Hannah, A.

Abstract Background: The need remains for novel agents that prolong survival and/or improve QOL in women with aBC. EP is a long-acting topoisomerase 1 inhibitor engineered to produce sustained exposure to irinotecan and its active metabolite SN38. Given previous efficacy seen in an earlier phase II trial in MBC, EP 145 mg/m2 every 3 weeks was compared to TPC (one of 7 single-agent regimens) in the randomized phase 3 BEACON study (NCT01492101). As reported at ASCO 2015 (abstract 1001), EP prolonged median overall survival by 2.1 months, although this did not reach statistical significance (12.4 vs 10.3 months; HR 0.87, p=0.08). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were significantly less common with EP (48% vs 63% with TPC, p<0.001). We now present results of the QOL analyses. Methods: Patients completed validated health-related QoL (HRQoL) questionnaires, EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) and breast cancer-specific QLQ-BR23, pretreatment and every 8 weeks until progression, death or withdrawal of consent. Questionnaires were scored according to the EORTC manual. For each scale, raw scores were standardized via a linear transformation to a range from 0 to 100. Absolute scores and changes from baseline were analyzed longitudinally and categorically using a 5-point difference calculated by treatment group. Comparisons between treatment groups were conducted to evaluate the differences in global health status, functional scores and symptoms over time. Results: The majority of patients who were randomized (total: 733/852 [86%], EP: 378/429 [88%], TPC: 355/423 [84%]) completed at least one post-baseline HRQoL questionnaire. In the EORTC QLQ-C30, grade ≥ 3 AEs significantly impacted HRQoL measured by global health status and 5 additional functional domains. Of the six domains, compared to TPC in a longitudinal analysis, EP was statistically superior in the mean treatment effect through Week 32 in global health status p=0.02 and physical functioning scale p=0.01. EP was also numerically superior in all other scales. In EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR-23, a total of 13 symptoms were measured and categorically analyzed. There were no treatment differences in 7 of 13 symptom scales. EP was associated with worsening of 3 symptom scales: appetite loss, nausea/vomiting, and diarrhea. TPC was associated with worsening of 2 symptom scales: dyspnea and systemic side effects. Conclusions: In the phase 3 BEACON trial comparing EP to TPC, the more favorable toxicity profile of EP resulted in an improvement in global health status and physical function (results of the symptom scales confirmed the different toxicities of the two arms). EP remains a promising investigational therapy for aBC. Citation Format: Cortes J, Awada A, Perez EA, Rugo HS, Twelves C, Im S-A, Zhao C, Hoch U, Ney J, Hannah AL, O'Shaughnessy J. Impact of treatment on quality of life (QOL) in the BEACON study, a randomized phase III trial of etirinotecan pegol (EP) versus treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in patients (pts) with advanced breast cancer (aBC) whose disease has progressed following anthracycline (A), taxane (T) and capecitabine (C). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-11-08.

Abstract Background: Etirinotecan pegol (EP) is a long-acting Top1 inhibitor providing sustained levels of active metabolite throughout the entire chemotherapy cycle. The phase 3 BEACON trial compared EP to treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in patients with advanced breast cancer, demonstrating a non-statistically significant 2.1 month difference in survival favoring EP in the intent to treat population. A novel aspect of the BEACON trial is to explore the utility of biomarkers measured in CTCs for predicting efficacy with EP. Pre- and post-treatment CTCs were isolated from blood of 77% of the 852 BEACON patients. Target-specific pharmacodynamic biomarkers for EP measured in CTCs were analyzed to identify patients most responsive to treatment with EP. Methods: Donation of blood samples for CTC analysis was voluntary. Participating BEACON patients had serial (baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1 [C2D1], Cycle 4 Day 1 [C4D1], End of Treatment) 7.5-mL whole blood samples drawn in EDTA tubes and shipped within 96 hours ambient to ApoCell (Houston, TX) for processing. PBMCs were separated by Ficoll® gradient, and CTCs were isolated using ApoStream® technology. Isolated cells were deposited on three slides and stained for DAPI, CD45, cytokeratin markers, as well as Top1, Top2, Ki67, γH2AX, Rad51, ABCG2, and TUNEL. Biomarkers were quantified by iCys® laser scanning cytometer equipped with image analysis software, and correlated with OS using Cox multiple regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses. Results: The CTC substudy yielded 611 pre-treatment, 519 C2D1, 268 C4D1, and 431 End of Treatment samples. Among the successfully processed blood samples, 98% had detectable CTCs, with a median of 63, 46, 51, and 57 CTCs/mL at baseline, C2D1, C4D1, and End of Treatment, respectively. Cox regression analyses of CTC number and percentage of Top1, Top2, Ki67, or TUNEL positive CTCs identified a correlation for post-treatment number of Top1-positive CTCs with OS in patients receiving EP. To assess the impact of Top1-positive CTCs, patients were classified as Top1-High (> median) or Top1-Low (≤ median) based on the percent of Top1-positive CTCs at baseline. Among the Top1-High patients at baseline, significantly improved OS (HR 0.54, p=0.007) was observed for those who converted to Top1-Low after their first treatment with EP (C2D1), but not TPC (HR 1.12, p=0.613). These results suggest that decreased number of Top1-positive CTCs may reflect EP target engagement with Top1, as these patients derived the most benefit from treatment. Conclusions: CTC collection and analysis was successfully incorporated into the phase 3 BEACON study, with 77% patient participation. CTC detection rate using ApoStream® was high, permitting evaluation of biomarkers at baseline and post-treatment. Significantly improved OS was observed in patients who had a decreased number of Top1-positive CTCs following cycle 1 of EP. Citation Format: Rugo HS, Cortes J, Awada A, O'Shaughnessy J, Twelves C, Im S-A, Hannah AL, Lu L, Sy S, Caygill K, Zajchowski D, Davis DW, Hoch U, Perez EA. Early change in topoisomerase 1 (Top1) positive circulating tumor cells (CTCs) is associated with overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced breast cancer after treatment with etirinotecan pegol. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-13-02.

Abstract Background NKTR-102 is a next-generation topoisomerase I inhibitor-polymer conjugate with a markedly reduced Cmax and a continuous exposure profile compared to irinotecan. A phase 2 trial of single-agent NKTR-102 compared a dose of 145 mg/m2 every 2w or every 3w in 3rd-line MBC (Awada et al, ASCO 2011). Overall the ORR was 29% (including 3% CR) with the prior ATC subset demonstrating an ORR of 31%. Dosing every 3w was better tolerated; in this arm, median PFS equaled 5.3m and median OS equaled 13.1m. Trial Design: NKTR-102 will be compared to TPC in an open-label, randomized, parallel, two arm multicenter Phase 3 pivotal study in pts with previously treated locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. Key Entry Criteria: Adult females, with ECOG 0 or 1 with adequate liver, kidney and marrow function. All patients must have received prior therapy with an anthracycline (in neo/adjuvant or metastatic setting or both), a taxane (in neo/adjuvant or metastatic setting or both) and capecitabine (in neo/adjuvant or locally advanced/metastatic setting or both) unless not medically appropriate or explicitly contraindicated for the patient. All chemotherapy- and radiation-related toxicities must have resolved to ≤ Grade 1, except for stable sensory neuropathy ≤ Grade 2 and alopecia. Pts with brain metastases may be eligible, if stable for prior 4 weeks without steroids. Pts with Grade ≥ 2 pre-existing diarrhea or receiving chronic anti-diarrheal supportive care are not eligible. Statistical Methods: The primary efficacy endpoint is OS. Secondary endpoints include ORR by RECIST v1.1 and PFS. Pts will be randomized 1:1 to NKTR-102 given IV at 145 mg/m2 over 90-min every 21 days or TPC. Patients randomized to TPC will receive single agent chemotherapy, limited to choice of one of the following 5 agents: eribulin, ixabepilone, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, or a taxane. The investigator must decide which agent will be given to the patient prior to randomization. Pts will be stratified by geographical region and disease characteristics. Target Accrual: Approximately 840 patients (420 pts per treatment arm) will be randomized in order to obtain 615 deaths (alpha = 0.05; power 90% with one interim analysis scheduled when 50% of the deaths have occurred). PK sampling will be performed in a subset of pts and blood and/or tumor samples are planned for potential predictive markers of response and toxicity. Enrollment is expected to remain open until the end of 2013. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-01-07.

Abstract Background: NKTR-102, a topoisomerase 1 inhibitor-polymer conjugate with reduced peak concentrations and a continuous concentration profile, demonstrated evidence of anti-tumor activity in a broad range of tumors in phase 1 (Von Hoff; EORTC-NCI-AACR 2008, abstract #595), including three patients (pts) with triple negative breast cancer (one confirmed PR by RECIST, one 20% reduction in tumor burden and one 50%+ reduction in CA 27.29). We now report data of a randomized phase 2 study in pts with MBC following progression to taxane-based therapy. Methods: This open-label, phase 2 study enrolled pts to receive NKTR-102 intravenously (IV) at a target dose of 145 mg/m2. Eligible patients had progressive MBC following taxane therapy, ECOG PS 0-1, adequate renal, hepatic, and marrow function. The study randomized pts to receive NKTR-102 q14d or q21d; each schedule followed a two-stage Simon design to ensure adequate response rate prior to proceeding to full enrollment. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.0; secondary endpoints were safety and PFS. Results: 70 pts were randomized from Feb09 to Apr10 and treated (35 on each schedule); 20 patients remain active on study as of 14Jun2010. Median age was 55 (range 33-83); all but 1 pt was female. ECOG PS 0/1 equaled 40%/60%. Prior neo-adjuvant and adjuvant therapy had been administered in 15 and 39 patients respectively; 23 pts had received prior hormonal therapy. Median number of prior non-hormonal regimens for metastatic disease was 2 (range 0-4). All pts had received prior taxane therapy; 11 in the adjuvant setting and 60 in the metastatic setting). 45 pts had received only prior anthracycline/taxane therapy (“AT”); an additional 14 pts had received prior AT/capecitabine therapy (“ATC”). 42 were estrogen or progesterone receptor positive and 20 pts had triple negative disease. Best RECIST response rate (confirmed and unconfirmed) equaled 27% (9 pts; 2 awaiting confirmation) and 24% (8 pts; 4 awaiting confirmation) for the q14d and q21d schedules (n=33 and 34, respectively; 3 patients had not undergone first on-study CT exam). As ORR results were similar for each schedule, the combined best RECIST ORR for in AT/ATC pts equaled 23%/29%, respectively and in pts with triple negative disease, this equaled 25%. Common related Grade 3/4 toxicities (q14d/q21d schedules; n=67 pts with AE data available): diarrhea (15%/12%), neutropenia (15%/9%),fatigue (12%/3%), and dehydration (6%/3%). One pt in each schedule died due to septic shock and acute renal failure secondary to hypovolemia. Conclusion: Single-agent NKTR-102 demonstrates significant anti-tumor activity in pts with MBC, including pts having tumor progression after ATC-based therapy and pts with triple negative disease, with a tolerable toxicity profile. Mature ORR and median PFS will be available by December 2010. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-11-01.