Ferrario, Carlos M.

The natriuretic peptide system (NPS) and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) function oppositely at multiple levels. While it has long been suspected that angiotensin II (ANGII) may directly suppress NPS activity, no clear evidence to date supports this notion. This study was designed to systematically investigate ANGII–NPS interaction in humans, in vivo, and in vitro. Circulating atrial, b-type, and c-type natriuretic peptides (ANP, BNP, CNP), cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP), and ANGII were simultaneously investigated in 128 human subjects. Prompted hypothesis was validated in vivo to determine the influence of ANGII on ANP actions. The underlying mechanisms were further explored via in vitro approaches. In humans, ANGII demonstrated an inverse relationship with ANP, BNP, and cGMP. In regression models predicting cGMP, adding ANGII levels and the interaction term between ANGII and natriuretic peptides increased the predictive accuracy of the base models constructed with either ANP or BNP, but not CNP. Importantly, stratified correlation analysis further revealed a positive association between cGMP and ANP or BNP only in subjects with low, but not high, ANGII levels. In rats, co-infusion of ANGII even at a physiological dose attenuated cGMP generation mediated by ANP infusion. In vitro, we found the suppressive effect of ANGII on ANP-stimulated cGMP requires the presence of ANGII type-1 (AT1) receptor and mechanistically involves protein kinase C (PKC), as this suppression can be substantially rescued by either valsartan (AT1 blocker) or Go6983 (PKC inhibitor). Using surface plasmon resonance (SPR), we showed ANGII has low binding affinity to the guanylyl cyclase A (GC-A) receptor compared to ANP or BNP. Our study reveals ANGII is a natural suppressor for the cGMP-generating action of GC-A via AT1/PKC dependent manner and highlights the importance of dual-targeting RAAS and NPS in maximizing beneficial properties of natriuretic peptides in cardiovascular protection.

The importance of canonical versus noncanonical mechanisms for the generation of angiotensins remains a major challenge that, in part, is heavily swayed by the relative efficacy of therapies designed to inhibit renin, ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme), or the Ang II (Angiotensin II) receptor. Ang (1–12) (angiotensin [1-12]) is an Ang II forming substrate serving as a source for Ang II–mediated tissue actions. This study identifies for the first time the presence of Ang (1–12) in the blood of 52 normal (22 women) and 19 (13 women) patients with hypertension not receiving antihypertensive medication at the time of the study. Normal subjects of comparable ages and body habitus had similar circulating plasma Ang (1–12) concentrations (women: 2.02±0.62 [SD] ng/mL; men 2.05±0.55 [SD] ng/mL, P >0.05). The higher values of plasma Ang (1–12) concentrations in hypertensive men (2.51±0.49 ng/mL, n=6) and women (2.33±0.63 [SD] ng/mL, n=13) were statistically significant ( P <0.02) and correlated with elevated plasma renin activity, systolic and pulse pressure, and plasma concentrations of NT-proBNP (N-terminal prohormone BNP). The increased plasma Ang (1–12) in patients with hypertension was not mirrored by similar changes in plasma angiotensinogen and Ang II concentrations. The first identification of an age-independent presence of Ang (1–12) in the blood of normotensive subjects and patients with hypertension, irrespective of sex, implicates this non-renin dependent substrate as a source for Ang II production in the blood and its potential contribution to the hypertensive process.

Background Ang‐(1‐12) is a primary non‐renin dependent substrate for direct tissue angiotensin II (Ang II) formation by chymase. This discovery challenges conventional thinking and explains the large residual risk of cardiovascular events in patients medicated with blockers of the renin angiotensin system (RAS). Here we report the first demonstration of circulating Ang‐(1‐12) as a biomarker of essential hypertension (EH) and cardio‐renal remodeling. Methods The cohort of patients from Olmsted County MN included 52 healthy adult volunteers (21 females), age 54 ± 8 years, and 23 essential hypertensive (EH) patients (14 females) age 61 ± 8 years with systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥140 mm Hg prior to recruitment. Clinical examination, standardized BP measurements, and venous blood were obtained for measurements of plasma concentrations of angiotensinogen (AGT), Ang‐(1‐12), Ang II, aldosterone, renin activity, N‐terminal pro–B‐type natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) and atrial and brain natriuretic peptides (ANP and BNP, respectively). All values are Means ± SD. Data were analyzed by 2‐way ANOVA for sex and hypertension. Results Plasma Ang‐(1‐12) levels in EHs [SBP: 134 ± 14 mm Hg; Ang‐(1‐12): 1,463 ± 446] were higher than normotensives [SBP: 117 ± 13 mm Hg; Ang‐(1‐12): 1,353 ± 379 fmol/mL, hypertension effect: P<0.05], irrespective of sex. Hypertension associated with increases in pulse pressure, PRA, and plasma AGT and NT‐proBNP concentrations (see Figure ). The elevation in circulating NT‐proBNP levels with hypertension was accounted for by a 4.6‐fold increase in hypertensive males (165 ± 134 pg/mL) while the 1.5‐fold rise in plasm NT‐proBNP did reach significance (134 ± 127 pg/mL, p> 0.05). Conclusions We show for the first time that Ang‐(1‐12) circulates in humans and its concentrations are elevated by chronic hypertension. We further demonstrate a sexual dimorphic pattern in hypertensives with respect to NT‐proBNP, the latter a biomarker for cardiac remodeling. Whether this represents a natriuretic system‐related compensatory mechanism, or worsening pathology, due to an elevated noncanonical RAS specific to male hypertensives remains to be studied. Further investigation to fully define the role of Ang‐(1‐12) as a cardiac disease biomarker in a larger, gender and ethnic diverse population and its relationship to hypertension and myocardial structure is warranted. Support or Funding Information Supported by grant HL‐051952 from the NHLBI of the NIH Lines are means ± SD Figure 1