Citations

Abstract Background The ability of large language models (LLMs) to work collaboratively and screen studies in a systematic review (SR) is under-explored. Hence, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of LLMs in automating the process of screening in systematic reviews. Methods This is an observational study which included labeled data (title and abstracts) for five SRs. Originally, two reviewers screened the citations independently for eligibility. A third reviewer cross-checked each citation for quality assurance. GPT-4, Claude-3-Sonnet, and Gemini-Pro-1.0 were used using zero-shot chain-of-thought prompting. Collaborative approaches included (i): conflict resolution using benefit of the doubt, (ii) majority voting using an independent third LLM and (iii) conflict resolution using an informed third LLM. Performance was assessed using accuracy, precision for exclusion, and recall for inclusion. Work saved over samples (WSS) was computed to estimate the reduction in manual human effort. Results A total of 11300 articles were included in this study. The individual models, GPT-4, Claude-3-Sonnet, and Gemini-Pro-1.0 exhibited a high precision for exclusion, achieving 99.7%, 99.7%, and 99.2% and high recall for inclusion achieving 95.5%, 96.6% and 85.7%, respectively. However, the collaborative approach utilizing the two best-performing models (GPT-4 and Claude-3S) achieved an average precision of 99.9% and a recall of 98.5% (across all collaborative approaches). Furthermore, the proposed collaborative approach resulted in an average WSS of 63.5%, compared to the average WSS of 45.2% for individual models. Conversational LLM interactions showed a consistent pattern of results. Limitations This study was limited due to reliance on proprietary models, and evaluation on oncology datasets. Conclusion Evidence shows that collaborative LLMs enable efficient, high-performing screening in systematic reviews, supporting continuous evidence updates. Primary funding source NIH (U24CA265879-01-1) and Carolyn-Ann-Kennedy-Bacon Fund.

Abstract Background: Fatty Acid Synthase (FASN) is a key lipogenic enzyme co-regulated with HER2 and highly expressed in ER+ and HER2+ BC. Its targeting downregulates HER2 expression. Our preclinical studies revealed that FASN inhibition can sensitize or restore sensitivity to trastuzumab, paclitaxel and ET in HER2+ BC models. Denifanstat (deni, formerly TVB-2640) is a novel FASN inhibitor that demonstrated promising clinical activity and safety in a prior phase I trial as either monotherapy or in combination with paclitaxel. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the objective tumor response rate (ORR) of deni plus trastuzumab (H) in combination with paclitaxel (T) or ET. Methods: Two independent, phase II clinical trials were initiated to assess the efficacy and safety of deni plus H in combination with T (Cohort A) or ET (Cohort B). Key inclusion criteria included HER2+ MBC resistant to HER2-directed therapy, measurable disease, unlimited ET, ≤6 prior chemotherapy or antibody drug conjugate regimens, and confirmation of HER2+ MBC on a pre-registration biopsy. Deni was administered 100 mg/m2 orally once daily. HP or H plus ET (fulvestrant or aromatase inhibitor) was administered at standard dose and schedule. Blood was collected on Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1D1), C1D8 and C2D1 for serum FASN analysis. An additional MBC tumor biopsy was collected on C2D1 for correlative studies. A 2-stage Simon design with a safety-run in was used to test the null hypothesis that the true ORR is at most 5% against the alternative it is at least 20%. With a sample size of 32 patients (pts) per cohort, if ≥4 responses are seen, this design has a 90% chance of rejecting the true ORR is <5% when the true ORR is ≥20% at a 0.10 level of significance. The decision to close both trials to enrollment early was multifactorial. Results: From August 2017 - February 2024, 33 pts with HER2+ MBC pre-registered, among which 17 were eligible and 16 were evaluable (15 pts in Cohort A and 1 pt in Cohort B). The most common reason for ineligibility was HER2-negative status on central review of the pre-registration biopsy. Median age was 57 years (range 35-80). All pts were non-Hispanic and 13 (81.3%) were White. Median prior lines of therapy was 5 (range 0 - 11). In Cohort A, there were 5 partial responses; thus, the primary endpoint was met with the ORR estimated to be 33.3% (90% CI: 14.2-57.7%). The median PFS time was 7.0 months (95 %CI: 3.7 - 11.3), and median OS was 25.7 months (95%CI: 10.2 - NE). No dose limiting toxicities were observed during the C1 safety run-in (6 pts). In Cohort A, 7 (46.7%) developed a grade 3 or 4 adverse event (AE) attributed to combination therapy. Grade ≥2 AEs regardless of attribution occurring in ≥20% of all pts included anemia, fatigue, neutropenia, palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE), and peripheral neuropathy. Treatment was discontinued due to progression (12; 80%) or AE (3; 20% - pneumonitis; neuropathy; PPE). In Cohort B, the pt maintained stable disease through 8 cycles with grade 3 ALT increase, and she remained alive 31.2 months post-registration. Median C1D1 FASN level was 32.7 ng/mL (IQR: 18.7 - 49.6 ng/mL). There was minimal association between C1D8 and C2D1 FASN levels and time to disease progression (C1D8 n=9, Spearman rank correlation coefficient (r s) = 0.040; C2D1 n=13, r s = -0.019). Analyses of changes in MBC tumor expression of FASN, phospho-AKT, and phospho-S6 are in progress. Conclusion: Deni combined with HP provided clinical antitumor activity in pts with HER2+ MBC resistant to trastuzumab. Expected paclitaxel-associated AEs were observed. Nearly half of pts experienced a grade 3 or 4 AE attributed to the combination therapy, and 20% stopped treatment due to AE. Further study of deni, H plus ET is necessary to draw safety and efficacy conclusions. Citation Format: T. C. Haddad, V. J. Suman, R. R. Roa, B. J. Ernst, R. Lupu, T. Vander Steen, M. H. Solanki, M. Keeney, D. W. Northfelt, K. S. Anderson, T. J. Hobday, S. Chumsri, J. E. Hoppenworth, J. L. Carroll, K. V. Giridhar, C. C. O’Sullivan, R. A. Leon-Ferre, M. P. Goetz. Phase II Trial of the FASN Inhibitor, Denifanstat (TVB-2640), Plus Trastuzumab in Combination with Paclitaxel or Endocrine Therapy (ET) in Patients with HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Resistant to Trastuzumab [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-01-16.

Abstract As shown by the TAILORx and RxPONDER trials, recurrence score (RS) identifies many postmenopausal pts who do not benefit from addition of ACT to endocrine therapy (ET); however, it also identifies certain subsets of premenopausal pts who do benefit (node-neg/high clinical risk/RS 16-20, node-neg/RS 21-25, and node-pos/RS ≤25). Most premenopausal pts in these trials did not receive ovarian function suppression (OFS) as part of their ET regimen. Given the observed benefit from OFS in high-risk premenopausal pts with HR+/HER2- BC in the SOFT/TEXT trials, we question whether the noted ACT benefit in TAILORx/RxPONDER may have been the result of chemotherapy-induced OFS. To address this, we developed OFSET, a phase III clinical trial comparing OFS+ET v ACT+OFS+ET. We hypothesize that addition of ACT to OFS+ET is superior to OFS+ET in improving invasive breast cancer-free survival (IBCFS) among premenopausal, early-stage BC pts with HR+/HER2- tumors and a 21-gene RS between 16-25 (for pN0 pts) and 0-25 (for pN1 pts). Secondary objectives include invasive disease-free survival, overall survival, distant recurrence-free interval, breast cancer-free interval, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Pts must be node-neg with RS 16-20 (plus high clinical risk), or RS 21-25, or have 1-3 positive nodes with RS ≤25. Stratification is by nodal status/RS status (pN0 RS 16-25 v pN1 RS 0-15 and pN1 RS 16-25), intent to receive CDK4/6 inhibitor (yes; no), and age (18-39 v ≥40). Pts are randomized after surgery to either OFS+ET or ACT+OFS+ET. ET is an aromatase inhibitor (AI) per physician discretion; or tamoxifen if AI is not tolerated or if OFS is incomplete. Radiotherapy will be administered per protocol guidelines. The HRQOL substudy will assess differences between arms in severe menopausal symptoms (measured by FACT ESS-19) and pain severity (PROMIS). Blood and tumor specimens will be collected for future research. We anticipate accrual of 3,960 pts in 7 yrs, 7 mos. Per NSABP B-28/RxPONDER data, 5-yr IBCFS of pN1 pts on the ACT+OFS+ET arm is estimated at 92.3%. Based on TAILORx data, 5-yr IBCFS of pN0 pts on the ACT arm is ∼95%. Assuming 56% of pts to be pN0 and 44% pN1, and a 0.5% annual loss-to-follow-up rate, the definitive analyses to detect a hazard ratio: 0.75 with ACT+OFS+ET v OFS+ET, with 1-sided α of 0.025 and 80% power, will require 380 IBCFS events, expected to occur ∼11 yrs after study initiation. Accrual is 292/3,960 (from 8/2023 to 5/2025). Among 148 pts with OFS data available, 79 (53.4%) were prescribed goserelin and 69 (46.6%) leuprolide. A monthly dosing schedule was prescribed for 86.1% of pts receiving goserelin and 73.5% of those receiving leuprolide; the remaining received a 3-monthly schedule. NCT05879926 Support: U10 CA180868, -80822, UG1 CA189867, U24 CA196067 Citation Format: S. Swain, G. Tang, S. L. Puhalla, P. A. Ganz, N. L. Henry, R. S. Cecchini, S. A. Reid, P. Rastogi, C. E. Geyer, Jr., J. R. White, A. S. Clark, T. C. Haddad, G. A. Vidal, N. Wolmark, E. P. Mamounas. NRG-BR009: A phase III trial evaluating addition of adjuvant chemotherapy to Ovarian Function Suppression + Endocrine Therapy in premenopausal women with pN0-1, HR+/HER2- breast cancer and recurrence score ≤25 (OFSET) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-07-04.

Abstract Introduction: An Our Practice Advisory (OPA), formerly known as Best Practice Advisory (BPA), is an electronic health record (EHR) tool. OPAs identify key parameters to alert providers of potential interventions that could enhance quality of care. Such functionality is increasingly relevant given the rapid pace of new drug approvals. Within the Mayo Clinic system, we previously identified that amongst Mayo Clinic patients (pts) meeting the MonarchE criteria, 28% of pts did not undergo a documented discussion with their provider regarding the role of adjuvant abemaciclib (Premji, SABCS 2024). Further, a Flatiron study identified that only 40% of eligible pts received abemaciclib (Sandoval, Miami Breast 2025). To address this practice gap, in 2024 we began to implement EHR clinical decision support by creating an OPA trigger for pts eligible for an adjuvant CDK 4/6 inhibitor (CDK 4/6i). Here we report on ‘action taken’ versus not for the OPA and the most common reasons for re-prompts. Methods: The Mayo Breast Disease Group designed an OPA including pts who are within 14 months of a clinical or pathologic diagnosis of high-risk early-stage breast cancer. We leveraged structured data captured in the Epic staging forms (Epic Systems) to identify pts with clinical or pathologic T-stage, N-stage, grade, ± Ki-67/ multigene signature to identify ER+/HER2- pts eligible for adjuvant ribociclib or abemaciclib based on FDA approvals. The OPA was triggered by a patient encounter in oncology when endocrine therapy (but not CDK4/6i) was on the active medication list resulting in a hard stop. The OPA gathered limited details about whether adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors were discussed and whether the provider followed a link that resulted in prescribing one—considered an indicator of action taken. In this IRB-exempt quality improvement project, we describe the responses captured in the OPA trigger utilizing Epic tools. Results: The OPA went live on 1/10/2025. Over a 5-month period post OPA initiation, we identified 517 OPA alerts among 332 unique pts. Their median age was 62.5 years, and the majority were female (97%). The median time to resolve the OPA was 17.5 seconds (range 2-567 seconds). 12.6% (65/517) of the time there was ‘action taken’ by selecting the hyperlink to potentially start a treatment plan. Providers selected the following OPA pre-set responses: ‘re-prompt in one month’ 248 (48%), ‘patient not a candidate for therapy’ 48 (9%), ‘patient declines’ 69 (13%), ‘outside oncologist will prescribe’ 36 (7%), ‘not discussed’ 44 (9%), and unknown 72 (14%). The most common free text comments among the 517 OPA alerts (summarized) included: ‘revisit in future’ 108 (21%), ‘too early’ 65 (13%), ‘patient declines’ 66 (13%), ‘outside oncologist will start’ 31 (6%), ‘not a candidate’ 26 (5%), and ‘co-morbidities’ 18 (3%). Erroneous OPA prompting occurred in 14 (3%) who previously failed a CDK4/6i due to toxicity and in 18 (3%) for pts currently on a CDK4/6i. 30 (6%) OPA comments noted that they discussed or started therapy that day. Conclusion: The OPA offered clinical decision support and ensured that clinicians considered prescribing CDK 4/6i in all pts identified as eligible, and captured deferrals. Refinements are needed to ensure appropriate timing of OPA and minimize erroneous firing. The OPA remains active and captures the reason for deferral of adjuvant CDK 4/6i prescription. This data pairs real world decision making to better understand clinically meaningful application of improved invasive disease-free survival (iDFS). Citation Format: S. Premji, P. Advani, S. Chumsri, L. Mina, J. Taraba, J. Carroll, J. Hoppenworth, E. Cathcart-Rake, T. Haddad, B. Rudder, G. Choong, D. Idossa, C. O’Sullivan, S. Yadav, K. Ruddy, P. Peethambaram, T. Hobday, M. Goetz, R. Rao, B. Ernst, F. Batalini, R. Leon-Ferre, A. Tevaarwerk, K. Giridhar. Implementing an Our Practice Advisory (OPA) to provide clinical decision support for adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors in early-stage hormone receptor positive breast cancer: The Mayo Clinic Experience [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-11-10.

Abstract Intro: The 70-gene MammaPrint (MP) assay is prognostic for distant recurrence and predictive of benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) benefit established on surgical tissue of systemically untreated patients (pts). The MP index range is from -1 to +1 with higher index indicating lower risk of early recurrence. Risk is categorized as MP High Risk, MP Low Risk, and MP UltraLow Risk, and results can guide treatment decisions. Pts with MP index >0 are classified as Low Risk and derive little benefit from CT. There are clinical scenarios in which the only available tissue for MP or other genomic testing has been exposed to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET). Few studies have investigated the impact of ET exposure on MP index. Methods: Pts were identified through the I-SPY Low Risk Registry (LRR), an observational sub-study which enrolled pts with hormone receptor positive (HR+)/HER2-negative early breast cancer ineligible for the I-SPY2 trial due to MP Low Risk or UltraLow Risk status, between 2010-2020. Pts were treated at the discretion of their provider. We conducted a retrospective analysis of MP index from paired tumor tissue obtained from systemically untreated diagnostic core biopsies and surgical specimens after NET. MP categories and index before and after NET were compared. Change in MP index was assessed for an association with changes in clinicopathologic factors obtained through the LRR using the paired-t test. Results: 28 pts with paired tumor samples were included in the analysis. Median age was 48 (range 31-75) and 18 (64%) were premenopausal. At baseline, 13 (46%) were clinically node-positive and 22 (76%) had ductal histology. Tumor grade was 1 in 6 pts (21%), 2 in 20 pts (71%), and 3 in 2 pts (7%). ER expression was >95% in 25 pts (range 60-100%) and PR expression was >90% in 14 pts (range 0-100%). NET regimens included tamoxifen +/- ovarian function suppression (OFS) in 3 pts (10.7%), aromatase inhibitor (AI) +/- OFS in 15 pts (53.6%), tamoxifen followed by or in combination with AI +/- OFS in 8 pts (28.6%), fulvestrant in 1 pt (3.6%) and OFS alone in 1 pt (3.6%). 11 (61%) of premenopausal pts received OFS. 96% (27/28) of pts were classified as Low Risk both pre- and post-NET. Only one pt had MP change from Low Risk to High Risk. Three pts had change from Low Risk to UltraLow Risk or vice versa. As a continuous variable, a small average increase in MP index was observed after NET; but, there was a range of responses. 19 pts (68%) had an increase in MP index after NET, while 9 pts (32%) had a decrease. In those with a decrease in MP index, the average ER expression decreased by -13.6%, whereas in those with an increase in MP index, ER expression was unchanged (-0.18%) (p=0.049). There was no significant difference in changes in PR expression between tumors with increased vs decreased MP indices. At a median follow-up of 35 months, 4 distant recurrences were observed. Of the 9 pts with a decrease in MP index, 3 pts (33%), including the one who changed from Low Risk to High Risk, experienced a distant recurrence. In contrast, in those with an increase in MP index, 1 of 19 (5%) experienced a distant recurrence. Conclusion: In pts with early-stage HR+/HER2- MP Low Risk or UltraLow Risk breast cancer, NET had minimal impact on the tumor MP classification. These data suggest that the MP assay could be used for tissue exposed to NET if untreated tissue is not available. Further investigation in larger cohorts is needed to validate these findings. The observation that there were more distant recurrences in pts with tumors that had an increase in MP after NET is hypothesis generating, and potentially clinically relevant if validated in a larger study. The potential of MP as a dynamic risk marker to stratify recurrence risk following NET is being evaluated in the ongoing I-SPY2 Endocrine Optimization Pilot. Citation Format: S. Jacob, C. Wu, A. Glas, C. Yau, L. Brown-Swigart, G. Hirst, T. Haddad, K. Giridhar, A. Elias, R. Mukhtar, L. Huppert, K. Albain, D. Yee, L. van’t Veer, L. Esserman, J. Chien. Impact of Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy on MammaPrint Index in Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative MammaPrint Low Risk Early-Stage Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS4-05-28.

Abstract Significance: Emergence of resistance to endocrine therapies represents a major challenge in theclinical management of estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast tumors. CDK4/6 inhibitors(palbociclib, ribociclib, abemaciclib) have improved survival when combined with endocrine therapy. Nonetheless, resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors eventually occurs. One of the emerging mechanisms ofresistance toward endocrine therapy and CDK4/6 inhibitors is characterized by the enrichment ofbreast cancer stem cells (CSCs) that show stem-like features such as self-renewal capacity, highCD44 expression and ALDH activity. We have demonstrated that Aurora-A kinase (AURKA) has apivotal role in promoting cancer cellular plasticity and clonal expansion of endocrine resistantCD44high/ALDHhigh CSCs. Our preclinical studies on AURKA-driven tumor stemness provided thetherapeutic foundation for a Phase-II clinical trial (TBCRC041) of the AURKA inhibitor, alisertib, whichdemonstrated clinically meaningful activity in patients with endocrine and CDK4/6 inhibitors resistantER+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Despite such activity, alisertib resistance finally occurred. Therefore, we hypothesize that up-regulation of IL6R/STAT3 and PR stemness oncogenic pathwaysmay sustain the clonal expansion of CD44high/ALDHhigh CSCs after tumor progression on AURKAinhibitors. Experimental Design: We used variant MCF-7 breast cancer models that show resistance toendocrine therapy (letrozole and fulvestrant) and alisertib (MCF-7 LR/FR, MCF-7 LR/FR-AlisR) todefine in vitro and in vivo the efficacy of stemness-targeted therapies to enhance alisertib activity byimpairing the enrichment of hormone refractory CD44High/ALDHHigh CSCs. Parental MCF-7 cells wereused as control. We employed exclusive PDX-derived 3D-Mammospheres (MPS) that wereestablished from the Phase-II clinical trial TBCRC041 to test the efficacy of stemness-targetedtherapies in enhancing the therapeutic activity of alisertib. In Vitro Studies: Immunofluorescence andimmunoblot assays were used to assess the expression of breast cancer stemness biomarkers. Enrichment of ALDHHigh CSCs was measured using Red-Aldefluor kit. Cell proliferation and Red-Annexin-VHigh apoptotic cells were quantified in real-time using IncuCyte S3. In Vivo Studies: 1x106breast cancer cells were injected into the mammary fat pad of NSG-female mice and treated withfulvestrant, alisertib and tocilizumab as monotherapy or in combination. Control groups were treatedwith saline solution placebo. Drug Treatments: Tocilizumab and Onapristone were used to inhibit theIL6R/STAT3 and PR stemness pathways, respectively. Results: Our study demonstrates for the first time that nuclear STAT3/PR complex mediatesAURKA-induced expression of KLF4 stemness gene and enrichment of endocrine resistantCD44high/ALDHhigh CSCs. Alisertib resistant MCF-7 LR/FR cells showed increased expression ofIL6R, T288-AURKA, S727-STAT3 and S294-PR compared to alisertib naïve cells. MCF-7 LR/FR-AlisR-derived 3D-MPS had increased KLF4 and CD44 expression. Alisertib resistant PDX modelsalso showed high levels of CD44, IL6R/STAT3 and KLF4 expression. Remarkable, pharmacologicalblockade of PR and STAT3 transcriptional regulatory networks enhanced the efficacy of alisertib byreducing the enrichment of CD44High/ALDHHigh CSCs. Conclusions: These findings provide the strong preclinical rationale for the development of novelcombinatorial therapeutic strategies targeting IL6R/STAT3 and PR stemness pathways to enhancethe efficacy of AURKA inhibitors that will result in the selective eradication of CD44High/ALDHHighCSCs with consequent benefits on the overall survival of patients with advanced ER+ breast tumorsrefractory to endocrine therapies and CDK4/6 inhibitors.輀 Citation Format: A. B. D'ASSORO, M. Drago, T. Haddad, M. GOETZ, K. Giridhar, K. Kalari, L. Manzella, P. Vigneri, F. Drago, C. Vancheri, C. Lange, J. Ingle. Stemness-targeted therapies to enhance the efficacy of AURKA inhibitors in endocrine resistant er+ breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS2-11-08.

Abstract Introduction Serial assessments of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) provide independent prognostic significance for progression free survival and overall survival. A low CTC burden (<5 CTCs / 7.5mL blood) at baseline is favorable prognostically, and reduction of CTCs during treatment indicates response to treatment (Janni, CCR 2025). Despite increasing evidence supporting its clinical validity, real-time serial CTC enumeration has not been utilized broadly in clinical practice in the U.S. The ACT-MBC study is a prospective observational study to evaluate the impact of serial CTC testing on treatment decisions and response assessment (NCT05662345). Provider (physician or advanced practitioner) perception of CTC testing is measured with questionnaires at baseline (PQ1), and for each pt during the first restaging visit (PQ2), and at the end of the study (PQ3). We previously reported PQ1 results (Giridhar, SABCS 2024). Here, we report on results of PQ2. Methods ACT-MBC prospectively enrolled patients (pts) at Mayo Clinic Rochester and Mayo Clinic Health Systems sites (Mankato, Albert Lea and Eau Claire). Pts with MBC were enrolled at time of progressive disease during any line of therapy (TNBC) or ≥2nd line metastatic therapy for ER+/HER2- disease. Pts were tested for CTCs using the FDA-cleared CellSearch® assay which included enumeration and biomarker testing on CTCs for ER, HER2, and PD-L1. The treating clinician determined the regimen and timing of restaging scans. CTC testing was performed once per cycle (every 3-4 weeks) with results returned to the treating provider within 7 days. We descriptively summarized PQ2 responses from providers who had at least one on-treatment CTC result available by the first restaging visit. We report the proportion (90% CI) of providers who agreed or strongly agreed that assessing CTCs enhanced their ability to determine response to therapy and that the CTC results helped guide their decision to continue or change therapy (co-primary endpoints) while accounting for within provider correlation. Results As of June 25, 2025, 15 providers enrolled a median of 2 pts each (range: 1 to 15 pts) and completed PQ2 surveys on 40 pts. 7 providers (47%) practiced in the community setting and 4 (27%) were nurse practitioners. Most pts were female (98%), White (98%), and had ER+/HER2- MBC (80%). Baseline (C1) CTC results were elevated (≥5 CTCs) in 24 (60%) pts (CTC range 0-609). At C2 (n=39), CTC values remained undetected in 7 pts, decreased in 21 pts, increased in 8 pts, and remained unchanged in 3 pts. At PQ2 (n=40), based on clinician interpretation of radiographic findings, results showed 2.5% of pts with complete response, 20% with partial response, 25% with stable disease, 17.5% with mixed response, and 35% with progressive disease. Clinicians reported that CTC results were concordant with imaging results in 34 (85%) responses, discordant with imaging in 7.5% of responses, and unclear in the remaining 7.5% of responses. Most clinicians (82.5%) agreed or strongly agreed that assessing CTCs enhanced their ability to determine response to therapy (90% CI: 68.3%, 96.7%). Further, 70% of providers agreed or strongly agreed that the CTC results helped guide their decision to continue or change therapy (90% CI: 50.8%, 89.2%). 32.5% of the time, CTCs results influenced the timing of the first restaging scans. In 11/25 pts without progressing disease, CTC results influenced the timing of future scans. In the 7/8 pts with a mixed response at first restaging scans with decreasing CTCs, 4 remained on the same systemic therapy. Conclusions Oncologists in academic and community practice responded that serial CTC assessments enhance ability to determine response of therapy, guide decisions to continue or change treatments, and influence timing of radiographic assessments. Citation Format: K. V. Giridhar, D. Zahrieh, M. Hanna, A. Singh, E. Al-Hattab, P. Schumacher, J. Carroll, J. Hoppenworth, T. Haddad, A. Tevaarwerk, B. Rudder, G. M. Choong, S. Basu, R. A. Leon-Ferre, T. O'Brien, A. Lewis, F. de Snoo, L. Stork-Sloots, F. K. Kuhr, S. Lazaro, R. Prendergast, D. S. Spinner, M. P. Goetz. Assessing the impact of real-time serial circulating tumor cell results on the management of patients with metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS4-03-10.

Abstract Background: Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in HER2+ and triple-negative breast cancer (BC) are prognostic and associated with therapy response; however, there are few data regarding distribution and significance of TIL values in ER+ HER2-negative (HER2-) MBC patients (pts) treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i). CDK4/6 inhibition may promote antitumor immunity by production of type III interferons and tumor antigen presentation, and by inhibition of regulatory T cells (Goel, Nature 2017). Further, the addition of immune checkpoint therapy to palbociclib numerically prolonged PFS in the 2nd line (2L) setting (Mayer, JCO 2024). We aimed to investigate the prognostic role of TILs derived from fresh metastatic tumor biopsies in pts with ER+HER2- MBC prior to starting CDK4/6i and endocrine therapy (ET) in the first line (1L) and 2L setting. Methods: PROMISE (NCT0281902) is a multicenter, prospective study that enrolled women commencing the CDK4/6i palbociclib (Pb) with letrozole (1L) or fulvestrant (2L) for HR+HER2- MBC. The primary goal was to identify novel genomic variants and pathways associated with PFS. Here, we performed a secondary analysis to quantitate stromal TILs using protocol mandated pretreatment tumor biopsies and determine their association with PFS. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, we reported median PFS (mPFS) and 3-year PFS percentage (%) (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) by TILs [≥20% vs <20%] separately within 1L and 2L. As sample TIL values were generally concentrated at zero (27/58 = 46.6%), coupled with wide spread of sample TIL values ≥20% [range: 20%- 80%], we applied a ≥20% threshold for PFS analysis (high vs low TIL group) as described by Luen, Salgado et al. Lancet Oncol 2017. Statistical significance was based on the Wilcoxon test of the null hypothesis that there was no difference in the PFS curves by TILs. PFS is reported at median follow-up of 21 months. Results: Pretreatment tumor biopsies from 58/68 (85.3 %) pts were evaluable (42 in 1L and 16 in 2L). Median [Q1, Q2] TIL values were higher in 1L (5% [0, 10]) vs 2L (0% [0, 15]). The most common biopsy sites were bone (44.8%), lymph node (17.2%), liver (17.2%) and breast (12%). Overall, TILs frequency (>20%) by the 4 most common biopsy sites were bone (2/20, 10%), lymph node (4/7, 57%), liver (2/6, 33%), and breast (1/7, 14%). In 1L, although PFS was not significantly different (P = 0.237), mPFS (44 vs 34 months) and 3-year PFS 75.0%, [95% CI: 50.3%, 100%] vs 46.4% [95% CI: 31.0%, 69.5%]) were longer in pts with high versus low TILS, respectively. In 2L, the 3-year PFS was numerically similar comparing high and low TILs groups, (25.0%, [95% CI: 4.6%, 100%] vs 22.5% [95% CI: 6.7%, 76.1%]) with no significant difference in PFS (P = 0.761). Conclusions: In pts with ER+HER2- MBC treated with Pb and ET, PFS was numerically longer comparing high vs low TIL values in 1L but not 2L settings. Future studies evaluating TILs in larger datasets are needed to validate these findings. Genomic analysis (DNA/RNA) and its association with TIL levels is underway and will be presented at the meeting. Funding: The Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic Breast Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE P50CA116201); Mayo Clinic Cancer Center (CA15083-40A2); TEMPUS (https://www.tempus.com/) and Conquer Cancer Foundation of ASCO (Career Development Award 2018, Dr. O’Sullivan) Citation Format: C. C. O'Sullivan, A. M. Moyer, A. Nassar, D. M. Zahrieh, V. Suman, X. Tang, K. J. Thompson, R. C. Hentz, J. J. Harrington, A. Moreno-Aspitia, D. W. Northfelt, T. C. Haddad, S. Chumsri, P. P. Peethambaram, K. J. Ruddy, K. V. Giridhar, R. A. Leon-Ferre, R. Weinshilboum, L. Wang, K. R. Kalari, M. P. Goetz. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in advanced ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer prior to treatment with palbociclib and endocrine therapy: a retrospective analysis of the PROMISE study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-10-22.

Abstract Background: Aurora kinase A (AURKA) plays an integral role in the mitotic cell cycle, regulating spindle assembly, centrosome function, chromosome alignment, and mitotic entry. In addition to its mitotic role, activated AURKA has been shown to induce epithelial-mesenchymal transition reprogramming and contribute to endocrine resistance in ER+ breast cancer (BC) models. Amplification/overexpression of AURKA is linked to poor prognosis across multiple tumor types, including ER+/HER2- BC. Alisertib is a selective, reversible, ATP-competitive AURKA inhibitor that has been shown to disrupt spindle formation, leading to mitotic defects and cell death. In xenografts, the potent inhibition of AURKA by alisertib led to antitumor activity across a variety of tumor types. Preliminary clinical data with alisertib have shown significant antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with various cancers, including ER+/HER2- BC. This study aims to better characterize the role of alisertib in patients with BC to provide a rationale for future clinical studies. Methods: Three studies evaluating alisertib in patients with ER+/HER2- MBC have been completed, including a phase I study of alisertib + fulvestrant (Haddad 2018), a phase II alisertib monotherapy study (Melichar 2015), and a phase II study of alisertib ± fulvestrant (TBCRC 041; Haddad 2023). Descriptive summary statistics were utilized for patient characteristics, as well as clinical safety and efficacy data. Results: A total of 126 patients were enrolled and evaluable in the 3 clinical studies, as per Table 1. All patients had MBC and received prior endocrine therapy and chemotherapy. All patients in TBCRC 041 also received a prior CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK 4/6i). In these heavily pretreated patients, tumor objective response rates (ORR) were ∼20%, and 6-month clinical benefit rates (CBRs) were 29-78%. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) across studies were hematologic AEs (neutropenia, leukopenia, and anemia), and fatigue. In TBCRC 041, ctDNA- and tumor-derived RNA-Seq-based biomarker assessments are ongoing to investigate associations with clinical benefit from alisertib alone or combined with fulvestrant. Conclusions: Alisertib has shown efficacy and safety across multiple clinical studies in patients with ER+/HER2- MBC and could provide a novel option for treating those who have progressed on endocrine therapy and a CDK 4/6i. These findings provide a strong rationale for further development of alisertib in this patient population. The ongoing phase II ALISCA-Breast1 study (NCT06369285) is investigating the optimal dose of alisertib in combination with standard endocrine therapies in this setting. Citation Format: T. C. Haddad, K. McCann, P. Advani. The Aurora Kinase A Inhibitor Alisertib Alone or in Combination with Endocrine Therapy for Patients with Estrogen Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative (ER+/HER2-) Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-10-03.

Abstract Introduction: Endocrine therapy (ET) is central to treating hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (BC), but its side effects impact adherence and quality of life, especially in patients with metabolic dysfunction. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors offer cardiometabolic benefits, potentially improving inflammation, glycemic control, and physical well-being. However, data on SGLT-2 use in BC patients is scarce. This study is the first to evaluate the real-world effects of SGLT-2 inhibitors on all-cause mortality and ET tolerability in BC patients. Methodology: We conducted a real-world analysis using the TrinetX database, which includes data from 184 million patients in 156 healthcare organizations, to identify BC patients on ET (letrozole, anastrozole, exemestane, tamoxifen) who received SGLT-2 inhibitors vs. those who did not. Patients were grouped by age (≤50 and ≥51 years as a surrogate for menopausal status. Primary outcome: all-cause mortality from the start of the index event, defined as the first day meeting BC diagnosis and ET use, with or without SGLT-2. Secondary endpoint: ET tolerability. Propensity score matching completed by TriNetX adjusted for confounders. Multivariate analysis yielded odds ratios and risk differences with 95% CI. Results: Among 1,136 BC patients ≤50 years, 568 were assigned to each group (SGLT-2 vs non-SGLT-2). For patients ≥51 years (n=28,600), each group included 14,300. Demographics across cohorts were comparable. No mortality benefit was seen in premenopausal patients. In postmenopausal women, SGLT-2 use reduced all-cause mortality—647/13,676 events (SGLT-2) vs 953/13,517 (non-SGLT-2) [OR: 0.655 (0.591-0.726)]. In premenopausal patients, SGLT-2 reduced endometrial cancer risk [RD: -0.018 (-0.029, -0.007)] but increased diarrhea risk [OR: 2.305 (1.078, 4.930)]. No significant differences were found in hot flashes, PE, DVT, depression, osteoporosis, joint pain, fatigue, nausea/vomiting, abdominal pain, or dizziness. Among postmenopausal patients, SGLT-2 reduced PE [OR: 0.757 (0.605-0.948)] and osteoporosis [OR: 0.877 (0.784-0.981)], but increased risks of depression [OR: 1.153 (1.007-1.319)], nausea/vomiting [OR: 1.120 (1.001-1.253)], diarrhea [OR: 1.193 (1.058-1.345)], and dizziness [OR: 1.234 (1.103-1.380)]. No significant differences were found for hot flashes, DVT, EC, joint pain, fatigue, or abdominal pain. Conclusion: This analysis reveals novel evidence supporting the cardiometabolic potential of SGLT-2 inhibitors in hormone receptor-positive BC, particularly postmenopausal populations. These agents were linked to lower all-cause mortality and improved tolerance of specific ET-related effects. However, certain adverse risks require caution. Future prospective studies are essential to validate their role and safety in oncologic care. Citation Format: C. Jones, J. Michalek, E. Obomanu, Y. Arya, A. Syal, S. Haddad, V. Kaklamani, S. Shaikh. Evaluating all-cause mortality and endocrine therapy tolerability with sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: A real-world analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-05-28.