Citations

2519 Background: PT-112 is a novel platinum-pyrophosphate agent designed to avoid the toxicity and drug resistance mechanisms of conventional chemotherapy. Pre-clinical models show effects on multiple cell signaling components: p16 mediated G1/S cell cycle arrest; modulation of MDM2/p53 expression; extrinsic apoptosis initiation; and immunogenic cell death (ICD) induction. This Phase I first-in-human, multicenter, open label study assesses PT-112’s safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile in advanced solid tumor patients (pts), to determine the RP2D and signals of activity. Methods: Pts with advanced solid tumors and acceptable marrow / organ function received PT-112 IV over 1-hr on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 wks in a 3+3 dose escalation design. Intra-subject escalation was allowed. PK samples from cycles 1-2 were analyzed by ICP-MS and LC-MS/MS. Results: 44 pts have been treated across dose levels (DL) from 12-300mg/m2. Cumulative dosing ranged from 1 to 60 infusions, and cumulative exposure from 96 to 5,244 mg/m2. PK parameters were dose proportional. Target Cmax and AUC levels were achieved, with constant VD. DLTs were observed at 150mg/m2 (G3 pancytopenia); 250mg/m2 (G2 renal injury in a cervical ca pt with hydro-nephrosis); and 300mg/m2 (G3 rash). The most common treatment-related AEs were G1-2 fatigue (26% pts), nausea (23%), vomiting (14%), constipation (12%), and diarrhea (12%). Numerous signals of activity were observed at DLs ≥ 125mg/m2. These include a confirmed PR in a NSCLC pt with 6 prior lines of therapy and no response to TKI inhibition or PD-1 blockade; PFS > 6 months (7-18 months) in 3 pts; metabolic response via PET scan in bone and liver mets (basal cell and pancreatic ca.); biomarker responses in ovarian and prostate ca.; and nodal/metastatic volumetric reduction in 3 pts. Conclusions: PT-112 is a well-tolerated novel agent with a pleiotropic mode of action and feasibility for long-term and combination treatment. Numerous signals of anti-cancer efficacy in heavily pre-treated pts suggest lack of cross-resistance with conventional agents. MTD has not yet been reached. PT-112’s profile makes it an attractive candidate for further development, including in combination with immunotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02266745.

9505 Background: D (BRAF inhibitor) + T (MEK inhibitor) combination therapy is associated with rapid clinical responses and has improved clinical outcomes in pts with BRAFV600–mutant MM, but long-term (˃ 3 y) clinical efficacy and safety data are limited. The longest follow-up to date of a randomized trial evaluating D+T at the approved dose (150 mg BID/2 mg QD [150/2]) was of the phase II study BRF113220 (part C; median, 45.6 mo) in which durable outcomes were achieved in some pts with BRAFV600–mutant MM (3-y OS, 38%). Here, we report updated 5-y landmark analyses to further characterize the impact of D+T in MM. Methods: Pts with BRAFV600–mutant mm enrolled in BRF113220 part C (NCT01072175) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive monotherapy D (150 mg BID), D+T (150 mg BID/1 mg QD), or D+T (150/2). Pts who progressed on D alone could cross over to the D+T 150/2 arm. Pt disposition, pt demographics, and 4- and 5-y efficacy and safety were analyzed for both the D-alone and D+T (approved 150/2 dose) arms. Results: This updated analysis represents an additional ≈ 2 y of follow-up (D and D+T arms; n = 54 each). As of 13 Oct 2016, 45 pts (83%) on D alone had crossed over to D+T. 20 pts were ongoing (D, n = 7 [13%]; D+T, n = 13 [24%]); 80% of D pts and 70% of D+T pts had died. D+T OS remained superior to D alone. The 4- and 5-y OS rates with D+T were 30% and 28%, respectively, demonstrating a stabilization of the OS curve. The PFS curve for D+T also remained stable (4- and 5-y: both 13%). Consistent with earlier results, the best OS for pts who received D+T was seen in pts with normal LDH (5-y, 45%) and normal LDH with disease in < 3 organ sites (5-y, 51%). At the 5-y landmark, 1 additional pt who received D+T improved from a partial to a complete response. Additional follow-up revealed no new safety signals with D+T. Detailed analyses of D crossover pts, responders, and post-progression therapy will be presented. Conclusions: This longest follow-up to date of BRAF + MEK inhibitor combination therapy in pts with BRAFV600–mutant mm revealed stable OS and PFS lasting ≥ 5 y with consistent tolerability. These results demonstrate that some pts with mm can achieve durable benefit with D+T therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT01072175.

Purpose: Socioeconomic status (SES) influences health care outcomes, but the influence of primary payer on cancer-associated wasting is unknown. We hypothesized that primary payer as an indicator of SES would influence pretreatment cancer-associated weight loss and treatment outcomes. Materials and Methods: Retrospective review of medical records identified 1,366 patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) consecutively treated at a tertiary care health system between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2013. Insurance status was obtained from an institutional tumor registry. Cancer-associated weight loss was based on the validated international consensus definition of cachexia. Multivariable regression analyses were used to identify prognostic factors of pretreatment cancer-associated weight loss and survival. Results: The cohort included a representative group of patients with a median age at diagnosis of 64 years, 47% females, and 33% patients of nonwhite race. Pretreatment cancer-associated weight loss was present at the time of NSCLC diagnosis in 17%, 14%, 32%, and 38% of patients with stage I, II, III, and IV disease, respectively. Pretreatment cancer-associated weight loss was associated with increasing age at diagnosis, black race, single marital status, tobacco use, and disease stage. Compared with private insurance, Medicaid insurance (odds ratio, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.42 to 3.30) and lack of insurance (odds ratio, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.50 to 3.58) were associated with pretreatment cancer-associated weight loss. Among cachectic patients, comorbidity, histology, tumor grade, and disease stage were prognostic of survival on multivariable analysis; however, primary payer was not. Conclusion: Pretreatment cancer-associated weight loss is common in patients with NSCLC, and its presence is significantly associated with lower SES. However, among patients with pretreatment cancer-associated weight loss, SES was not predictive of survival. Early use of cancer cachexia–directed therapies may improve outcomes, and further study on the biologic mechanisms of cancer cachexia will provide novel therapeutic avenues.

Purpose: Cancer-associated weight loss is associated with poor prognosis in advanced malignancy; however, its pretreatment prevalence and survival impact are inadequately described in large cohorts. Such data, stratified by tumor type and stage, may facilitate the optimal and timely allocation of complementary care, leading to improvements in patient survival and quality of life. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 3,180 consecutively treated adult patients with lung or GI (including colorectal, liver, and pancreatic) cancer. Pretreatment cancer-associated weight loss was based on the international consensus definition of cachexia. Prevalence and survival impact of pretreatment cancer-associated weight loss were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank test. Results: Cancer-associated weight loss was observed at the time of cancer diagnosis in 34.1% of patients. Pretreatment weight loss was documented in 17.6%, 25.8%, 36.6%, and 43.3% of stage I, II, III, and IV cancers, respectively. Wasting was common regardless of tumor type, with prevalence at diagnosis ranging from 27.3% in patients with colorectal cancer to 53.4% in patients with gastroesophageal cancer. Pretreatment weight loss was associated with reduced overall survival after adjusting for stage, size, grade, comorbidity, age, sex, and tobacco history (hazard ratio, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.39). Conclusion: Pretreatment cancer-associated weight loss is common, even in early-stage disease, and is independently associated with reduced survival. Minimal weight loss represents a clinically distinct entity with an associated overall survival intermediate to that of no weight loss and overt wasting. Early diagnosis and treatment of cancer-associated wasting offers a novel therapeutic avenue for reducing cancer mortality.

Purpose CD27, a costimulatory molecule on T cells, induces intracellular signals that mediate cellular activation, proliferation, effector function, and cell survival upon binding to its ligand, CD70. Varlilumab is a novel, first-in-class, agonist CD27 antibody that stimulates the CD27 pathway, which results in T-cell activation and antitumor activity in tumor models. This first-in-human, dose-escalation and expansion study evaluated the safety, pharmacology, and activity of varlilumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods In a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design (n = 25), patients received a single dose of varlilumab (0.1, 0.3, 1.0, 3.0, or 10 mg/kg intravenously) with a 28-day observation, followed by up to five multidose cycles (one dose per week for 4 weeks), depending on tumor response. Expansion cohorts were initiated at 3.0 mg/kg in patients with melanoma (n = 16) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC; n = 15). Primary objectives were to assess the safety and the maximum tolerated and optimal biologic doses of varlilumab. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical antitumor activity of varlilumab. Results Exposure to varlilumab was linear and dose proportional across dose groups. Only one patient experienced a dose-limiting toxicity—grade 3 transient asymptomatic hyponatremia at the 1.0-mg/kg dose level. Treatment-related adverse events were generally grade 1 or 2 in severity. Evidence of biologic activity consistent with CD27 stimulation—chemokine induction, T-cell stimulation, regulatory T cell depletion—was observed at all dose levels. A patient with metastatic RCC experienced a partial response (78% shrinkage, progression-free survival > 2.3 years). Eight patients experienced stable disease > 3 months, including a patient with metastatic RCC with progression-free survival of > 3.9 years. Conclusion Dose escalation of varlilumab to 10 mg/kg was well tolerated without identification of a maximum tolerated dose. Varlilumab was biologically and clinically active.

368 Background: SGN-75 is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of a humanized anti-CD70 mAb conjugated to the microtubule-disrupting agent MMAF via a plasma-stable linker. Upon binding to CD70, SGN-75 internalizes and releases cys‑mcMMAF which binds tubulin and induces G2/M arrest and apoptosis. Methods: A phase 1, dose-escalation, multicenter study was initiated to investigate the safety, tolerability, PK, and antitumor activity of SGN-75 monotherapy in pts with CD70-positive metastatic RCC or relapsed/refractory NHL (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT01015911). SGN-75 was administered IV in cohort-specific doses using 2 schedules [every 3 weeks (q3wk) or weekly (days 1, 8, 15 q28 days)] at doses of 0.3-4.5 mg/kg. Pts were eligible to receive treatment until PD. Results: A total of 58 pts (39 RCC/19 NHL) with a median age of 60.5 yrs (range 30-82) were treated. The MTD was 3 mg/kg q3wk; 2 pts had DLTs at 4.5 mg/kg q3wk (NHL pt had neutropenia and RCC pt had proteinuria). Weekly dosing (N=11) was terminated at the 0.6 mg/kg dose level after 2 pts with NHL developed idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. At the MTD, adverse events (AEs) in ≥30% of RCC pts (N=21) were fatigue (52%), dry eye (48%), nausea (38%), constipation (33%), and corneal epithelium defect (33%). AEs ≥ Grade 3 in >10% of RCC pts treated at the MTD were corneal epithelium defect (19%) and thrombocytopenia (14%). PK analysis suggested that SGN-75 exposure was approximately dose-proportional with a mean terminal half-life of 6-11 days. Among the 32 pts with RCC treated in the q3wk schedule, all had prior nephrectomy and a median of 3 prior therapies (range 1-6). All pts had clear cell RCC, with the exception of 2 pts who had papillary RCC. Most pts had high CD70 expression by central IHC analysis (2 or 3+, 80-100% of cells). The best clinical responses of RCC pts treated q3wk were 2 PR, 12 SD, 12 PD, and 6 were not evaluable. Durations of response for the 2 responding pts were 23 and 41 weeks. The median duration of disease control (PR and SD) was 46.4 weeks [95% CI (12, 46)]. Conclusions: SGN-75 monotherapy was generally well tolerated in pts with metastatic RCC. Evidence of antitumor activity was observed in heavily pretreated RCC pts and further studies of SGN-75 in RCC are warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT01015911.

249 Background: HA, a glycosaminoglycan in the tumor matrix, accumulates in 20-30% of solid tumors and ≥28%, ≥42% and ≥87% of colon, gastric and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) tumors, respectively. Tumors that accumulate HA can develop high interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) and are resistant to chemotherapy. HA in human PDA is associated with disease progression and poor prognosis. In animal models, PEGPH20 reduced tumor-associated HA, tumor IFP and tumor growth, and increased efficacy of chemotherapy. Pharmacodynamic (PD) activity of PEGPH20 is being evaluated in Phase 1 (Ph1) trials. Methods: Two Ph1 studies in pts with advanced solid tumors refractory to prior therapy examined the safety, tolerability, PK, PD and MTD of single-agent IV PEGPH20. Dosing in Study 1 was 2x/wk and then reduced to q21d and in Study 2 is 1-2x/wk x 4wks and 1x/wk thereafter with dexamethasone pre-medication regimen. Biomarkers evaluated: Histochemistry to detect depletion of tumor HA, serum HA catabolites, Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE)-MRI and FDG-PET. Results: In Study 1, the first 3 pts demonstrated musculoskeletal events (MSE; 2 pts dosed with 50 µg/kg 2x/wk, severe; 1 pt dosed with 0.5µg/kg 2x/wk, moderate) not predicted from GLP safety studies. The frequency of drug administration was reduced to q21d and the next 10 pts tolerated ≤1.5 µg/kg. In Study 2, dexamethasone pre-medication regimen was evaluated while dosing at 1-2x/wk. Nine pts were dosed ≤5.0 µg/kg. Doses ≤3.0 µg/kg administered 2x/wk were tolerated with intermittent Grade 1-2 MSE. Activity of PEGPH20 was reflected by increased HA serum catabolites. Pre- and post-dose biopsies from 2 colon pts demonstrated a 23-60% reduction in tumor HA after 4 wks of PEGPH20 dosing. DCE-MRI of PDA and FDG-PET of lung metastases increased tumor perfusion (Ktrans) and decreased metabolic activity 8 and 24hrs post-PEGPH20 dose and was still apparent after 4 wks of treatment with PEGPH20. Conclusions: Ongoing Ph1 studies have shown in vivo activity of PEGPH20 through HA plasma catabolites, tumor HA depletion, DCE-MRI and FDG-PET.

265 Background: Gemcitabine (G) is the standard treatment for first- line PanC. PanC is one of the most hypoxic solid tumors. TH-302 is an inert prodrug of brominated isophosphoramide mustard and undergoes selective activation in deep hypoxia. As a single agent, tumor responses were reported in patients (pts) with metastatic melanoma, SCLC, and head/neck cancer at TH-302 weekly doses of 480-575 mg/m2. Methods: Eligible pts for the PanC expansion of this phase I/II study ( NCT00743379 ) had ECOG <1, locally advanced or metastatic PanC previously untreated with systemic chemotherapy other than adjuvant G, 5FU, and/or radiation. IV TH-302 was dosed at 240-575 mg/m2 (240 or 340 in expansion) with standard dose G (1000 mg/m2) on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Serum protein and microRNA hypoxia biomarkers were analyzed at baseline, start of cycle 3 and end of study. Results: 46 PanC subjects (12 locally advanced, 34 distant mets); median age: 63 (range 41-83); 24 male; ECOG 0/1 in 29/17 pts; RECIST response rate (RR) of 21%, median PFS of 6.1 mo (95%CI 4.8, 7.7) and median survival of 11.4 mo (95%CI 6.0, not reached) were observed. RR was 23% with median survival of 7.4 mo in pts with distant mets. 52% of pts had a >50% decrease in CA19-9. Common adverse events were skin or mucosal toxicity, nausea, fatigue and vomiting; most grade 1/2. Grade 3/4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia in 68%, 64%, and 20% of pts respectively. The dose intensities at 240 mg/m2 and 340 mg/m2 were similar and related to hematologic toxicities. Skin toxicities were less common at 240 mg/m2. A TH-302 dose response was present with higher RR and PFS at 340 mg/m2. Initial serum hypoxia biomarkers did not identify a preferential pt population. Conclusions: The activity and clinical benefits of the combination of TH-302 with G in first line PanC are promising as compared to previous studies of G alone. TH-302 adds to the hematologic toxicity of G, but the regimen is well tolerated. The safety and activity provided rationale for comparing TH-302 plus G versus G alone in a randomized phase II trial ( NCT01144455 ) and indicate TH-302 may complement G by penetrating into the hypoxic regions of the PanC tumors where activation induces cytotoxicity. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Consensus diagnostic recommendations to distinguish GORD from eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) by response to a trial of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) unexpectedly uncovered an entity called ‘PPI-responsive oesophageal eosinophilia’ (PPI-REE). PPI-REE refers to patients with clinical and histological features of EoE that remit with PPI treatment. Recent and evolving evidence, mostly from adults, shows that patients with PPI-REE and patients with EoE at baseline are clinically, endoscopically and histologically indistinguishable and have a significant overlap in terms of features of Th2 immune-mediated inflammation and gene expression. Furthermore, PPI therapy restores oesophageal mucosal integrity, reduces Th2 inflammation and reverses the abnormal gene expression signature in patients with PPI-REE, similar to the effects of topical steroids in patients with EoE. Additionally, recent series have reported that patients with EoE responsive to diet/topical steroids may also achieve remission on PPI therapy. This mounting evidence supports the concept that PPI-REE represents a continuum of the same immunological mechanisms that underlie EoE. Accordingly, it seems counterintuitive to differentiate PPI-REE from EoE based on a differential response to PPI therapy when their phenotypic, molecular, mechanistic and therapeutic features cannot be reliably distinguished. For patients with symptoms and histological features of EoE, it is reasonable to consider PPI therapy not as a diagnostic test, but as a therapeutic agent. Due to its safety profile, ease of administration and high response rates (up to 50%), PPI can be considered a first-line treatment before diet and topical steroids. The reasons why some patients with EoE respond to PPI, while others do not, remain to be elucidated.