Citations

SummaryDespite the absence of high‐risk cytogenetics and lower International Staging System (ISS) stages, a subset of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) experience poor overall survival (OS). We studied 1461 patients with newly diagnosed MM to identify patient and disease characteristics that predict a high‐risk phenotype among standard‐risk patients. Fifty‐six percent of all patients presented with standard‐risk disease. Among them, advanced age, extremes of body mass index, non‐hyperdiploid karyotype and abnormal lymphocyte counts were associated with worse OS. Standard‐risk patients with 0–1 of these adverse factors (hazard ratio [HR] 0·32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0·24–0·43, P < 0·001) and 2 adverse factors (HR 0·54, 95% CI 0·41–0·72, P < 0·001) experienced better OS than high‐risk patients. Two or more adverse factors were present in 17% of standard‐risk patients and were associated with OS comparable to high‐risk patients (HR 0·91, 95% CI 0·67–1·24, P = 0·548). Predictive power among standard‐risk patients was improved using score groups compared to ISS stages. Patients with standard‐risk MM are a heterogeneous group with one in six patients experiencing OS comparable to high‐risk disease. Patients at risk can be identified using readily available patient and disease characteristics. These findings emphasize the importance of accurate risk stratification and help explain part of the heterogeneity observed in clinical practice.

Abstract Peripheral blood biomarkers of tumor microenvironment and immune surveillance are independent prognostic factors in multiple myeloma. The timing and prognostic impact of immune reconstitution has been studied after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, less is known about its significance in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. We studied absolute lymphocyte (ALC) and absolute monocyte (AMC) counts at the time of treatment initiation and 1 month thereafter in 771 newly diagnosed patients. Two hundred and thirty‐four patients (31%) had evidence of immune dysregulation at baseline (abnormal biomarkers). Eighty‐seven of these patients (37%) recovered normal biomarkers at 1 month (early immune reconstitution). The absence of immune dysregulation at baseline (compared to the presence thereof) was associated with better overall survival (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61‐0.97, P = 0.025, n = 771). The absence of immune dysregulation at 1 month (compared to the persistence or development thereof) was associated with better overall survival (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.50‐0.80, P < 0.001, n = 771). Early immune reconstitution (compared to the persistence or development of immune dysregulation) was associated with better overall survival (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.43‐0.92, P = 0.016, n = 771). Cytogenetic high‐risk disease was negatively, and treatment with immunomodulators positively, associated with early immune reconstitution. The presence or development of immune dysregulation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma is an independent risk factor. The favorable impact of early immune reconstitution suggests immune dysregulation to be a potentially modifiable risk factor that may be exploited for therapeutic benefit.

AbstractResponse rates in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma have improved dramatically with the introduction of highly effective novel therapies. However, survival in patients achieving optimal responses to initial treatment can vary significantly, and new prognostic indicators are required to improve risk stratification. We investigated the relationship between time to plateau (TPlat) and survival in 1099 newly diagnosed patients treated with novel agents at our institution from 2005 to 2015.TPlatwas defined as time from initiation of first‐line therapy to best response to first‐line therapy. The medianTPlatwas 4.9 months (0.7‐58.6) and plateau duration was 1.8 years (0.2‐11.0). Patients who required > 120 days to achieve a plateau had longer modified overall survival (mOS) and progression free survival (mPFS) calculated from a landmark of best response (P < .001 for both comparisons). Statistically significant improvement in mOS was retained in subgroup analysis based on age and whether patients received upfront autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) (P < .001 for all comparisons). Our results suggest that patients who respond more gradually to initial therapy (TPlat > 120 days) experience longer survival compared to more rapid responders. Patients with a prolongedTPlatcould represent an “ongoing responder” phenotype that portends a survival advantage independent of treatment with upfront ASCT, depth of response, and biologic markers such as ISS stage and cytogenetic risk.

AbstractHigher ratios of the pre‐treatment peripheral blood absolute lymphocyte (ALC) to absolute monocyte counts (AMC) are associated with improved outcomes in lymphoma. Conversely, elevated pre‐treatment serum cytokines are associated with inferior outcomes. The relationship between pre‐treatment serum cytokines and ALC/AMC ratios remains unknown. We studied twelve serum cytokines and the ALC/AMC ratios in 390 patients with untreated diffuse large B‐cell, follicular, mantle cell, T‐cell, and Hodgkin lymphoma. Different pre‐treatment serum cytokine concentrations correlated with ALC, AMC, and ALC/AMC ratios depending on the lymphoma type. In the entire cohort (n = 390) lower ALC/AMC ratios modestly correlated with higher IL‐2R (r = −0.36), IL‐12 (r = −0.17), IP‐10 (r = −0.23), and MIG (r = −0.32) concentrations (p < 0.001). Elevated IL‐2R was independently associated with suppressed ALC (OR 2.69, 95% CI 1.77–4.07,p < 0.001), elevated AMC (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.34–3.14,p < 0.001), and suppressed ALC/AMC ratios (OR 3.51, 95% CI 2.31–5.34,p < 0.001). Both elevated IL‐2R (HR 2.27, 95% CI 1.48–3.49,p < 0.001) and suppressed ALC/AMC ratios (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.03–2.28,p = 0.037) were independently associated with inferior overall survival. These data support the notion that elevated serum cytokines are immunosuppressive and provide further rationale to target the tumor microenvironment for therapeutic benefit.

Objective Microscopic colitis (MC) is a common cause of chronic diarrhoea, often with additional symptoms. No validated instruments exist to assess disease activity in MC, making it difficult to compare efficacy of treatments between clinical trials. We aimed to identify clinical features that independently predicted disease severity and create a Microscopic Colitis Disease Activity Index (MCDAI). Design Patients with MC were prospectively administered a survey assessing their GI symptoms and the IBD Questionnaire (IBDQ). A single investigator also scored a physician global assessment (PGA) of disease severity on a 10-point scale. Multiple linear regression identified which symptoms best predicted the PGA. These symptoms were then combined in a weighted formula to create the MCDAI. The relationship between MCDAI and the IBDQ was investigated. Results Of the 175 patients enrolled, 13 (7.4%) did not complete the survey. The remaining 162 had a median age of 66 years (range, 57–73) and 74% were female. Several clinical features were independently associated with PGA (number of unformed stools daily, presence of nocturnal stools, abdominal pain, weight loss, faecal urgency and faecal incontinence). These parameters were combined to create the MCDAI, which strongly predicted the PGA (R 2 =0.80). A 1-unit decrease in disease activity (ΔMCDAI) was associated with a 9-unit increase in quality of life (ΔIBDQ). Conclusions The MCDAI strongly predicted the PGA and correlated with a validated measure of quality of life. Several symptoms in addition to diarrhoea are associated with disease severity in MC.

SummaryBackgroundOesophageal lichen planus is an idiopathic inflammatory disorder characterized by significant oesophageal stricturing. Oesophageal lichen planus is a rare, difficult to diagnose, and likely an under recognized disease. As a result, there is no standardized approach to therapy and treatment strategies vary.AimTo examine the utility of topical steroid therapy (fluticasone or budesonide) in the management of oesophageal lichen planus.MethodsA retrospective chart review was conducted of patients diagnosed with oesophageal lichen planus who underwent baseline and follow up endoscopy pre and post topical steroid therapy between 1995 and 2016 at Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN. Average time between upper GI endoscopy was 3.2 months (0.7–11.7). Swallowed steroid preparations included fluticasone 880 μg twice daily or budesonide 3 mg twice daily. Patients were reviewed for symptomatic response to therapy using the Dakkak‐Bennett dysphagia score (0–4, no dysphagia to total aphagia). Pre‐ and post‐endoscopic findings were assessed. Additional baseline demographic, endoscopic, and histologic data were also obtained.ResultsWe identified 40 patients who met the inclusion criteria. A significant reduction in median dysphagia score from 1 (0–4) to 0 (0–3) after steroid therapy (P < 0.001) was noted. 62% of patients reported resolution of their dysphagia after receiving topical corticosteroids. 72.5% had an endoscopic response to steroid therapy.ConclusionTopical swallowed budesonide or fluticasone appear to effective treatment for oesophageal lichen planus.