Citations

Background: Heart disease is linked to worse acute outcomes after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), although long-term outcomes and prognostic factor data are lacking. We aim to characterize the outcomes and the impact of underlying heart diseases after surviving COVID-19 hospitalization. Methods: We conducted an analysis of the prospective registry HOPE-2 (Health Outcome Predictive Evaluation for COVID-19-2, NCT04778020). We selected patients discharged alive and considered the primary end-point all-cause mortality during follow-up. As secondary main end-points, we included any readmission or any post-COVID-19 symptom. Clinical features and follow-up events are compared between those with and without cardiovascular disease. Factors with p < 0.05 in the univariate analysis were entered into the multivariate analysis to determine independent prognostic factors. Results: HOPE-2 closed on 31 December 2021, with 9299 patients hospitalized with COVID-19, and 1805 died during this acute phase. Finally, 7014 patients with heart disease data were included in the present analysis, from 56 centers in 8 countries. Heart disease (+) patients were older (73 vs. 58 years old), more frequently male (63 vs. 56%), had more comorbidities than their counterparts, and suffered more frequently from post-COVID-19 complications and higher mortality (OR heart disease: 2.63, 95% CI: 1.81–3.84). Vaccination was found to be an independent protector factor (HR all-cause death: 0.09; 95% CI: 0.04–0.19). Conclusions: After surviving the acute phase, patients with underlying heart disease continue to present a more complex clinical profile and worse outcomes including increased mortality. The COVID-19 vaccine could benefit survival in patients with heart disease during follow-up.

Abstract The late-phase allergic reaction (LPR) occurs 4 to 8 h after allergen exposure and probably causes the symptoms of chronic allergic disease. To determine the effects of soluble IL-1 receptor on the cutaneous LPR, we performed a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study on 15 allergic subjects. Intradermal injections of allergen were placed on subjects' forearms, followed by immediate subcutaneous injections at the same site of either 1, 10, 25, 50, or 100 micrograms of rhu IL-1R to three subjects in each dosage group. Placebo was given to matched allergen-injected sites on the contralateral arm. Erythema, induration, and itching were recorded for each site. Sites were biopsied at 8 h for immunohistologic evaluations. Rhu IL-1R significantly reduced the clinical reaction at all concentrations. At 1 and 10 micrograms, measurements of LPR were significantly less (p &lt; 0.05) than at placebo sites at several time points from 2 to 8 h. At higher concentrations, LPR was suppressed at rhu IL-1R and placebo sites, suggesting a systemic effect of rhu IL-1R. Histologic evaluation and indirect immunofluorescence for eosinophil granule major basic protein, neutrophil elastase, and mast cell tryptase showed no statistical differences between rhu IL-1R and placebo sites or among doses. IL-1 plays an important role in the generation of allergic LPR. While microgram quantities of rhu IL-1R inhibited the clinical signs and symptoms of LPR, its effects on the allergic inflammatory infiltrate are yet to be defined. In this short term trial, rhu IL-1R was neither immunogenic nor toxic.

Abstract Background The criteria for the selection of COVID‐19 patients that could benefit most from ECMO organ support are yet to be defined. In this study, we evaluated the predictive performance of ECMO mortality predictive models in patients with COVID‐19. We also performed a cost–benefit analysis depending on the mortality predicted probability. We conducted a retrospective cohort study in COVID‐19 patients who received ECMO at two tertiary care hospitals between March 2020 to July 2021. Materials and Methods We evaluated the discrimination (C‐statistic), calibration (Cox calibration), and accuracy of the prediction of death due to severe ARDS in V‐V ECMO score (PRESERVE), the Respiratory Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Survival Score (RESP) score, and the PREdiction of Survival on ECMO Therapy‐Score (PRESET) score. In addition, we compared the RESP score with Plateau pressure instead of Peak pressure. Results We included a total of 36 patients, 29 (80%) of them male and with a median (IQR) APACHE of 10 (8–15). The PRESET score had the highest discrimination (AUROCs 0.81 [95%CI 0.67–0.94]) and calibration (calibration‐in‐the‐large 0.5 [95%CI −1.4 to 0.3]; calibration slope 2.2 [95%CI 0.7/3.7]). The RESP score with Plateau pressure had higher discrimination than the conventional RESP score. The cost per QALY in the USA, adjusted to life expectancy, was higher than USD 100 000 in patients older than 45 years with a PRESET > 10. Conclusion The PRESET score had the highest predictive performance and could help in the selection of patients that benefit most from this resource‐demanding and highly invasive organ support.

ImportanceLate-onset meningitis (LOM) has been associated with adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in children born extremely preterm.ObjectiveTo report the incidence of LOM during birth hospitalization and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 to 26 months’ corrected age.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study is a secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort of children born at 22 to 26 weeks’ gestation between 2003 and 2017 with follow-up from 2004 to 2021. The study was conducted at 25 Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network centers.ExposuresCulture-confirmed LOM.Main Outcomes and MeasuresIncidence and microbiology of LOM (2003-2017); lumbar puncture (LP) performance in late-onset sepsis (LOS) evaluations (2011-2017); composite outcome of death or neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI; 2004-2021).ResultsAmong 13 372 infants (median [IQR] gestational age, 25.4 [24.4-26.1] weeks; 6864 [51%] boys), LOM was diagnosed in 167 (1%); LOS without LOM in 4564 (34%); and neither LOS nor LOM in 8641 (65%). The observed incidence of LOM decreased from 2% (95% CI, 1%-3%) in 2003 to 0.4% (95% CI, 0.7%-1.0%) in 2017 (P &amp;lt; .001). LP performance in LOS evaluations decreased from 36% (95% CI, 33%-40%) in 2011 to 24% (95% CI, 21%-27%) in 2017 (P &amp;lt; .001). Among infants with culture-confirmed LOS, LP performance decreased from 58% (95% CI, 51%-65%) to 45% (95% CI, 38%-51%; P = .008). LP performance varied by center among all LOS evaluations (10%-59%, P &amp;lt; .001) and among those with culture-confirmed LOS (23%-79%, P &amp;lt; .001). LOM occurred in the absence of concurrent LOS in 27 of 167 cases (16%). The most common LOM isolates were coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (98 [59%]), Candida albicans (38 [23%]), and Escherichia coli (27 [16%]). Death or NDI occurred in 22 of 46 children (48%) with LOM due to coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, 43 of 67 (64%) due to all other bacterial pathogens, and 26 of 33 (79%) due to fungal pathogens. The adjusted relative risk of death or NDI was increased among children with LOM (aOR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.04-2.25) and among those with LOS without LOM (aOR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.29-1.54) compared with children with neither infection.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cohort study, LP was performed with decreasing frequency, and the observed incidence of LOM also decreased. Both LOM and LOS were associated with increased risk of death or NDI; risk varied by LOM pathogen. The full association of LOM with outcomes of children born extremely preterm may be underestimated by current diagnostic practices.

PURPOSE At the primary analysis of CASTOR (median follow-up, 7.4 months), daratumumab plus bortezomib and dexamethasone (D-Vd) significantly prolonged progression-free survival versus bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) alone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We report updated efficacy and safety results at the final analysis for overall survival (OS). METHODS CASTOR was a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III study during which eligible patients with ≥ 1 line of prior therapy were randomly assigned to Vd (up to eight cycles) with or without daratumumab (until disease progression). After positive primary analysis and protocol amendment, patients receiving Vd were offered daratumumab monotherapy after disease progression. RESULTS At a median (range) follow-up of 72.6 months (0.0-79.8), significant OS benefit was observed with D-Vd (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.92; P = .0075). Median OS was 49.6 months with D-Vd versus 38.5 months with Vd. Prespecified subgroup analyses demonstrated an OS advantage with D-Vd versus Vd for most subgroups, including patients age ≥ 65 years and patients with one or two prior lines of therapy, International Staging System stage III disease, high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities, and prior bortezomib treatment. The most common (≥ 10%) grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events with D-Vd versus Vd were thrombocytopenia (46.1% v 32.9%), anemia (16.0% v 16.0%), neutropenia (13.6% v 4.6%), lymphopenia (10.3% v 2.5%), and pneumonia (10.7% v 10.1%). CONCLUSION D-Vd significantly prolonged OS in patients with RRMM, with the greatest OS benefit observed in patients with one prior line of therapy. To our knowledge, our results, together with the OS benefit observed with daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in the phase III POLLUX study, demonstrate for the first time an OS benefit with daratumumab-containing regimens in RRMM (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02136134 [CASTOR]).

Abstract INTRODUCTION Medulloblastomas (MB) are embryonal tumors arising in the cerebellum, predominantly affecting pediatric patients. Recognition of molecularly defined subgroups has advanced management. Factors influencing the prognosis and management of adult MB patients remain poorly understood. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed our experience with adult (&gt; 18 years at initial diagnosis) MB patients, diagnosed between 1992-2020. Molecular subtyping corresponding to the 2021 WHO Classification was performed. Kaplan-Meier estimates (Log-rank test assessing for group differences) were performed for univariate survival analysis with cox regression used for multivariate (subgroup, age, gender, disseminated disease, extent of resection) analyses. RESULTS Our cohort included 76 adult MB patients (62% male), with a median age of 31.7 years (range: 18-66) at diagnosis, and median follow-up of 7.7 years (range: 0.6-26.9). 58 patients had sufficient tissue for molecular characterization by immunohistochemistry and corresponded to the SHH-activated (n=37; 64%), non-WNT/non-SHH (n=12; 21%), WNT-activated (n=9; 15%) subgroups. At initial diagnosis, all patients underwent radiotherapy, with 97% (n=66) receiving craniospinal irradiation with a boost either to the posterior fossa (75%) or tumor bed (22%); and underwent gross total resection (n=51; 67%) and chemotherapy (n=56; 75%). Median overall survival (OS) for the whole cohort was 14.8 years (93% 2-year OS; 86% 5-year OS; 64% 10-year OS) and was longer for younger patients (&lt; 30: &gt; 15.4 years, &gt; 30: 9.9 years; Log-rank p&lt; 0.001). No significant OS difference was identified by MB molecular subgroup (SHH, TP53-wt: 14 years, WNT: 11.4 years, non-WNT/non-SHH: &gt; 14.8 years; Log-rank p=0.1167) or extent of resection. Only age at diagnosis remained significant in multivariate survival analyses. DISCUSSION We report one of the largest retrospective cohorts in adult MB patients with molecular subtyping. Survival and molecular subgroup frequencies were similar to previous reports. Survival was longer for younger patients and was not significantly different by MB molecular subgroup or extent of resection.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) remains the most common and lethal adult primary brain cancer. Two of the most significant issues preventing the development of effective GBM treatments are inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity. To address these issues, we developed a novel platform termed ISOSCELES (Inferred cell Sensitivity Operating on the integration of Single-Cell Expression and L1000 Expression Signatures). ISOSCELES integrates single-cell gene expression data in individual GBM tumors with perturbation-response data derived from the NIH Library of Integrated Network-Based Cellular Signatures (LINCS) L1000 dataset to predict sensitive and resistant tumor cell populations. Importantly, we analyzed the predictive power of ISOSCELES in an in vivo xenograft model and demonstrated that ISOSCELES reveals the GBM cell identities primed for lineage expansion during treatment with the aurora kinase inhibitor alisertib. These studies suggest that ISOSCELES can be used to identify sensitive and resistant cell populations to targeted therapies in GBM, which can inform treatment decisions in ongoing and future clinical trials.

Abstract Objectives To establish a framework by which experts define disease subsets in systemic sclerosis associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). Methods A conceptual framework for subclinical, clinical and progressive ILD was provided to 83 experts, asking them to use the framework and classify actual SSc-ILD patients. Each patient profile was designed to be classified by at least four experts in terms of severity and risk of progression at baseline; progression was based on 1-year follow-up data. A consensus was reached if ≥75% of experts agreed. Experts provided information on which items were important in determining classification. Results Forty-four experts (53%) completed the survey. Consensus was achieved on the dimensions of severity (75%, 60 of 80 profiles), risk of progression (71%, 57 of 80 profiles) and progressive ILD (60%, 24 of 40 profiles). For profiles achieving consensus, most were classified as clinical ILD (92%), low risk (54%) and stable (71%). Severity and disease progression overlapped in terms of framework items that were most influential in classifying patients (forced vital capacity, extent of lung involvement on high resolution chest CT [HRCT]); risk of progression was influenced primarily by disease duration. Conclusions Using our proposed conceptual framework, international experts were able to achieve a consensus on classifying SSc-ILD patients along the dimensions of disease severity, risk of progression and progression over time. Experts rely on similar items when classifying disease severity and progression: a combination of spirometry and gas exchange and quantitative HRCT.