Citations

Twelve cases (6 M, 6F; mean age 87.9) with incidental Lewy bodies (no clinical diagnosis of parkinsonism or dementia) had medical histories of supraventricular arrhythmia (6/12), dysphagia (5/12), depression (5/12) and falls (4/12). Standardized movement disorder assessments were performed antemortem on 6 cases. The mean Part III UPDRS score was 7 (range 2–14). Motor findings included kinetic tremor (5/6), rest tremor (3/6), postural instability (3/6), postural tremor (2/6), and voice tremor (2/6). Of these 6 cases one was considered to have a normal movement exam, 2 were diagnosed as essential tremor, and 3 as nonspecific tremor disorder. Mean MMSE score in 7 cases was 26.6 (range 23–30). Medical records review revealed 4/12 cases had cognitive impairment not meeting criteria for dementia. Of these 12 cases, 5 had received standardized cognitive assessments: 3 were categorized as cognitively normal and 2 as mild cognitive impairment. Our series of incidental Lewy body disease cases reveal a range of neurologic findings including tremor and cognitive impairment. Antemortem standardized evaluations suggest there may be early clinical markers for Lewy body disorders. Supported by the State of AZ Department of Health Services, NIA P30 AG19610 and the Prescott Family Parkinson's Initiative: a Partnership of the Michael J. Fox Foundation and the Arizona Parkinson's Disease Consortium.

TPS7569 Background: Progress in genome technology allows analysis of previously completed trials to identify patients subgroups potentially benefiting from therapy. Enzastaurin is a potent inhibitor of protein kinase C beta (PKC- b) and suppresses the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT pathway. The safety and efficacy of Enzastaurin has been tested in more than 60 clinical trials including 2 major studies in DLBCL: (1) PRELUDE (A phase III maintenance trial of Enzastaurin vs Placebo, N=758) ( Crump, 2016), and (2) S028 (A randomized phase II study of Enzastaurin/R-CHOP vs R-CHOP in frontline intermediate/high-risk DLBCL, N=101) ( Hainsworth, 2016). DNA samples extracted from blood of patients from PRELUDE were retrospectively genotyped using whole genome SNP arrays. From the genome wide screening a novel genetic biomarker, DGM1, was identified showing high correlation with response to Enzastaurin treatment ( Luo, ASH 2018). Importantly, these findings were replicated in the phase II S028 study. In the S028 study the hazard ratio (HR) for OS in high-risk (IPI ≥ 3) DGM1 positive (+) patients who received Enzastaurin/R-CHOP was 0.28 (0.1-0.81) when compared to subjects who received R-CHOP, a benefit favoring Enzastaurin (p=0.018). These data suggest that addition of Enzastaurin to R-CHOP may significantly improve outcome in frontline high-risk DGM1 (+) DLBCL. The ENGINE study was initiated to validate this finding in a prospective study. Methods: Adult patients must have untreated CD20+ DLBCL, IPI ≥ 3. Patients are randomized 1:1 to Enzastaurin/R-CHOP or Placebo/R-CHOP for 6 cycles during combination phase. Each subject’s treatment assignment will be unblinded after response assessment at the end of the combination phase. Subjects randomized to the investigational arm who have a complete or partial response will have the option to continue in the single agent phase to receive Enzastaurin for up to 2 additional years. The study intends to enroll approximately 235 patients with primary endpoint of OS in DGM1 (+) patients. The study is ongoing with 51 sites open in the US and China. As of 22 Jan 2019, 70 patients have been randomized. Clinical trial information: NCT03263026.

10058 Background: P-METs remain illusive with standard treatments for STS. AGM-CSF demonstrated tolerability with promising efficacy in reducing P-METS. We evaluated the 2-yr P-MET free rate in chemonaiive pts with extremity STS. Methods: ECOG PS 0/1 and Gr 3/4 primary STS of the limb girdle/extremities, were required. Treatment sequence: 2 cycles of IMAP (Ifosfamide, Mitomycin, Doxorubicin, Cisplatin) plus s.q. GM-CSF (preload d -6 to -3, d1–14); MAP (d0, 28) during irradiation (d1–35) plus AGM-CSF 250 mcg bid (d1–7, 15- 22, 28–35); surgery; post-op irradiation plus AGM-CSF 250 mcg bid (d1–7, 15–22, 28–35, 42–49). 6 of 35 pts with P-METS in ≤ 2 yrs implied lack of efficacy w.r.t. reducing P-METS. Results: 38 eligible pts were enrolled (20 male, median age 51 yrs, 24 PS 0). Median size of tumor 9 cm (2.3–26.7 cm).Location of tumors included: proximal extremity-16, distal extremity-11, and limb girdle-12. 79% received debulking surgery; 29 rendered disease-free. 38 pts are evaluable for toxicity (see table ). More common Gr 3+ events related to treatment appear below. 79% had Gr 4 neutropenia, despite s.q. GM-CSF. 6 pts have died, with 2.5 yrs median follow-up on survivors (range .4- 4.6). No treatment related fatalities occurred. 10 pts had P-METS ≤ 2 yrs. The estimated 2 yr P-MET free rate is 75% (95% CI 62–91). Conclusions: Although high, neutropenia was as expected. AGM-CSF failed to improve the 2 yr P-MET free rate in this group of STS pts. Other strategies need to be explored. Supported by NIH Grant CA15083–32 and Berlex Corporation. Max Severity (Gr 3+) [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

8003 Background: Carfilzomib is a novel, irreversible tetrapeptide proteasome inhibitor derived from the natural product epoxomicin. Carfilzomib was well tolerated in preclinical animal studies when administered on a two-week cycle, QDx5; proteasome inhibition one hour after dosing at the MTD was >80%. Two Phase I dose-escalation studies are ongoing, aimed at determining the safety, tolerability, and biological response to carfilzomib. Methods: Carfilzomib was administered according to two different dose-intensive schedules. In PX-171–001, carfilzomib was administered on a two week cycle, QDx5 with nine days rest; in PX-171–002, carfilzomib was administered on a four week cycle, QDx2 weekly for three weeks with 12 days rest. Eligible patients have multiple myeloma (MM), Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL), Hodgkin's Disease (HD), or Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia (WM). Results: Thus far, a total of 54 subjects have been enrolled. Although the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) has not yet been identified on either study, responses seen on both protocols have established 11 and 15 mg/m2 as the minimal effective doses (MEDs) on PX-171–001 and 002, respectively. Of 3 patients with MM or WM treated on the 001 protocol, one MM patient has had a Partial Response (PR) and one WM patient had a Minimal Response (MR). Of 8 patients with MM treated on the 002 protocol, 3 patients have had PRs. 6 additional patients have had Stable Disease lasting longer than 6 months and symptomatic improvement has been seen in patients on both protocols. 11 subjects remain on study with stable disease or better. Proteasome inhibition in whole blood at the highest dose levels exceeded 80% one hour after the first dose. Carfilzomib has been well tolerated at doses at and above the MED thus far. There has been no incidence of painful peripheral neuropathy on either study. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) have occurred on PX-171–001; one DLT (Gr 4 anemia and thrombocytopenia) was observed at 27 mg/m2 on PX-171–002. Conclusions: Thus far, intensive dosing with carfilzomib is well-tolerated at proteasome inhibition levels of more than 80%. Five responses have been observed, and several subjects have achieved long lasting SD and/or symptomatic improvement. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

174 Background: Docetaxel (D) and cabazitaxel (C) are standard chemotherapies for mCRPC. A reliable biomarker predictive of resistance to D or C is yet to be identified. We aimed to assess the association between genetic amplification of the multidrug resistance transporter ABCB1 (ABCB1 amp) and primary resistance (RES) to D or C for mCRPC, using cfDNA. Methods: A cohort (A) of 136 patients (pts) with at least 1 plasma sample drawn and stored within 1 year prior to starting D for mCRPC (2002-2014) and a cohort (B) of 42 pts with at least 1 plasma sample from within 1 year prior to starting C for mCRPC (2010-2016) were identified from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute IRB approved database. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) at 0.1x coverage, termed ultra-low pass WGS (ULP-WGS), was performed on cfDNA extracted from the selected samples (1000μL/subject) and sequencing data were analyzed using a tool called ichorCNA to identify cases with sufficient tumor DNA content (>7%) for accurate detection of copy number alterations (CNAs) including ABCB1 amp. Primary objective was the association between ABCB1 amp and RES to D or C. RES was defined as lack of response (no PSA50 decline or radiologic response per RECIST criteria 1.1, within 4 months from treatment start). Odds ratio (OR) was used to compare odds of RES to D or C for pts with ABCB1 amp and P-values were calculated by Fisher’s exact test. Results: Of the selected 178 pts, 66 had tumor fraction >7%: 45 pts in cohort A and 21 in cohort B. No significant association was noted between ABCB1 amp and RES to D (P=0.7123; OR=1.600) or C (P=1.000; OR=1.0606). RES was observed in 26 pts (57.8%) of cohort A and 18 (85.7%) of cohort B. ABCB1 amp was found in 9 pts (20%; 95% CI, 9.6-34.6) in group A and 6 of them (66%) had RES to D. ABCB1 amp rate among D-resistant men was 23.1% (95% CI, 9.0-43.7). In group B, 2 pts (9.5%; 95% CI, 1.2-30.4) had ABCB1 amp and both of them had RES to C. ABCB1 rate among C-resistant pts was 11.1% (95% CI, 1.4-34.7). Conclusions: In this study, ABCB1 amp using cfDNA did not show statistically significant correlation with RES to D or C for pts with mCRPC. Future studies including ABCB1 amp in a suite of putative biomarkers and larger sample size may aid drawing definitive conclusions.

AbstractAimsSome patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms have rapid gastric emptying (GE). We aimed to compare patients with normal and rapid GE and to identify phenotypes among patients with rapid GE.MethodsAmong 2798 patients who underwent GE scintigraphy, we compared patients with normal and rapid GE and separately, patients with rapid GE at 1 hour (GE1), 2 hours (GE2), or both (GE12).ResultsIn 2798 patients, GE was normal (74%), delayed (18%), or rapid (8%). Among 211 patients with rapid GE, patterns were rapid GE1 (48%), 2 hours (17%), or 1 and 2 hours (35%); 42 (20%) had diseases that explain rapid GE. A combination of upper and lower gastrointestinal symptoms (54%) was more common that isolated upper (17%) or lower (28%) gastrointestinal symptoms (P < .001). Constipation was more prevalent in patients with rapid GE 2 (72%) than rapid GE 1 (47%) or rapid GE12 hours (67%) (P < .05). Among 179 diabetes mellitus (DM) patients, 15% had rapid GE, which was not associated with the DM phenotype. By multivariable analysis, insulin therapy (odds ratio [OR], 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15‐0.88), and weight loss (OR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.01‐0.78) were associated with a lower risk of rapid than normal GE in DM.ConclusionsEight percent of patients undergoing scintigraphy had rapid GE, which is most frequently associated with upper and lower gastrointestinal symptoms; constipation is common. Insulin therapy and weight loss were associated with a lower risk of rapid than normal GE in DM patients.

AbstractIntroductionAlthough some members of families with autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease mutations learn their mutation status, most do not. How knowledge of mutation status affects clinical disease progression is unknown. This study quantifies the influence of mutation awareness on clinical symptoms, cognition, and biomarkers.MethodsMutation carriers and non‐carriers from the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN) were stratified based on knowledge of mutation status. Rates of change on standard clinical, cognitive, and neuroimaging outcomes were examined.ResultsMutation knowledge had no associations with cognitive decline, clinical progression, amyloid deposition, hippocampal volume, or depression in either carriers or non‐carriers. Carriers who learned their status mid‐study had slightly higher levels of depression and lower cognitive scores.DiscussionKnowledge of mutation status does not affect rates of change on any measured outcome. Learning of status mid‐study may confer short‐term changes in cognitive functioning, or changes in cognition may influence the determination of mutation status.

AbstractClear‐cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) presents challenges to clinical management because of late‐stage detection, treatment resistance, and frequent disease recurrence. Metabolically, ccRCC has a well‐described Warburg effect utilization of glucose, but how this affects complex carbohydrate synthesis and alterations to protein and cell surface glycosylation is poorly defined. Using an imaging mass spectrometry approach, N‐glycosylation patterns and compositional differences were assessed between tumor and nontumor regions of formalin‐fixed clinical ccRCC specimens and tissue microarrays. Regions of normal kidney tissue samples were also evaluated for N‐linked glycan‐based distinctions between cortex, medullar, glomeruli, and proximal tubule features. Most notable was the proximal tubule localized detection of abundant multiantennary N‐glycans with bisecting N‐acetylglucosamine and multziple fucose residues. These glycans are absent in ccRCC tissues, while multiple tumor‐specific N‐glycans were detected with tri‐ and tetra‐antennary structures and varying levels of fucosylation and sialylation. A polycystic kidney disease tissue was also characterized for N‐glycan composition, with specific nonfucosylated glycans detected in the cyst fluid regions. Complementary to the imaging mass spectrometry analyses was an assessment of transcriptomic gene array data focused on the fucosyltransferase gene family and other glycosyltransferase genes. The transcript levels of the FUT3 and FUT6 genes responsible for the enzymes that add fucose to N‐glycan antennae were significantly decreased in all ccRCC tissues relative to matching nontumor tissues. These striking differences in glycosylation associated with ccRCC could lead to new mechanistic insight into the glycobiology underpinning kidney malignancies and suggest the potential for new therapeutic interventions and diagnostic markers.

OBJECTIVE Traditionally, stent-assisted coiling and balloon remodeling have been the primary endovascular treatments for wide-necked intracranial aneurysms with complex morphologies. PulseRider is an aneurysm neck reconstruction device that provides parent vessel protection for aneurysm coiling. The objective of this study was to report early postmarket results with the PulseRider device. METHODS This study was a prospective registry of patients treated with PulseRider at 13 American neurointerventional centers following FDA approval of this device. Data collected included clinical presentation, aneurysm characteristics, treatment details, and perioperative events. Follow-up data included degree of aneurysm occlusion and delayed (> 30 days after the procedure) complications. RESULTS A total of 54 aneurysms were treated, with the same number of PulseRider devices, across 13 centers. Fourteen cases were in off-label locations (7 anterior communicating artery, 6 middle cerebral artery, and 1 A 1 segment anterior cerebral artery aneurysms). The average dome/neck ratio was 1.2. Technical success was achieved in 52 cases (96.2%). Major complications included the following: 3 procedure-related posterior cerebral artery strokes, a device-related intraoperative aneurysm rupture, and a delayed device thrombosis. Immediately postoperative Raymond-Roy occlusion classification (RROC) class 1 was achieved in 21 cases (40.3%), class 2 in 15 (28.8%), and class 3 in 16 cases (30.7%). Additional devices were used in 3 aneurysms. For those patients with 3- or 6-month angiographic follow-up (28 patients), 18 aneurysms (64.2%) were RROC class 1 and 8 (28.5%) were RROC class 2. CONCLUSIONS PulseRider is being used in both on- and off-label cases following FDA approval. The clinical and radiographic outcomes are comparable in real-world experience to the outcomes observed in earlier studies. Further experience is needed with the device to determine its role in the neurointerventionalist’s armamentarium, especially with regard to its off-label use.