Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

377 citation(s) found for "Yu, Joyce".

Abstract 10960: Genetic Overlap of Acute Myocarditis and Inherited Cardiomyopathy
Salmi, Sara, Meena, Devendra, Iacob, Alma, Jones, Richard W. , Wage, Rick, Yazdani, Momina , Wong, Joyce , Baksi, John, Pantazis, Antonios , Prasad, Sanjay, Lota, Amrit , Hazebroek, Mark R. , Theotokis, Pantazis , Wassall, Rebecca, Halliday, Brian P. , Tayal, Upasana , Verdonschot, Job A.J. , Marvao, Antonio de , Hammersley, Daniel , Jones, Richard, Buchan, Rachel , Noseda, Michela , Mittal, Tarun , Robertus, Jan Lukas , Vassiliou, Vassilios S. , Tzoulaki, Ioanna , Cleland, John G.F. , Barton, Paul J.R. , Cook, Stuart A. , Pennell, Dudley J. , Garcia-Pavia, Pablo , Cooper, Leslie T. , Heymans, Stéphane , Ware, James S.

Circulation | March 19, 2022 | Volume: 144 | Issue: Suppl_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10960 Get It

Background: Myocarditis may predispose to dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and sudden cardiac death (SCD). Familial data indicate a potential genetic susceptibility shared with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM). We present the first large-scale genotype-phenotype study of adults with acute myocarditis. Methods: A cohort comprising 336 consecutive patients with acute myocarditis was enrolled in London and Maastricht. All participants underwent targeted DNA sequencing for well-characterised cardiomyopathy-associated genes. The burden of rare protein altering variants (PAV) in ACM genes, DCM genes, and TTN specifically, were compared with local healthy controls sequenced on the same platform (n=1053). Case ascertainment was assessed against national hospital admission data. Results: We identified rare protein-altering variants in 23% of cases compared to 16% in controls (Δ+6.8%; p=0.021), with rare truncating variants (tv) in 6% of cases compared to <1% of controls ((Δ+5%; p=0.0097). In London (n=230; median left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 63%), which was representative of national myocarditis admissions, 4.8% of cases carried rare tv, particularly within ACM genes (3% cases vs 0% controls; odds ratio 8.2; p=0.001). This was predominantly driven by desmoplakin (DSP)-tv in patients with normal LVEF. In Maastricht (n=106; median LVEF 30%), rare tv in DCM genes were enriched, particularly TTN-tv found in 7% (all with LVEF<50%) compared to 1% in controls (OR 3.6; p=0.0116). During a median follow-up of 1.9 years, all-cause mortality was greatest in those with a DCM variant (18% vs 4% with no variant; OR 5.0; p=0.004). Conclusion: We identified enrichment of cardiomyopathy gene variants in acute myocarditis patients, dominated by DSP-tv in those with normal LVEF and TTN-tv in those with reduced LVEF. Incorporation of genetic testing may be beneficial to identify such high-risk individuals and guide family screening in acute myocarditis patients.
Cost effectiveness of adjuvant pembrolizumab after nephrectomy for RCC: Insights for patient selection from a Markov model.
Sharma, Vidit , Wymer, Kevin , Thompson, R. Houston, Costello, Brian A. , Leibovich, Bradley C. , Boorjian, Stephen A. , Joyce, Daniel , Moriarty, James P. , Borah, Bijan J.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 16, 2022 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 6_suppl | Pages: 321-321

10.1200/jco.2022.40.6_suppl.321 Get It

321 Background: KEYNOTE-564 demonstrated that adjuvant pembrolizumab after nephrectomy for high-risk clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) decreased the risk of disease progression and – albeit with immature follow-up (2 years) – found a signal of improved overall survival as well. Herein, we used extrapolations from a Markov-model, accounting for the costs and toxicities of pembrolizumab relative to its efficacy, to investigate its utility at a population level. Methods: A decision-analytic Markov Model was used to conduct a cost-utility analysis of adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo after nephrectomy for high risk RCC, using data from KEYNOTE-564 to inform model probabilities. Transition probabilities not found in KEYNOTE-564, in addition to utility values, were extracted from the literature. Base case analyses were conducted with 5-year and 15-year time horizons (using extrapolations from 2-year outcomes), and 3-week time cycles. Primary outcomes were Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), 2021 US Medicare costs, and Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). The willingness-to-pay threshold was set at $100,000/QALY. One-way sensitivity analyses were used to identify cost-effectiveness thresholds of individual parameters while probabilistic sensitivity analyses with 100,000 Monte-Carlo simulations were used to simultaneously vary all model inputs. Results: Pembrolizumab was associated with higher QALYs and costs relative to placebo (Table). Pembrolizumab was not cost-effective at a 5-year time horizon but was cost-effective at 15 years and beyond. One-way sensitivity analysis noted that pembrolizumab became cost-effective at 5-years if: 1) its administration cost was less than $5,064 (base = $10,278) or 2) if the 5-year risk of progression was 18.8% higher in placebo vs pembrolizumab (base = 9%). Using pembrolizumab’s reported hazard ratio of 0.68 for progression from KEYNOTE-564, we estimated that pembrolizumab would be cost-effective at 5-years for all patients with a Mayo Progression Free Survival Score of 10 or higher. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis found that pembrolizumab was cost-effective for 29% and 58% of microsimulations at 5 and 15 years, respectively. Conclusions: At current prices, adjuvant pembrolizumab was not cost-effective for all trial patients at a population level at 5-years after treatment but may be cost-effective for time horizons over 15 years. Instead, adjuvant pembrolizumab was found to be cost-effective only for the highest risk subsets of RCC at 5-years. Longer term trial data of progression-free survival and overall survival are necessary to confirm these extrapolations.[Table: see text]
Objective home sleep profiles differentiate Alzheimer disease from α‐synucleinopathies
Levendowski, Daniel J. , Walsh, Christine M. , Salat, David H. , Hamilton, Joanne M., Ruoff, Leslie, Payne, Sarah, Lee‐Iannotti, Joyce , Westbrook, Philip R., Mazeika, Gandis, Boeve, Bradley F. , Neylan, Thomas C. , Tsuang, Debby W. , Shprecher, David , Berka, Chris , Louis, Erik K. St.

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 31, 2021 | Volume: 17 | Issue: S5 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.052238 Get It

AbstractBackgroundNeurodegenerative disease (NDD) is associated with sleep disturbances, including decreased stage N3 and REM sleep and reduced spindle activity. Further, supine sleep position may impact NDD risk by altering glymphatic clearance. This study evaluated conventional and exploratory sleep metrics in the differentiation of subjects with normal cognition (NC) and patients with Alzheimer’s disease dementia (AD) and alpha‐synucleinopathies (α‐Syn).MethodHome sleep data were acquired across multiple study sites using the self‐applied Sleep ProfilerTM, including 44 NC subjects (age=69+5.0), 22 patients diagnosed with AD (age=75+7.1) and 25 with α‐Syn (Parkinson’s disease=14, Parkinson’s disease with Dementia or Dementia with Lewy Bodies=11; age=69+6.9). Recordings were auto‐staged and technically reviewed, with 86% of the records having two‐night averages. Logistic regression and Mann‐Whitney U tests were used to characterize group differences based on age, conventional sleep metrics (i.e., sleep efficiency, sleep onset (SO), awakenings, percent of sleep time (%) in REM,N1, N2 and N3, and sleep spindles) and exploratory sleep measures [i.e., % supine, % Light N2 (L2=N2 epochs absent of spindles with K‐complexes and/or alpha or EMG (>40 Hz) intrusion), % NREM sleep with hypertonia (NRSH=>4 consecutive epochs with persistently elevated EMG power relative to delta and theta power) and % atypical N3 (AN3=epochs staged N3 with low theta and sigma power relative to delta, alpha, beta and EMG)].ResultAD were older than both NC and α‐Syn patients (p<0.005). Both AD and α‐Syn had lower %REM and greater %supine than NC (p<0.005), and %NRSH was greater in α‐Syn than NC or AD (p<0.005). Based on logistic regression, AD was differentiated from NC based on age, %REM, %L2 (p<0.05) and %supine (p=0.06). α‐Syn was distinguished from NC using both conventional (%N3 and SO, p<0.05) and exploratory sleep metric (%AN3 and %NRSH, p<0.05; %supine, p=0.06). Age (p=0.05) and %NRSH (p<0.01) were the only metrics that differentiated α‐Syn from AD.ConclusionObjective home sleep profiles hold promise for differentiating NDD patients from NC. The sleep metrics that provided the greatest distinction between NDD and NC were %REM, %supine and NRSH, while only NRSH distinguished AD from α‐Syn patients. Further confirmatory studies are underway.
Metabolic Syndrome and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19
Gillet, A.S. , Zu, Yuanhao, Brown, Margo, Pham, Thaidan , Yoshida, Yilin , Douglas, Ivor S. , Moore, Mathew, Tea, Kevin, Wetherbie, Andrew, Stevens, Rachael, Lefante, John J., Shaffer, Jeffrey G. , Armaignac, Donna Lee , Belden, Katherine A. , Kaufman, Margit, Heavner, Smith F. , Danesh, Valerie , Hill, Catherine A. St., Boman, Karen , Bansal, Vikas , Kumar, Vishakha K. , Group, Society of Critical Care Medicine Discovery Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study (VIRUS): COVID-19 Registry Investigator, Mesland, Jean-Baptiste , Henin, Pierre , Petre, Hélène, Buelens, Isabelle, Gérard, A , Granado, Rolando Claure-Del, Vega-Terraza, Esdenka, Iturricha-Cáceres, Maria F., Garza, Rubén , Chan, Victoria , Gavidia, Oscar Y., Pachon, Felipe, Tawheed, Ahmed , Pineda, Estela , Guillen, Gabina María Reyes, Soto, Helin Archaga, Lizardo, Ana Karen Vallecillo, Segu, Smitha, Chakraborty, T., Joyce, Epcebha, Kasumalla, Phani Sreeharsha, Vadgaonkar, Girish, Ediga, Rekha, Basety, Shilpa, Dammareddy, Shwetha, Raju, Umamaheswara, Manduva, Janaki, Kolakani, Naresh, Sripathi, Shreeja , Chaitanya, Sheetal, Parameswaran, Sreejith , Parthiban, Magesh, Menu, P., Daga, Mardul Kumar, Agarwal, Munisha , Rohtagi, Ishan, Papani, Sridhar, Kamuram, Mahesh, Agrawal, Kamlesh Kumar , Baghel, Vijendra, Patel, K, Mohan, Surapaneni Krishna, Jyothisree, Ekambaram, Dalili, Nooshin , Nafa, Mohsen, Matsuda, Wataru , Suzuki, Reina , Horikita, Sho, Kodate, Akira, Takahashi, Yuki , Moriki, Koyo, Iwasaki, Yudai , Rodríguez‐Gutiérrez, René , Gonzale, Jose Gerardo, Salcido‐Montenegro, Alejandro , Hassan-Hanga, Fatimah , Gezawa, Abubakar Shehu, Kabir, Halima , Amole, Taiwo Gboluwaga , Haliru, Dalha Gwarzo, Ibrahim, Abdullahi S., Asghar, Muhammad Sohaib , Syed, Mashaal , Naqvi, Syed Anosh Ali, Заболотских, И. Б. , Alamoudi, Razan K., Alsharif, Hassan, Almazwaghi, Sarah A., Elsakran, Mohammed S., Aid, M., Darwich, Mouaz A., Hagag, Omnia M., Ali, Salah A., Rocacorba, Alona, Supeña, Kathrine, Juane, Efren Ray, Medina, Jenalyn, Baduria, Jowany, Amer, Marwa , Dahhan, Talal, Kseibi, Eiad, Butt, Abid Shahzad, Khurshid, Syed Moazzum, Rabee, Muath, Abujazar, Mohammed, Alghunaim, Razan K, Abualkhair, Maal, AlFirm, Abeer Turki, Alarifi, Mohammed I, Macarambon, Jara Mia, Bukhari, Ahmad Abdullah, Albahrani, Hussian A, Aldossary, Kaltham M., Zoran, Marija Zdravkovic, Popadic, Viseslaz, Bojicic, Jovana, Predrag, Stevanović, Stojakov, Dejan , Ignjatovic, Duska K., Bojicic, Suzana C, Bobos, Mariana M, Nenadić, Irina , Zaric, Milica S., Djuric, Marko , Djukic, Vladimir R., Teruel, Santiago, Martin, Belen C., Bilgin, Huseyin, Dodd, Kenneth W. , Goodmanson, Nicholas, Hesse, Kathleen, Bird, P. H., Weinert, Chauncey, Schoenrade, Nathan, Altaher, Abdulrahman, Mayar, Esmael, Aronson, Matthew, Cooper, Tyler, Logan, Monica, Miner, Brianna, Papo, Gisele, Siegal, Eric M., Runningen, Phyllis, Patel, Love , Melamed, Roman , Tierney, David M. , Raj, Vino S., Mazumder, Narayana, Hill, Catherine St., Kirkland, Lisa L., Schmitz, Nova J., Sigman, Alena, Hall, Joan, Raval, Abhijit, Franks, Andrea S. , Jarvis, Jennifer M., Kharbanda, Anmol, Jhajhria, Sunil, Fyffe, Zachary, Capizzi, Stephen A., Alicie, Bethany, Green, Martha, Corckarell, Lori, Drennan, A. M., Dubuque, Kathleen, Fambrough, Tonya, Gasaway, Nikole, Krantz, Briana, Nebi, Peiman, Orga, Jan, Serfass, Margaret, Simion, Alina, Warren, Kimberly R., Wheeler, Cassie, Woolman, C. J., Christie, Amy B. , Adiga, Rajani, Moyer, A, Verghese, George M., Forehand, Chirsty C, Sabov, Moldovan, Zaidi, Fatema, Tissavirasingham, Fiona, Malipeddi, Dhatri , Campbell, Beth Salvagio , Wilson, Cathleen, Rivers, Patrick , Brinks, Jonathan, Mongoh, Mokenge Ndiva, Gilson, Boris, Armaignac, Donaa Lee, Parris, Don, Zuniga, Maria Pilar, Vargas, Ilea, Boronat, Viviana, Hutton, Anneka, Kaur, Navneet , Neupane, Prashank, Sadule-Rios, Nohemi, Rojas, Lourdes M. , Neupane, Aashish, Rivera, Priscilla, Carlos, Carlos Valle, Amin, Mahesh, Schelle, Mary E, Steadham, Amanda, McBride, Cameron , Abraham, Jocelyn, Richards, Katherine , Collins, Keegan, Antony, Preethi, Dubrocq, Gueorgui , Davis, Amber, Hammers, Marissa J, McGahey, Ill M, Farris, Amanda C., Priest, Elisa L. , Korsmo, Robyn, Fares, Lorie, Skiles, Kathy, Shor, Susan M, Burns, Kenya, Flores, Melody, Newman, Lindsay, Wilk, Debora A., Ettlinger, Jason, Bomar, Jaccallene, Darji, Himani, Arroliga, Alejandro C. , Dowell, Corrie A., Gonzales, Gabriela “ Hope”, Garcia, Michael A. , Colona, Mia R., Kibbelaar, Zoé A. , Leong, Michael S. , Wallman, Daniel , Soni, Kanupriya , Maccarone, Jennifer , Gilman, Joshua, Devis, Ycar, Chung, Joseph, Paracha, Munizay , Lumelsky, David , DiLorenzo, Madeline A. , Abdurrahman, Najla, Johnson, Shelsey W. , Hersh, Maj Andrew M., Wachs, Stephanie, Swigger, Brittany S., Sattler, L, Moulton, Michael N., Zammit, Kimberly, Loeffler, William, Tirupathi, Raghavendra , Tang, Alymer, Safi, Arshad M., Green, Cindy, Newell, J.D., Ramani, Naga, Ganti, Bhavani Harika, Ihle, R , Davis, Elaine , Martin, Shelda A, Sayed, Imran A., Strom, Larisa, Lee, Giyoung , Burnett, Ryan H., Sydney, Guy I. , Traynor, Danielle M., White, Joshua, Khan, Aftab, Dhahwal, Rahul, Ahmed, Farzin, Deonarine, Chrispoter, Jones, Ashley, Shaikh, Mohammad Ali, Preston, David A. , Chin, Jeanette, Duggal, Abhijit, Rajendram, Prabalini , Mehkri, Omar , Biehl, Michelle, Houltham, Stuart, Kind, Alexander, Ashok, Kiran, Poynter, Bryan, Beukemann, Mary, Rice, Richard, Gole, Susan, Shaner, Valerie , Conjeevaram, Adarsh, Ferrari, Michlelle, Alappan, Narendrakumar, Minear, Steven , Hernández-Montfort, Jaime , Nasim, Syed Sohaib, Sunderkrishnan, Ravi, Sahoo, Debasis , Milligan, Patrick S., Koglin, Joy M., Gibson, Regina, Johnson, Lana, Preston, Felicia, Scott, Crimson, Nungester, Bethany, Byrne, Dana , Grant, Katie, Doktar, Katherine L, Porto, Maura C, Kaplan, Olgo, Schonewald, Brian, Woodford, Ashley L., Tsai, Alan , Reid, Savina, Bhowmick, Kuntal, Daneshpooy, Saba , Mowdawalla, Cyrus , Dave, Trishna Akshay, Crudeli, Wilhemina Kennedy Connor, Ferry, Chirstopher, Nguyen, Long , Modi, Sneha, Padala, Niharika, Patel, Pavan Jitendra, Lin, Belle, Qiuyun, Jamie, Liu, Fan Mandi, Kota, Rasagna, Banerjee, Annesha , Daugherty, Steven K., Atkinson, Sam, Shrimpton, Kelly, Ontai, Sidney , Contreras, Brian, Obinwanko, Uzoma, Amamasi, Nneka, Sharafi, Amir, Lee, Sarah , Esber, Zahia , Jinjvadia, Chetna, Krishnamoorthy, Vijay , Kraft, Bryan , Pulsipher, Aaron, Friedman, Eugene, Mehta, Sachin , Kaufman, Margit, Lobel, G, Gandhi, Nisha, AbdelAty, Amr M. , Shaji, Elizabeth, Lim, Kiana, Marte, Juan M., Sosa, Dani Ashley, Benjenk, Ivy , Prasanna, Nivedita, Perkins, Nicholas , Roth, Prera J, Litwin, Alain H. , Pariyadath, Ananda, Moschella, Phillip , Llano, Trayson, Waller, Christine, Kallies, Kara J. , Thorsen, Jonean , Fitzsimmons, Alec , Olsen, H. L., Smalls, Normal, Davis, S., Jovic, Valentina, Masuda, M, Hayes, Amanda, Nault, Katharine, Snow, William G., Liptak, Riley, Durant, Hannah, Pendleton, Valerie, Nanavati, Alay, Mrozowsk, Risa, Doubleday, Erica, Liu, Yuk Min, Zavala, Sarah , Shim, Esther, Reilkoff, Ronald A., Eichen, Sarah, Goertzen, Lexie, Rajala, Scott, Feussom, Ghislaine, Junia, Christine, Lichtenberg, Robert, Sidhu, Hasrat, Espinoza, Diana , Rodrigues, Shelden , Zabala, Marai Jose, Susheela, Ammu , Hatharaliyadda, Buddhi, Rameshkumar, Naveen, Kasireddy, Amulya, Beltran, Lisseth, Chaugule, Akshata, Patil, Namrata, Patil, Ruhi, Cartin‐Ceba, Rodrigo , Sen, Ayan , Talaei, Fahimeh , Domecq, Juan Pablo , Gajic, Ognjen, Sharma, Mayank , Qamar, Shahraz , Morales, Diana J. Valencia , Nou, Abigail T. La, Bogojevic, Marija , Sanghavi, Devang , Franco, Pablo Morno, Ganaphadithan, Karthik, Saunders, Hollie , Fleissner, Zachary, Mateus, Alejandra Yu Lee, Kaur, Nirmaljot , Giri, Abhisekh, Hasan, Mohammed Mustafa, Donepudi, Ashrita , Khan, Syed Anjum , Jain, Nitesh , Koritala, Thoyaja , Nanchal, Rahul , Peterson, Jennifer , Yamanaka, Travis, Barreras, Nicholas A., Markos, Michael, Fareeduddin, Anita, Mehta, Rohan, Venkata, Chakradhar , Engemann, Miriam, Mantese, Annamarie, Tarabichi, Yasir , Wang, Christine, Kotekal, Dhatri, Bierwirth, Adriana C. Briceno, Orellana, Gabriela, Catalasan, Gerardo , Ahmed, Shohana, Salinas, Ivania, Nogal, Genesis Del, Tejada, Ángel Morales-Martínez de, Chen, Jen‐Ting , Hope, Aluko A. , Tsagaris, Zoe, Ruen, Elise, Hambardzumyan, Aram, Siddiqi, Nasar A, Jurado, Lesly, Tincher, Lindsey, Brown, Carolyn , Aulakh, Bhagat , Bandy, Jennifer A., Kreps, Lisa M., Bollinger, Dwan R, Stienecker, Roger Scott , Melendez, Andre G, Brunner, Tressa A., Budzon, Sue M., Heffernan, J., Souder, Janelle M., Miller, Tracy L., Maisonneuve, A., Redfern, Roberta E. , Shoemaker, Jessica, Micham, Jennifer, Kenney, Lynn, Naimy, Gabriela, Pulver, Kerry P J, Yehle, Jennifer, Weeks, Alicia, Inman, T., Delmonaco, Brain L, Franklin, Anthony , Heath, Mitchell, Vilella, Antonia L. , Kutner, Sara B., Clark, Kacie , Anderson, Harry L, Rajkumar, Dixy, Abunayla, Ali, Heiter, Jerrilyn, Zaren, Howard A. , Smith, Stephanie J., Lewis, Grant C., Seames, Lauren, Farlow, Cheryl, Miller, Judy, Broadstreet, Gloria, Martinez, Anthony , Allison, Micheal, Mittal, Aniket, Ruíz, Rafael Azuar , Skaanland, Aleta, Patel, Umang, Hodge, Jordesha, Patel, Krunal Kumar, Dalal, Shivani , Kavani, Himanshu , Joseph, Sam W. , Bernstein, Michael, Goff, Ian K., Naftilan, Matthew, Mathew, Amal , Williams, Debora, Murdock, Sue, Ducey, Maryanne, Nelson, Kerianne, Mitchel, James, Cox, Sylvan, Amzuta, Ioana, Shah, Amish , Modi, Ritu, Al-Khalisy, Hassan, Masuta, Pradeep, Schafer, Melissa , Wratney, Angela, Carter, K., Olmos, M. A. Martinez, Parker, Brittany M, Quintanilla, Julio, Craig, Tara A, Clough, B., Jameson, J, Jones, Tacy L, Ayers, Shonda C., Harrell, Amy B., Brown, Brent R., Darby, Caleb, Page, Kristy, Brown, Amanda, McAbee, Jessie, Baram, Michael , Weber, Devin , DePaola, Rosalie, Xia, Yuwei , Carter, Hudson, Tolley, A. E., Ferranti, Mary, Steele, Mark P., Kemble, Laurie, Sethi, Joshua, Han, Chung Cheng, Pagliaro, Jaclyn , Husian, Abdurrahman, Zawaydeh, Qais , Sines, B. , Markotić, Dragana, Bošnjak, Ivana, Nicholson, Susannah E. , Jonas, Rachelle B., Dement, AnnaRose E, Tang, William , DeRose, Mark, Villarreal, Robert E, Dy, Rajany , Lardino, Alfredo, Sharma, Jill H., Czieki, Richard, Christopher, Julia, Lacey, Ryan, Mashina, Marwan , Patel, Kushal, Gomaa, Dina , Goodman, Micahel, Spuzzillo, Anthony , Shinn, John O., Baslanti, Tezcan Ozrazgat, Omalay, George, Hashemighouchani, Haleh , Cupka, Julie S , Galet, Colette , Hubbard, Janice, Nazir, Usman, Rampon, Garrett , Riggle, Jake, Dismag, Nathan, Lenhardt, Rainer, Cavallazzi, Rodrigo , Jerde, Ann, Black, Alexa, Polidori, A., Griffey, Haily, Winkler, J., Brenzel, Thomas, Alvarez, Rodger A, Alarocon-Calderon, Amarilys, Sosa, Marie Anne , Mahabir, Sunita, Patel, Mausam , Parker, Pauline, Admon, Andre, Hanna, Sinan, Pliakas, Maria , Wolski, Ann, Cirino, Jennifer, Geiger, Grant , Njai, Abdoulie , Saad, Baraa M., Chuan, Byron, Rawal, Sagar L, Piracha, Manal, Levin, Nicholas M. , Suslavich, Kayte , Tsolinas, Rachel , Fica, Zachary , Skidmore, Chloe R., Stapleton, Renee D., Dixon, Anne E. , Johnson, Olivia, Ardren, Sara S., Burns, Stephanie, Raymond, Anna, Gonyaw, Erika, Hodgdon, Kevin , Houseger, Chole, Lin, Benjamin R. , McQuesten, Karen, Grimm, Heidi Pecott-, Sweet, Julie, Ventrone, Sebastian, Khandelwal, Nita , Lovelace-Macon, Lara, Garimella, Navya, Dow, Denisse Bazan, Rahman, Rania Abdul, Mulrow, Mary, Wilfong, Erin M. , Vela, Kelsi, Harris, Lynne, Cusson, Bruce, Fowler, Jacob , VanEenenaam, David P., Mckinney, Glen , Udoh, Imoh, Johnson, Kathleen N. , Michelson, Andrew P. , Haulf, Sara S, Lynch, Lauren, Steinbery, Aaron, Braus, Nicholas, Pattan, Vishwanath , Papke, J, Jimada, Ismail, Mhid, Nida, Chakola, Samuel, Sheth, Kevin N., Ammar, Abdalla , Lopez, Victor Torres , Khosla, Akhil , Gautam, Samir C. , Lee‐Mateus, Alejandra Yu , Bansal, Vikas , Yu Lee-Mateus, Alejandra , Kaur, Nirmaljot , Asghar, Muhammad S , Redfern, Roberta E , Denson, Joshua L. , Mauvais‐Jarvis, Franck , Cheruku, Sreekanth , Deo, Neha , Walkey, Allan J. , Kashyap, Rahul , Group, Society of Critical Care Medicine Discovery Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study (VIRUS): COVID-19 Registry Investigator, Clevenbergh, Philippe Albert , Granado, Rolando Claure‐Del , Mercado, Jose A, Garza, Ruben, Chu, Eric, Chan, Victoria, El‐Kassas, Mohamed , Chakraborty, Tuhin, Cherian, Anusha , Menu, Priya A, Sanui, Masamitsu , Itagaki, Yuki , Shiga, Takuya , Camacho-Ortíz, Adrián , Galadanci, Hadiza , Syed, Mashaal, Musaeva, Tatiana Sergeevna , Bawazeer, Mohammed Abdullah , Alghunaim, Razan K, Almazyad, Mohammed , Asfina, Kazi Nur , Klašnja, Slobodan , Kovačević, Bojan , Teruel, Santiago Y, Sili, Uluhan , Ay, Pınar , Bird, Paige, Schoenrade, Nathan, Hall, Joan, Franks, Andrea, Drennan, Amelia, Warren, Kimberly, Ashley, Dennis W. , Sikora, Andrea , Bruning, Rebecca, Jones, Timothy W, Mosier, Jarrod , Lutrick, Karen , Vincent, Gregory, Howard, Christopher M. , Garner, Orlando , Mathew, Sindhu, Dubrocq, Gueorgui , Waikar, Sushrut S. , Leong, Michael, McGrath, Patrick J, Chilbert, Maya R. , Green, Cindy, Ihle, Rayan E, Martin, Shelda A., Gist, Katja M. , Chiotos, Kathleen , Blatz, Allison M. , Surani, Salim , White, Joshua, Khan, Aftab, Preston, David, Vachharajani, Vidula , Dugar, Siddharth , Sacha, Gretchen , Kind, Alexander, Gole, Susan, Gupta, Sandeep , Schorr, Christa , Siegler, James E. , Bartz, Raquel R. , Mehta, Sachin, Kaufman, Margit, Abdelaty, Amr, Yamane, David , Pariyadath, Anand, Olsen, Haley, Smith, Michael A. , Snow, William, Heneghan, Julia A. , Tang, Ben, Goyes, Daniela , Maldonado, Génessis , Khan, Hassan, Gajic, Ognjen , Tekin, Aysun , Lal, Amos , O’Horo, John C. , Singh, Romil , Nou, Abigail La, Zec, Simon , Guru, Pramod , Garcia, Juan, Yarrarapu, Siva Naga S. , Bergl, Paul A. , Peterson, Jennifer L, Perzynski, Adam T. , Wang, Christine, Matute, Carlos , Hamdan, Ahmad, Tejada, Angel, Tripathi, Sandeep , Inman, Terra, Moore, Danielle, Anderson, Harry L, Miller, Judy, Ruiz, Rafael, Ross, Robert, Joseph, Sam, Block, Jason, O’Brien, Connor , Carter, Kristina L, Olmos, Michael, Gupta, Neha , Darby, Caleb, Tolley, Aaron, Malhotra, Atul , Bice, Thomas J. , Bosnjak, Ivana, Vail, Emily A. , Tang, William, Villarreal, Roberto E., Patel, Kushal, Wakefield, Devin, Bihorac, Azra , Ruppert, Matthew M. , McGonagill, Patrick W. , Wang, David , Allan, Lauren , Badheka, Aditya V. , Chegondi, Madhuradhar , Akça, Ozan , Polidori, Allison, Winkler, Justin, Chanderraj, Rishi , Dandachi, Dima , Regunath, Hariharan , Camazine, Maraya , Saad, Baraa, Shah, Faraaz A , Tonna, Joseph E. , Lin, Benjamin, Pecott-Grimm, Heidi, West, T. Eoin , Caldwell, Ellen , Akhter, Murtaza , Khanna, Ashish , Lyons, Patrick G. , Lynch, Lauren M, Nguyen, Nguyet Minh , Papke, Jessica, Ammar, Mahmoud A , Dela Cruz, Charles S

JAMA Network Open | December 22, 2021 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 12 | Pages: e2140568

10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.40568 | PMID 34935924 Get It

Decision aids for localized prostate cancer in diverse minority men: Primary outcome results from a multicenter cancer care delivery trial (Alliance A191402CD)
Tilburt, Jon C. , Zahrieh, David , Pacyna, Joel E. , Petereit, Daniel G. , Kaur, Judith S. , Rapkin, Bruce D. , Grubb, Robert L., Chang, George J. , Babaian, Kara N., Sloan, Jeff A. , Basch, Ethan , Peil, Elizabeth S., Dueck, Amylou C. , Novotny, Paul J. , Buckner, Jan C. , Joyce, Daniel , Frosch, Dominick L. , Kim, Simon P. , Basch, Ethan , Joyce, Daniel D., Volk, Robert J , Dueck, A. C. , Joyce, Daniel D , Morris, Michael J. , Kovac, Evan Z. , Paskett, Electra D. , Montori, Víctor M.

Cancer | December 10, 2021 | Volume: 128 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1242-1251

10.1002/cncr.34062 | PMID 34890060 Get It

BackgroundDecision aids (DAs) can improve knowledge for prostate cancer treatment. However, the relative effects of DAs delivered within the clinical encounter and in more diverse patient populations are unknown. A multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial with a 2×2 factorial design was performed to test the effectiveness of within‐visit and previsit DAs for localized prostate cancer, and minority men were oversampled.MethodsThe interventions were delivered in urology practices affiliated with the NCI Community Oncology Research Program Alliance Research Base. The primary outcome was prostate cancer knowledge (percent correct on a 12‐item measure) assessed immediately after a urology consultation.ResultsFour sites administered the previsit DA (39 patients), 4 sites administered the within‐visit DA (44 patients), 3 sites administered both previsit and within‐visit DAs (25 patients), and 4 sites provided usual care (50 patients). The median percent correct in prostate cancer knowledge, based on the postvisit knowledge assessment after the intervention delivery, was as follows: 75% for the pre+within‐visit DA study arm, 67% for the previsit DA only arm, 58% for the within‐visit DA only arm, and 58% for the usual‐care arm. Neither the previsit DA nor the within‐visit DA had a significant impact on patient knowledge of prostate cancer treatments at the prespecified 2.5% significance level (P = .132 and P = .977, respectively).ConclusionsDAs for localized prostate cancer treatment provided at 2 different points in the care continuum in a trial that oversampled minority men did not confer measurable gains in prostate cancer knowledge.
Combined Drainage and Protocolized Necrosectomy Through a Coaxial Lumen-apposing Metal Stent for Pancreatic Walled-off Necrosis
Dayyeh, Barham K. Abu, Chandrasekhara, Vinay, Shah, Raj J., Easler, Jeffrey J., Storm, Andrew C., Topazian, Mark, Levy, Michael J., Martin, John A., Petersen, Bret T., Takahashi, Naoki, Edmundowicz, Steven, Hammad, Hazem, Wagh, Mihir S., Wani, Sachin, DeWitt, John, Bick, Benjamin, Gromski, Mark, Haddad, Mohammad Al, Sherman, Stuart, Merchant, Ambreen A., Peetermans, Joyce A., Gjata, Ornela, McMullen, Edmund, Willingham, Field F., Takahashi, Naoki , Takahashi, Naoki , Dayyeh, Barham K. Abu, Chandrasekhara, Vinay, Shah, Raj J., Easler, Jeffrey J., Storm, Andrew C., Topazian, Mark, Levy, Michael J., Martin, John A., Petersen, Bret T., Takahashi, Naoki, Edmundowicz, Steven, Hammad, Hazem, Wagh, Mihir S., Wani, Sachin, DeWitt, John, Bick, Benjamin, Gromski, Mark, Haddad, Mohammad Al, Sherman, Stuart, Merchant, Ambreen A., Peetermans, Joyce A., Gjata, Ornela, McMullen, Edmund, Willingham, Field F.

Annals of Surgery | November 4, 2021 | Volume: 277 | Issue: 5 | Pages: e1072-e1080

10.1097/sla.0000000000005274 | PMID 35129503 Get It

Objective: We evaluated a protocolized endoscopic necrosectomy approach with a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) in patients with large symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WON) comprising significant necrotic content, with or without infection. Summary Background Data: Randomized trials have shown similar efficacy of endoscopic treatment compared with surgery for infected WON. Design: We conducted a regulatory, prospective, multicenter single-arm clinical trial examining the efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound -guided LAMS with protocolized necrosectomy to treat symptomatic WON ≥6 cm in diameter with >30% solid necrosis. After LAMS placement, protocolized WON assessment was conducted and endoscopic necrosectomy was performed for insufficient WON size reduction and persistent symptoms. Patients with radiographic WON resolution to ≤ 3 cm and/or 60-day LAMS indwell had LAMS removal, then 6-month follow-up. Primary endpoints were probability of radiographic resolution by 60 days and procedure-related serious adverse events. Results: Forty consecutive patients were enrolled September 2018 to March 2020, of whom 27 (67.5%) were inpatients and 19 (47.5%) had clinical evidence of infection at their index procedure. Mean WON size was 15.0 ± 5.6 cm with mean 53.2% ± 16.7% solid necrosis. Radiographic WON resolution was seen in 97.5% (95% CI, 86.8%, 99.9%) by 60 days, without recurrence in 34 patients with 6-month follow-up data. Mean time to radiographic WON resolution was 34.1 ± 16.8 days. Serious adverse events occurred in 3 patients (7.5%), including sepsis, vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteremia and shock, and upper gastrointestinal bleeding. There were no procedure-related deaths. Conclusions: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage with protocolized endoscopic necrosectomy to treat large symptomatic or infected walled-off necrotic pancreatic collections was highly effective and safe. Clinicaltrials.-gov no: NCT03525808.
Patient Recommendations for Shared Decision-Making in Uterine Fibroid Treatment Decisions
Riggan, Kirsten A. , Venable, Sateria, Allyse, Megan , Balls-Berry, Joyce E, Allyse, Megan A , Riggan, Kirsten A , Stewart, Elizabeth A. , Balls‐Berry, Joyce E.

Journal of Patient Experience | October 20, 2021 | Volume: 8 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1177/23743735211049655 | PMID 34692992 Get It

Uterine fibroids are noncancerous tumors associated with significant morbidity among symptomatic patients. While medical and surgical treatments have expanded, hysterectomy remains common. We interviewed women diagnosed with uterine fibroids ( n = 47) to explore their experiences and recommendations for shared decision-making. A majority were non-Hispanic Black, highly educated (51.1%), and had graduate degrees (40.4%). Participants with both positive and negative provider experiences expressed a desire for a more proactive therapeutic approach, including a presentation by their provider of the spectrum of medical and surgical treatment options, and greater provider recognition of the impact of symptoms on quality of life. Women advocated for expanded shared decision-making that acknowledged their contribution to their own treatment plan and felt early screening and improved patient/provider education of uterine fibroid symptoms would facilitate greater congruence between treatment approaches and patient goals. Perceptions of insufficient input into their treatment plans frequently served as a barrier to care-seeking and treatment acceptance among women with uterine fibroid symptoms. Improved discussion of treatment options in the context of the unique symptom burden and values of the patient may facilitate greater provider trust and acceptance of uterine fibroid treatment.
P077 Reliability of the Clinical Characterization of Isolated REM Sleep Behavior Disorder
Levendowski, Daniel J. , Lee‐Iannotti, Joyce , Guevarra, C, Timm, Paul, Angel, E, Mazeika, Gandis, Shprecher, David , Angel, Elise, Louis, Erik K. St.

SLEEP Advances | October 7, 2021 | Volume: 2 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: A46-A46

10.1093/sleepadvances/zpab014.121 Get It

Abstract Purpose Compare agreements between polysomnography-based (PSG) diagnosis of isolated REM-sleep-behavior-disorder (iRBD) and Non-REM-Hypertonia (NRH), a novel biomarker independently associated with synucleinopathy-related neurodegenerative diseases. Methods Sixteen patients with histories of dream-enactment-behavior (DEB)(women=38%; age:64.6±13.0) underwent PSG with simultaneously-recorded Sleep Profiler (SP). Two boarded sleep neurologists independently characterized iRBD. Physician1 combined abnormal qualitative REM-sleep-without-atonia (RSWA) by submental electromyography, with video-confirmation of probably DEB. Physician2 relied solely on qualitative RSWA. SP was auto-staged, technically reviewed, and reprocessed for automated abnormal NRH detection. Kappa scores measured physician and NRH agreements. Results In the 14 records with REM sleep, iRBD was characterized in: Physician1=64%, Physician2=79%, NRH=71% of the records. Across the three methods, unanimous iRBD agreement occurred in 57% of the records (positive=7, negative=1). The between-physician agreement in iRBD classifications was fair (kappa=0.32). The agreement between NRH and Physician1 was moderate (kappa=0.52) versus slight with Physician2 (kappa=0.05). NRH comparisons to consensus physician agreement yielded one false-positive and one false-negative iRBD finding. Physician2 classified: a) iRBD in two cases that were negative by Physician1 and NRH, and b) one negative case that Physician1 and NRH characterized as iRBD. Physician1 identified one negative case that was classified iRBD by Physician2 and NRH. Additionally, NRH was abnormal in one of the two records with no REM sleep. Discussion NRH may assist in iRBD risk assessment, given it agreed with at least one physician in 86% of the cases and the between-physician iRBD agreement was only fair. NRH also characterized iRBD-risk in patients with insufficient REM sleep for RSWA assessment.
P076 Sleep Staging Agreement Between Polysomnography and Sleep Profiler in Isolated REM Sleep Behavior Disorder
Levendowski, Daniel J. , Lee‐Iannotti, Joyce , Guevarra, C, Timm, Paul, Angel, E, Mazeika, Gandis, Shprecher, David , Angel, Elise, Louis, Erik K. St.

SLEEP Advances | October 7, 2021 | Volume: 2 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: A45-A46

10.1093/sleepadvances/zpab014.120 Get It

Abstract Purpose Evaluate the sleep staging agreement between polysomnography (PSG) and Sleep Profiler (SP) in patients with suspected isolated REM-sleep-behavior-disorder. Methods Twenty-six patients with reported dream-enactment-behavior (Site1=16, Site2=10; 27% women; age 64±13 years) underwent a diagnostic PSG with simultaneously recorded SP. A registered sleep-technologist at each site performed PSG-staging, while SP was auto-staged and technically reviewed/edited. Across technicians, the initial staging was blinded. Site1 then performed unblinded restaging of PSG=N3(N2) vs. SP=N2(N3) epochs, while Site2 conducted a blinded, carefully-targeted restaging of N3. Statistics included Cohen’s kappa and Chi-square analyses. Results Agreement between SP and Site1 vs. Site2 were significantly different for Wake (kappa:Site1=0.816;Site2=0.650;combined=0.736), stage N1 (kappa:Site1=0.149;Site2=0.228;combined=0.188), stage N2 (kappa:Site1=0.632;Site2=0.718;combined=0.659), stage N3 (kappa:Site1=0.715;Site2=0.368;combined=0.525) and REM (kappa:Site1=0.827;Site2=0.719;combined=0.766)(all P&lt;0.001). After restaging of N3, the kappa values improved at Site1 (unblinded:N2=0.659/N3=0.883) and Site2 (blinded:N2=0.775/N3=0.736)(combined:N2=0.735/N3=0.851). The proportion of PSG-epochs restaged from N3 to N2 was 17% at Sites1 and 38% at Site2 (P&lt;0.001), while Site1 had fewer remaining PSG=N3 vs. SP=N2 conflicts (5.6% vs. 20.8%, P&lt;0.001). Compared to Site2, Site1 had a superior: REM kappa due to fewer SP=N2 disagreements (8.5% vs. 16.8%, P&lt;0.001), and Wake kappa resulting from fewer SP=N1 (6.6 vs. 15.6%, P&lt;0.001) and SP=N2 conflicts (5.9 vs. 12.0%, P&lt;0.001). Conversely, the Site1 N1 kappa was inferior due to greater SP=wake disagreement (41.6% vs. 19.8%, P&lt;0.001). Discussion N3 was excessively stage by both PSG technicians before restaging. At Site1, Wake, N3, and REM had almost-perfect-agreement with SP, while N2 had substantial-agreement. At Site2 and across-site, substantial-agreement was observed for Wake, N2, N3, and REM.
A consensus statement on the use of botulinum toxin in pediatric patients
Vova, Joshua , Green, Michael , Brandenburg, Joline E. , Davidson, Loren , Paulson, Andrea, Deshpande, Supreet , Inanoglu, Didem, Vova, Joshua A , Oleszek, Joyce L. , McLaughlin, Matthew J.

PM&R | September 24, 2021 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1116-1142

10.1002/pmrj.12713 | PMID 34558213 Get It

AbstractBotulinum toxin has been used in medicine for the past 30 years. However, there continues to be controversy about the appropriate uses and dosing, especially in the pediatric population. A panel of nine pediatric physiatrists from different regions and previous training programs in the United States were nominated based on institutional reputation and botulinum toxin (BoNT) experience. Based on a review of the current literature, the goal was to provide the rationale for recommendations on the administration of BoNT in the pediatric population. The goal was not only to review safety, dosing, and injection techniques but also to develop a consensus on the appropriate uses in the pediatric population. In addition to upper and lower limb spasticity, the consensus also provides recommendations for congenital muscular torticollis, cervical dystonia, sialorrhea, and brachial plexus palsies.