Citations

Abstract Objective To (1) track the incidence of pleomorphic adenomas (PAs) and (2) compare demographic and treatment trends in PAs over the last five decades in a single county. Study Design Retrospective cohort of all patients with a pathologic diagnosis of nonrecurrent PA from January 1976 to December 2022. Setting Olmsted County, Minnesota. Methods Incidence was calculated per 100,000 persons/year and age and sex‐adjusted to the US 2020 census data. Incidence trends were identified using Poisson rate regression models. Changes in clinical features of diagnosis were evaluated using Spearman rank correlation coefficient tests, Wilcoxon rank sum tests, and Kruskal‐Wallis tests. Results In total, 251 patients with PA were identified. The median age at diagnosis was 50.0 years with a slight female predominance (1.24:1). The adjusted incidence during this period is 4.79/100,000 person‐years, increasing from 2.50 in 1976 to 1979 to 5.73/100,000 persons/year in 2020 to 2022. Less extensive surgery, including partial and superficial parotidectomies, increased significantly from 1976 to 2022, whereas total parotidectomies decreased ( P < .0001). The number of patients who presented with an incidental imaging finding increased during this time period ( P < .001), as did the age at diagnosis (45‐51 years, P = .05) Conclusion The average annual incidence of PAs in Olmsted County from 1976 to 2022 is higher than reported US estimates and has increased over the last five decades. The percentage of patients who presented with incidental imaging findings increased over this period, as did the age at diagnosis. These findings highlight modern imaging techniques and an aging population more willing to seek workup and treatment of a benign parotid mass.

Objective: To assess the impact of extent of parotidectomy on surgical and oncologic outcomes in low grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma (LGMEC). Methods: A retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing primary surgical treatment for LGMEC from 2000 to 2022 was conducted. Clinical features collected included demographics, facial nerve function, operative techniques, postoperative complications/facial nerve function, and recurrence. Results: 58 patients were included; 10 patients underwent partial parotidectomy (PP), 38 underwent superficial parotidectomy (SP), and 10 underwent near-total/total parotidectomy. PP and SP patients had smaller tumors and more superficial tumors compared to near-total/total parotidectomy group ( P = .03). PP and SP were more likely to have negative margins and less locoregional disease compared to near-total/total parotidectomy patients ( P < .01). Near-total/total parotidectomy were more likely to undergo facial nerve resection (20% vs 0% for PP & SP respectively) ( P = .05). Immediate postoperative facial nerve function was significantly better among PP patients (73% HB I) compared to SP (44% HB I) and near-total/total parotidectomy patients (0% HB I) ( P < .01). Most patients regained their facial nerve function although only 40% of the near-total/total parotidectomy patients had a HB I at the time of last follow up ( P < .01). Patients were followed for a median of 6.2 years, during which only 1 patient (total parotidectomy) had a recurrence. Conclusions: PP offers a safe and effective approach for small LGMEC tumors, ensuring better facial nerve function postoperatively with minimal complications compared to more extensive surgery.

ASCO Guidelines provide recommendations with comprehensive review and analyses of the relevant literature for each recommendation, following the guideline development process as outlined in the ASCO Guidelines Methodology Manual . ASCO Guidelines follow the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy for Clinical Practice Guidelines . Clinical Practice Guidelines and other guidance (“Guidance”) provided by ASCO is not a comprehensive or definitive guide to treatment options. It is intended for voluntary use by clinicians and should be used in conjunction with independent professional judgment. Guidance may not be applicable to all patients, interventions, diseases or stages of diseases. Guidance is based on review and analysis of relevant literature, and is not intended as a statement of the standard of care. ASCO does not endorse third-party drugs, devices, services, or therapies and assumes no responsibility for any harm arising from or related to the use of this information. See complete disclaimer in Appendix 1 and 2 (online only) for more . PURPOSE To provide evidence-based recommendations for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). METHODS An Expert Panel including patient representation completed a systematic review of the evidence and made recommendations. RESULTS Depending upon prior treatment received, androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs: enzalutamide, abiraterone with prednisone), poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi), chemotherapeutic agents (docetaxel, cabazitaxel), radiopharmaceuticals (radium 223, 177 Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen [PSMA]-617), and sipuleucel-T have demonstrated an overall survival (OS) benefit for patients with mCRPC. For patients with BRCA1 / 2 alterations who did not receive prior ARPI, the combination of PARPi and ARPI (talazoparib + enzalutamide, olaparib and/or niraparib + abiraterone) has shown clinical benefit. For patients with BRCA1 / 2 alterations who received prior ARPI or ARPI followed by docetaxel, olaparib showed OS benefit. In select patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient, pembrolizumab showed clinical efficacy. RECOMMENDATIONS Prior systemic therapy for castration-sensitive prostate cancer will determine subsequent therapy used for mCRPC. Continue androgen-deprivation therapy for patients with mCRPC indefinitely. Early adoption of somatic genetic testing and palliative care is recommended. Patients with mCRPC and bony metastases should receive a bone-protective agent. The panel recommends the combination of ARPI with PARPi in patients with BRCA1 / 2 alterations who did not receive prior ARPI. For patients who received prior ARPI, the panel recommends docetaxel chemotherapy. The panel recommends 177 Lu-PSMA-617 or cabazitaxel chemotherapy for patients who receive prior ARPI and docetaxel chemotherapy. For patients with BRCA1 / 2 alterations who received prior ARPI, the panel recommends PARPi monotherapy. Radium 223 is recommended for patients with symptomatic bone–only disease. Evidence for optimal sequencing for mCRPC regimens is lacking. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/genitourinary-cancer-guidelines .

ABSTRACTBackgroundIdiopathic inflammatory myopathies, beyond inclusion body myositis (IBM), have demonstrated an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, particularly myocardial infarction (MI). This study evaluated the risk of cardiovascular disease in IBM.MethodsWe conducted a non‐concurrent cohort study utilizing the expanded Rochester Epidemiologic Project, including 50 patients with IBM, matched 1:6 to age‐, sex‐, and calendar year‐matched referents without IBM. Baseline cardiovascular risk factors were recorded. Differences in baseline covariates were adjusted by the inverse probability of treatment weighting method. Participants were followed from the index date forward to determine relative risks (RR) and hazard ratios (HR) for the development of cardiovascular outcomes including MI, ischemic stroke, cardiomyopathy, congestive heart failure (CHF), and peripheral vascular disease (PVD).Results50 patients with IBM and 294 matched population referents were included. Baseline cardiovascular risk factors were similar between groups. Aspirin use was more common (28% vs. 18%, p = 0.03) and statin use less common (26% vs. 38%, p = 0.04) in IBM versus referents. Patients with IBM had an increased hazard of MI compared to referents [HR: 5.79, 95% CI (2.51, 13.36)]. The risk of MI remained consistently elevated across all models, after accounting for potential confounders. For PVD, 16/50 IBM patients versus 16/287 referents were excluded due to pre‐existing PVD at index (p < 0.001). Among remaining participants, RR for PVD was 2.38 (0.82, 6.9). IBM was not associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke, cardiomyopathy, or CHF.ConclusionsIBM is associated with increased risk of MI compared to population referents. Heightened cardiovascular monitoring and prevention strategies are needed in IBM.

Abstract Introduction: Heme-binding biguanides inhibit cytochrome P450 monooxygenase-mediated biosynthesis of the epoxy fatty acid (EpFA) (±)14,15-EET, which promotes progression of ER+HER2- breast cancer as well as regulatory T cell (Treg) proliferation. However, there are no known strategies to exploit this vulnerability. Metformin has shown promise but lacks sufficient potency and clinical utility. Through structure-based design, heme binding hexyl cubane derivatives of metformin were identified, which potently inhibited (±)14,15-EET biosynthesis. Fluorination of the hexyl moiety improved pharmacokinetics (PK) and reduced toxicity. Among the fluorinated derivatives, C5F2-HCB potently inhibited (±)14,15-EET biosynthesis (IC50=3.1 uM for C5F2-HCB vs. 5 mM for metformin). C5F2-HCB and metformin are candidate agents for TME activation from “cold” to “hot” due to their inhibition of EETs biosynthesis and EET-driven oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) which promotes tumor hypoxia. We then tested whether C5F2-HCB or metformin could inhibit immune exclusion in the immunologically “cold” ovarian dependent STAT1 KO SSM2ucd mammary carcinoma model, in part, by reducing Tregs and/or increasing CD8 or CD4 tumor infiltrating T cells (TIL). We hypothesized that biguanides, by reducing EETs, would suppress Tregs and promote effector T cells in the TME. We also hypothesized that C5F2-HCB would be more effective than metformin in modulating the TME, based on greater potency for inhibition of (±)14,15-EET biosynthesis. Both biguanides were tested at their maximum tolerated dose (C5F2-HCB; 18 mg/kg daily and metformin; 50 mg/kg every other day). Results: In the SSM2ucd allograft, all combination treatment groups with biguanides reduced tumor growth relative to the IgG control at the endpoint (day 63) : metformin + IgG (51.5±9.8% of control), C5F2-HCB + IgG (53.3±12.8%), metformin + anti-PD-1 (50.4±11.5%), and C5F2-HCB + anti-PD-1 (49.6±12.8%) [(P &lt; 0.05) for all comparisons]. In contrast, anti-PD-1 antibody alone failed to reduce tumor growth at the endpoint. Flow cytometry analysis of the TME revealed that only C5F2-HCB + IgG treatment increased CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) compared to all other treatment groups (&gt;2-fold; P &lt; 0.05). Additionally, only C5F2-HCB + anti-PD-1 reduced intratumoral Tregs (&gt;3-fold; P &lt; 0.05). C5F2-HCB in combination with IgG or anti-PD-1 reduced intratumoral macrophages by &gt;50% (P &lt; 0.001) and reduced the M2/M1 macrophage ratio by 32-61% (P &lt; 0.05) relative to other groups. No effects on CD4+ T cells were observed. Furthermore, C5F2-HCB and IgG or anti-PD-1 increased intratumoral neutrophils by 75- 120% compared to the anti-PD-1 or IgG (P &lt; 0.05). (Multiple comparisons tested by ANOVA). Conclusion: Relative to IgG alone, C5F2-HCB and metformin inhibited growth of the SSM2ucd allograft in combination with either anti-PD1 or IgG. In contrast to metformin, only C5F2-HCB modulated the TME, including increased CD8+ TILs with IgG, reduced Tregs with anti-PD-1, and decreased M2/M1 macrophage ratio with IgG and anti-PD-1. C5F2-HCB, in contrast tometformin, was effective in modulating an immune excluded TME and may contribute to a strategy for clinical translation. Citation Format: Zhijun Guo, Jianxun Lei, Joshua McCarra, Qing Cao, Michael J. Pryzbilla, Brenda Koniar, Beverly Norris, Robert J. Schumacher, Swaathi Jayaraman, John R. Hawse, Antonino B. D'Assoro, Ilia G. Denisov, Stephen G. Sligar, Kathryn L. Schwertfeger, Michael A. Farrar, Dipak Panigrahy, Hammock D. Bruce, Elizabeth A. Ambrose, Gunda I. Georg, Goetz P. Matthew, David A. Potter. C5F2-hexyl-(cuban-1-yl-methyl)-biguanide (C5F2-HCB) overcomes an immune excluded tumor microenvironment (TME) and suppresses tumor growth in the ovarian dependent ER+HER2- SSM2ucd mammary carcinoma allograft model [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_2):Abstract nr LB010.

Abstract Background: Effective treatments (Tx) are needed for MTAP-del cancers (10-15% of all cancers). BMS-986504 (formerly MRTX1719) is a potential first-in-class MTA-cooperative protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) inhibitor that selectively binds to the PRMT5-MTA complex, a synthetic lethal target in MTAP-del but not MTAP-wild-type cells. In the first-in-human phase 1/2 CA240-0007 study, BMS-986504 was well tolerated and showed clinical activity in heavily pretreated pts across multiple advanced solid tumors with homozygous MTAP-del. Here, we report results of exploratory PD analyses of PRMT5 inhibition with BMS-986504 in CA240-0007. Methods: Pts with advanced, unresectable or metastatic solid tumors with homozygous MTAP-del received BMS-986504 (50 to 800 mg) in 3-wk cycles. Symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) and intron retention are known PD BMs of PRMT5 inhibition. Therefore, PD effects of BMS-986504 were assessed via changes in plasma and tumor SDMA levels (mass spec and IHC), intron retention, and gene expression (RNASeq) based on samples collected at baseline (BL) and cycle 2 day 1 (C2D1). Additional analyses correlating efficacy outcomes with PD results and select mutations at BL were performed in clinically evaluable pts as of 19-SEP-24. Results: Robust PD modulation of the PRMT5 pathway was observed with BMS-986504. Among pts with matched samples (n = 63), median plasma SDMA levels were reduced by 56% from BL (122.6 ng/mL) to C2D1 (53.8 ng/mL). There were dose-dependent reductions in median plasma SDMA with the greatest reductions at 400 mg QD (59.7% [n = 20]), 400 mg BID (61.9% [n = 9]) and 600 mg QD (59.1% [n = 14]). These PD effects were corroborated in the tumor. Median tumor SDMA levels decreased from an HScore of 285 at BL to 0 at C2D1. Consistent with the SDMA decreases, increased intron retention was observed in 9/11 pts with matched samples. BMS-986504 led to downregulation of several gene pathways including DNA repair and mitotic spindle formation, and MYC and E2F targets, as assessed by RNASeq. There was no significant change in expression of MAT2A, PRMT5, or other PRMT genes, suggesting a lack of compensation for PRMT5 inhibition through these genes. Responses were observed with BMS-986504 across EGFR, KRAS, and TP53 mutation subgroups. Additional correlative analyses among BMs and efficacy outcomes will be presented. Conclusions: BMS-986504 demonstrated robust PD effects across multiple doses and solid tumors which is consistent with the proposed mechanism of action. There was a trend of increasing plasma SDMA reduction across doses, with the greatest reductions observed at 400 mg QD and above. Together these results support further investigation of BMS-986504 at 400 mg QD and higher doses as a potential first-in-class synthetic lethal Tx option in pts with advanced solid tumors with MTAP-del. Citation Format: Jordi Rodón, Tyler Simpson, Ben George, Pasi A. Jänne, Kathryn C. Arbour, Konstantinos Leventakos, Kyriakos P. Papadopoulos, Melissa L. Johnson, Alexander I. Spira, Cesar A. Perez, Hani M. Babiker, Richard Zuniga, Candace L. Haddox, Tapsi Kumar, Yidi Qin, Wen-Chi Chou, Peter Olson, Kenna Anderes, Alice Wozniak, Curtis Chin, Ming Lei, Jason T. Henry. Pharmacodynamic (PD) and exploratory biomarker (BM) analysis of the PRMT5 inhibitor BMS-986504 in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors with homozygous MTAP deletion (MTAP-del) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_2):Abstract nr CT079.

PURPOSE Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy is a potentially debilitating adverse effect of cancer therapy that can lead to delay, reduction, or discontinuation of cancer treatment. Population-based data on peripheral neuropathy incidence among young cancer survivors are lacking. METHODS Using a linkage between Medicaid, the California Cancer Registry, and hospitalization and emergency department data, we identified 6,028 adolescents and young adults (15-39 years) with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), breast cancer, colorectal cancer, or testicular cancer and 418 children (<15 years) with HL or NHL during 2005-2017. We determined the cumulative incidence of peripheral neuropathy and its association with neurotoxic chemotherapy identified from Medicaid claims, using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS Of 6,446 patients, 1,007 were diagnosed with peripheral neuropathy. Across each cancer type, incidence was higher among patients receiving neurotoxic drugs. For example, compared with non-neurotoxic agents, 5-year cumulative incidence was higher with oxaliplatin for colorectal cancer (24.0% v 6.2%) and paclitaxel for breast cancer (22.6% v 5.1%). In multivariable analysis, the agents most strongly associated with peripheral neuropathy were brentuximab (±other neurotoxic drugs) for HL (hazard ratio [HR], 9.53 [95% CI, 5.95 to 15.26]); brentuximab (±vinca alkaloids; HR, 7.00 [95% CI, 4.13 to 11.87]) for NHL, paclitaxel for breast cancer (HR, 4.03 [95% CI, 3.05 to 5.31]); oxaliplatin for colorectal cancer (HR, 3.46 [95% CI, 2.23 to 5.36]); and cisplatin and etoposide for testicular cancer (HR, 2.06 [95% CI, 1.37 to 3.11]). CONCLUSION The high incidence of peripheral neuropathy highlights the need for frequent monitoring, new supportive care approaches, and development of novel therapeutic agents to minimize toxicity while maintaining treatment efficacy.

PURPOSE Survival for patients with melanoma has recently improved. The propensity of melanoma to metastasize to the brain remains a common and serious feature of this disease. The purposes of this study were to evaluate prognostic factors for patients with newly diagnosed melanoma brain metastases (MBMs) in a large cohort treated with modern multimodal therapies, compare those results with those in prior eras, and update the Melanoma Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA). METHODS Univariable and multivariable (MVA) analyses of prognostic factors and treatments associated with survival were performed on 1,796 patients with newly diagnosed MBM treated between January 01, 2015, and December 31, 2021, using a multi-institutional retrospective database. Multiple imputation was used to address missingness of potential predictors. Significant variables in combined MVA were used to update the Melanoma GPA. Comparisons were made with legacy cohorts. RESULTS Median survivals for cohorts A (1985-2007, n = 481), B (2006-2015, n = 823), and C (2015-2021, n = 1,796) were 6.7, 9.8, and 16.6 months and median follow-up times were 40.1, 43.6, and 48.8 months, respectively. In combined MVA, significant prognostic factors for survival were higher Karnofsky Performance Status, fewer MBMs, absence of extracranial metastases, lower serum lactate dehydrogenase, and no immunotherapy before MBM. These factors were incorporated into the updated Melanoma GPA. The combined median and 3-year survivals for patients with GPA 0-1, 1.5-2, and 2.5-4.0 were 5.4, 13.2, and 43.2 months and 12.4%, 28.8%, and 51.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION Prognostic factors have changed and survival has improved for patients with MBM but varies widely by GPA. The updated Melanoma GPA calculator (BrainMetGPA), available free online, can be used to estimate survival, individualize treatment, stratify clinical trials, guide surveillance, and augment clinical trial eligibility. Multidisciplinary treatment is essential. Trials are needed to elucidate the optimal sequencing of various therapeutic modalities.

Background: Breast cancer survivors face a risk of significant psychological distress, which can persist for years after their initial diagnosis. Although numerous guidelines and tools exist to help screen for and measure distress in patients with cancer, additional longitudinal studies are needed to better characterize the trajectory of distress over time. Patients and Methods: We conducted a longitudinal study to evaluate distress and health-related quality of life in patients with breast cancer. Annual assessments included global mental and physical health scores using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global-10 (PROMIS-10), posttraumatic stress symptoms using the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), and depressive symptoms using the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2). Eligible participants had stage 0–III breast cancer, with baseline surveys administered within 1 year of diagnosis. Annual follow-up surveys were conducted through year 4 after the baseline survey. Only patients who completed the baseline survey and at least one follow-up survey were included in this analysis. Individuals with stage IV or recurrent breast cancer were excluded. Results: A total of 2,140 individuals were included. Over time, global mental health scores declined slightly, with differences in T-scores from baseline ranging from 0.4 to 0.9. In contrast, global physical health scores improved, with differences in T-scores ranging from 0.3 to 0.6. Mean scores remained in the normative range. Depressive symptoms remained stable throughout the study period, while posttraumatic stress symptoms showed improvement over time. Conclusions: This study provides important longitudinal data on distress subtypes in breast cancer survivors with nonmetastatic disease. Although global mental health declined slightly, depression symptoms remained stable, and posttraumatic stress symptoms improved. Investigation of distress subtypes over time merits further study to advance detection of significant distress across the cancer continuum.