Citations

Abstract Abstract 3063 Background: The combination of Cyclophosphamide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (CYBOR-D) is proven to be highly active and effective in multiple myeloma. (Reeder, Leukemia 2009) We aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this regimen in a separate plasma cell neoplasm, AL Amyloidosis. The primary endpoint of this study is hematologic response. Complete hematologic response is defined as normalization of the free light chain ratio with no evidence of a monoclonal protein by immunofixation. Partial hematologic response is defined as a 50% reduction in M-spike or absolute light chain level (Gertz Am J Heme 2006). Methods: We report a series of patients with symptomatic AL Amyloidosis who received treatment with a combination of Bortezomib (1.3mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 every 28 days or 1.5 mg/m2 weekly), Cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2 orally weekly) and Dexamethasone (40 mg weekly). We include patients in this study regardless of autologous bone marrow transplant candidacy or previous treatment history. Results: Fifteen patients with AL amyloidosis received two to six cycles of CYBOR-D. The treatment history, bone marrow transplant candidacy prior to treatment, hematological response, and status of transplant after therapy are shown in table 1. Of note, 8 (53%) had symptomatic cardiac involvement all of whom had elevated levels of both cardiac biomarkers (Troponin T and B-natriuretic peptide). Complete hematological response occurred in 11 patients (73.3%) with partial hematological response in 3 patients (20.0%). One patient (6.6%) did not achieve a partial response but did receive autologous bone marrow transplant after treatment with CYBOR-D. Median time to response was 2 months. Six patients (40%) had objective evidence of kidney response to therapy with a greater than 50% decrease in proteinuria. Conclusions: CYBOR-D produces a rapid and complete hematological response in the majority of patients with AL amyloidosis regardless of previous treatment history or bone marrow transplant candidacy. Overall, it is well tolerated with few side effects that included peripheral neuropathy and infectious complications. Two patients originally determined to be not eligible for transplant improved sufficiently on CYBOR-D to become eligible and then went on to receive autologous bone marrow transplant. The retrospective nature and small sample size limit this study, and prospective, randomized studies are needed to further elucidate the role of this regimen in AL amyloidosis. Disclosures: Stewart: Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria. Fonseca:Amgen: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy; Onyx: Research Funding; Otsuka: Consultancy; Medtronic: Consultancy.

Abstract Abstract 308 Introduction: The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) has previously reported the superior 1 and 2 year survival of Ld versus LD as initial therapy in newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM) (Rajkumar et al Lancet Oncol 2010; 11: 29–37). The 1 year and 2 year OS for Ld vs LD were 96% and 85% vs 88% and 78%, (p < 0.01), respectively. This despite higher ORR in LD vs Ld (79% vs 68%; p = 0.008). The difference in OS was predominantly due to early death in the LD group (5% vs 0.5%; p = 0.003). As a result of this analysis, Ld is now considered the standard of care. However, it should be noted that the majority of these deaths occurred in pts > 65. In this analysis, we evaluated the impact of age on dexamethasone dose intensity and OS. Methods: 445 pts were randomly assigned: 223 to LD and 222 to Ld. Pts were analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis for OS. The pts were analyzed by age in 2 groups: < 65 and > 65 (the age corresponding to transplant eligibility outside the US). The pts > 65 were then further subdivided into >70 and > 75 yrs. Results are expressed as OS probability at 1 and 2 years post randomization. In addition, to eliminate the early death ‘penalty’ in the LD group in the original analysis, a landmark analysis was performed at 4 months. Results: Overall Survival Probability: Intent-to Treat Analysis Overall Survival Probability: 4 month Landmark Analysis Conclusions: As previously reported, OS in the trial at 1 and 2 years was superior with Ld. OS was not superior with LD compared with Ld in any age group despite a higher response rate. This was true even when using a landmark analysis to eliminate the 5% early deaths seen in the first 4 months of treatment. We conclude the following: 1) LD is not definitively superior to Ld in any age group; 2) Given the higher toxicity in the absence of a clear survival benefit with LD, Ld remains the best choice for all ages. This analysis confirms the original opinion that low-dose dexamethasone is the standard of care for all newly diagnosed MM pts, regardless of age. Disclosures: Vesole: Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Centorcor-Ortho-Biotech: Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide for front-line therapy in multiple myeloma. Abonour:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau. Callander:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Fonseca:Amgen: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy; Onyx: Research Funding; Otsuka: Consultancy; Medtronic: Consultancy; Intellikine: Consultancy. Siegel:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract Abstract 1999 Recurrent chromosomal translocations involving the IGH locus are characteristic of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and MALT lymphoma in particular has been pathologically characterized by specific IGH translocations. However, these translocations are present in only a subset of cases, suggesting that additional uncharacterized translocations might exist. In previous studies we characterized the novel t(X;14)(p11.4;q32) translocation in a patient with MALT lymphoma and found that GPR34, an orphan G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR), was highly expressed due to its juxtaposition to the IGHSA2 switch region. Although the t(X;14)(p11;q32) translocation was only identified in one patient, we wanted to determine its expression across a spectrum or normal and malignant lymphoma tissue, as other mechanisms may contribute to overexpression of genes. We measured GPR34 mRNA expression by quantitative PCR in tissue biopsies from a panel of lymphomas. As controls, we also measured GPR34 mRNA expression in normal resting or activated CD19+ B cells, resting and activated CD3+ T cells, and CD14+ monocytes. Expression of GPR34 was significantly increased in MALT (37-fold, n=35), LPL (23-fold, n=23), nodal marginal zone B cell lymphoma (18-fold, n=21), and splenic marginal zone B cell lymphoma (21 fold, n=33) compared to resting CD19+ B cells (n=11). In a gastric MALT lymphoma specimen we detected GPR34 expression at levels similar to the t(X;14)(p11;q32) patient and interphase FISH studies showed an extra intact GPR34 signal, but no translocation involving IGH or GPR34, suggesting that other mechanisms, including gene dosage effect, can upregulate GPR34. The receptor encoded by GPR34 is most similar to the PY2 receptor subfamily of GPCRs and signaling studies suggest that overexpression of GPR34 results in an accumulation of inositol phosphates and MAP-kinase activation. To further characterize the impact of GPR34 overexpression on cell signaling, HeLa cells were transduced with WT GPR34, a signaling deficient GPR34 (GPR34 DRY), or a vector control. To determine if MAPK activity was upregulated, the phosphorylation status of ERK1/2 in GPR34 WT, GPR34 DRY, and vector control cells was analyzed and we found that ERK1/2 was constitutively phosphorylated at higher levels (1.6-fold) in GRP34 WT cells compared to GRR34 DRY or vector control cells. To further explore which signaling pathways were affected by GPR34 overexpression, GPR34 WT or vector control cells were transfected with an AP-1, CRE, NF-kB, E2F, SRE, NFAT, or ISRE- luciferase reporter plasmid. GPR34 expressing cells had increased luciferase activity driven by AP-1 (5.35-fold), CRE (4.7-fold), NF-kB (2.6-fold), and E2F (2.1) when compared to vector control cells. GPR34 DRY was unable to activate these pathways. AP-1 and CRE have been implicated in a large variety of cellular processes, including transformation, and both AP-1 and CRE activity is induced upon activation of MAP kinases. In untreated cells, both AP-1 and CRE activity were significantly higher in GPR34 WT cells compared to GPR34 DRY cells and both AP-1 and CRE luciferase activity was inhibited by the MEK1 inhibitor PD98059, suggesting that activation of these pathways is MAP-kinase dependent. To determine the biologic impact of GRP34 overexpression, the proliferation rates of vector control, GPR34 WT, and GPR34 DRY cells were compared and we found that proliferation of GPR34 WT cells was significantly higher (5.6-fold) than that seen in GPR34 DRY cells. We next tested the effect of the MEK inhibitor on proliferation and saw a dose dependent decrease in proliferation of GPR34 WT expressing cells. These results suggest that GPR34-mediated proliferation is dependent on MAPK. The presence of elevated GPR34 expression in tumors and the increased proliferation mediated by GPR34 suggests that it may have oncogenic potential. We therefore tested the ability of GPR34 WT cells to generate tumors in a tumor colony-forming assay. Only the GRP34 WT cells had the ability to form tumors in soft agar suggesting that overexpression of GPR34 can result in tumor formation. Taken together, our results identify a novel translocation in MALT lymphoma, emphasize a novel role for GPR34 in tumor cell growth, and suggest that MEK inhibitors may be useful in a subset of translocation-harboring or GRP34 high-expressing tumors. Disclosures: Fonseca: Genzyme: Consultancy; Medtronic: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; AMGEN: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Intellikine: Consultancy; Cylene: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; FISH probes prognostication in myeloma: Patents & Royalties.

Abstract Abstract 2406 The outcome for a given CLL patient is difficult to predict. While there are promising models, they require collation of multiple clinical and laboratory parameters, and it remains to be seen whether they will apply to typical CLL patients in the community. To further dissect out explanations for this dramatic clinical heterogeneity, we sought to understand genomic complexity of clonal B-cells as a possible explanation of clinical variability with specific application to genomic complexity as a predictor of therapeutic response and clinical outcome in CLL. Thus we wished to identified global gains and losses of genetic material in order to define copy-number abnormalities (CNA) in 48 clinically progressive CLL patients who were about to be treated on a chemoimmunotherapy protocol. This protocol was previously reported by us (Blood. 109:2007) and had an induction phase with pentostatin (2 mg/m2), cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) and rituximab (375 mg/m2) given every 3 weeks for 6 cycles and then responding patients were followed ever three months until relapse. In order to estimate CNA, we employed array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) using a one-million oligonucleotide probe array format on the leukemic B-cells from the 48 patients entering this trial. In those same patients, the aCGH data were compared to a) FISH detecxtable data using a panel for the common recurring genetic defects seen in CLL and b) to their clinical outcome on this trial. With aCGH we found that 288 CNA were identified (median of 4 per patient; range 0–32) of which 215 were deletions and 73 were gains. The aCGH method identified most of the FISH detected abnormalities with a complete concordance for 17p13.1- deletion (17p-) between aCGH and FISH. We also identified chromosomal gain or loss in ≥6% of the patients on chromosomes 3, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 17. We found that CLL patients with ≥15 CNA had a significantly worse progression free survival (PFS) than patients with <15 CNA (p=0.004)(figure). Patients with ≥15 CNA also had a shorter duration of response than those with <15 CNA (p=0.0726). Of interest, more complex genomic features were found both in patients with a 17p13.1 deletion and in more favorable genetic subtypes such as 13q14.1. Thus, for 5 patients with >15 CNAs the following FISH patterns were seen: +12/13q14.1-x1/13q14.1 -x2, 13q14.1 ×1 (n=2), and 17p13.1 (n=2). In addition, a 17p- by FISH was positively associated with the number of CNA and total deletion size. The odds of having an overall response decreased by 28% (95% CI: 5–55%; p=0.015) with each additional CNA for the 17p13.1- patients. In addition to defining genomic complexity as the total number of CNA for each patient, we also defined complexity as the sum of the lengths of all interstitial chromosomal gains and losses. When defined as the total size of chromosomal gains or losses, genomic complexity was significantly associated with 17p13.1 and worse overall clinical response. In summary, this analysis utilized the global assessment of copy number abnormalities using a high-resolution aCGH platform for clinically progressive CLL patients prior to initiation of their treatment. One outcome was that we found higher genomic complexity was associated with shorter progression-free survival, reduced duration of response and predicted a poor response to treatment. In addition since we did find genomic complexity in more traditionally favorable FISH categories, such as 13q14.1 type defects, this may explain why some of the latter patients do not fare as well as might be expected even with aggressive chemoimmunotherapy approaches. This study adds information on the association between inferior trial response and increasing genetic complexity as CLL progresses. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Pentostatin. Kipps: GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; Memgen: Research Funding; Igenica: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi Aventis: Research Funding; Abbott Laboratories: Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 2877 Poster Board II-853 Background and Objective: In newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients, treatment with lenalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone (RD) was superior to high-dose dexamethasone in terms of both response rates and 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) (Zonder JA et al, Blood 2007;110:77). Preliminary results suggest that the combination lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (Rd) compared to the RD regimen yields significantly better 2-year overall survival (OS) (Rajkumar SV et al, J Clin Oncol 2008;26:8504). The combination of melphalan, prednisone, and lenalidomide (MPR) has been investigated in a phase I/II study showing promising results (Palumbo A et al, J Clin Oncol 2007; 25:4459-4465). The goal of this case –control study was to compare the efficacy and the toxicity of the lenalidomide/dexamethasone (len/dex) combination vs MPR as primary therapy for newly diagnosed elderly MM patients, to determine the additive value of melphalan compared to a regimen of lenalidomide plus corticosteroid. Patients and methods: Data from 51 newly diagnosed MM patients enrolled in Italy in a phase I/II dose-escalating trial, from January to October 2005, with MPR, were analyzed. For comparison of their outcome, 37 patients were identified among newly diagnosed patients seen at the Mayo Clinic from March 2005 to December 2008 who received len/dex as primary therapy and were enrolled in phase II or III trials. Patients treated with MPR received 9 monthly cycles of oral melphalan (doses ranging from 0.18 to 0.25 mg/kg on days 1-4), prednisone (2 mg/kg on days 1-4) and lenalidomide (doses ranging from 5 to 10 mg/day on days 1-21). After 9 cycles, patients started maintenance with lenalidomide alone (10 mg, days 1-21) until relapse or progression. Patients treated with len/dex received oral lenalidomide (25 mg/day, days 1-21) plus dexamethasone, either at low-dose (n=17) (40 mg orally days 1, 8, 15, 22) or at high-dose (n=21) (40 mg orally on days 1-4, 9-12, and 17-20). Treatment was continued until progression, relapse or unacceptable toxicity, or could be stopped at the physician's discretion. Patients (n=13) were allowed to receive transplant if they wished and were deemed eligible. Outcome was analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. The Chi-square or the rank sum tests were used to compare variables. Time-to-event analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and comparisons were determined by the log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazards model. Results: On intention-to-treat analysis, 15.7% versus 23.7% patients, respectively in the MPR and in the len/dex group, (p=0.342) achieved a complete response, and 43.2% vs 47.4%, (p=0.691) achieved at least a very good partial response. Time-to-progression (TTP) (median: 24.7 vs 27.5 in MPR and len/dex groups, respectively; HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.55-1.98; p=0.903), PFS (median: 24.7 vs 27.5 in MPR and len/dex groups, respectively; HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.55-1.92; p=0.926) and OS (2-year OS: 86.2% in MPR group vs 89.1% in len/dex, HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.38-1.98; p=0.730) were not significantly different between the 2 groups. No significant differences in TTP, PFS and OS were reported when MPR patients were compared with the subgroup of patients treated with low-dose dexamethasone plus lenalidomide. Similar results were found when the analysis was restricted to MPR patients and len/dex pair mates receiving lenalidomide plus low/dose dexamethasone, matched according to age and sex, and who did not received transplant. The toxicity profile was different in the two groups. Hematologic grade 3-4 toxicities were more common with MPR compared with len/dex, in particular neutropenia (66.7% vs 21.1%, p < 0.001) and thrombocytopenia (31.4% vs 2.6%, p < 0.001), respectively. Grade 3-4 gastrointestinal events (13.2% vs 2.0%, p= 0.080), thrombotic events (13.2 vs 5.9, p= 0.279) and fatigue (10.5% vs 3.9%, p= 0.395) were more common with len/dex compared with MPR. Conclusion: Results of this case-control study show that both MPR and Rd are efficacious regimens for elderly MM patients. Data need however to be carefully evaluated and randomized control trials are needed to confirm these results. Disclosures: Off Label Use: research drug in combination to standard of care. Kumar:celgene: Research Funding; millenium: Research Funding; bayer: Research Funding; novartis: Research Funding; genzyme: Research Funding. Dispenzieri:celgene: Research Funding. Gertz:celgene: Honoraria; genzyme: Honoraria; millenium: Honoraria; amgen: Honoraria. Lacy:celgene: Research Funding. Musto:celgene: Honoraria. Fonseca:medtronic: Consultancy; genzyme: Consultancy; celgene: Consultancy; amgen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; otsuka: Consultancy. Petrucci:celgene: Honoraria; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria. Greipp:celgene: Research Funding. Boccadoro:jansen Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; pharmion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Palumbo:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria.

Abstract Abstract 2868 Poster Board II-844 Background and Objective: In newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM), the combination of lenalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone (RD) is superior to high-dose dexamethasone (Zonder JA et al, Blood 2007;110:77). Preliminary results show that lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (Rd) has better 2-year overall survival (OS) compared with RD (Rajkumar SV et al, J Clin Oncol 2008;26:8504). The addition of clarithromycin (Biaxin) to lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone (BiRd) has been investigated in a phase II study, demonstrating a high response rate and 2-year OS (Niesvizky R at al, Blood 2008;111:1101-1109). However, the additive value of clarithromycin is not known. No randomized trials have compared Rd versus BiRd, none are planned. The objective of this case–matched study was to compare the efficacy and the toxicity of BiRd vs Rd as initial therapy for newly diagnosed MM. Patients and methods: Data from 72 newly diagnosed MM patients treated at the New York Presbyterian Hospital–Cornell Medical Center, from December 2004 to December 2006, with BiRD, were analyzed. For comparison, an equal number of pair mates were selected among newly diagnosed patients seen at the Mayo Clinic who received Rd, from March 2005 to December 2008. Case matching was performed with respect to age, gender, and transplant status. Patients treated with BiRd received oral lenalidomide (25 mg/day, days 3-21 of cycle 1; days 1-21 of subsequent cycles); dexamethasone (40 mg days 1, 2, 3, 8, 15, 22 of cycle 1; days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each subsequent cycle); clarithromycin (500 mg twice daily, from day 2 of cycle 1). Patients treated with Rd received oral lenalidomide (25 mg/day, days 1-21) plus low-dose dexamethasone (40 mg days 1, 8, 15, 22). In both groups patients were allowed to discontinue treatment to pursue transplant, but treatment until progression, relapse or unacceptable toxicity was permitted at the physician's discretion. Outcome was analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. The Chi-square or the rank sum tests were used to compare variables. Time-to-event analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method; comparisons were determined by the log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Median duration of treatment was 11.8 months in the BiRd group vs 6 months in the Rd group. On intention-to-treat analysis, complete response was significantly higher with BiRd compared to Rd (45.8% vs 13.9%, respectively, p<0.001); similarly very good partial response (VGPR) or better was higher with BiRd (73.6% vs 33.3%, p<0.001). Rates of VGPR or better, after 6 months and 1 year of therapy, were significantly higher in BiRd patients. Both time-to-progression (TTP) (median 48.3 months vs 27.5 months; HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.25-1.06; p=0.071) and PFS (median 48.3 months vs 27.5 months, HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.25-0.98; p=0.044) were higher with BiRd. Median time to next treatment (TTNT) was not reached in BiRd group compared to 29.9 months in Rd patients (HR 0.37 95% CI 0.20-0.66, p<0.001). There was a trend toward better OS with BiRd, (3-year OS: 89.7% vs 73.0%), but the difference was not statistically significant (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.17-1.37; p=0.170). Thirty-two patients in each group received transplant; median time to transplant was longer in BiRd group (13.5 vs 5.9 months). Results of survival, for patients who received transplant and patients who did not, were similar to those of the total population. On subset analysis, among patients presenting with International Staging System (ISS) stage I/II at diagnosis, TTP, PFS and TTNT were significantly longer in BiRd patients; no significant differences were found among patients with ISS stage III. Main grade 3-4 toxicities of BiRd were hematological, in particular thrombocytopenia (23.6% vs 8.3%, p=0.012); rate of neutropenia was similar between the 2 groups (19.4% vs 16.7%, p=0.665). Infections (16.7% vs 9.7%, p=0.218) and dermatological toxicity (12.5% vs 4.2%, p=0.129) were higher in patients who received Rd. Rate of venous thromboembolism was similar in the 2 groups (9.7% vs 12.5%, respectively in Rd and BiRd patients, p=0.596). Conclusion: Results of this case-control analysis suggest superiority of BiRd in terms of response rate and survival, compared with Rd, and suggest that there may be a significant additive value when clarithromycin is added to Rd. These data indicate the need for randomized prospective phase III studies to evaluate BiRd versus Rd in the treatment of MM. Disclosures: Off Label Use: research drug in combination to standard of care. Kumar:celgene: Research Funding; millenium: Research Funding; bayer: Research Funding; novartis: Research Funding; genzyme: Research Funding. Mark:celgene: Research Funding. Dispenzieri:celgene: Research Funding. Gertz:celgene: Honoraria; genzime: Honoraria; millenium: Honoraria; amgen: Honoraria. Leonard:celgene: Consultancy. Lacy:celgene: Research Funding. Witzig:celgene: Research Funding. Fonseca:medtronic: Consultancy; genzyme: Consultancy; celgene: Consultancy; amgen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; otsuka: Consultancy. Greipp:celgene: Research Funding. Niesvizky:celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Proteolix: Research Funding, data monitoring committee.

Abstract Background: MM is an incurable disease with an anticipated overall survival ranging from months to decades. Novel therapies like bortezomib have activity in both the relapsed/refractory and up front settings. There are sparse data on whether novel therapies may overcome high risk features. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed high-risk myeloma (beta-2 microglobulin [B2M] >= 5.5., plasma cell labeling index [PCLI] >= 1, or deletion 13q) were eligible. Patients were treated with bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 day 1, 4, 8, and 11 every 21 days for 8 cycles as induction. After induction, patients received bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 every other week indefinitely. Patients relapsing on maintenance schedule resumed full induction schedule. Responses were defined by the EBMT criteria. The primary end-point was the response rate (90% power to detect a response rate of >=50% ). Results: Between March 15, 2004 and March 10, 2005, 44 patients enrolled. Among the 43 eligible patients, median age was 63; 51% were male. All had high risk disease: deletion 13q (6/41); PCLI >=1% (17/33); t(4:14) (4/27) and B2M >= 5.5 (34/43). Response data are available for 37 of the 43 eligible patients. The overall response rate was 49% (95% CI: 0.32, 0.66) (0 patients with CR, 1 VGPR, 15 PR, 2 MR, and 11 inevaluable). The response rate allowing for use of serum monoclonal protein levels when a measurable urine monoclonal protein was unavailable at follow-up was 59.5% (1 patient with CR, 1 VGPR, 18 PR, 2 MR, and 6 inevaluable). The median progression free survival is 9.4 months. Thirty-three percent of patients completed the 8 cycles of planned induction therapy and moved to maintenance. Reasons for discontinuing therapy have included progression or death (n=18), adverse events (n=6), and other (n=14). Only 12% of patients remain on active therapy: 0% of deletion 13q patients; 25% of t(4:14) and 12% each of high B2M and high PCLI patients. Of the 14 patients who entered the maintenance phase of treatment, 3 have progressed. Of these 3, 2 took re-induction, and neither responded. Median time to progression for those entering maintenance was12.4 months from the time of starting maintenance. The most common adverse events of grade 3 or higher included neutropenia (33%), diarrhea (31%), hyponatremia (21%), anemia (19%), thrombocytopenia (16%), fatigue (14%). Grade 1–2 sensory peripheral neuropathy occurred in 53% of patients, with only 2% having grade 3 sensory neuropathy. One patient had grade 3 peripheral neuropathy. One patient died after receiving 2 doses of protocol treatment due to heart block and asystole. Updated results on the full study population will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: In high risk patients, upfront bortezomib appears to result in comparable response rates to those reported for unselected cohorts of newly diagnosed myeloma patients. Continued follow-up of these patients will provide information about whether this will translate into better overall outcomes. Figure Figure

Previously, we have shown that centrosome amplification is common in multiple myeloma and is already present in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), suggesting an early role in myelomagenesis. In addition, we derived a gene expression based centrosome index (CI) that correlated closely with centrosome amplification detected by immunofluorescence. We also showed in a heterogeneously treated and relatively small cohort of patients that the CI is an independent prognostic factor. In this study, we validated the prognostic significance of a gene expression based centrosome index (CI) in 2 large cohorts of homogenously treated myeloma patients entered into clinical trials. Cohort 1 consisted of newly diagnosed patients from the University of Arkansas for Medical Science (UAMS) entered treated with total therapy II. These patients have gene expression profiling performed on purified CD138+ plasma cells from pre-treatment bone marrow cells using the Affymetrix U133plus chip (data available from Gene Expression Omnibus). Cohort 2 consisted of relapsed or refractory patients entered into bortezomib trials. These patients have GEP performed on purified CD138+ PCs using the Affymetrix U133A and B chip as part of a pharmacogenomics study (data kindly provided by Millenium Pharmaceuticals). Expression values extracted using the MAS 5.0 software are log-transformed, median centered and analyzed using Genespring 7.0 (Agilent Technologies). Survival is calculated from date of entry into trial till death in both cohorts. In the UAMS dataset, a high CI is significantly associated with shorter survival and emerged as an independent prognostic factor with t(4;14) (detected by spike FGFR3/MMSET expression) when entered into a multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis (other variables entered included CKS1B expression above median and elevated gene expression based proliferation index, both of which were significantly associated with shorter survival on univariate but not multivariate analysis). In the bortezomib cohort, a high CI is again significantly associated with shorter survival, and this effect is independent of response to bortezomib. Therefore, a high CI is a powerful independent prognostic factor in both newly diagnosed and relapsed patients even in patients treated by intensive therapy (total therapy II) and novel agents (bortezomib). We next compared the gene expression profiles of tumors with high and low CI, to define the molecular phenotype of these aggressive tumors and identify possible novel therapeutic targets. Tumors with high CI over-expressed genes coding for proteins associated with the centrosome (TUBG1, CETN2, TACC3, NEK2, PRKRA, STK6, AURKB and PLK4), cell cycle (CCNB1, CCNB2, CCND2, E2F2, CDC gene family, CDK5, CDK6, CDKN2C), proliferation (RAN, CKS1B, TOP2A, TTK, TYMS, MCM gene family, ASPM), involve in DNA repair / G2 cell cycle checkpoints (BRCA1, CHEK1, CHEK2, MAD2L1, BUB1, BUB1B, FANCD2, REV1L), kinetochore and microtubule attachment (AURKB, BIRC5, CENPA, CENPE, CENPH, ZWINT), genes coding for cancer testis antigens (GAGE and MAGE family) and implicated in other cancer (PTP4A3, EZH2). Consistent with this, the most significantly associated Gene Ontology biological process are cell cycle, mitosis, proliferation, DNA repair, microtubule related In particular, aurora kinases are significantly over-expressed in patients with high CI and may represent novel therapeutic targets in these patients with very poor prognosis.

Abstract The study of genomic aberrations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has yielded critical information, now routinely used for the prognostication of patients. An unbiased search for genome wide areas of copy number change is needed to identify possible primary genetic events in CLL and to elucidate their relationship to other known cytogenetic factors, such as deletions of 13q14, 11q23 and 17p13 and trisomy 12. Here we report on a study where we used a 60-mer oligo array-based Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH, 44B platform from Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA). We observed the most common genetic aberrations in CLL and in similar frequencies as would be predicted for CLL (e.g. 44% showing deletions of chromosome 13q14). Among those patients, 45% had no apparent other aberration. Of great interest, small bi-allelic deletions of chromosome 13, which predominantly involved the DLEU1 and DLEU2 locus, were detected in 4 patients (16%). Deletions of 11q23 were observed in 6 cases (24%), and while some involved the ATM locus one did not, casting doubt on the precise gene deregulated by these deletions. Large deletions of the whole 17p-arm were detected in three cases (12%). Trisomy 12 was present in only two cases (8%). No other trisomies were detected and also small regions of copy gain were uncommon. Monosomy of chromosomes 19, X and Y were present in three separate cases. Large deletions of chromosome 2p were seen in two cases, but an additional case had a small deletion involving the ALK gene. This case also had a breakpoint at chromosome 5 involving the NMP1 locus, suggestive of a t(2;5). A recent study (Mayr et al., Blood 2006) indicates that chromosomal translocations in CLL are present in 33% and were associated with a dismal prognosis. In our analysis we detected several breakpoints indicative of translocations. Detailed study is necessary to elucidate possible molecular events associated with these translocations. Other small regions of DNA copy loss were found at several locations throughout the genome. Regions of interest are shown in the table. In summary we show that multiple areas of recurrent genomic gain and loss can be identified in clonal cells of CLL and should lead to further insights into the understanding of disease pathogenesis. Chromosome Location Gene(s) of interest Loss 6q24.3 LATS Loss 10q23.3 LG11 Loss 10q24.2 PAX2, WNT8B, TLX1, POLL, NFKB2 Loss 11p15.4 PPFIBP2 Loss 12p13 TNFRSF1A and 7 Loss 15q22.1 TCF12 Loss 19p13.3 BAX, RUVBL2 Loss 20q11.2 TP53INP2 Loss 20q13.1 WFDC13

Abstract Background: An abnormal free light chain (FLC) indicating the presence of excess monoclonal FLC is associated with an increased risk of progression of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) to multiple myeloma (MM) or related disorder. In addition, the risk of progression rises with increasingly abnormal FLC ratio, suggesting that the mechanism for markedly abnormal FLC ratios may be different compared to ratios closer to normal range. We hypothesized that as in light chain MM (in which IgH expression is completely lost), a more markedly abnormal FLC ratio is a marker for IgH translocations (TCs) involving 14q32. We tested this hypothesis using data obtained from gene expression profiling (GEP) to identify the presence of specific IgH TCs and correlating them to serum FLC ratio. Methods: We examined data from 128 GEPs from pts with MM (92), smoldering MM (13), MGUS (9) and primary amyloidosis (14). Presence of IgH translocations were identified using the specific probes for the partner chromosome TC sites, namely FGFR3/MMSET (4p16), cyclin D3 (6p21), cyclin D1 (11q13), c-maf (16q23), and mafB (20q12) as previously described. FLC estimation was carried out on stored serum samples from these patients using the serum FLC assay (FreeliteH, The Binding Site Limited, UK) performed on a Dade-Behring Nephelometer. Based on the established reference range, kappa/lambda FLC ratio <0.26 or >1.65 were defined as abnormal indicating the presence of monoclonal lambda and kappa FLC, respectively. The monoclonal LC isotype was considered the involved FLC isotype, and the opposite LC type as the uninvolved FLC type. Differential expression of genes was examined using Genespring 7.2 software. Results: Among the 92 pts with MM, 36 (42%) had evidence of one of the 5 primary IgH TCs: 20 pts with 11q13 (22%), 7 pts with 4p16 (8%), 4 pts with16q23 (4%), 3 pts with 20q12 (3%), and 2 patients with 6p21 (2%). Among the 11 pts with MM with an FLC ratio of > 1000, 8 (72%) had an IgH TC. The proportion of pts with an FLC ratio >1000 was significantly higher in pts with an IgH TCcompared to those without, 22% vs 5% respectively, P=0.02. The mean FLC ratio was 1728 (range; 1.6 to 31,008) in patients with an IgH TC vs. 412 (1–11340) for those without IgH TCs, P=0.09. Similarly in pts with MGUS, SMM or AL all three pts with a ratio > 50 had evidence of an IgH translocation. compared to 14/33 with lower ratio. The mean FLC ratio was 29 (range;1 to 209) in pts with an IgH TC vs. 9.1 (1–41) for those without IgH TCs, P=0.1. We correlated the results of FISH tests where available (122 of 128 pts) to determine the ability of GEP to identify IgH TCs. IgH translocation identified by the GEP could be detected on FISH in 42 of 47 patients (89%). Correspondingly, 61 of 75 patients (81%) without an IgH translocation on GEP had a similar result by FISH as well. We compared the GEP of MM pts with FLC ratio of >500 to the rest and identified 34 genes which were 2 fold differentially expressed between the two groups. Conclusion: By combining GEP data and serum FLC measurements, we show that very high FLC ratios is associated with IgH translocations. However, the correlation is not absolute, likely reflecting that markedly abnormal FLC ratios may be mediated through other mechanisms including increasing tumor load. To further explore this we analyzed differentially expressed genes between patients with high and low ratios and identified a set of 34 genes, which are currently being studied further.