Citations

Background: Telemedical physician triage (TPT) is a potential application of telemedicine in the emergency department (ED). We report the technical success, patient satisfaction, and effect on ED throughput metrics (length of stay [LOS] and time to physician evaluation [TPE]) of TPT performed on a mobile platform. Materials and Methods: Patients underwent standard nursing triage with or without TPT. Technical success is reported as raw data. Patient satisfaction is reported as raw data±standard deviation on a 5-point (low-to-high) scale. LOS and TPE are reported as mean±SD [95% CI] values. Statistical analyses of LOS and TPE are via two-sample t test. Results: One hundred six patients were registered during intervention periods, and TPT was completed in 36 (34%). One hundred ninety-six patients were registered during control periods. The technical success rate was 95%. Average patient satisfaction was 4.7 on a 5-point scale. The primary analysis (106 patients) showed no change in LOS (266±101 [244–288] min versus 258±172 [234–282] min) but a trend toward improved TPE with TPT (35±28 [29–41] min versus 42±31 [38–46] min) ( p =0.052). A secondary analysis (36 patients) showed no change in LOS (273±125 [231–316] min versus 258±172 [234–282] min) but improved TPE with TPT (16±15 [11–21] min versus 42±31 [38–46] min) ( p <0.0001). Conclusions: TPT in the ED on a mobile platform was technically successful, well accepted by patients, and associated with a decrease in TPE but not LOS.

Islet amyloid derived from islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP) is a well-recognized feature of type II diabetes. However, the mechanism of islet amyloidogenesis is unknown. In vitro studies suggest that amino acid residues 20–29 in human, but not mouse, IAPP confer amyloidogenicity consistent with the absence of spontaneous islet amyloidosis in mice. Several clinical and in vitro studies suggest that increased synthetic rates of IAPP predispose to IAPP-amyloidosis. In the present study, we sought to test the hypothesis that pharmacological induction of insulin resistance in a mouse transgenic (TG) for human IAPP would induce islet amyloid and β-cell dysfunction. TG and non-transgenic (N-TG) control mice were treated with both rat growth hormone (12 μg/day) and dexamethasone (0.24 mg/day) (dex/GH) or received no treatment for 4 weeks, after which animals were killed to examine islet morphology. Treatment with dex/GH caused hyperglycemia (7.3 ± 0.4 vs. 5.2 ± 0.1 mmol/l, TG vs. N-TG, P &lt; 0.001) associated with a decreased plasma insulin concentration (595 ± 51 vs. 996 ± 100 pmol/1, TG vs. N-TG, P &lt; 0.05) in TG versus control mice. Islet amyloid was induced in treated TG mice but not in control mice. Islet amyloid was identified in both intra- and extracellular deposits, the former being associated with evidence of β-cell degeneration. We conclude that dex/GH treatment in mice TG for human IAPP induces IAPP-derived islet amyloid, hyperglycemia, and islet dysfunction. The present model recapitulates the islet morphology and phenotype of type II diabetes.

Although sulfonylureas enhance insulin secretion, it is unknown whether these hypoglycemic chemicals stimulate insulin secretion through the augmentation of the pulsatile or basal modes of insulin release. Enhanced pulsatile insulin could occur in turn through amplification of the burst mass or an increase in burst frequency. To address the mechanism of sulfonylurea action, we employed a recently validated canine model with a portal vein sampling catheter and flow probe to measure pulsatile insulin secretion in vivo directly in response to tolbutamide infusion or ingestion. After a 16-h fast, seven dogs were studied in the postabsorptive basal state and during a tolbutamide (0.2 mg/min) infusion when their plasma glucose concentrations were clamped at euglycemia. Insulin concentrations in the carotid artery (basal vs. tolbutamide, 85 ± 12 vs. 325 ± 66 pmol/l; P &lt; 0.01) and portal vein (basal vs. tolbutamide, 345 ± 55 vs. 1,288 ± 230 pmol/l; P &lt; 0.01) increased during tolbutamide infusion, but the portal vein plasma flow did not change. Increased plasma insulin concentrations were achieved by a fourfold increase in the total insulin secretion rate (2.3 ± 0.2 to 9.4 ± 1.9 pmol · kg−1 · min−1; basal vs. tolbutamide, P &lt; 0.01). The augmented total insulin secretion was achieved mechanistically via a marked and selective increase in the insulin secretory burst mass (basal vs. tolbutamide, 266 ± 64 vs. 817 ± 144 pmol/pulse; P &lt; 0.01), with no change in portal-vein insulin pulse frequency (basal vs. tolbutamide, 10.1 ± 0.6 vs. 11.1 ± 0.8 pulses/h; P = 0.3). Oral (250 mg) tolbutamide also magnified the endogenous insulin secretion rate by the preferential amplification of the secretory pulse mass (basal vs. tolbutamide, 167 ± 37 vs. 362 ± 50 pmol/pulse; P &lt; 0.01). Neither the infusion nor the ingestion of tolbutamide changed the calculated clearance rates of endogenously secreted insulin. We conclude that sulfonylurea (tolbutamide) induced insulin secretion in vivo is achieved by the highly selective amplification of insulin secretory burst mass with no change in basal insulin release or the frequency of the β-cell-network pacemaker.

In the present studies, we used a recently validated canine model to determine 1) if glucose ingestion stimulates insulin secretion by amplifying the pulsatile component of insulin release, and if so, 2) whether this effect is achieved preferentially through burst mass or frequency modulation, and 3) if the mechanism of incretin effect of insulin secretion is mediated via the pulsatile mode of secretion. We report that 30 g of glucose ingestion stimulates an ∼ 550% increase in the overall rate of insulin secretion (1.8 ± 0.2 to 11.6 ± 1.5 pmol.kg−1 · min−1), which is achieved via an ∼ 400% increase in the mass of insulin secreted per burst (202 ± 38 to 1,003 ± 147 pmol/pulse, P &lt; 0.001) and a ∼ 40% increase in burst frequency (8.7 ± 0.5 to 12.3 ± 0.6 pulse/h, P &lt; 0.001). Of the insulin secreted after glucose ingestion, 68% (±4) was released in discrete secretory bursts. Further analyses showed that the incretin effect of ingested (GPO) versus infused glucose (GIV) is achieved through regulation of pulsatile insulin secretion. Glucose ingestion led to an ∼ 70% greater rate of insulin secretion than intravenous glucose delivery (10.0 ± 1.6 vs. 5.9 ± 0.9 pmol.kg−1 · min−1, P &lt; 0.005, GPO vs. GIV). This incretin effect was achieved by the specific mechanism of an ∼ 70% greater pulse mass (930 ± 196 vs. 558 ± 97 pmol/pulse, P &lt; 0.02, GPO vs. GIV) but with a comparable pulse frequency (13.1 ± 0.9 vs. 12.0 ± 0.5 pulses/h, P = 0.14, n = 9 dogs, GPO vs. GIV). We conclude that in vivo glucose regulates overall insulin secretion almost exclusively by amplification of the pulsatile mode of insulin secretion, and that the incretin effect is achieved by preferential enhancement of insulin secretory burst mass.

Amyloid deposits that characteristically form in the pancreatic islets of patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and in insulinomas are both derived from islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP). Evidence from previous studies has suggested that deposition of IAPP-derived amyloid is related to inherent amyloidogenic sequences present within normal human IAPP, together with an increased production and local concentration of IAPP. However, whether the aggregation of IAPP to form amyloid fibrils is primarily an intra- or extracellular event is not clear. To address this question, we studied 20 human insulinomas by light and electron microscopy. By light microscopy, amyloid deposits were demonstrated in 13 of 20 (65%) human insulinomas. Furthermore, evaluation of Congo red-stained tumor sections showed small, globular or irregular, congophilic amyloid deposits within the cytoplasm of many tumor cells in 10 of 13 (77%) amyloid-containing insulinomas. Dense, punctate areas of IAPP immunoreactivity within tumor cells corresponded with the congophilic intracellular deposits. Ubiquitin immunoreactivity also was observed as punctate intracellular labeling and within large extracellular amyloid deposits. Among the 10 insulinomas available for electron microscopic evaluation, pathological IAPP-immunoreactive (immunogold) deposits were found in 3 of 5 insulinomas in which amyloid was demonstrated by light microscopy and in none of 5 tumors found negative for amyloid by light microscopy. Morphology of IAPP-immunoreactive deposits varied from those with the classical distinct 7- to 10-nm diameter nonbranching fibrils to those with distinct but faint fibrillarity to those without discernable fibrils. In each of the 3 tumors with ultrastructurally demonstrable amyloid deposits, intracellular aggregates of IAPP-immunoreactive amyloid fibrils were observed either free in the cytoplasmic matrix or in membrane-bound structures. Intracellular IAPP-immunoreactive deposits were up to 10 urn in the greatest dimension. Free intracellular aggregates of amyloid fibrils sometimes contained degenerating secretory vesicles and fragments of membranous organelles. These observations suggest that IAPP-derived amyloid deposits are initially formed intracellularly and are subsequently released to the extracellular space by exocytosis of the membrane-bound structures and/or after necrosis of the tumor cells. Our observations raise the possibility that IAPP-derived islet amyloid deposits (characteristically present in NIODM patients) also may be initially formed within the cytoplasm of β-cells, thus leading to β-cell necrosis and a reduction of β-cell mass as seen in NIDDM.

Excessive amounts of glucose enter the systemic circulation when patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) eat a carbohydrate-containing meal. To determine the contribution of hepatic glucose cycling (defined as the net effect of glucose/glucose-6-phosphate cycling and uptake and release of glucose from hepatic glycogen) to postprandial hyperglycemia, diabetic, glucose-intolerant, and nondiabetic subjects were fed mixed meals. The meal contained both [2-3H]glucose (an isotope that is extensively detritiated during hepatic glucose cycling) and [6-3H]glucose (an isotope that is not detritiated during hepatic glucose cycling). Of the 50 g of carbohydrate contained in the meal, ∼4–8 g underwent hepatic glucose cycling. Although total cycling of ingested glucose did not differ between diabetic, glucose-intolerant, and nondiabetic subjects (361 ± 67 vs. 494 ± 106 vs. 322 ± 44 μmol · kg−1 · 5 h−1, respectively), the data suggested that hepatic cycling was increased in the diabetic and glucose-intolerant individuals but not in the nondiabetic subjects during the first 2 h after eating. Hepatic cycling during the first 2 h after eating was correlated with the prevailing glucagon concentration (r = 0.6, P &lt; 0.01) and increased (P &lt; 0.05) as hepatic glucose release increased. Hepatic glucose cycling had a marked effect on the measurement of so-called initial splanchnic glucose uptake. Nevertheless, however measured, initial splanchnic glucose uptake was not decreased and, if anything, was increased in diabetic and glucose-intolerant patients. Integrated postprandial hepatic glucose release increased (r &lt; 0.01) with the severity of fasting hyperglycemia. These results indicate that postprandial hyperglycemia in diabetic and glucose-intolerant patients is not due to enhanced hepatic glucose cycling or a lack of uptake of ingested glucose by the splanchnic bed but rather to excessive release of glucose by the liver coupled with a failure of extrahepatic tissues to appropriately increase glucose disposal.

It is well established that patients with non-insulindependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) are resistant to insulin. However, the contribution of hepatic and extrahepatic tissues to insulin resistance remains controversial. The uncertainty may be at least in part due to errors introduced by the unknowing use in previous studies of impure isotopes to measure glucose turnover. To determine hepatic and extrahepatic responses to insulin in the absence of these errors, steady-state glucose turnover was measured simultaneously with [6-3H]- and [6-14C]glucose during sequential 5- and 4-h infusions of insulin at rates of 0.4 and 10 mil · kg−1 · min−1 in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects. At low insulin concentrations, [6-3H]- and [6-14C]glucose gave similar estimates of glucose turnover. Hepatic glucose release was equal to but not below zero in the nondiabetic subjects, but persistent glucose release (P &lt; 0.001) and decreased glucose uptake (P &lt; 0.001) was observed in the diabetic patients. At high insulin concentrations, both isotopes underestimated glucose turnover during the 1st h after initiation of the highdose insulin infusion. More time (P &lt; 0.05) was required to reachieve steady state in NIDDM than nondiabetic subjects. At steady state, [6-3H] but not [6-14C]glucose systematically underestimated (P &lt; 0.05) glucose turnover in both groups due to the presence of a tritiated nonglucose contaminant. The percentage of radioactivity in plasma due to tritiated contaminants was linearly related to turnover. When plasma [6-3H]glucose specific activity was corrected for the presence of the contaminant in each subject, both [6-3H]- and [6-14C]glucose indicated that diabetic patients had hepatic and extrahepatic insulin resistance. We conclude that in these experiments, although the presence of a low percentage of tritiated nonglucose contaminant in the tracer may alter estimates of the severity of hepatic and extrahepatic insulin resistance in patients with NIDDM, it does not obscure their presence

The importance of portal insulin delivery in the regulation of postprandial carbohydrate metabolism is uncertain. To address this question, three groups of dogs were studied: one group in which pancreatic venous drainage was transected and reanastomosed (portal insulin delivery), one in which the pancreatic drainage was transected and anastomosed to the inferior vena cava (peripheral insulin delivery), and one that received only a sham operation. Plasma insulin was greater (P &lt; 0.05) during peripheral insulin delivery than in either the portal or sham groups, respectively, before and after meal ingestion. On the other hand, C-peptide concentrations did not differ between groups, resulting in a higher (P &lt; 0.001) insulin to C-peptide ratio in the peripheral group. This indicated that the hyperinsulinemia in the peripheral group was due to decreased insulin clearance rather than increased insulin secretion. Isotopically determined splanchnic uptake of ingested glucose, postprandial suppression of hepatic glucose release, incorporation of CO2 into glucose (a qualitative measure of gluconeogenesis), and total-body glucose uptake were virtually identical in all groups. Similarly, plasma lipid, β-hydroxybutyrate, and lactate concentrations did not differ between groups. Our data indicate that, despite differences in systemic insulin concentration, portal and peripheral insulin delivery comparably regulate hepatic and extrahepatic carbohydrate metabolism after meal ingestion.

Insulin-stimulated glucose oxidation is decreased in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). It is not known whether this decrease is due to a primary defect in the oxidative pathway or is secondary to impaired glucose transport and/or phosphorylation. To address this issue, glucose oxidation was measured under steady-state conditions at low (∼270 pmol) and high (∼17 μmol) insulin concentrations in seven patients with NIDDM and seven healthy nondiabetic subjects matched for sex, age, and obesity. Glucose oxidation was measured simultaneously by indirect calorimetry and the isotopedilution technique. Although glucose oxidation and nonoxidative storage were lower (P &lt; 0.05) in diabetic than nondiabetic subjects during the low- and highdose insulin infusions, oxidation of intracellularly derived glucose, estimated by subtracting the rate of oxidation measured isotopically (i.e., glucose oxidation derived from the extracellular space) from that measured by indirect calorimetry (i.e., total glucose oxidation), did not differ in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects during the low-dose insulin infusion (3.3 ± 0.1 vs. 3.0 ± 0.1 μmol · kg−1 · min−1). Both techniques provided identical estimates of glucose oxidation during the high-dose insulin infusion. Impaired oxidation of extracellularly but not intracellularly derived glucose strongly suggests that the cause of decreased glucose oxidation in patients with NIDDM is secondary to impaired glucose transport and/or phosphorylation rather than a primary abnormality in the oxidative pathway.