Citations

Abstract Amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare, typically fatal disease characterized by the accumulation of misfolded immunoglobulin light chains (LCs). Birtamimab is an investigational humanized monoclonal antibody designed to neutralize toxic LC aggregates and deplete insoluble organ-deposited amyloid via macrophage-induced phagocytosis. VITAL was a phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial assessing the efficacy and safety of birtamimab + standard of care (SOC) in 260 newly diagnosed, treatment-naive patients with AL amyloidosis. Patients received 24 mg/kg IV birtamimab + SOC or placebo + SOC every 28 days. The primary composite end point was the time to all-cause mortality (ACM) or centrally adjudicated cardiac hospitalization ≥91 days after the first study drug infusion. The trial was terminated early after an interim futility analysis; there was no significant difference in the primary composite end point (hazard ratio [HR], 0.826; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.574-1.189; log-rank P = .303). A post hoc analysis of patients with Mayo stage IV AL amyloidosis, those at the highest risk of early mortality, showed significant improvement in the time to ACM with birtamimab at month 9 (HR, 0.413; 95% CI, 0.191-0.895; log-rank P = .021). At month 9, 74% of patients with Mayo stage IV AL amyloidosis treated with birtamimab and 49% of those given placebo survived. Overall, the rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were generally similar between treatment arms. A confirmatory phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of birtamimab in patients with Mayo stage IV AL amyloidosis (AFFIRM-AL; NCT04973137) is currently enrolling. The VITAL trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02312206.

Antiplatelet therapy is the mainstay of pharmacologic treatment to prevent thrombotic or ischemic events in patients with coronary artery disease treated with percutaneous coronary intervention and those treated medically for an acute coronary syndrome. The use of antiplatelet therapy comes at the expense of an increased risk of bleeding complications. Defining the optimal intensity of platelet inhibition according to the clinical presentation of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and individual patient factors is a clinical challenge. Modulation of antiplatelet therapy is a medical action that is frequently performed to balance the risk of thrombotic or ischemic events and the risk of bleeding. This aim may be achieved by reducing (ie, de-escalation) or increasing (ie, escalation) the intensity of platelet inhibition by changing the type, dose, or number of antiplatelet drugs. Because de-escalation or escalation can be achieved in different ways, with a number of emerging approaches, confusion arises with terminologies that are often used interchangeably. To address this issue, this Academic Research Consortium collaboration provides an overview and definitions of different strategies of antiplatelet therapy modulation for patients with coronary artery disease, including but not limited to those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, and consensus statements on standardized definitions.

Objective: Limited evidence is available regarding the impact of workload-indexed hypertensive response to exercise (HRE) in patients at different stages of the heart failure (HF) spectrum. We evaluated the prevalence, pathophysiologic and prognostic correlates of HRE, evaluated by the systolic blood pressure (SBP)/Workload slope, across the HF spectrum as defined by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association. Design and method: We prospectively enrolled 58 healthy controls, 201 subjects at risk of developing HF (HF Stages A-B), and 369 patients with a definite diagnosis of HF (Stage C) and either preserved (HFpEF) or reduced (HFrEF) left ventricular ejection fraction. All patients underwent a combined cardiopulmonary-exercise stress echocardiography test. We recorded two SBP measurements for each patient: the first within the first minute of exercise and the last at peak effort. The SBP/Workload slope was calculated as the difference in SBP over the corresponding increment in watts (W): (SBPpeak – SBPfirst)/(Wpeak – Wfirst). In each subgroup, we divided patients according to SBP/Workload slope tertiles, using sex-specific cut-off values; HRE was defined as the highest SBP/Workload slope tertile in each HF stage. A composite of all-cause mortality and hospitalization for cardiovascular reasons was chosen as the primary outcome. Results: The median SBP/Workload slope was 0.53 (interquartile range 0.36 - 0.72) mmHg/W and was steeper in women than men in all subgroups. After adjusting for age and sex, SBP/Workload slope in controls was similar to HFrEF but significantly lower than Stages A-B and HFpEF. In all HF stages, patients with HRE showed significantly lower peak oxygen consumption and peripheral oxygen extraction. After a median follow-up of 16 months, HRE was independently associated with adverse outcomes (Hazard Ratio 2.05, 95% confidence interval 1.81 - 5.18). Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed a worse survival probability in Stages A-B and HFpEF, but not HFrEF. After adjusting for clinical and echocardiographic variables, patients in the highest SBP/Workload tertile had a 47% higher risk of the primary outcome than subjects in the lowest tertile. Conclusions: HRE is associated with peculiar pathophysiological features and possibly worse prognosis in patients in the earliest stages of cardiovascular disease and in those with HFpEF.

Pharmacogenetics can improve clinical outcomes by reducing adverse drug effects and enhancing therapeutic efficacy for commonly used drugs that treat a wide range of cardiovascular diseases. One of the major barriers to the clinical implementation of cardiovascular pharmacogenetics is limited education on this field for current healthcare providers and students. The abundance of pharmacogenetic literature underscores its promise, but it can also be challenging to learn such a wealth of information. Moreover, current clinical recommendations for cardiovascular pharmacogenetics can be confusing because they are outdated, incomplete, or inconsistent. A myriad of misconceptions about the promise and feasibility of cardiovascular pharmacogenetics among healthcare providers also has halted clinical implementation. Therefore, the main goal of this tutorial is to provide introductory education on the use of cardiovascular pharmacogenetics in clinical practice. The target audience is any healthcare provider (or student) with patients that use or have indications for cardiovascular drugs. This tutorial is organized into the following 6 steps: (1) understand basic concepts in pharmacogenetics; (2) gain foundational knowledge of cardiovascular pharmacogenetics; (3) learn the different organizations that release cardiovascular pharmacogenetic guidelines and recommendations; (4) know the current cardiovascular drugs/drug classes to focus on clinically and the supporting evidence; (5) discuss an example patient case of cardiovascular pharmacogenetics; and (6) develop an appreciation for emerging areas in cardiovascular pharmacogenetics. Ultimately, improved education among healthcare providers on cardiovascular pharmacogenetics will lead to a greater understanding for its potential in improving outcomes for a leading cause of morbidity and mortality.

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Conflicting data exist regarding the prognostic significance of hypertensive response to exercise (HRE), commonly defined according to absolute peak systolic blood pressure (SBP) values. Limited evidence is available regarding the impact of workload-indexed HRE in patients at different stages of the heart failure (HF) spectrum as defined by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association HF staging system. Purpose We evaluated the SBP/Workload slope during exercise across the HF spectrum and investigated the haemodynamic, functional and prognostic correlates of HRE. Methods We prospectively enrolled 58 healthy controls, 201 subjects at risk of developing HF (HF Stages A-B), and 369 patients with a definite diagnosis of HF (Stage C); among the latter, 143 had preserved (HFpEF) and 226 reduced (HFrEF) left ventricular ejection fraction. All patients underwent a combined cardiopulmonary-exercise stress echocardiography test. For each patient, we recorded the first (i.e., within the first minute of exercise) and last (i.e., at peak effort) BP measurement during the ramp protocol. The SBP/Workload slope (Figure 1) was calculated as the ratio of the difference in SBP over the corresponding increment in watts (W): (SBPpeak – SBPfirst)/(Wpeak – Wfirst). In each subgroup, we divided patients according to SBP/Workload slope tertiles; HRE was defined as the highest sex-specific SBP/Workload slope tertile in each HF stage. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and hospitalization for cardiovascular reasons. Results Median SBP/Workload slope was 0.53 mmHg/W, interquartile range 0.36-0.72 mmHg/W; the slope was 39% steeper in women than in men (p<0.0001). After adjusting for age and sex, SBP/Workload slope in controls (0.43, 0.35-0.57 mmHg/W) was similar to HFrEF (0.47, 0.30-0.63 mmHg/W) but significantly lower than Stages A-B (0.61, 0.47-0.75 mmHg/W) and HFpEF (0.63, 0.42-0.86 mmHg/W). In all HF stages, patients with HRE showed significantly lower peak oxygen consumption and peripheral oxygen extraction. After a median follow-up of 16 months, HRE was independently associated with adverse outcomes (Hazard Ratio 2.05, 95% confidence interval 1.81-5.18), while rest and peak SBP were not. Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed a worse survival probability in Stages A-B (p=0.005) and HFpEF (p<0.001), but not HFrEF. After adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, rest and peak SBP, rest and peak cardiac output, and rest and peak left ventricular ejection fraction, patients with the highest SBP/Workload slope had a 47% higher risk of the primary outcome than subjects in the lowest tertile (Figure 2). Conclusion HRE, as evaluated by the SBP/Workload slope, is associated with distinct pathophysiological features and impaired functional capacity across the HF spectrum, especially in Stages A-B and in patients with HFpEF. Patients with HRE in these subgroups may be at increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes.

Abstract Introduction Transthyretin–mediated (ATTR) amyloidosis is a progressive, multisystem, fatal disease. Patisiran, an IV RNAi therapeutic, is approved for the treatment of hereditary ATTR amyloidosis with polyneuropathy. The safety and efficacy of patisiran in patients with wild–type or hereditary ATTR amyloidosis with cardiomyopathy (CM) is being investigated in the ongoing APOLLO–B study. Methods Patients were 18–85 yrs old with evidence of cardiac amyloidosis by echocardiography, and ATTR amyloid by tissue biopsy or fulfilling nonbiopsy diagnostic criteria for ATTR amyloidosis with CM. Medical history of heart failure (HF) due to ATTR amyloidosis with ≥1 prior hospitalization or current clinical evidence of HF was required. Patients were randomized 1:1 to patisiran IV 0.3 mg/kg or placebo Q3W for 12 months. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in 6–MWT at Month 12 (M12) with patisiran vs placebo. Results APOLLO–B enrolled 360 patients (patisiran, n=181; placebo, n=179): median age (range), 76.0 (41, 85) yrs; male, 89%; wtATTR, 80%. Baseline characteristics were consistent between patients on tafamidis at baseline (91/360 [25%]) and those who were not. Patisiran achieved a rapid and sustained reduction in serum TTR, irrespective of baseline tafamidis treatment. At M12, patisiran showed a significant benefit vs placebo in 6–MWT (median [95% CI] change from baseline: patisiran, –8.15 [–16.42, 1.50]; placebo, –21.35 [–34.05, –7.52]; HL estimate of median difference: 14.69 [0.69, 28.69]; p=0.0162) and KCCQ–OS (LS mean [SEM] change from baseline: patisiran, 0.300 [1.263]; placebo, –3.408 [1.277]; LS mean [SEM] difference: 3.709 [1.796]; p=0.0397). Consistent benefits with patisiran in 6–MWT and KCCQ–OS were observed across predefined patient subgroups. Time to first event of all–cause hospitalization, urgent HF visit, or death directionally favored patisiran vs placebo (HR [95% CI], 0.839 [0.557, 1.263]), as did all–cause mortality (HR [95% CI], 0.355 [0.110, 1.138]), but all composite outcomes endpoints did not achieve statistical significance over 12 months. Patisiran was well tolerated; most AEs were mild or moderate in severity, and there were no cardiac safety concerns. Conclusions Benefits at 12 months were observed with patisiran vs placebo in functional capacity, and health status and quality of life, in patients with ATTR amyloidosis with CM. The efficacy and safety of patisiran continues to be studied in the APOLLO–B open–label extension.

Multiple myeloma (MM) arises following malignant proliferation of plasma cells in the bone marrow, that secrete high amounts of specific monoclonal immunoglobulins or light chains, resulting in the massive production of unfolded or misfolded proteins. Autophagy can have a dual role in tumorigenesis, by eliminating these abnormal proteins to avoid cancer development, but also ensuring MM cell survival and promoting resistance to treatments. To date no studies have determined the impact of genetic variation in autophagy-related genes on MM risk. We performed meta-analysis of germline genetic data on 234 autophagy-related genes from three independent study populations including 13,387 subjects of European ancestry (6863 MM patients and 6524 controls) and examined correlations of statistically significant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs; p < 1 × 10−9) with immune responses in whole blood, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), and monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM) from a large population of healthy donors from the Human Functional Genomic Project (HFGP). We identified SNPs in six loci, CD46, IKBKE, PARK2, ULK4, ATG5, and CDKN2A associated with MM risk (p = 4.47 × 10−4−5.79 × 10−14). Mechanistically, we found that the ULK4rs6599175 SNP correlated with circulating concentrations of vitamin D3 (p = 4.0 × 10−4), whereas the IKBKErs17433804 SNP correlated with the number of transitional CD24+CD38+ B cells (p = 4.8 × 10−4) and circulating serum concentrations of Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein (MCP)-2 (p = 3.6 × 10−4). We also found that the CD46rs1142469 SNP correlated with numbers of CD19+ B cells, CD19+CD3− B cells, CD5+IgD− cells, IgM− cells, IgD−IgM− cells, and CD4−CD8− PBMCs (p = 4.9 × 10−4−8.6 × 10−4) and circulating concentrations of interleukin (IL)-20 (p = 0.00082). Finally, we observed that the CDKN2Ars2811710 SNP correlated with levels of CD4+EMCD45RO+CD27− cells (p = 9.3 × 10−4). These results suggest that genetic variants within these six loci influence MM risk through the modulation of specific subsets of immune cells, as well as vitamin D3−, MCP-2−, and IL20-dependent pathways.