Citations

Abstract Background: Ovarian cancer ranks fifth in cancer deaths among women. The gold standard of care for advanced disease includes cytoreductive surgery along with adjuvant or neoadjuvant platinum/taxane-based chemotherapy. Although response to this treatment is high, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting due to platinum agents and allergic reactions due to both agents are common. For nearly half a century, the glucocorticoid (GC) dexamethasone (DEX) has been administered as part of supportive care. However, there have periodically been questions about the possible deleterious effects of DEX on chemotherapy response, especially in solid tumors. Methods: Platinum-sensitive, glucocorticoid receptor (GRa) expressing ovarian cancer cells were exposed to DEX prior to chemotherapy and clonogenic survival was assessed. The effects of DEX on cell cycle and apoptosis were assessed by flow cytometry. Changes in the tumor cell transcriptome after acute DEX treatment were determined by RNA sequencing. Mice bearing orthotopic ovarian cancer patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) were treated with chemotherapy ± DEX to assess changes in chemotherapy response in vivo. Findings: DEX pre-treatment decreased platinum cytotoxicity in ovarian cancer cell lines in vitro and diminished platinum response in some PDXs analyzed for chemotherapy response ex vivo. RNA-seq analysis revealed changes in transcripts encoding proteins involved in platinum detoxification and TNFa pro-survival signaling. In ovarian cancer PDXs, DEX decreased platinum response in one model and had limited impact on both platinum and platinum/taxane chemotherapy in three distinct studies. Interpretation: DEX appears to modulate chemotherapy response in some settings in vitro and ex-vivo. The impact of DEX on chemotherapy response in vivo appears to be limited. However, further investigation of this question in vivo in non-immunosuppressed murine models appears warranted. Citation Format: Annapoorna Venkatachalam, Cristina Correia, Cordelia Mcgehee, Sarah Finstuen-Magro, Paula A. Schneider, Rachel Hurley, Kevin L. Peterson, Ethan Heinzen, Melissa C. Larson, Xiaonon Hou, Ann L. Oberg, Saravut Weroha, Scott H. Kaufmann. Impact of dexamethasone on chemotherapy response in ovarian cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Ovarian Cancer; 2023 Oct 5-7; Boston, Massachusetts. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(5 Suppl_2):Abstract nr B098.

Abstract Background: The kinases ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated-and-Rad3-related kinase (ATR), checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1) and WEE1 participate in the response to replication stress. Inhibitors of ATR, WEE1, and CHK1 are being tested for antineoplastic activity as monotherapies and in combination with chemotherapy. Although these agents impair cell cycle checkpoints, fork stabilization, origin firing, and HR, little is known about the apoptotic pathways that are engaged and the critical mediators activating cell death mechanisms. The present study utilizes high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) cell lines and patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) to understand the predominant apoptotic players and assess changes involved in the resistance setting after treatment with these inhibitors. Methods: HGSOC cell lines were examined for responses to ceralasertib (ATRi), prexasertib (CHK1i), or adavosertib (WEE1i) using colony forming assays, immunoblotting, and assays for apoptosis. To characterize the cell death networks after prexasertib treatment, RNA-seq analysis was performed in two representative cell lines. Mechanisms involved in acquired resistance and downstream changes in cell fate were evaluated by generating prexasertib- resistant HGSOC cell lines. Results: Irrespective of the homologous recombination (HR) status, ovarian cell lines, and PDXs underwent cell death during prolonged exposure at clinically achievable concentrations. CDC25A-CDK2 signaling was predictive of responsiveness in vitro and in vivo. The subsequent apoptotic response was c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNK) dependent and involved engagement of mitochondrial pathways rather than the TNFa-induced death receptor-mediated apoptosis we recently described in acute leukemia (H. Ding, N. Vincelette, et al., Cancer Res. 81:2666-2678, 2021). Additionally, ovarian lines selected for CHK1i resistance failed to die in response to either ATRi or WEE1i but were sensitive to front-line therapy options, including carboplatin and PARP inhibitor. Conclusions: Unlike AML, death receptor-mediated apoptosis was not observed; instead, the primary mechanism of cell killing in HGSOC lines involves activation of the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway. Our findings identify the key cell death-initiating events that serve as measures of response to replication checkpoint inhibitors in ovarian cancer. Acquired resistance to these therapies is multifactorial and mainly involves failure to exacerbate the replication stress response. Citation Format: Annapoorna Venkatachalam, Cristina Correia, Kevin L. Peterson, Xiaonan Hou, Annabella R. Strathman, Paula A Schneider, Karen S. Flatten, Laura N. Duffield, Cordelia D. McGehee, Melissa C. Larson, Xue Meng, Nicole D Vincelette, Ann L. Oberg, Hu Li, John Weroha, Scott H Kaufmann. Transcriptomic insights reveal role of BCL2 proteins in replication checkpoint inhibitor response [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Ovarian Cancer; 2023 Oct 5-7; Boston, Massachusetts. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(5 Suppl_2):Abstract nr B012.

Background Comparative evaluations of preventive migraine treatments can help inform clinical decision making for managing migraine in clinical practice. Methods An anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison analysis was conducted using pooled participant-level data from two phase 3 atogepant trials (ADVANCE and PROGRESS) and one phase 2/3 rimegepant trial (BHV3000-305) to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety/tolerability of atogepant and rimegepant as preventive migraine treatments. Participants receiving atogepant 60 mg once daily, rimegepant orally disintegrating tablet 75 mg once every other day, and placebo were included. Only participants meeting the BHV3000-305 inclusion/exclusion criteria were analyzed: ≥6 monthly migraine days and ≤18 monthly headache days at baseline. The primary efficacy assessment of interest was change in monthly migraine days across weeks 1–12. Results There were 252 participants in the atogepant group and 348 in the rimegepant group. Across weeks 1–12, atogepant 60 mg demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in mean monthly migraine days compared with rimegepant 75 mg (mean difference [95% CI]: −1.65 [−2.49, −0.81]; p < 0.001). Both atogepant and rimegepant demonstrated similar safety/tolerability profiles. Conclusion In this matching-adjusted indirect comparison analysis, oral atogepant 60 mg once daily demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in monthly migraine days compared with rimegepant 75 mg orally disintegrating tablet once every other day.

Cancer is a complex disease involving the deregulation of intricate cellular systems beyond genetic aberrations and, as such, requires sophisticated computational approaches and high-dimensional data for optimal interpretation. While conventional artificial intelligence (AI) models excel in many prediction tasks, they often lack interpretability and are blind to the scientific hypotheses generated by researchers to enable cancer discoveries. Here we propose that hypothesis-driven AI, a new emerging class of AI algorithm, is an innovative approach to uncovering the complex etiology of cancer from big omics data. This review exemplifies how hypothesis-driven AI is different from conventional AI by citing its application in various areas of oncology including tumor classification, patient stratification, cancer gene discovery, drug response prediction, and tumor spatial organization. Our aim is to stress the feasibility of incorporating domain knowledge and scientific hypotheses to craft the design of new AI algorithms. We showcase the power of hypothesis-driven AI in making novel cancer discoveries that can be overlooked by conventional AI methods. Since hypothesis-driven AI is still in its infancy, open questions such as how to better incorporate new knowledge and biological perspectives to ameliorate bias and improve interpretability in the design of AI algorithms still need to be addressed. In conclusion, hypothesis-driven AI holds great promise in the discovery of new mechanistic and functional insights that explain the complexity of cancer etiology and potentially chart a new roadmap to improve treatment regimens for individual patients.

Abstract Introduction The implantation of a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) can have esthetic and psychological consequences on patients. We explore a heart team model for care coordination and discuss esthetic approaches for improved cosmetic outcomes in patients undergoing (CIED)‐related procedures or de novo implantation. Methods Patients undergoing CIED surgery for approved indications between June 2015 and June 2022 were identified. Patients were included when surgical care was provided by a collaborative relationship between the primary electrophysiologist and the plastic surgeon. Patient demographics, details of the surgical procedure, information on breast implants, complications, and outcomes related to cosmesis were recorded. Results Twenty‐two female patients were included in this study. The mean age was 50.2 ± 18.2 years. The mean follow‐up duration was 2.2 ± 5.5 months. The top two indications for the procedure included CIED generator change ( n = 9, 41%) and implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) implantation ( n = 7, 32%). The most common reasons for involving plastic surgery in the procedure included surgery near breast implants ( n = 10, 45%) and device displacement or discomfort ( n = 8, 36%). CIED pocket position was prepectoral in 10 cases (45%), subpectoral in 11 patients (50%), and intramuscular in one patient (4.5%). The majority of the patients (20, 91%) had cosmetically acceptable results postprocedure. One patient (4.5%) had breast asymmetry on the CIED side, and another continued to have skin erosion over the CIED and leads. Conclusion A heart team approach incorporating the expertize of cardiac electrophysiology and plastic surgery is essential for providing optimal care for patients with breast implants and patients requesting esthetic appeal.

Background: Eyelid ptosis may present with upper lid dermatochalasis and brow ptosis. When indicated, ptosis correction (PC) is advocated during upper blepharoplasty (UB). In this study, the authors aimed to report their outcomes following UB and PC. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent UB from November of 2018 to March of 2020 was performed. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and revisions were recorded. Cox regression was performed to assess predictors of revision. Results: Overall, 278 patients with 533 UB were included. The mean patient age was 67.3 years. The mean follow-up was 8.3 months. In 169 cases (31.7%), a brow lift was performed. UB and PC were performed in 109 cases (20.5%), of which 60 (55%) involved Müller muscle conjunctival resection and 49 (45%) were levator repairs. New dry eye symptoms lasting 3 months or longer occurred in 4 cases (0.8%), all of which resolved. The revision rate was 3.8% after UB (residual skin [ n = 11], hypertrophic scar [ n = 4], and Herring law–related ptosis [ n = 1]) versus 9.2% after UB and PC (overcorrection [ n = 4], residual skin [ n = 4], and asymmetry [ n = 2]). Multivariable analysis demonstrated increased revision rates after UB and PC ( P = 0.008). There was no difference in revision rates between different techniques of PC. Conclusions: In this study of 278 patients presenting for dermatochalasis, up to 21% of cases required ptosis correction in addition to upper blepharoplasty. Ptosis correction is a safe procedure when combined with upper blepharoplasty, regardless of technique used. The revision rate in our series was 9.2% after the combined procedure, which is greater than the revision rate of upper blepharoplasty only but comparable to that in the literature. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

SummaryThe thrombotic risk with haemoglobin C trait (HbAC) or haemoglobin C disease (HbCC) is unclear. However, individuals with HbCC have demonstrated chronic haemolysis, higher blood viscosity and altered rheology when compared to individuals with wild‐type haemoglobin (HbAA). These physiological alterations may theoretically translate to increased risk of thrombosis; therefore, a systematic literature review was performed to investigate the possible association between HbAC and/or HbCC and thrombosis. Twenty‐two studies met inclusion criteria representing 782 individuals with HbAC (n = 694) or HbCC (n = 88). Fifteen studies described the presence/absence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with HbAC (n = 685) or HbCC (n = 79), while seven studies described patients with HbAC (n = 9) or HbCC (n = 9) and arterial thrombosis. Most (n = 20) studies were case reports or case series; however, two studies suggested a potential increased VTE risk with HbAC compared to HbAA in (i) all patients (OR 2.2, 95% CI: 0.9–5.5) and in (ii) pregnant individuals (RR 3.7, 95% CI 0.9–16). This review is the largest assessment of patients with HbC trait or disease and thrombosis to date; despite its limitations, the findings suggest HbC may be a predisposing risk factor to thrombosis. Prospective cohort studies are warranted to definitively elucidate the risk of thrombosis in this population.

Staphylococcus aureus skin colonization and eosinophil infiltration are associated with many inflammatory skin disorders, including atopic dermatitis, bullous pemphigoid, Netherton’s syndrome, and prurigo nodularis. However, whether there is a relationship between S. aureus and eosinophils and how this interaction influences skin inflammation is largely undefined. We show in a preclinical mouse model that S. aureus epicutaneous exposure induced eosinophil-recruiting chemokines and eosinophil infiltration into the skin. Remarkably, we found that eosinophils had a comparable contribution to the skin inflammation as T cells, in a manner dependent on eosinophil-derived IL-17A and IL-17F production. Importantly, IL-36R signaling induced CCL7-mediated eosinophil recruitment to the inflamed skin. Last, S. aureus proteases induced IL-36α expression in keratinocytes, which promoted infiltration of IL-17-producing eosinophils. Collectively, we uncovered a mechanism for S. aureus proteases to trigger eosinophil-mediated skin inflammation, which has implications in the pathogenesis of inflammatory skin diseases.