Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

511 citation(s) found for "Murad, M H".

Association Between SARS-CoV-2 Cycle Threshold Values and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Shah, Vishal P. , Farah, Wigdan , Hill, James C. , Hassett, Leslie C. , Binnicker, Matthew J. , Yao, Joseph D. , Farah, Wigdan H, Hassett, Leslie C , Farah, Wigdan , Murad, M. Hassan

Open Forum Infectious Diseases | August 31, 2021 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 9 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/ofid/ofab453 | PMID 34584900 Get It

Abstract Cycle threshold (CT) values are correlated with the amount of viral nucleic acid in a sample and may be obtained from some qualitative real-time polymerase chain reaction tests used for diagnosis of most patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). However, CT values cannot be directly compared across assays, and they must be interpreted with caution as they are influenced by sample type, timing of sample collection, and assay design. Presently, the correlation between CT values and clinical outcomes is not well understood. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies through April 19, 2021, that reported an association between CT values and hospitalization, disease severity, and mortality in patients ≥18 years old with SARS-CoV-2. A meta-analysis of 7 studies showed no significant difference in mean CT values between hospitalized and nonhospitalized patients. Among hospitalized patients, those with CT values <25 had a high risk of more severe disease and mortality than patients with CT values >30 (odds ratio [OR], 2.31; 95% CI, 1.70 to 3.13; and OR, 2.95; 95% CI, 2.19 to 3.96; respectively). The odds of increased disease severity and mortality were less pronounced in patients with CT values of 25–30 compared with >30.
Systematic review with network meta‐analysis: comparative efficacy of pharmacologic therapies for fibrosis improvement and resolution of NASH
Majzoub, Abdul M., Nayfeh, Tarek , Barnard, Abbey, Munaganuru, Nagambika, Dave, Shravan , Singh, Siddharth , Loomba, Rohit , Murad, Mohammad Hassan, Loomba, Rohit , Nayfeh, Tarek , Murad, M. Hassan

Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics | August 26, 2021 | Volume: 54 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 880-889

10.1111/apt.16583 | PMID 34435378 Get It

SummaryBackgroundNonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a common cause of chronic liver disease. There is a major need to understand the efficacy of different pharmacological agents for the treatment of NASH.AimTo assess the relative rank‐order of different pharmacological interventions in fibrosis improvement and NASH resolution.MethodsA comprehensive search of several databases was conducted by an experienced librarian. We included randomised controlled‐trials (RCTs) comparing pharmacological interventions in patients with biopsy‐proven NASH. The primary outcome was ≥1 stage improvement in fibrosis. The secondary outcome was NASH resolution.ResultsA total of 26 RCTs with 23 interventions met the eligibility criteria. Lanifibranor and obeticholic acid had the highest probability of being ranked the most effective intervention for achieving ≥1 stage of fibrosis improvement (SUCRA 0.78) and (SUCRA 0.77), respectively. For NASH resolution, semaglutide, liraglutide and vitamin E plus pioglitazone had the highest probability of being ranked the most effective intervention for achieving NASH resolution (SUCRA 0.89), (SUCRA 0.84) and (SUCRA 0.83), respectively. Lanifibranor, obeticholic acid, pioglitazone and vitamin E were significantly better than placebo in achieving ≥1 stage of fibrosis improvement. Conversely, semaglutide, liraglutide, vitamine E plus pioglitazone, pioglitazone, lanifibranor and obeticholic acid were significantly better than placebo in achieving NASH resolution.ConclusionThese data provide relative rank‐order efficacy of various NASH therapies in terms of their improvements in liver fibrosis and NASH resolution. Therapies that have been shown to improve NASH resolution may be combined with therapies that have an antifibrotic effect to further boost treatment response rate in future.
Health Care Delivery Interventions for Hypertension Management in Underserved Populations in the United States: A Systematic Review
Pasha, Maarya , Brewer, LaPrincess C. , Sennhauser, Susie , Alsawas, Mouaz , Brewer, LaPrincess C , Alsawas, Mouaz , Murad, M. Hassan

Hypertension | August 16, 2021 | Volume: 78 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 955-965

10.1161/hypertensionaha.120.15946 | PMID 34397275 Get It

The high prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension in underserved populations is a major cause of health disparities in the United States and requires innovative health care delivery interventions. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and comparative observational studies examining the effectiveness of contemporary systems change and quality improvement interventions aimed at improving blood pressure (BP) control published from 2010 to 2020. We included studies evaluating multicomponent practice improvement interventions conducted in the United States in community health centers. We identified 26 studies including 48 187 patients with hypertension with a high proportion of racial/ethnic minorities, low socioeconomic status, and a high burden of chronic illness. Multicomponent interventions led to an average reduction of 5 to 10 mm Hg in systolic BP. Four studies demonstrated the effectiveness of integrating pharmacists into community health centers for BP management and reduced cardiovascular disparities for at-risk populations. Five studies demonstrated the effectiveness of integrating community health workers into care workflows leading to reduction in BP and high patient satisfaction. Five studies used the electronic medical record as a tool for population management and showed only modest reduction in BP. One study demonstrated the effectiveness of incentivizing clinics with higher payments for uninsured and Medicaid patients meeting performance criteria. Very few studies evaluated treatment complications or medications side effects. Multicomponent quality improvement interventions instituted in community health centers are effective in lowering BP. Several components of the interventions were identified as being associated with higher efficacy.
Peripartum Antibiotics Exposure and the Risk of Autoimmune and Autism Disorders in the Offspring
Almasri, Jehad , Barazi, Ahmed, Walther-António, Marina , Wang, Zhen , Absah, Imad , King, Katherine S. , Walther-Antonio, Marina R S, Murad, Mohammad H, Walther-Antonio, Marina , Murad, M. Hassan , Murray, Joseph A.

Avicenna Journal of Medicine | August 12, 2021 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 03 | Pages: 118-125

10.1055/s-0041-1732485 | PMID 34646788 Get It

Abstract Background As the use of antibiotics during the peripartum period increases, the incidence of autoimmune disorders and autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) is also increasing. In this study, we aim to assess if antibiotic exposure during the peripartum period affects the incidence of autoimmune diseases and ASD in the offspring. Methods We identified children (< 18 years of age) born in Olmsted County from January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2012. Offspring with celiac disease (CD), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), or ASD diagnoses were matched to two controls on birth date, index date, mother’s age at delivery, and sex. Data from the mother’s medical records were retrieved to determine peripartum antibiotics use. Results A total of 242 cases and 484 matched controls were included in this study. Median age at the last follow-up was 11.3 years (range: 0.5–14.9), 73% were males in both groups. Odds of CD diagnosis was not statistically different between vaginal delivery with antibiotics compared with vaginal delivery with no antibiotics (odds ratio [OR] = 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.32–1.85), similarly in IBD (OR = 2.41, 95% CI: 0.53–10.98) and ASD (OR = 1.00, 95% CI:0.55–1.79). Preeclampsia or eclampsia was associated with offspring CD (OR = 3.20, 95% CI: 1.05–9.78). Smoking history and diabetes mellitus were associated with offspring ASD (OR = 1.84, 95% CI: 1.22–2.77 and OR = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.03–3.91, respectively). Conclusion In this cohort, we found no statistically significant association between peripartum antibiotics exposure and the development of CD, IBD, or ASD.
Reply to Wu, et al
Alrahmani, Layan , Alrahmani, Layan , Matar, Reem , Murad, M. Hassan

Clinical Infectious Diseases | August 6, 2021 | Volume: 74 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1319-1320

10.1093/cid/ciab694 | PMID 34358318 Get It

Erratum to: Characterizing Benefit from Temozolomide in MGMT Promoter Unmethylated and Methylated Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Alnahhas, Iyad , Alsawas, Mouaz , Raval, Raju R. , Ong, Shirley, Giglio, Pierre , Murad, Mohammad Hassan, Alsawas, Mouaz , Rayi, Appaji , Palmer, Joshua D. , Murad, M. Hassan , Puduvalli, Vinay K.

Neuro-Oncology Advances | July 10, 2021 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/noajnl/vdab095 | PMID 34258581 Get It

Recurrence and mortality rates with different treatment approaches of Merkel cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Harvey, Jamison A. , Mirza, Sultan A., Erwin, Patricia J., Chan, An Wen, Brewer, Jerry D., Mirza, Sultan A., Murad, M. Hassan

International Journal of Dermatology | July 6, 2021 | Volume: 61 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 687-697

10.1111/ijd.15753 | PMID 34227108 Get It

AbstractBackgroundComprehensive treatment recommendations for Merkel cell carcinoma are complex. We aimed to systematically review the published data on recurrence and mortality rates associated with various treatment approaches for Merkel cell carcinoma.MethodsSearch of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to August 2015. Studies were included that reported comparative survival and recurrence data for two or more treatment modalities. Two reviewers independently reviewed and abstracted recurrence and mortality rates. Event rates for individual treatment arms in each study were pooled and meta‐analyzed across studies using a random‐effects model.ResultsFifty‐two retrospective studies met inclusion criteria, revealing a total of 1,804 patients with primary Merkel cell carcinoma with data available for analyses. The recurrence rate was higher for surgery alone (55.0%) versus a combination of surgery and radiotherapy (39.0%) (odds ratio, 2.089; 95% CI, 1.374–3.177; P < 0.001). Combination therapy including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy had a higher mortality rate (44.6%) than did combined surgery and radiotherapy (23.2%) (odds ratio, 2.688; 95% CI, 1.196–6.037; P = 0.02).ConclusionsThe treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma with surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy may produce lower recurrence rates.
Abstract WP11: Comparative Safety and Efficacy of the Trevo, Penumbra and Solitaire Devices in Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke
Brinjikji, Waleed , Cloft, Harry J. , Kallmes, David F. , Murad, M. Hassan

Stroke | July 3, 2021 | Volume: 47 | Issue: suppl_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/str.47.suppl_1.wp11 Get It

Background and Purpose: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing rates of recanalization, good neurological outcome, and mortality between patients treated with three modern devices used for endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Materials and Methods: We performed a comprehensive literature search on studies reporting outcomes of endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke. We selected studies including≥30 patients treated with either the Trevo stent-retriever, Penumbra aspiration system or the Solitaire stent-retriever. Outcomes studied included mrs≤2, 90-day mortality, symptomatic and intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), recanalization. Outcomes were pooled across studies using a random-effects meta-analysis. Results: 27 articles with 2666 patients were included (1514 Solitaire, 260 Trevo and 892 Penumbra). Rates of good neurological outcome (mRS≤2) were higher in the Solitaire group (54.0%, 95%CI=49.0-58.0%) than the Penumbra group (39.0%, 95%CI=31.0%-47.0%) (P<0.01). There was a trend towards higher rates of good neurological outcome in the Solitaire compared to the Trevo group (P=0.08). Rates of 90-day mortality were significantly lower in the Solitaire group (16.0%, 95%CI=11.0%-22.0%) than in the Penumbra group (27.0%, 95%CI=24.0%-30.0%) (P<0.01) and the Trevo group (23.0%, 95%CI=13.0-33.0)(P=0.01). Recanalization rates were similar between groups at 80.0% (95%CI=75.0%-84.0% for the Solitaire group, 82.0% (95%CI=75.0%-88.0%) for the Penumbra group (P=0.54) and 76.0% (95%CI=68.0-83.0) for the Trevo group (P=0.13 vs Penumbra and P=0.27 vs. Solitaire). Conclusions: Meta-analysis of incidence rates in noncomparative series reporting on over 2500 patients suggests that the Solitaire device maybe associated with superior neurological outcomes and lower rates of 90-day mortality. Comparative studies are needed to confirm these observations.
Abstract 309: Is Right Bundle Branch Block Associated with Poor Outcomes in the Setting of an Acute Coronary Syndrome? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Hazem, Ahmad, Sharma, Sunita , Sharma, Amit , Leitch, Cameron, Sharadanant, Roopalakshmi, Uriell, Matthew, Neutzling, Kari, Moreno, Patricia Brrionuevo, Sorita, Atsushi , Vilesnki, Leonid, Makkuni, Premraj, Ting, Henry H. , Wang, Zhen , Moreno, Patricia Barrionuevo, LeBlanc, Annie , Prokop, Larry J. , Murad, M. Hassan

Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes | July 3, 2021 | Volume: 7 | Issue: suppl_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circoutcomes.7.suppl_1.309 Get It

Importance: Up to 10% of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have right bundle branch block (RBBB), and RBBB has been associated with a higher risk of mortality. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the prognostic significance of RBBB for patients with AMI. Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) Data Sources: We have systematically searched Ovid, Scopus and Web of Science through January 2014. Study Selection: Reviewers working independently and in duplicate screened all eligible abstracts, selecting studies that described all-cause mortality or cardiovascular death in patients with RBBB and suspected ACS. We excluded studies that reported unadjusted outcomes. Knowledge synthesis: We pooled risk ratio with hazard ratio in studies reporting those outcomes. When reported, odds ratio was converted into risk ratio using reported event rate in each study’s unexposed -read: non RBBB- group. Main Outcomes: All-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality (death). Results: Eighteen studies were found that reported eligible data. All were observational studies, involving over 89,000 patients. In short-term follow up (up to 30 days), RBBB on presentation was associated with higher all-cause mortality rate, compared to patients without RBBB (RR 2.23, 95% CI 1.76-2.82). There was a trend for higher mortality at long-term follow up (range: 6 months-16 years) that did not reach statistical significance (RR 1.45, 95% CI 0.93-2.25). Figure-1 demonstrates the forest plot. Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and majority of included studied were deemed moderate to high quality. Conclusion and Relevance: RBBB is associated with a more than 2-fold higher risk of all-cause mortality in patients with AMI at 30 days follow up. Patients with AMI and RBBB represent a high risk group for adverse outcomes. A sentence on the differential findings for new vs. old RBBB and association with outcomes could follow here.
Abstract 118: Right Bundle Branch Block and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Hazem, Ahmad, Sharma, Sunita , Sharma, Amit , Leitch, Cameron, Sharadanant, Roopalakshmi, Uriell, Matthew, Neutzling, Kari, Moreno, Patricia Barrionuevo, Sorita, Atsushi , Vilenski, Leonid, Prokop, Larry, Makkuni, Premraj, Ting, Henry H. , LeBlanc, Annie , Wang, Zhen , Murad, M. Hassan

Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes | July 3, 2021 | Volume: 7 | Issue: suppl_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circoutcomes.7.suppl_1.118 Get It

Importance: Right bundle branch block (RBBB) is observed in approximately 5-14% of patients with heart failure (HF). Multiple observational studies have reported the association of RBBB with clinical outcomes in patients with HF. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the prognostic significance of RBBB for patients with HF. Data Sources: We have systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science and Scopus through January 2014. Study Selection: Reviewers working independently and in duplicate screened all eligible abstracts that described all cause or cardiovascular mortality in patients with RBBB and HF. We excluded studies that reported unadjusted outcome, i.e.: unadjusted event rates. Knowledge synthesis: We pooled reported risk ratio and hazard ratio. Main Outcomes: All-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality (death). Results: We found 12 relevant observational studies enrolling over 38,000 patients. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Included studies had at least a moderate quality. Seven of those evaluated prognosis of patients with RBBB and heart failure. After a mean follow up period of 2.5 years (range: 1-5 years), RBBB was associated with a statistically significant increased risk of all-cause mortality compared to patients with heart failure but no BBB, RR 1.27, 95% CI (1.08-1.50), Figure 1. The other 5 studies evaluated CHF patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), comparing outcomes of patients with RBBB to those with LBBB. After a mean f/u period of 3 years, patients with RBBB were once again found to have an increased risk of all-cause mortality, RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.12-1.89. Conclusion and Relevance: RBBB in patients with HF is associated with higher all-cause mortality in comparison to patients without inter-ventricular conduction defects, as well as LBBB patients in patients undergoing CRT setting.