Citations

Background and Aims: Among those with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) is often diagnosed at a late stage and is a leading source of mortality. Detection of pCCA in PSC when curative action can be taken is challenging. Our aim was to create a deep learning model that analyzed MRI to detect early-stage pCCA and compare its diagnostic performance with expert radiologists. Approach and Results: We conducted a multicenter, international, retrospective cohort study involving adults with large duct PSC who underwent contrast-enhanced MRI. Senior abdominal radiologists reviewed the images. All patients with pCCA had early-stage cancer and were registered for liver transplantation. We trained a 3D DenseNet-121 model, a form of deep learning, using MRI images and assessed its performance in a separate test cohort. The study included 398 patients (training cohort n=150; test cohort n=248). pCCA was present in 230 individuals (training cohort n=64; test cohort n=166). In the test cohort, the respective performances of the model compared to the radiologists were: sensitivity 87.9% versus 50.0%, p <0.001; specificity 84.1% versus 100.0%, p <0.001; area under receiving operating curve 86.0% versus 75.0%, p <0.001. Even when a mass was absent, the model had a higher sensitivity for pCCA than radiologists (91.6% vs. 50.6%, p <0.001) and maintained good specificity (84.1%). Conclusions: The 3D DenseNet-121 MRI model effectively detects early-stage pCCA in PSC patients. Compared to expert radiologists, the model missed fewer cases of cancer.

Background: The primary aim of this study was to demonstrate the benefits of topical human platelet exosome extract (HPE) (plated) hair serum for improving hair and scalp health in participants with self-perceived thinning hair. Methods: This single-center, placebo-controlled, double-blind study enrolled 39 healthy men and women 18–65 years of age with self-perceived thinning hair. Participants applied either HPE for 9 months or a topical placebo for 6 months with the option to cross over to HPE at 6 months for an additional 3 months. End points included improvements in the global aesthetic appearance of hair, as assessed by a blinded live evaluator; participant-reported outcomes; hair trichoscopy; and independent physician photograph evaluations. Safety data included monitoring for adverse events. Results: Blinded live evaluator assessments demonstrated statistically significant improvements in the global aesthetic appearance of hair for volume/fullness, density, scalp coverage, and appearance, with all P values less than 0.0001 within the HPE group and statistical improvement over the control at months 3 and 6 for volume/fullness, density, and scalp coverage. Participant-reported outcomes for within-group changes for HPE were statistically significant for all hair health parameters, including density, volume fullness, scalp coverage, scalp health, thickness, amount, quality, color, dryness, strength, and overall health of the hair. Hair trichoscopy analyses were significantly improved from baseline within the HPE group. Independent physician photography review demonstrated greater improvements within the HPE group. No adverse effects were observed. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that topical HPE (plated) hair serum with Renewosome technology significantly improves hair and scalp health and is safe and well tolerated.

Background and Aims: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the performance of UroVysion® FISH based on the different definitions of a positive result used in published literature with the goal of determining the optimal FISH definition for detecting pancreaticobiliary malignancy. Methods: A systematic literature search identified studies from database inception to Sept 2024 that evaluated the diagnostic performance of FISH in determining malignancy among patients with biliary strictures. All thresholds for positive FISH, as defined by the individual study, were included in this review. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the definitions of positive FISH as follows: (1) polysomy only; (2) polysomy, tetrasomy, or trisomy; and (3) polysomy or 9p deletion. Results: Eighteen studies comprising 2516 FISH specimens were analyzed, including 1133 (45.0%) with malignancy. Using a threshold for positivity as defined in individual studies, the overall sensitivity of FISH was 57.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.4–65.4%), and the overall specificity was 87.8% (95% CI, 79.2–93.2%). Subgroup analysis showed that polysomy as the threshold for positive FISH yielded a sensitivity of 49.4% (95% CI, 43.2–55.5%), with an increased specificity of 96.2% (95% CI, 92.7–98.1%), while polysomy + tetrasomy/trisomy as positive FISH resulted in an increased sensitivity of 64.3% (95% CI 55.4–72.2%) but a decreased specificity of 78.9% (95% CI 64.4–88.5%). The addition of 9p deletion to polysomy as the criteria for a positive test resulted in a non-significant increase in sensitivity (54.7% (95% CI 42.4–66.5%) while maintaining specificity (95.1% (95% CI 84.0–98.6%). Conclusions: Based on these findings, polysomy only or polysomy/9p deletion should be considered as the criterion for defining a positive FISH test to improve diagnostic sensitivity while maintaining high specificity.

With longer survival of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) undergoing liver transplantation (LT), the frequency and risk factors associated with vascular and biliary complications in the allograft and the impact on long-term outcomes are poorly understood. To assess frequency and risk factors for long-term outcomes in patients after LT for PSC, all recipients of LT for advanced stage PSC for a non-cholangiocarcinoma indication from 1984 to 2012, with follow-up through March 2022 (>10+ y follow-up), were identified. One-, 5-, and 10-year cumulative risks of complications were estimated using the Aalen-Johansen method, where death was considered a competing risk. Two hundred ninety-three patients (mean age, 47.3 ± 12 y) formed our study cohort. One hundred and thirty-four patients received LT before 1995, and 159 were transplanted after 1995. Over a median (IQR) follow-up of 15.0 (10.3–22.1) years, LT was complicated by hepatic artery thrombosis (N = 30), portal vein stenosis/thrombosis (N = 48), biliary leak (N = 47), biliary strictures (N = 87), recurrent PSC (N=107), and graft failure (N=70). The 1-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year cumulative incidence of recurrent PSC was 1.0%, 8.0%, 23.5%, and 34.3%, respectively. The type of donor and older donor age were associated with an increased risk of biliary strictures. Donor age >60 years was associated with an increased risk of recurrent PSC. Long-term patient and graft survival have not changed significantly for patients transplanted for PSC. Controlling transplant-related factors, such as donor age, prompt identification of vascular and biliary complications early, and long-term rigorous follow-up, is recommended to continue to improve on these outcomes.

Objectives: Determine whether the timing of transplantation affects patient mortality. Background: Neoadjuvant therapy and liver transplantation have emerged as an excellent treatment option for select patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA). However, the optimal timing of transplantation is not known. Methods: We reviewed all patients registered for a standardized pCCA protocol between 1996 and 2020 at our center. After adjusting for confounders, we examined the association of waiting time with patient mortality in an intention-to-treat cohort (n=392) and those who received a liver transplant (n=256). Results: The median (interquartile range) time from registration to transplant or dropout was 5.74 (3.25–7.06) months. Compared with a short wait time (0–3 mo), longer waiting times did not affect all-cause mortality: (3–6 mo) hazard ratio (HR) 0.98; 95% CI: 0.52–1.84; (6–9 mo) HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.39–1.65; (9–12 mo) HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.26–1.22. Subgroups with a shorter waiting time had similar survival to those with long waiting times: living donor available HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.67–1.42; AB or B blood group HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.62–1.39. Longer waiting times were associated with decreased all-cause mortality after transplantation (HR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.87–0.97). This benefit began after a 6-month waiting time minimum (HR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.26–1.10) and increased further after 9 months (HR: 0.43 95% CI: 0.20–0.93). Waiting time was not associated with residual adenocarcinoma in the explant (odds ratio 0.99; 95% CI: 0.98–1.00). Conclusions: A waiting time of at least 6 months will optimize results with transplantation without affecting overall (intention-to-treat) patient survival.

LINKED CONTENTThis article is linked to Trivedi et al paper. To view this article, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17944