Citations

TPS2103 Background: Treatment for newly diagnosed IDH-mutant astrocytoma, WHO grade 3, is based on the results of the CATNON study, demonstrating benefit of radiotherapy followed by 12 months of adjuvant temozolomide. While temozolomide and radiotherapy significantly improved survival, the prognosis for these patients remains limited and more effective therapies are required. This trial will evaluate the benefit of the addition of the IDH1 and IDH-2 inhibitor vorasidenib to adjuvant temozolomide versus placebo following standard radiotherapy to evaluate possible improvement in outcomes. Methods: Alliance A072301 (NCT07215910) is a multicenter, double-blinded phase 3 randomized study to determine if the addition of vorasidenib to adjuvant temozolomide significantly improves progression-free survival (PFS), based on blinded central review in patients with newly diagnosed, IDH-mutant astrocytoma, WHO grade 3. Key inclusion criteria include age ≥ 12 years old, histological confirmation of astrocytoma (absence of 1p/19q codeletion), WHO grade 3, presence of any IDH mutation, plan for radiation and chemotherapy and surgery within 6 months. The presence of CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion, spinal or leptomeningeal disease, as well as prior chemotherapy, cranial irradiation or IDH inhibitor therapy, is exclusionary. 408 patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive vorasidenib 40 mg or placebo daily with 12 cycles of temozolomide following radiotherapy and then continued as monotherapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Stratification factors include age (< 40 years old vs ≥ 40 years old) and residual disease (< 2 cm vs ≥ 2 cm). Tumor assessments with MRI will be every three months for the first two years, every four months for the next two years and then every six months thereafter as per blinded independent central review using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) 2.0 criteria. Key secondary endpoints include PFS by local review, time to next treatment, safety and tolerability, quality of life measures. Exploratory measures will include seizure frequency. The trial will have 85% power to detect a hazard ratio of 0.625 with one-sided type I error rate of 0.025. Enrollment for the trial commenced February 2026. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171. https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org.

OBJECTIVE Craniopharyngiomas are benign intracranial tumors that can be difficult to manage operatively and often result in postoperative complications and prolonged recovery. Understanding the factors that influence length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and readmission can guide perioperative planning and patient counseling. The authors examined the clinical, radiographic, and surgical predictors of extended LOS (eLOS), nonhome discharge, 90-day readmission, and hospitalization ratio (HR) after craniopharyngioma resection using a large, multicenter cohort. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted using the Registry of Adenomas of the Pituitary and Related Disorders database, encompassing 469 patients who underwent craniopharyngioma resection at 14 US academic centers from 2011 to 2025. Patients were stratified by 4 outcomes: eLOS (> 75th percentile), discharge to home versus skilled nursing facility/rehabilitation, 90-day hospital readmission, and hospitalization ratio (i.e., integration of initial and readmission LOS). Multivariable logistic regression models identified independent predictors for each outcome among patient and surgical variables. RESULTS An eLOS (> 10 days) was independently associated with preoperative memory loss (OR 3.75, 95% CI 1.95–7.21), gait imbalance (OR 5.90, 95% CI 1.53–22.70), and postoperative complications (OR 4.07, 95% CI 2.34–7.06). The use of a nasoseptal flap was protective against an eLOS (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28–0.93). Discharge to home was predicted by an endoscopic approach (OR 3.87, 95% CI 1.78–8.44) and postoperative intact thirst (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.05–4.66) and negatively predicted by preoperative diabetes mellitus (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.09–0.50), LOS (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.84–0.91), and postoperative cognitive dysfunction (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.13–0.72). Among 385 patients with follow-up data, a 90-day readmission was independently associated with postoperative complications (OR 5.62, 95% CI 3.12–10.13), preexisting coronary artery disease (OR 4.30, 95% CI 1.46–12.69), and postoperative cognitive dysfunction (OR 3.33, 95% CI 1.76–6.44). A higher HR was associated with diabetes mellitus (unstandardized B 0.059, 95% CI 0.010–0.108, p = 0.02), postoperative complications (unstandardized B 0.054, 95% CI 0.021–0.086, p = 0.001), and postoperative cognitive dysfunction (unstandardized B 0.049, 95% CI 0.006–0.092, p = 0.02). Tumor pathologic subtype and size, prior treatment, extent of resection, and surgeon experience were not directly predictive of outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Cognitive and functional status, systemic comorbidities, and postoperative complications, in addition to surgical approach, are important predictors of the early clinical course after craniopharyngioma surgery. Early identification of high-risk patients may help to guide treatment decisions, improve discharge planning, and reduce healthcare utilization.

PURPOSE Integrating external control data into clinical trial designs and analyses has the potential to accelerate drug development processes. We reanalyzed the three experimental arms of the Individual Screening Trial of Innovative Glioblastoma Therapy (INSIGhT), a randomized phase II platform trial in newly diagnosed O 6 -methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase-unmethylated glioblastoma (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02977780 ). To evaluate the validity of using external data sets, we compared treatment effect estimates based on internal INSIGhT control data and matched external control data. METHODS The three experimental arms of INSIGhT (abemaciclib [n = 72], neratinib [n = 80], and CC-115 [n = 12]) did not improve survival compared with internal controls (standard chemoradiation [n = 70]). We derived external control patient-level data from multiple real-world and clinical trial data sets. We applied propensity score matching and Cox proportional hazards models to estimate treatment effects with external controls. Additionally, using this glioblastoma (GBM) data collection, we specified simulation scenarios to evaluate trial designs that integrate external controls. RESULTS After matching to external controls, no survival benefit was observed for patients receiving abemaciclib (hazard ratio [HR], 1.00 [95% CI, 0.75 to 1.34]), neratinib (HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.70 to 1.24]), or CC-115 (HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.41 to 1.88]). Simulations, together with the INSIGhT data and a collection of GBM data sets, allowed us to examine efficiencies and risks of clinical trial designs that leverage external control data. CONCLUSION The use of carefully matched external controls, to replace or augment the internal controls of INSIGhT, produced treatment effect estimates that were similar to previously published analyses. Single-arm trial designs and hybrid randomized designs incorporating propensity score–matched external control data evaluated treatment effects in the early-phase testing of experimental therapies in newly diagnosed GBM. The validity of this approach and risks of bias depended on the availability of comprehensive and accurate data on all potential confounders, in the absence of unmeasured confounding.

Abstract To enhance the prediction of traumatic brain injury (mTBI) outcomes, we propose a deep learning approach that integrates brain computed tomography (CT) scans with corresponding synthetic T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (T1-MRI). Our method significantly outperforms the prediction using CT scans alone. TRACK-TBI Pilot dataset, which includes imaging and clinical outcome data from patients with TBI, is studied. The hypothesis is brain CT and T1-MRI complement each other and together will improve TBI prognosis compared to using either CT or T1-MRI alone. Since CT and T1-MRI may not be available for the same individual, we employed a specialized version of a generative adversarial network (GAN), known as fixed-point GAN (FP-GAN). FP-GAN was trained using unpaired CT and T1-MRI scans to generate synthetic T1-MRIs from real CT scans. This process produced pseudo-paired CT-MRI data, which was then used to train a deep learning classifier for outcome prediction. The classifier consists of dual parallel 3D ResNet-18 models, each independently processing T1-MRI and CT scans. We used Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) scores at 3 months post-TBI as the measure of patient outcomes. To avoid data leakage, the subjects used in FP-GAN and ResNet-18 model have no overlap. We further divided the paired data, allocating 69 samples for 5-fold cross-validation and 17 samples for testing. Prognostic performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), F1-score (the harmonic mean of precision and recall), sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (true negative rate). For binary classification, we defined good recovery as GOSE ≥ 7 (positive) and poor recovery (negative) as 3 ≤ GOSE ≤ 6. Accordingly, our training set consists of 24 subjects with poor recovery and 45 subjects with good recovery, while the testing set includes 5 subjects with poor recovery and 12 subjects with good recovery. A DeLong test on AUC confirms that the improvement from incorporating synthetic T1-MRI (AUC = 0.76 ± 0.10) is statistically significant (P &lt; 0.05) compared to using CT alone (AUC = 0.68 ± 0.13). The significant improvement from using the combination of real CT and synthetic T1-MRI in sensitivity (SEN = 0.95 ± 0.07) and overall performance metrics, such as F1-score (F1 = 0.84 ± 0.03), suggests that the proposed approach provides a robust and effective prognostic approach compared to using CT alone (SEN = 0.83 ± 0.18 and F1 = 0.76 ± 0.07). This pilot research demonstrates the potential of a deep learning-based harmonization model to bridge the gap between CT and T1-MRI in TBI assessment. By integrating synthetic T1-MRI with CT, prediction performance is substantially enhanced.

ABSTRACT Recent advances in the diagnosis and management of reflux disease were the central focus of the inaugural Gatherings in Esophagology (GiE), which convened experts across gastroenterology, surgery, otolaryngology, pulmonology, and basic research. The sessions highlighted innovations in reflux monitoring—including high‐resolution manometry, wireless pH monitoring, and novel salivary biomarkers—while critically evaluating their diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility. Presentations explored the limitations of traditional proton‐pump inhibitor therapy, the emergence of potassium‐competitive acid blockers as a new class of acid suppressants, and the evolving role of adjunctive treatments such as mucosal protectants, reflux reducers, and neuromodulators for refractory symptoms. The discourse extended to advanced interventional procedures, including transoral incisionless fundoplication, magnetic sphincter augmentation, and the RefluxStop device, with discussion of patient selection, efficacy, and complication management. Discussants emphasized the pathophysiology and management of extraesophageal manifestations of reflux, the interplay between reflux and pulmonary disease, and the diagnostic challenges in pediatric populations. The meeting also addressed the integration of behavioral therapies, the role of the microbiome, and the application of artificial intelligence in reflux diagnostics. Collectively, these insights underscore a shift toward precision medicine in reflux disease, emphasizing individualized diagnostic strategies and tailored therapeutic approaches to improve patient outcomes.

Importance Brain metastases are common in patients with cancer, and radiation is often used for management. Among patients with more than 4 brain metastases, the effects of stereotactic radiation targeting only individual tumors, compared with whole brain radiation with hippocampal avoidance, which radiates both tumors and normal brain, remain unknown. Objective To determine whether stereotactic radiation improves symptom severity and interference with daily functioning, compared with whole brain radiation with hippocampal avoidance. Design, Setting, and Participants Phase 3, open-label, randomized clinical trial conducted at 4 United States–based centers. Eligible patients had 5 to 20 brain metastases and no prior brain-directed radiation. Enrollment occurred between April 11, 2017, and May 17, 2024 (final follow-up, March 18, 2025). Intervention Stereotactic radiation, compared with whole brain radiation with hippocampal avoidance. Main Outcomes and Measures Mean weighted patient-reported symptom severity and interference score change over 6 months postbaseline relative to baseline using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory–Brain Tumor instrument (scale, 0-10; score change range, −10 to 10; −10 = best). A clinically meaningful Δ was defined as 0.98. Results Of 196 randomized patients (mean age, 61 years; 129 [66%] female; 176 [90%] White; median number of brain metastases, 14 [IQR, 11-18]; 49 [25%] with prior neurosurgical resection), 83 (42%) completed the 6-month assessment. For the primary outcome, between baseline and postbaseline assessments through the 6-month follow-up, stereotactic radiation changed the weighted composite MD Anderson Symptom Inventory–Brain Tumor score from 2.69 to 2.37 (mean change, −0.32) and hippocampal-avoidance whole brain radiation changed the score from 2.29 to 3.03 (mean change, 0.74) (mean difference, −1.06 [95% CI, −1.54 to −0.58]; P &amp;lt; .001). Related grade 3-5 adverse events occurred in 12 patients (12%) in the stereotactic radiation group and 13 patients (13%) in the hippocampal-avoidance whole brain radiation group; grade 1-3 fatigue was most frequent (27 [28%] vs 43 [44%], respectively). Conclusions and Relevance In patients with 5 to 20 brain metastases, these findings support stereotactic radiation over hippocampal-avoidance whole brain radiation to improve symptoms and interference with daily functioning, key components of quality of life. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03075072

Abstract Endometriosis (EMS) is an estrogen-dependent, chronic inflammatory disease in which endometrial-like tissue grows outside the uterus, leading to pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and infertility. Increasing evidence shows that these symptoms do not arise from the presence of ectopic tissue alone. Rather, they reflect a sustained neuroimmune process in which inflammatory, neural, and stromal pathways continuously interact. Within the peritoneal cavity of EMS, immune activation elevates cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α, which stimulate production of neurotrophic mediators including NGF, BDNF, and IGF-1. These signals induce sensory-nerve sprouting, lower nociceptor thresholds, and convert lesions into hyperinnervated, pain-generating structures. Once these fibers infiltrate lesions, they release neuropeptides such as substance P (SP) and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). Rather than simply transmitting nociceptive signals, these neurons actively reshape the lesion microenvironment. SP and CGRP amplify inflammation, promote immune-cell recruitment, and drive epithelial–mesenchymal transition and myofibroblast differentiation, accelerating the fibrotic remodeling characteristic of deep infiltrating endometriosis. This neuropeptide-driven activity strengthens the lesion’s neuroimmune profile and forms a feed-forward loop in which inflammation, nerve growth, and fibrosis reinforce one another over time. Persistent nociceptive input from sensitized lesions produces downstream changes in the central nervous system. Within the spinal cord, activated microglia and astrocytes release proinflammatory mediators that enhance excitatory signaling and diminish inhibitory tone. With continued input, spinal and cortical circuits undergo neuroplastic changes that give rise to central sensitization, hyperalgesia, allodynia, and the cross-organ sensitization that links pain across the uterus, bladder, bowel, and pelvic floor. These long-range effects explain why pain may persist even when visible lesions are small or surgically removed. Together, these findings position endometriosis as a chronic systemic neuroimmune disorder maintained by reciprocal signaling between immune cells, sensory neurons, and central pain networks. Viewing EMS through this lens highlights multiple therapeutic entry points. Targeting NGF–TrkA and CGRP–RAMP1 signaling, modulating macrophage and B-cell function, dampening glial activation, or applying neuromodulatory techniques offers a more rational pathway to interrupt the self-reinforcing neuroimmune loop that sustains pain. Integrating immunologic and neurobiologic evidence therefore provides a foundation for mechanism-based therapies capable of delivering more durable relief and improving long-term quality of life. Citation Format: Ariana F. Rahman. Endometriosis as a Neuroimmune Disorder: Integrating Inflammation, Innervation, and Sensitization [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Immuno-Oncology Conference (AACR IO): Discovery and Innovation in Cancer Immunology: Revolutionizing Treatment through Immunotherapy; 2026 Feb 18-21; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2026;14(2 Suppl):Abstract nr A062.

64 Background: The incidence of eoCRC (diagnosed at age <50) is increasing. We have previously shown higher rates of severe anxiety and depression in this group compared to adults diagnosed at age ≥50 (average-onset CRC, aoCRC). We assessed the impact of ePROM collection coupled with a CC-based supportive care intervention on symptom burden in patients with eoCRC. Methods: The Enhanced, EHR-facilitated Cancer Symptom Control (E2C2) trial was a cluster-randomized, pragmatic trial conducted at Mayo Clinic Rochester and within the Mayo Clinic Health System (in Minnesota and Wisconsin) between 2019 and 2023. Enrolled patients serially reported the severity of six SPPADE symptoms (Sleep deficit, Pain, Physical function impairment, Anxiety, Depression, and Energy deficit/fatigue) on 11-point numerical rating scales. Symptom scores were interpreted as none to mild (0-3), moderate (4-6), or severe (7-10). Those with moderate symptoms were offered symptom management education and self-management materials, while those with severe symptoms were offered the option to work with a symptom care manager. In this post hoc analysis we examined the effects of the intervention on change in symptom scores among those with eoCRC, and using the Kaplan-Meier method, the median time to improvement to a mild/moderate level in those with a severe symptom, comparing eoCRC with aoCRC. Results: Among 4,422 patients with CRC, 887 had eoCRC. Forty-six percent of patients were female ( p =0.61), and a greater proportion of eoCRC patients were of a non-white race (11.6% vs 4.7%), lived in an urban setting (65.6% vs 50.5%), had a Bachelor’s degree or higher (36.8% vs 24.4%), were employed (78.5% vs 36.7%), on a non-government insurance plan (83.4% vs 35.3%), single (19.7% vs 11.2%) or married (74.2% vs 67.9%), and had metastatic disease (54.8% vs 46.1%, p <0.0001 for all). Compared to a pre-intervention baseline, the mean change in symptom scores for eoCRC patients following the intervention demonstrated improvements in anxiety (-0.238), depression (-0.134), and fatigue (-0.146, p <0.05 for all). Time to symptom improvement from severe to mild/moderate was longer for anxiety and depression in eoCRC patients compared to aoCRC patients (Table 1). Conclusions: Collection of ePROMs coupled with a CC-based intervention led to improvements in anxiety, depression, and fatigue among eoCRC patients, although time to symptom improvement was longer among eoCRC patients compared to aoCRC patients. Time to improvement of severe symptom (months), median (95% CI). eoCRC aoCRC p -value Sleep 4.2 (3.1-5.8) 3.8 (2.7-5.4) 0.4 Pain 4.1 (3.0-7.5) 3.2 (2.3-5.0) 0.5 Physical function impairment 3.1 (1.9-6.3) 2.8 (2.2-4.2) 0.5 Anxiety 4.3 (3.4-9.1) 2.6 (2.0-3.5) 0.009 Depression 4.3 (2.6-7.5) 2.6 (2.1-3.5) 0.04 Fatigue 4.3 (3.7-9.5) 3.4 (2.7-4.2) 0.06

210 Background: ERBB2/HER2 amplification defines a rare but clinically distinct subtype of colorectal cancer (CRC), associated with favorable responses to HER2-targeted therapies. In contrast, ERBB2/HER2 -mutant CRCs show limited therapeutic benefit, and their clinical and molecular features remain poorly defined. This study investigated the molecular and clinical features of ERBB2/HER2 -mutant CRCs to provide insight into the molecular basis of their differential therapeutic vulnerabilities compared to amplified CRC. Methods: CRC cases were identified from cBioPortal studies with available clinical and ERBB2/HER2 genomic data. After quality control and deduplication, the cohort included 4407 unique cases: 97 with driver mutation(s) only (2.2%), 86 with amplification only (2%), and 4224 wild-type (95.9%). Demographic, clinical, and molecular features, including microsatellite instability (MSI), tumor mutational burden (TMB), and alterations in 94 oncogenic pathway genes, were compared across groups. Statistical analyses used chi-square/Fisher’s exact tests for categorical data, Kruskal-Wallis tests for continuous variables, and the Benjamini-Hochberg correction for multiple comparisons. Odds ratios and FDR-adjusted p-values were calculated to assess associations. Results: Across groups, the distributions of gender, race, and primary cancer site (colon or rectal cancer) were comparable. However, significant differences were observed in age (mean 58.7 ± 15.0 years for ERBB2/HER2 -mutant, 55 ± 13.9 for amplified, and 59 ± 14.8 for wild-type; p = 0.035) and tumor sidedness (among ERBB2/HER2 -mutant cases: right-colon 30.8%, left-colon 15.2%; among ERBB2/HER2 -amplified: right-colon 12.1%, left-colon 37.9%, p = 0.011). KRAS alterations were significantly more common in ERBB2/HER2 -mutant CRCs (50.5%) compared with both amplified (19.8%) and wild-type (37.6%). MSI-H was detected in 34.5% of ERBB2/HER2 -mutant cases, whereas no MSI-H was observed among amplified tumors (p < 0.001). Expectedly, ERBB2/HER2 -mutant tumors exhibited a hypermutated phenotype, with significantly higher TMB (30.3 ± 45.5) and total mutation count (232.8 ± 926.0), compared to amplified (6.1 ± 9.7 and 15.3 ± 28.4) and wild-type (10.5 ± 20.3 and 126.3 ± 424.5; both p < 0.001). Conversely, ERBB2/HER2 -amplified tumors had the highest fraction of overall genomic alterations including chromosomal changes (0.24 ± 0.17 in amplified vs 0.14 ± 0.17 in mutants and 0.20 ± 0.16 in wild-type; p < 0.001). Hierarchical clustering demonstrated that ERBB2/HER2 -mutant tumors form a distinct molecular cluster, whereas amplified tumors cluster closely with wild-type CRC. Conclusions: ERBB2/HER2 - mutant and amplified CRCs show highly distinct genomic and clinical features, supporting the need for tailored treatment approaches.