (median, 47–63 CTCs/mL; range, 0–2,020 CTCs/mL). Top1, Top2, and TUNEL expression was detected in 52% to 90% of samples; no significant associations with OS were observed in pretreatment samples for either group. EP-treated patients with low C2D1Top1+ CTCs had improved OS compared with those with higher positivity (14.1 months vs. 11.0 months, respectively; HR, 0.7; P = 0.02); this difference was not seen in TPC-treated patients (HR, 1.12; P = 0.48). Patients whose CTCs decreased from Top1Hi to Top1Lo at C2D1 had the greatest OS benefit from EP (HR, 0.57; P = 0.01). Conclusions: CTC Top1 expression following EP treatment may identify patients with MBC most likely to have an OS benefit. Clin Cancer Res; 24(14); 3348–57. ©2018 AACR.

Abstract Background: Abemaciclib is an orally administered, selective inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 & 6 that is dosed on a twice daily continuous schedule. Abemaciclib has demonstrated clinical efficacy with a generally tolerable safety profile in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer in combination with fulvestrant in MONARCH 2 (NCT02107703) and in combination with non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAI) in MONARCH 3 (NCT02246621). These analyses were conducted to evaluate if patient and disease characteristics may better inform in whom and when abemaciclib should be initiated to define optimal treatment strategies. Methods: MONARCH 2 and 3 enrolled patients with HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer. In MONARCH 2, patients whose disease had progressed while receiving endocrine therapy were treated with abemaciclib/placebo plus fulvestrant. In MONARCH 3, patients were treated with abemaciclib/placebo plus NSAI as initial therapy for advanced disease. An exploratory pooled analysis of the two studies was performed to determine significant prognostic factors. Efficacy results (progression-free survival [PFS] and objective response rate [ORR] in patients with measurable disease) were examined for patient subgroups corresponding to each of the identified significant prognostic factors. Subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot (STEPP) methodology was performed to examine the association between treatment-free interval (TFI) following adjuvant endocrine therapy and outcomes of endocrine therapy alone or in combination with abemaciclib in MONARCH 3. Results: Analyses of clinical factors in over 1000 patients confirmed the following to have prognostic value: bone-only disease, liver metastases, tumor grade, progesterone receptor (PgR) status, and ECOG performance status. Prognosis was poor in patients with liver metastases, PgR-negative tumors, and high-grade tumors. While all subpopulations benefited from the addition of abemaciclib to endocrine therapy regardless of prognosis, substantial benefit of abemaciclib was observed in poor prognosis subgroups, characterized by large increases in PFS (hazard ratios = 0.4 to 0.5) and ORR (over 30%). In addition, STEPP analysis of TFI on a subset of the MONARCH 3 population showed that patients with the shortest TFI appeared to have a poorer prognosis and received more benefit from the addition of abemaciclib compared to patients with longer TFI. Conclusions: This exploratory analysis has provided data that could help optimize treatment strategies by identifying that patients with poor prognostic factors may receive greater benefit from the addition of abemaciclib to endocrine therapy. Citation Format: Goetz MP, O'Shaughnessy J, Sledge Jr. GW, Martin M, Lin Y, Forrester T, Mockbee C, Smith IC, Di Leo A, Johnston S. The benefit of abemaciclib in prognostic subgroups: An exploratory analysis of combined data from the MONARCH 2 and 3 studies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS6-02.

Abstract Purpose: Little is known about the molecular signatures associated with specific metastatic sites in breast cancer. Using comprehensive multi-omic molecular profiling, we assessed whether alterations or activation of the PI3K–AKT–mTOR pathway is associated with specific sites of breast cancer metastasis. Experimental Design: Next-generation sequencing–based whole-exome sequencing was coupled with reverse-phase protein microarray (RPPA) functional signaling network analysis to explore the PI3K–AKT–mTOR axis in 32 pretreated breast cancer metastases. RPPA-based signaling data were further validated in an independent cohort of 154 metastatic lesions from breast cancer and 101 unmatched primary breast tumors. The proportion of cases with PI3K–AKT–mTOR genomic alterations or signaling network activation were compared between hepatic and nonhepatic lesions. Results: PIK3CA mutation and activation of AKT (S473) and p70S6K (T389) were detected more frequently among liver metastases than nonhepatic lesions (P < 0.01, P = 0.056, and P = 0.053, respectively). However, PIK3CA mutations alone were insufficient in predicting protein activation (P = 0.32 and P = 0.19 for activated AKT and p70S6K, respectively). RPPA analysis of an independent cohort of 154 tumors confirmed the relationship between pathway activation and hepatic metastasis [AKT (S473), mTOR (S2448), and 4EBP1 (S65); P < 0.01, P = 0.02, and P = 0.01, respectively]. Similar results were also seen between liver metastases and primary breast tumors [AKT (S473) P < 0.01, mTOR (S2448) P < 0.01, 4EBP1 (S65) P = 0.01]. This signature was lost when primary tumors were compared with all metastatic sites combined. Conclusions: Breast cancer patients with liver metastasis may represent a molecularly homogenized cohort with increased incidence of PIK3CA mutations and activation of the PI3K–AKT–mTOR signaling network. Clin Cancer Res; 23(16); 4919–28. ©2017 AACR.

Abstract Background: The need remains for novel agents that prolong survival and/or improve QOL in women with aBC. EP is a long-acting topoisomerase 1 inhibitor engineered to produce sustained exposure to irinotecan and its active metabolite SN38. Given previous efficacy seen in an earlier phase II trial in MBC, EP 145 mg/m2 every 3 weeks was compared to TPC (one of 7 single-agent regimens) in the randomized phase 3 BEACON study (NCT01492101). As reported at ASCO 2015 (abstract 1001), EP prolonged median overall survival by 2.1 months, although this did not reach statistical significance (12.4 vs 10.3 months; HR 0.87, p=0.08). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were significantly less common with EP (48% vs 63% with TPC, p<0.001). We now present results of the QOL analyses. Methods: Patients completed validated health-related QoL (HRQoL) questionnaires, EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) and breast cancer-specific QLQ-BR23, pretreatment and every 8 weeks until progression, death or withdrawal of consent. Questionnaires were scored according to the EORTC manual. For each scale, raw scores were standardized via a linear transformation to a range from 0 to 100. Absolute scores and changes from baseline were analyzed longitudinally and categorically using a 5-point difference calculated by treatment group. Comparisons between treatment groups were conducted to evaluate the differences in global health status, functional scores and symptoms over time. Results: The majority of patients who were randomized (total: 733/852 [86%], EP: 378/429 [88%], TPC: 355/423 [84%]) completed at least one post-baseline HRQoL questionnaire. In the EORTC QLQ-C30, grade ≥ 3 AEs significantly impacted HRQoL measured by global health status and 5 additional functional domains. Of the six domains, compared to TPC in a longitudinal analysis, EP was statistically superior in the mean treatment effect through Week 32 in global health status p=0.02 and physical functioning scale p=0.01. EP was also numerically superior in all other scales. In EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR-23, a total of 13 symptoms were measured and categorically analyzed. There were no treatment differences in 7 of 13 symptom scales. EP was associated with worsening of 3 symptom scales: appetite loss, nausea/vomiting, and diarrhea. TPC was associated with worsening of 2 symptom scales: dyspnea and systemic side effects. Conclusions: In the phase 3 BEACON trial comparing EP to TPC, the more favorable toxicity profile of EP resulted in an improvement in global health status and physical function (results of the symptom scales confirmed the different toxicities of the two arms). EP remains a promising investigational therapy for aBC. Citation Format: Cortes J, Awada A, Perez EA, Rugo HS, Twelves C, Im S-A, Zhao C, Hoch U, Ney J, Hannah AL, O'Shaughnessy J. Impact of treatment on quality of life (QOL) in the BEACON study, a randomized phase III trial of etirinotecan pegol (EP) versus treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in patients (pts) with advanced breast cancer (aBC) whose disease has progressed following anthracycline (A), taxane (T) and capecitabine (C). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-11-08.

Abstract Background: Etirinotecan pegol (EP) is the first long-acting topoisomerase 1-inhibitor providing sustained level of active metabolite that concentrate in the tumor for an entire chemotherapy cycle. In a Phase 2 study (Lancet Oncology 2013), EP demonstrated a 29% overall response rate in patients with metastatic breast cancer, leading to the Phase 3 global BEACON study in this population. Detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) using immunomagnetic EpCAM-based methods have been conceptually accepted as a "liquid tumor biopsy". To circumvent the limited recovery of CTCs these methods provide for molecular profiling applications, we isolated CTCs based on an antibody-independent, continuous flow dielectrophoresis (DEP) technology (ApoStream®). We developed quantitative multiplex immunofluorescent assays for target-specific pharmacodynamics (PD) biomarkers for EP in CTCs isolated pre- and post-treatment. Here we present the distribution of the PD biomarkers in CTC samples collected from BEACON patients. Methods: Donation of blood samples for CTC analysis was voluntary. BEACON patients participating in the substudy had serial (pre-dose, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, End of Treatment) 7.5-mL whole blood samples drawn in EDTA tubes and shipped ambient to ApoCell (Houston, TX) within 96 hrs for processing. PBMCs were separated by Ficoll® gradient, and CTCs were isolated using ApoStream® technology. Isolated cells were deposited on three slides and stained for DAPI, CD45, and cytokeratin markers, as well as 2-3 of the seven PD markers, and analyzed by iCys® laser scanning cytometer equipped with image analysis software. CTC count, mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of PD biomarkers, and % marker-positive cells were analyzed for their distribution. Results: 75% of the 852 BEACON patients participated in the CTC substudy, yielding 649 pre-treatment CTC samples. As of Mar14, 538 Cycle 2 Day 1, 281 Cycle 4 Day 1, and 394 End of Treatment samples were collected. 98% of pre-treatment blood samples were successfully processed. 97% had detectable CTCs, with a median of 504 CTCs (interquartile range: 128-1432). PD markers could be analyzed in 83-92% of samples after implementing a minimum requirement of 10 CTCs analyzed. Staining was positive for Top1, Top2, μH2Ax, Rad51, ABCG2, Ki67, and TUNEL in 82%, 71%, 14%, 30%, 20%, 56%, and 94% of samples, respectively. Percent of marker-positive cells varied from 0.2-69%, with 6- to 37-fold interquartile ranges. Median MFI in these cells varied between 25x103 and 100x103, with 1.2- to 1.6-fold interquartile ranges. Conclusions: CTC collection was successfully incorporated into the BEACON study, with 75% patient participation. CTC detection rate using ApoStream® was high, permitting evaluation of biomarkers at baseline and over time. EP target-specific PD biomarkers can be measured in CTCs isolated from patients participating in BEACON and will be assessed for their potential to predict clinical response. Final BEACON efficacy and safety results are expected in early 2015, which will allow further analysis of CTCs with patient outcome (response, PFS, OS) and change in CTCs at time of progression. Citation Format: Edith A Perez, Katie Caygill, Alison L Hannah, Javier Cortes, Ahmad Awada, Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Christopher Twelves, Hope Rugo, Seock-Ah Im, Kenna Anderes, Darren W Davis, Ute Hoch. Etirinotecan pegol target-specific pharmacodynamic biomarkers in circulating tumor cells from patients with metastatic breast cancer in the phase 3 BEACON study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-10-03.

Abstract Background A Phase III trial (Study 301; NCT00337103) in MBC comparing eribulin (E) with capecitabine (C) showed a trend for improved overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.88; 95% CI 0.77, 1.00; P = 0.056) but not progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.93, 1.25; P = 0.30) with E. In order to investigate this apparent discordance, post-hoc analyses assessed the effect of PPT and events defining disease progression on OS. Methods Pts with locally advanced or MBC who had received an anthracycline and a taxane (≤2 prior chemotherapy regimens for advanced disease), were randomized to E (554) or C (548). Co-primary endpoints were OS and PFS. The impact of PPT on OS was assessed by analysis of exploratory PPT subgroups. Analyses of OS sensitivity censoring at time of PPT, and OS adjusted by PPT as a time-dependent covariate in a Cox regression model, were performed. The relationship between OS and progression events (appearance of a “new” lesion or metastasis [NM]; increase in size of pre-existing lesions [IPEL]; or other [death, clinical progression, or censored]) was investigated using Cox regression. Results PPT was received by 70% and 62% of E and C pts, respectively. For E pts, there were no significant OS differences by PPT (Table 1). Excluding 56 pts (22 E, 34 C) who received anti-HER2 therapy as PPT from the intent-to-treat OS analysis, OS was longer with E (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.76, 0.99; nominal P = 0.03). OS sensitivity analysis censoring at time of PPT was consistent with the overall study results (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.65, 1.03). Assessment of the overall effect of PPT, adjusting by PPT as a time-dependent covariate in a Cox regression model, showed that OS was longer with E (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.75, 0.97; nominal P = 0.02). Progression due to NM or IPEL occurred in 271 and 147 of E pts, and 285 and 129 of C pts, respectively. Median OS was similar between arms in pts with IPEL and longer with E vs C in pts with NM (Table 2). Pts who progressed due to NM were at higher risk of death (HR 2.12; 95% CI 1.84, 2.43; nominal P<0.01). Conclusions Treatment with C or any other PPT after progression on E did not account for the trend in OS benefit with E observed in the primary analysis. Pts who progressed with NM had a worse prognosis than those with IPEL. The appearance of NM was highly correlated with OS, and the apparent discordance between PFS and OS seems to be related to these different progression events. Tab 1: OS by PPT after EPPTAll ptsC as 1stOther than C as 1stC at any timeOther than C at any timeNoneN554221169275115164Median OS, months (95% CI)15.9 (15.2, 17.6)18.3 (15.8, 20.9)19.9 (17.6, 24.0)19.6 (17.6, 21.5)18.0 (15.4, 22.7)7.4 (6.2, 9.1) Tab 2: OS by progression event Progression event NMIPELOther ECECECN271285147129136134Median OS, months (95% CI)15.5 (14.2, 17.5)12.9 (11.3, 14.5)17.4 (14.4, 19.7)17.4 (15.3, 20.9)16.7 (14.8, 24.2)15.5 (11.7, 18.3)HR (95% CI)0.81 (0.68, 0.97)1.13 (0.87, 1.46)0.78 (0.59, 1.03)Nominal P -value0.020.350.08Time to NM or death, months (95% CI)5.8 (5.2, 6.5)5.2 (4.3, 5.9)NANAHR (95% CI)0.90 (0.77, 1.05)NANANominal P-value0.17NANA Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P3-13-03.

Purpose This phase III study compared the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab (BV) when combined with several standard chemotherapy regimens versus those regimens alone for first-line treatment of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative metastatic breast cancer. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned in 2:1 ratio to chemotherapy plus BV or chemotherapy plus placebo. Before random assignment, investigators chose capecitabine (Cape; 2,000 mg/m 2 for 14 days), taxane (Tax) -based (nab-paclitaxel 260 mg/m 2 , docetaxel 75 or 100 mg/m 2 ), or anthracycline (Anthra) -based (doxorubicin or epirubicin combinations [doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide, epirubicin/cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide, or fluorouracil/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide]) chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks. BV or placebo was administered at 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), 1-year survival rate, objective response rate, duration of objective response, and safety. Two independently powered cohorts defined by the choice of chemotherapy (Cape patients or pooled Tax/Anthra patients) were analyzed in parallel. Results RIBBON-1 (Regimens in Bevacizumab for Breast Oncology) enrolled 1,237 patients (Cape cohort, n = 615; Tax/Anthra cohort, n = 622). Median PFS was longer for each BV combination (Cape cohort: increased from 5.7 months to 8.6 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.84; log-rank P < .001; and Tax/Anthra cohort: increased from 8.0 months to 9.2 months; HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.80; log-rank P < .001). No statistically significant differences in OS between the placebo- and BV-containing arms were observed. Safety was consistent with results of prior BV trials. Conclusion The combination of BV with Cape, Tax, or Anthra improves clinical benefit in terms of increased PFS in first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer, with a safety profile comparable to prior phase III studies.

Abstract BackgroundRIBBON-1, a Phase III, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in patients with previously untreated MBC was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding bevacizumab (B) to chemotherapy regimens including capecitabine (Cape; n=615); a taxane (T; n=307), or an anthracycline (Anth; n=315) compared with chemotherapy alone. Pre-specified analyses of progression-free survival PFS) in the Cape and pooled T/Anth cohorts, the primary endpoints of the study were increased upon addition of B. In the Cape cohort, median PFS increased from 5.7 to 8.6 mo (HR=0.69, p-value=0.0002) and in the T/Anth cohort, it increased from 8.0 to 9.2 mo (HR=0.64; p-value&lt;0.0001).MethodsRECIST was used to determine objective response rate (ORR). Patients without a post-baseline tumor assessment were considered non-responders. The primary analysis for the ORR and the duration of response was performed using only patients with measurable disease at baseline. ORR was formally compared between the two treatment arms using the Mantel-Haenszel Chi-squared test, using the randomization stratification factors. Fisher's exact test was also performed. Clinical benefit rate (CBR) was defined as the proportion of patients with a complete or partial response or with stable disease at Week 24. Exploratory analyses of CBR and time to response are provided here. Summary statistics of time to response at Week 9 will be presented as will the final analysis of the secondary endpoint of overall survival.ResultsAnalyses of ORR and CBR are provided in the following table. CapeTaxaneAnth PL (n=206)B (n=409)PL (n=104)B (n=203)PL (n=103)B (n=212)Patients with measurable disease, n (%)161 (78.2)325 (61.1)85 (81.7)161 (79.3)92 (89.3)184 (86.8)ORR, %23.635.435.350.340.252.2CR, n (%)1 (0.6)7 (2.2)3 (3.5)4 (2.5)2 (2.2)3 (1.6)PR, n (%)37 (23.0)108 (33.2)27 (31.8)77 (47.8)35 (38.0)93 (50.5)Difference between arms, %11.815.012.0p-value, unstratified0.00940.030.073Duration of ORMedian, mo7.29.28.68.46.08.1HR (95% CI)0.61 (0.39–0.96)0.75 (0.45–1.27)0.53 (0.34–0.83)Log-rank p-value0.03260.2840.0047Clinical benefit rate*, %47.164.365.471.969.980.7p-value, unstratified&lt;0.00010.240.04CR+PR at Week 9, %20.229.438.354.544.451.1B=bevacizumab, cape=capecitabine, CI=confidence interval, HR=hazard ratio, OR=objective response, PL=placebo, T/Anth=taxane/anthracycline.*For randomized patients.ConclusionsIn patients with HER2-negative MBC, the addition of bevacizumab to capecitabine, taxane or anthracycline chemotherapy induces more responses and those responses occur more rapidly. For capecitabine and anthracycline the addition of bevacizumab leads to objective responses that last longer. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 6084.