Citations

Abstract Anti-tumor antibody (317G5) covalently coupled to an anti-CD3 antibody (OKT3) produces a heteroaggregate (HA) antibody that can target PBL to lyse tumor cells expressing the appropriate tumor Ag. The i.v. and i.p. distribution of radiolabeled HA antibody 317G5 x OKT3 and of radiolabeled cultured human PBL were studied in athymic nude mice bearing solid intraperitoneal tumor established from the human colon tumor line, LS174T. Mice were injected with 125I-labeled HA antibody, 125I-labeled anti-tumor mAb, or 111In-labeled PBL, and at designated timepoints tissues were harvested and measured for radioactivity. 125I-317G5 x OKT3 localized specifically to tumor sites. Tumor radioactivity levels (percent injected dose/gram) were lower with 125I-317G5 x OKT3 HA antibody than with 125I-317G5 anti-tumor mAb, but were similar to levels reported for other anti-tumor mAb. The major difference in radioactivity levels observed between i.v. and i.p. administration of 125I-317G5 x OKT3 was an increase in hepatic radioactivity after i.v. HA antibody administration. HA antibodies produced from F(ab')2 fragments, which exhibit decreased m. w. and decreased Fc receptor-mediated binding, demonstrated improved tumor:tissue ratios as compared to intact antibody HA. 125I-317G5 F(ab')2 x OKT3 F(ab')2 antibody levels were equivalent to intact HA antibody levels in tumor, but were lower than intact HA antibody levels in the blood, bowel, and liver. Tumor:bowel ratios (20:1 at 48 h) were highest when 317G5 F(ab')2 x OKT3 F(ab')2 was injected i.p. Autoradiography confirmed that anti-tumor x anti-CD3 HA antibodies localized specifically to intraperitoneal tumor; that i.p. administered HA antibodies penetrated tumor directly; and that i.v. administered HA antibodies distributed along tumor vasculature. Cultured human PBL distributed in moderate concentrations to intraperitoneal tumor when administered i.p., but not when administered i.v. The poor localization of i.v. injected PBL to tumor may reflect species disparity in homing receptors and/or endothelial ligands, a problem which may be overcome with a syngeneic model. These results suggest that regional therapy with HA antibodies and PBL may offer advantages over systemic therapy for initial clinical trials.

Abstract Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) were obtained from a mouse melanoma cell line (CL 62) transfected with the gene for the human melanoma Ag p97. TIL were cultured with anti-CD3 antibody and IL-2 for up to 38 days. Flow cytometry identified these TIL as Thy-1.2 + ve/CD4-ve/CD8 + ve cells. A heteroconjugated antibody 500A2 x 96.5, specific for both the CD3 Ag on TIL and the p97 Ag on CL 62 melanoma cells, was prepared using N-succinimidyl-3-(2-pyridyldithio)-propionate as a linking agent. TIL alone demonstrated low levels of cytotoxicity against autologous CL 62 tumor and also against the parental K1735 tumor and an allogeneic murine melanoma (B16). The addition of 500A2 x 96.5 heteroconjugated antibody enhanced TIL-mediated lysis of CL 62 tumor, but not of the K1735 or B16 tumors. This enhanced cytotoxicity was elicited at E:T ratios as low as 0.4:1, and in TIL cultured for 7 to 38 days. These results suggest that hetero-conjugated antibody may enhance the anti-tumor effect of TIL in vivo.

Abstract Tumor cell lysis can be enhanced significantly in vitro when heteroconjugate (HC) antibodies (anti-CD3 x anti-tumor mAb) are used to specifically direct lymphocyte effector cells to the tumor cell target. In order to effectively utilize HC antibodies in an immunotherapy protocol, methods must be identified for the optimum expansion, activation, and retargeting of lymphocyte-effector populations from cancer patients. In this study, we have compared the proliferative responses of different normal and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patient lymphocyte preparations (PBL, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes) stimulated in vitro for periods up to 12 days with a variety of growth factor combinations (anti-CD3, rIL-2, rIL-4). These activated lymphocyte preparations were then tested in vitro for their ability to kill RCC tumor cells and tumor cell lines in the presence of HC preparations (anti-CD3 mAb covalently linked to mAb reactive to different RCC tumor-associated Ag). RCC patient PBL cultured with anti-CD3 plus rIL-2 for 12 days resulted in a 3- to 160-fold expansion of effector cells. These cells, as well as tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, when retargeted with appropriate HC antibodies were capable of mediating high levels of killing of autologous tumor cells. No constitutive autologous anti-tumor cell response was detected in the absence of added HC antibodies. Of the five anti-RCC mAb tested (A6H, K29, K20, UR07, and URO 3), HC containing URO 3 x anti-CD3 and K20 x anti-CD3 elicited the highest level of tumor cell lysis by the activated lymphocyte effector cells. Together these results demonstrate that HC antibodies may be a useful imunotherapeutic reagent for directing the killing of RCC tumor cells by autologous lymphocytes.

AbstractBackgroundWe developed the Institute on Methods and Protocols for Advancement of Clinical Trials in ADRD (IMPACT‐AD) to address the shortage of qualified investigators with adequate training and expertise to conduct Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) and AD Related Dementias (ADRD) clinical trials.MethodWe describe the experience of the first two years of funding of the IMPACT‐AD course, specifically the rates of applications to the course, descriptive summaries of the accepted trainees, and the measures of participant satisfaction and learning.ResultOver the first two years of the course, we received 195 eligible applications to the course. Most (n = 121, 62%) applicants were female and nearly half self‐reported as being African American/Black, Asian, or Pacific Islander race and/or Hispanic/Latino ethnicity. Forty‐one applicants (21%) indicated that they were the first in their family to attend collegeOf 69 total trainees accepted to the course (36% acceptance rate), a majority (n = 44, 64%) were female. Twenty‐eight (41%) self‐reported as being African American/Black, Asian, or Pacific Islander race and eleven (16%) were of Hispanic ethnicity. Fourteen trainees (20%) identified as being the first person in their family to attend college. Among trainees, 24 (35%) were MDs, 30 (43%) were PhDs, and 9 (13%) held master’s degrees.Course lecture topics were rated, on average, as “essential” or “valuable” by 98% of trainees. Across lecture topics, on average, 48% of trainees rated their prior knowledge of topics as “very strong” or “strong,” and 11% of trainees rated their prior knowledge as “weak.” Overall, 52% of trainees evaluated their change in knowledge based on the lectures as “very much increased,” 46% as “somewhat” or “slightly” increased, and 2% as “no change.” Results were similar for the two tracks. Based on pre‐ and post‐course assessments, trainees improved their knowledge of covered content (from 62% to 79% correct responses on knowledge assessments).ConclusionThe IMPACT‐AD course is achieving its mission of educating and diversifying the next generation of ADRD trialists.We thank Dr. Laurie Ryan and Dr. Kristina McLinden from the National Institute on Aging for their key contributions in leadership and scientific guidance of IMPACT‐AD.

AbstractThe poor generalizability of clinical research data due to the enrollment of highly educated, non‐Latinx White participants hampers the development of therapies for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Black and Latinx older adults have a greater risk for dementia, yet it is unclear how health‐care disparities and sociocultural factors influence potential AD therapies and prognosis. Low enrollment of under‐represented populations may be attributable to several factors including greater exclusion due to higher rates of comorbidities, lower access to AD clinics, and the legacy of unethical treatment in medical research. This perspective outlines solutions tested in the Brain Health Registry (BHR) and the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), including culturally‐informed digital research methods, community‐engaged research strategies, leadership from under‐represented communities, and the reduction of exclusion criteria based on comorbidities. Our successes demonstrate that it is possible to increase the inclusion and engagement of under‐represented populations into US‐based clinical studies, thereby increasing the generalizability of their results.

AbstractIntroductionAn analysis of the ethnocultural and socioeconomic composition of Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) participants is needed to assess the generalizability of ADNI data to diverse populations.MethodsADNI data collected between October 2004 and November 2020 were used to determine ethnocultural and educational composition of the sample and differences in the following metrics: screening, screen fails, enrollment, biomarkers.ResultsOf 3739 screened individuals, 11% identified as being from ethnoculturally underrepresented populations (e.g., Black, Latinx) and 16% had <12 years of education. Of 2286 enrolled participants, 11% identified as ethnoculturally underrepresented individuals and 15% had <12 years of education. This participation is considerably lower than US Census data for adults 60+ (ethnoculturally underrepresented populations: 25%; <12 years of education: 4%). Individuals with <12 years of education failed screening at a higher rate.DiscussionOur findings suggest that ADNI results may not be entirely generalizable to ethnoculturally diverse and low education populations.

AbstractBackgroundThe overarching goal of the Longitudinal Early‐onset Alzheimer Disease study (LEADS) is to optimally characterize early‐onset AD (EOAD) and establish an EOAD clinical trials network. Here we report the baseline demographic and imaging biomarker comparisons of the LEADS cohort to late‐onset AD (LOAD) subjects from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI3).Method123 amyloid‐positive EOAD, 47 amyloid‐negative EOnonAD, 60 cognitively normal young controls were compared to 130 amyloid‐positive LOAD, 110 amyloid‐negative LOnonAD and 286 amyloid‐negative cognitively normal older controls. To account for the effect of cognitive aging between EO and LO populations, each cognitive measure was Z‐transformed. Cortical and hippocampal atrophy were quantified using W‐scores adjusted for age, sex and total intracranial volume. Z‐scores and W‐scores were compared using t‐test or Wilcoxson rank test as appropriate. All p‐values were corrected for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate correction.ResultEOAD showed greater pathology burden and greater cortical atrophy (AD signature) relative to LOAD. EOAD also showed greater cognitive impairment across all cognitive tests. EOAD showed greater functional impairment, more depression but less neuropsychiatric behaviors overall compared to LOAD (Table 1 and Figure 1, all ps<0.05). Repeating the analyses stratified by cognitive stage (MCI/dementia) or CDR global rating (0.5/1) did not result in any major differences.EOnonAD differed from LOnonAD by also showing greater impairment on all cognitive and functional measures There were no significant differences in amyloid and tau burden, or atrophy W‐scores between these groups. EOnonAD were more depressed and showed more functional impairment compared to LOnonAD (Table 2 and Figure 2, all ps<0.05). Repeating the analyses split by cognitive stage (MCI/dementia) or CDR global rating (0.5/1) did not result in any major differences.ConclusionConsistent with our preexisting hypotheses, EOAD and EOnonAD perform much worse relative to their LO counterparts. EOAD also show greater pathological burden as expected. The reported analyses were done in chronological rather than disease time (time since disease onset). Benchmarking individuals along the disease spectrum might prove to be a better strategy especially when conducting analyses on rate of disease progression.

AbstractBackgroundAn analysis of the ethnoracial and educational composition of Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) participants, and the relationship between ethnoracial/education and screening, enrollment, dropout, and biomarkers is needed to assess the generalizability of ADNI data to diverse populations, and to inform efforts to increase diversity.MethodData from all 4 ADNI phases were used to determine ethnoracial and educational breakdown and differences of the following ADNI participation metrics: screening, screen fails, enrollment, as well as drop‐out within and between ADNI phases. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze the association between ethnoracial and educational group and either amyloid positivity or ApoE e4 status, adjusting for age, gender, and diagnostic group.ResultAcross the 4 ADNI phases (screened: n=3,739; enrolled: n=2,286), 11% of screened and enrolled participants identified as Latinx, non‐Latinx Black, or non‐Latinx‐Asian and 16% of the screened and 15% of the enrolled participants reported having =<12 years of education. In contrast, the 2019 US Census American Community Survey for adults 60+ reports 25% non‐White, and 44 % =< 12 years of education. There were no observed differences between participants from historically underrepresented ethnoracial groups and NLW participants in screen fail and dropout rates. We found that individuals with =<12 years of education failed screening at a significantly higher rate (p=.01) and rolled‐over significantly less to subsequent ADNI phases (p<.001) compared to individuals with an education >12 years. Identifying as non‐Latinx Asian was associated with lower odds of being amyloid positive (OR=0.36; p=.014) and an ApoE4 carrier (OR=0.36; p=.008) compared to NLW. Identifying as Latinx was associated with being less likely to be amyloid positive than NLW participants (OR=0.54; p=.031).ConclusionCompared to the US Census, ADNI underrepresents enrollment of Latinx, non‐Latinx Black, and non‐Latinx Asian participants and those with low educational attainment. Hence, ADNI reflects the on‐going challenges with recruiting and enrolling underrepresented populations into most AD research. Our findings highlight the need for ADNI to increase enrollment and engagement of underrepresented ethnoracial and educational populations. ADNI is actively undertaking steps to implement improved recruitment approaches aimed at increasing ethnoracial and socioeconomical representation in multi‐center cohort studies.

Genome diversity is key to viral fitness and adaptability, especially for RNA viruses, which generate it through both mutation and recombination. Recombination occurs frequently in positive strand RNA virus infections, where the RNA‐dependent RNA polymerase can jump from one genomic template to another. On the other hand, template exchange events have been rarely detected in infections of negative strand RNA viruses even when sensitive functional assays were used. However, while characterizing defective interfering RNAs (DI RNA) generated by an innate immunity‐stimulating measles virus (MeV) mutant, we documented an unexpectedly high number of recombination events ( J. Virol. 89, 7735‐47, 2015 ). We asked here how frequently these events occur in the 15,894 bases genome of a MeV strain with intact innate immunity control functions. Towards this we purified MeV ribonucleocapsids and performed unbiased deep sequencing analyses. We detected more than 3000 recombination events while covering 32,000 genomes, or about one event every ten genomes. Mapping of breakpoints and re‐initiation sites indicated that recombination occurred along the entire genome, rather than being restricted to either end, where most DI RNAs were previously mapped. Recombination was phased neither by encapsidation (6‐base periodicity) nor by ribonucleocapsid helical turns (approximately 75‐base periodicity). Rather, most recombination events joined sequences located more than 1000 bases apart. Jump‐back events were prominent, occurring about 1.5 times more frequently than deletion or copy‐back events. Most events were unique, but a few short jump‐back events retaining 6‐base periodicity were detected up to 40 times, suggesting that the corresponding genomes were amplified. At new junctions, deletions or insertions were rare (<5%). Analyses of 10 nucleotides on each side of the new junctions suggested that base pairing guided about one third of the re‐initiation events. In addition to the recombination events, we detected clusters of adenosine deaminase acting on RNA 1 (ADAR1)‐like hypermutations in about 4% of the genomes. ADAR1 de‐stabilizes base pairing on double‐strand RNA, catalyzing C‐6 deamination of adenosine to produce inosine until double‐strand regions are unwound. Indeed, we document that in an infection with a MeV mutant known to generate many DI RNAs, the frequency of ADAR1‐like hypermutations was even higher than in standard infections. In summary, we show here that significant levels of RNA recombination occur even in standard lytic infections of a prototypic negative strand RNA virus. Even if some recombinant genomes may form double‐strand RNA, infections remain productive, probably due to the unwinding/modification activity of ADAR1. We discuss our data in the context of published observations indicating that recombination events, as well as ADAR1‐like hypermutations, contribute to the adaptation of other medically relevant negative strand RNA viruses to new hosts and environments. Support or Funding Information R21 AI 128037; Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Abstract Background It is unclear how the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) should be interpreted in the context of sharing of genomic information between family members. Methods The authors analyzed the HIPAA Privacy Rule, reviewed the literature and constructed a clinical scenario to inform how HIPAA can be interpreted for multiple forms of patient- and provider-mediated genetic risk notification. Results Under HIPAA, healthcare providers can lawfully notify relatives to recommend genetic risk assessment using multiple approaches, including supporting the patient telling their own relatives, contacting relatives directly with the patient’s authorization, or contacting a relative’s provider directly. Conclusions Multiple forms of patient- or provider-mediated contact of relatives are already legally permissible under HIPAA, are consistent with ethical obligations of care to patients and their families, and could result in improved population health through identification of clinically actionable disease risk. Unanswered questions remain about implementation and impacts of provider-mediated programs.