Back to Authors

Moawad, Fouad J.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4530-1523

Mayo Clinic

Walter Reed National Military Medical Center

Citations 2

Proton pump inhibitor-responsive oesophageal eosinophilia: an entity challenging current diagnostic criteria for eosinophilic oesophagitis
Molina‐Infante, Javier , Bredenoord, Albert J. , Cheng, Edaire , Dellon, Evan S. , Furuta, Glenn T. , Gupta, Sandeep K. , Hirano, Ikuo , Katzka, David A. , Moawad, Fouad J. , Schoepfer, Alain , Wen, Ting , Straumann, Alex , Rothenberg, Marc E. , Spechler, Stuart Jon , Lucendo, Alfredo

Gut | December 19, 2015 | Volume: 65 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 524-531

10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310991 Get It

Consensus diagnostic recommendations to distinguish GORD from eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) by response to a trial of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) unexpectedly uncovered an entity called ‘PPI-responsive oesophageal eosinophilia’ (PPI-REE). PPI-REE refers to patients with clinical and histological features of EoE that remit with PPI treatment. Recent and evolving evidence, mostly from adults, shows that patients with PPI-REE and patients with EoE at baseline are clinically, endoscopically and histologically indistinguishable and have a significant overlap in terms of features of Th2 immune-mediated inflammation and gene expression. Furthermore, PPI therapy restores oesophageal mucosal integrity, reduces Th2 inflammation and reverses the abnormal gene expression signature in patients with PPI-REE, similar to the effects of topical steroids in patients with EoE. Additionally, recent series have reported that patients with EoE responsive to diet/topical steroids may also achieve remission on PPI therapy. This mounting evidence supports the concept that PPI-REE represents a continuum of the same immunological mechanisms that underlie EoE. Accordingly, it seems counterintuitive to differentiate PPI-REE from EoE based on a differential response to PPI therapy when their phenotypic, molecular, mechanistic and therapeutic features cannot be reliably distinguished. For patients with symptoms and histological features of EoE, it is reasonable to consider PPI therapy not as a diagnostic test, but as a therapeutic agent. Due to its safety profile, ease of administration and high response rates (up to 50%), PPI can be considered a first-line treatment before diet and topical steroids. The reasons why some patients with EoE respond to PPI, while others do not, remain to be elucidated.
Endotherapy for and tailored approaches to treating GERD, and refractory GERD
Locke, G. Richard, Horwhat, John D., Mashimo, Hiroshi , Savarino, Edoardo , Zentilin, Patrizia , Savarino, Vincenzo , Armbruster, Steven, Wong, Roy K.H., Moawad, Fouad J. , Zerbib, Frank , Savarino, Edoardo

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences | June 6, 2014 | Volume: 1300 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 166-186

10.1111/nyas.12240 Get It

This paper presents commentaries on how endoluminal antireflux procedures compare to laparoscopic fundoplication; new endoscopic procedures being studied to treat refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); the new Stretta; the relationship between obesity and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) resistance; data concerning acid hypersensitivity and sensory receptors (vallinoid, TRPV1) causing refractory GERD; whether microscopic esophagitis is relevant in determining symptoms of non‐erosive reflux disease (NERD); how concomitant functional gastrointestinal disorders affect the PPI response in NERD; the evidence that a functional esophagus is associated with inflammatory bowel syndrome (IBS); the role of GABA agonists in the treatment of refractory GERD; the role of biofeedback and antidepressants in refractory GERD; and endoluminal fundoplication using the EsophyX device.