Citations

Abstract It is now widely accepted that a spectrum of somatic alterations occur in human cancer and that particular alterations are associated with response or lack of response to anti-cancer therapies. Here, we undertook a systematic correlation analysis of somatic mutations, copy number aberrations and drug response across 300+ human cancer cell lines. We studied the RAF and VEGFR inhibitor, sorafenib, evaluating associations between sorafenib response and somatic mutations in 35 common cancer genes and high-level amplifications and homozygous deletions in more than 100 minimal common regions of gain and loss, which include many known oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Notably, we found that NRAS mutations, among other alterations, were significantly associated with sensitivity to sorafenib (odds ratio = 7, p-value = 0.003), whereas activating BRAF mutations were strongly associated with a lack of response (odds ratio = 4.9, p-value = 0.012). Specifically, 64% (7 of 11) of NRAS mutant cell lines were sensitive to sorafenib, while only 20% (34 of 170) of NRAS wild-type lines were sensitive. On the contrary, just 6.7% (2 of 30) of BRAF mutant lines were sensitive to sorafenib. Because NRAS mutations occur frequently in leukemia and no leukemia cell lines were included in the original analysis, we selected 5 NRAS mutant and 5 NRAS wild-type leukemia cell lines for further evaluation. Consistent with our previous observation, the four most sensitive leukemia cell lines were all NRAS mutant, each line exhibiting greater than 50% growth inhibition after 72 hours of exposure to 4μM sorafenib. These results confirm the original association and suggest that across both solid tumors and hematologic malignancies, NRAS mutations may identify a subset of cancers that are likely to respond sorafenib. In addition, this work demonstrates that systematic analysis of somatic alterations and drug response across a large collection of cancer cell lines is capable of discovering novel predictive biomarkers. Citation Information: Clin Cancer Res 2010;16(7 Suppl):A41

ABSTRACTIntroductionOver the past 20 years our knowledge of premature ejaculation (PE) has significantly advanced. Specifically, we have witnessed substantial progress in understanding the physiology of ejaculation, clarifying the real prevalence of PE in population-based studies, reconceptualizing the definition and diagnostic criterion of the disorder, assessing the psychosocial impact on patients and partners, designing validated diagnostic and outcome measures, proposing new pharmacologic strategies and examining the efficacy, safety and satisfaction of these new and established therapies. Given the abundance of high level research it seemed like an opportune time for the International Society for Sexual Medicine (ISSM) to promulgate an evidenced-based, comprehensive and practical set of clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of PE.AimDevelop clearly worded, practical, evidenced-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of PE for family practice clinicians as well as sexual medicine experts.MethodReview of the literature.ResultsThis article contains the report of the ISSM PE Guidelines Committee. It affirms the ISSM definition of PE and suggests that the prevalence is considerably lower than previously thought. Evidence-based data regarding biological and psychological etiology of PE are presented, as is population-based statistics on normal ejaculatory latency. Brief assessment procedures are delineated and validated diagnostic and treatment questionnaires are reviewed. Finally, the best practices treatment recommendations are presented to guide clinicians, both familiar and unfamiliar with PE, in facilitating treatment of their patients.ConclusionDevelopment of guidelines is an evolutionary process that continually reviews data and incorporates the best new research. We expect that ongoing research will lead to a more complete understanding of the pathophysiology as well as new efficacious and safe treatments for this sexual dysfunction. Therefore, it is strongly recommended that these guidelines be re-evaluated and updated by the ISSM every 4 years.

Abstract Purpose: Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder associated primarily with bilateral schwannomas seen on the superior vestibular branches of the eighth cranial nerves. Significant morbidity can result from surgical treatment of these tumors. Meningiomas, ependymomas, and other benign central nervous system tumors are also common in NF2. The lack of effective treatments for NF2 marks an unmet medical need. Experimental Design: Here, we provide recommendations from a workshop, cochaired by Drs. D. Gareth Evans and Marco Giovannini, of 36 international researchers, physicians, representatives of the biotechnology industry, and patient advocates on how to accelerate progress toward NF2 clinical trials. Results: Workshop participants reached a consensus that, based on current knowledge, the time is right to plan and implement NF2 clinical trials. Obstacles impeding NF2 clinical trials and how to address them were discussed, as well as the candidate therapeutic pipeline for NF2. Conclusions: Both phase 0 and phase II NF2 trials are near-term options for NF2 clinical trials. The number of NF2 patients in the population remains limited, and successful recruitment will require ongoing collaboration efforts between NF2 clinics. (Clin Cancer Res 2009;15(16):5032–9)

Abstract The farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib exhibits modest activity against acute myelogenous leukemia. To build on these results, we examined the effect of combining tipifarnib with other agents. Tipifarnib inhibited signaling downstream of the farnesylated small G protein Rheb and synergistically enhanced etoposide-induced antiproliferative effects in lymphohematopoietic cell lines and acute myelogenous leukemia isolates. We subsequently conducted a phase 1 trial of tipifarnib plus etoposide in adults over 70 years of age who were not candidates for conventional therapy. A total of 84 patients (median age, 77 years) received 224 cycles of oral tipifarnib (300-600 mg twice daily for 14 or 21 days) plus oral etoposide (100-200 mg daily on days 1-3 and 8-10). Dose-limiting toxicities occurred with 21-day tipifarnib. Complete remissions were achieved in 16 of 54 (30%) receiving 14-day tipifarnib versus 5 of 30 (17%) receiving 21-day tipifarnib. Complete remissions occurred in 50% of two 14-day tipifarnib cohorts: 3A (tipifarnib 600, etoposide 100) and 8A (tipifarnib 400, etoposide 200). In vivo, tipifarnib plus etoposide decreased ribosomal S6 protein phosphorylation and increased histone H2AX phosphorylation and apoptosis. Tipifarnib plus etoposide is a promising orally bioavailable regimen that warrants further evaluation in elderly adults who are not candidates for conventional induction chemotherapy. These clinical studies are registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00112853.

Abstract Purpose: According to some studies, susceptibility of cells to anticancer drug-induced apoptosis is markedly inhibited by targeted deletion of genes encoding apoptotic protease activating factor 1 (Apaf-1) or certain caspases. Information about levels of these polypeptides in common cancer cell types and any possible correlation with drug sensitivity in the absence of gene deletion is currently fragmentary. Experimental Design: Immunoblotting was used to estimate levels of Apaf-1 as well as procaspase-2, -3, -6, -7, -8, and -9 in the 60-cell-line panel used for drug screening by the National Cancer Institute. Sensitivity of the same lines to >80,000 compounds was determined with 48-hour sulforhodamine B binding assays. Additional 6-day assays were performed for selected agents. Results: Levels of Apaf-1 and procaspases varied widely. Apaf-1 and procaspase-9, which are implicated in caspase activation after treatment of cells with various anticancer drugs, were detectable in all of the cell lines, with levels of Apaf-1 ranging from ∼1 × 105 to 2 × 106 molecules per cell and procaspase-9 from ∼5 × 103 to ∼1.6 × 105 molecules per cell. Procaspase-8 levels ranged from 1.7 × 105 to 8 × 106 molecules per cell. Procaspase-3, a major effector caspase, varied from undetectable to ∼1.6 × 106 molecules per cell. Correlations between levels of these polypeptides and sensitivity to any of a variety of experimental or conventional antineoplastic agents in either 2-day or 6-day cytotoxicity assays were weak at best. Conclusions: With the exception of caspase-3, all of the components of the core cell-death machinery are expressed in all of the cell lines examined. Despite variations in expression, levels of any one component are not a major determinant of drug sensitivity in these cells in vitro.