Citations

Underlying lung disease, especially asthma, has recently been found to be associated with a higher risk of hospitalization with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the most commonly used controller medications in patients with asthma. It is unclear whether ICS use increases the risk for severe COVID-19 infection. At the current time, asthma organizations are still recommending the continued use of ICS and other asthma medications to minimize the risk of uncontrolled asthma. However, for patients with asthma and who have recovered from COVID-19 infection, the timing of resumption of asthma therapy is equally uncertain. Pulmonary function testing and exhaled oral nitric oxide testing are aerosol-generating procedures and are currently being severely restricted at most health-care facilities. We presented a case of a patient with cough-variant asthma who developed severe COVID-19 associated acute respiratory distress syndrome with the need for intubation and prolonged mechanical ventilation. We highlighted the potential utility of using COVID-19 RNA detection as well as immunoglobulin G antibody testing to help guide the timing of resumption of asthma therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Nonendoscopic Barrett's esophagus (BE) screening may help improve esophageal adenocarcinoma outcomes. We previously demonstrated promising accuracy of methylated DNA markers (MDMs) for the nonendoscopic diagnosis of BE using samples obtained from a capsule sponge-on-string (SOS) device. We aimed to assess the accuracy of these MDMs in an independent cohort using a commercial grade assay. METHODS: BE cases had ≥ 1 cm of circumferential BE with intestinal metaplasia; controls had no endoscopic evidence of BE. The SOS device was withdrawn 8 minutes after swallowing, followed by endoscopy (the criterion standard). Highest performing MDMs from a previous study were blindly assessed on extracted bisulfite-converted DNA by target enrichment long-probe quantitative amplified signal (TELQAS) assays. Optimal MDM combinations were selected and analyzed using random forest modeling with in silico cross-validation. RESULTS: Of 295 patients consented, 268 (91%) swallowed the SOS device; 112 cases and 89 controls met the pre-established inclusion criteria. The median BE length was 6 cm (interquartile range 4–9), and 50% had no dysplasia. The cross-validated sensitivity and specificity of a 5 MDM random forest model were 92% (95% confidence interval 85%–96%) and 94% (95% confidence interval 87%–98%), respectively. Model performance was not affected by age, gender, or smoking history but was influenced by the BE segment length. SOS administration was well tolerated (median [interquartile range] tolerability 2 [0, 4] on 10 scale grading), and 95% preferred SOS over endoscopy. DISCUSSION: Using a minimally invasive molecular approach, MDMs assayed from SOS samples show promise as a safe and accurate nonendoscopic test for BE prediction.

3583 Background: The novel curaxin CBL0137 intercalates into DNA, interfering with histone/DNA binding. Consequent trapping of histone chaperone FACT leads to MYC, NF-kB, and HSF1 inhibition, p53 activation, and an IFN response. CBL0137 shows broad nonclinical antitumor activity (Gasparian et al. Sci Transl Med. 2011; 3(95):95ra74). Methods: This dose-ranging study assessed the CBL0137 maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) and CBL0137 safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy in adults with advanced treatment-refractory solid tumors. CBL0137 was administered IV on Days 1, 8, and 15 of repeated 28-day cycles until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. Doses were escalated using a 3+3 design based on Cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). PK was assessed through 168 hours after Day 1. Efficacy was evaluated every 8 weeks. Results: The study enrolled 83 pts (M/F [n] = 49/34; median [range] age = 64 [33-85] years; ECOG status [n] = 1/2 [32/51]), with cancer types (n) of colorectal (23), prostate (7), glioblastoma (6), liver (6), non-small-cell (5), and others (36) across 17 dose levels from 10 to 700 mg/m2/infusion. Durations of therapy ranged to 24 months. Cycle 1 DLTs (n type) were observed at 240 mg/m2 (1 Gr 3 photosensitivity), 400 mg/m2 (1 Gr 3 anemia), 700 mg/m2 (1 Gr 4 thrombocytopenia, 1 Gr 4 neutropenia/Gr 4 thrombocytopenia), and 650 mg/m2 (1 Gr 3 thrombocytopenia, 1 Gr 4 neutropenia/Gr 3 thrombocytopenia). Nausea and vomiting were successfully prevented with dexamethasone/serotonin antagonists. Photosensitization was effectively managed with sun protection. Peripheral venous thrombosis required central vein infusion in subjects with glioblastoma. PK showed dose-proportional increases in plasma CBL0137 area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), a high mean (range) volume of distribution (Vd) of 1,030 (655-1460) L/m2 consistent with extensive tissue distribution and DNA intercalation, and an average mean (range) half-life (t1/2) of 24.7 (10.3-40.7) hours without dose dependence. The best response was stable disease: 2 pts with liver cancer had tumor control for 9 and 24 months and a maximum tumor regression of 10%; 2 pts with prostate cancer had tumor regressions by 11% and 22%; 1 pt with uterine cancer had a 20% tumor regression. Conclusions: CBL0137 administered IV was generally well tolerated with manageable toxicities The MTD and RP2D were estimated at 540 mg/m2 due to myelosuppressive DLTs. PK were predictable. Preliminary evidence of antitumor activity supports Phase 2 testing. Clinical trial information: NCT01905228 .

AbstractIntroductionSystemic bevacizumab is a novel targeted therapy for severe epistaxis and chronic gastrointestinal bleeding in hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT), but published data are very limited.AimWe conducted a survey‐based study to characterize current treatment practices and physician‐reported safety and effectiveness of systemic bevacizumab for bleeding in (HHT).MethodsA 27‐item survey was sent to physician centre directors of 31 International HHT Centers of Excellence.ResultsResponse rate was 84%. Approximately half of centres had treated >10 HHT patients with systemic bevacizumab for chronic bleeding for a total of 291 patients treated. All centres utilize a 5 mg/kg dose for induction treatment and most administer six doses (range, 4‐8) every 2 weeks. However, maintenance regimens varied considerably between centres. Bevacizumab was highly effective, with 86% reporting significant (>50%) improvement in GI bleeding and/or epistaxis and haemoglobin rise in most patients treated with bevacizumab; 52% reported haemoglobin normalization in most patients. All centres reported adverse event rates <30% and two‐thirds of centres reported adverse event rates <10%. Discontinuation for adverse events or inefficacy was rare. Bleeding severity thresholds for initiation of bevacizumab were highly variable, and it is typically administered by haematologists (76% of centres). Two‐thirds of centres reported obtaining insurance approval for bevacizumab for most or all patients but 48% reported difficulty in obtaining coverage.ConclusionSystemic bevacizumab is widely used to treat bleeding in HHT with excellent physician‐reported effectiveness and safety. There is considerable variation in maintenance treatment practices and thresholds for initiation of bevacizumab among HHT centres.

Background Ang‐(1‐12) is a primary non‐renin dependent substrate for direct tissue angiotensin II (Ang II) formation by chymase. This discovery challenges conventional thinking and explains the large residual risk of cardiovascular events in patients medicated with blockers of the renin angiotensin system (RAS). Here we report the first demonstration of circulating Ang‐(1‐12) as a biomarker of essential hypertension (EH) and cardio‐renal remodeling. Methods The cohort of patients from Olmsted County MN included 52 healthy adult volunteers (21 females), age 54 ± 8 years, and 23 essential hypertensive (EH) patients (14 females) age 61 ± 8 years with systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥140 mm Hg prior to recruitment. Clinical examination, standardized BP measurements, and venous blood were obtained for measurements of plasma concentrations of angiotensinogen (AGT), Ang‐(1‐12), Ang II, aldosterone, renin activity, N‐terminal pro–B‐type natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) and atrial and brain natriuretic peptides (ANP and BNP, respectively). All values are Means ± SD. Data were analyzed by 2‐way ANOVA for sex and hypertension. Results Plasma Ang‐(1‐12) levels in EHs [SBP: 134 ± 14 mm Hg; Ang‐(1‐12): 1,463 ± 446] were higher than normotensives [SBP: 117 ± 13 mm Hg; Ang‐(1‐12): 1,353 ± 379 fmol/mL, hypertension effect: P<0.05], irrespective of sex. Hypertension associated with increases in pulse pressure, PRA, and plasma AGT and NT‐proBNP concentrations (see Figure ). The elevation in circulating NT‐proBNP levels with hypertension was accounted for by a 4.6‐fold increase in hypertensive males (165 ± 134 pg/mL) while the 1.5‐fold rise in plasm NT‐proBNP did reach significance (134 ± 127 pg/mL, p> 0.05). Conclusions We show for the first time that Ang‐(1‐12) circulates in humans and its concentrations are elevated by chronic hypertension. We further demonstrate a sexual dimorphic pattern in hypertensives with respect to NT‐proBNP, the latter a biomarker for cardiac remodeling. Whether this represents a natriuretic system‐related compensatory mechanism, or worsening pathology, due to an elevated noncanonical RAS specific to male hypertensives remains to be studied. Further investigation to fully define the role of Ang‐(1‐12) as a cardiac disease biomarker in a larger, gender and ethnic diverse population and its relationship to hypertension and myocardial structure is warranted. Support or Funding Information Supported by grant HL‐051952 from the NHLBI of the NIH Lines are means ± SD Figure 1

Abstract Risk stratification in Barrett's esophagus may allow aggressive management of those at “high risk” and reduction in surveillance in at “low” risk. Davison et al. report the results of the independent validation of a multibiomarker panel (TissueCypher assay) performed on biopsy tissue, in a case control study. “High-risk” patients progressed 5 times more than those at “low risk.” Sensitivity and specificity for “high-risk” patients were 29% and 86% with a positive predictive value of 23%. A negative predictive value of a “low-risk” score was 96%. These findings may allow more intensive surveillance in those at “high risk.” Despite some limitations, this assay is a potentially major advance in the management of Barrett's esophagus patients without dysplasia.