Citations

AbstractDNA‐binding proteins, including transcription factors (TFs), play essential roles in various cellular processes and pathogenesis of diseases, deeming to be potential therapeutic targets. However, these proteins are generally considered undruggable as they lack an enzymatic catalytic site or a ligand‐binding pocket. Proteolysis‐targeting chimera (PROTAC) technology has been developed by engineering a bifunctional molecule chimera to bring a protein of interest (POI) to the proximity of an E3 ubiquitin ligase, thus inducing the ubiquitination of POI and further degradation through the proteasome pathway. Here, the development of oligonucleotide‐based PROTAC (O'PROTACs), a class of noncanonical PROTACs in which a TF‐recognizing double‐stranded oligonucleotide is incorporated as a binding moiety of POI is reported. It is demonstrated that O'PROTACs of lymphoid enhancer‐binding factor 1 (LEF1) and ETS‐related gene (ERG), two highly cancer‐related transcription factors, successfully promote degradation of these proteins, impede their transcriptional activity, and inhibit cancer cell growth in vitro and in vivo. The programmable nature of O'PROTACs indicates that this approach is also applicable to destruct other TFs. O'PROTACs not only can serve as a research tool but also can be harnessed as a therapeutic arsenal to target DNA binding proteins for effective treatment of diseases such as cancer.

Abstract Background: The primary mechanism by which tamoxifen (Tam) and its metabolites exert their biologic effects is through estrogen receptor (ER) binding and inhibition of ER signaling. We and others demonstrated that endoxifen (Endx) has greater antitumor activity in vitro and in vivo compared to Tam and the first-in-human Endx phase I study demonstrated its antitumor activity in patients with prior progression on Tam (Goetz SABC 2015). PKCs are a family of serine/threonine-specific protein kinases that regulate signaling pathways involved in cell proliferation and tumorigenic transformation. Our prior protein docking studies suggested endoxifen may be a substrate for PKCs. Here we report the effects of Tam and Endx on PKCβ1 binding, kinase activity, as well as interactions between PKCβ1 and ERα. Methods: Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR, Biacore T200, GE Healthcare) was used to evaluate binding of Tam, N-desmethyl Tam (NDMT), 4-HT, and Endx to PKCβ1 and PKCβ2. The effects of Tam and Endx on PKCβ1 kinase activity were determined. Proliferation and colony formation in MCF7 parental and PKCβ1 overexpressing cells were evaluated. siRNA silencing was used to knockdown PKCβ1 expression in the following cells: MCF7 aromatase expressing cells that were either sensitive (MCF7/AC1) or resistant to letrozole (MCF7/AC1 L-resistant); T47D; and MDA-MB-361. Coimmunoprecipitation assay and DUOlink in situ proximity ligation were used to investigate the interaction between PKCβ1 and ERα. Results: Endx more potently inhibited PKCβ1 kinase activity compared to Tam ( IC50 350 nM vs 47.8 μM ) with KDs for PKCβ1 binding as follows: Endx (100 nM ), Tam ( 2 μM ), 4-HT ( 2 μM ) and NDMT (> 7 μM ). None of the SERMs exhibited PKCβ2 binding. In the MCF7/AC1 and MCF7/AC1 L-resistant cells, PKCβ1 knockdown resulted in ERα degradation and potently inhibited cell proliferation. These results were confirmed in T47D and MDA-MB-361 cells. Notably, PKCβ1 knockdown in MCF7/AC1 cells resulted in significantly greater E2 induced proliferation comparing siRNA knockdown vs. control. To further explore these effects, we evaluated the effects of PKCβ1 overexpression in MCF7 cells and demonstrated that PKCβ1 overexpression reduced cell proliferation and colony formation compared to parental MCF-7 cells without affecting ERα protein stability. Coimmunoprecipitation assays in transient transfected MCF-7 cells with exogenous PKCβ1 as well as PKCβ1 expressing MDA-MB-231 cells transiently or stably transfected with ERα demonstrated PKCβ1 and ERα interaction, with confirmation by Duolink assay that this interaction occurs in the cytoplasm. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrated that endoxifen binds and inhibits PKCβ1 at relevant concentrations achieved in the endoxifen clinical trial studies. PKCβ1 interacts with cytoplasmic ERα and PKCβ1 knockdown inhibits cell proliferation and enhances ERα turnover. However, in PKCβ1 overexpressing cells, PKCβ1 may exhibit tumor suppressive effects. These data suggest a complex interaction between PKCβ1 and ERα and that endoxifen's effects on PKCβ1 may alter drug response of endocrine therapy. Further studies are ongoing to characterize the role of PKCβ1 and its role in ER biology and response to endoxifen. Citation Format: Guo C, Kuffel MJ, Kudgus RA, Huang Z, Bode AM, Cheng J, Suman VJ, Reid JM, Bruinsma ES, Subramaniam M, Ames MM, Hawse JR, Goetz MP. Identification and characterization of a novel endoxifen substrate, PKCβ1, and its interaction with the estrogen receptor [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-08-03.

Abstract The recent identification of activating fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) mutations in endometrial cancer has generated an opportunity for a novel target-based therapy. Here, we explore the therapeutic potential of 2 FGFR inhibitors, the multikinase inhibitor dovitinib (TKI258) and the more selective FGFR inhibitor NVP-BGJ398 for the treatment of endometrial cancer. We examined the effects of both inhibitors on tumor cell growth, FGFR2 signaling, cell cycle, and apoptosis using a panel of 20 molecularly characterized human endometrial cancer cell lines. Anchorage-independent growth was studied using soft agar assays. In vivo studies were conducted using endometrial cancer xenograft models. Cell lines with activating FGFR2 mutations (S252W, N550K) were more sensitive to dovitinib or NVP-BGJ398 when compared with their FGFR2 wild-type counterparts (P = 0.073 and P = 0.021, respectively). Both agents inhibited FGFR2 signaling, induced cell-cycle arrest, and significantly increased apoptosis in FGFR2-mutant lines. In vitro, dovitinib and NVP-BGJ398 were both potent at inhibiting cell growth of FGFR2-mutant endometrial cancer cells, but the activity of dovitinib was less restricted to FGFR2-mutant lines when compared with NVP-BGJ398. In vivo, dovitinib and NVP-BGJ398 significantly inhibited the growth of FGFR2-mutated endometrial cancer xenograft models. In addition, dovitinib showed significant antitumor activity in FGFR2 wild-type endometrial cancer xenograft models including complete tumor regressions in a long-term in vivo study. Dovitinib and NVP-BGJ398 warrant further clinical evaluation in patients with FGFR2-mutated endometrial cancer. Dovitinib may have antitumor activity in endometrial cancer beyond FGFR2-mutated cases and may permit greater flexibility in patient selection. Mol Cancer Ther; 12(5); 632–42. ©2013 AACR.

Abstract Background: Endometrial carcinoma is the most common gynecological malignancy in the western world. Activating mutations of the fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) have been described in 12-16% of endometrial cancers. Moreover, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and their receptors are involved in the neovascularization, invasiveness, and metastatic potential of endometrial cancer. Therefore, suppression of FGFR/VEGFR/PDGFR signaling by TKI258 may represent a novel approach for treatment of endometrial cancer. Experimental Design: The aims of this study were 1.) to assess the effect of TKI258 on tumor cell growth in two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) culture assays using a panel of 20 human endometrial cancer cell lines, 2.) to identify candidate molecular markers predicting sensitivity using baseline gene expression profiling and mutational analyses, and 3.) to determine the in vivo antineoplastic activity of TKI258 in endometrial cancer xenograft models. In addition, we screened 200 fresh frozen endometrial cancer specimens to comprehensively assess the distribution pattern of PI3K, PTEN, and FGFR mutations in endometrial cancer. Results: Concentration-dependent anti-proliferative effects of TKI285 using 2D assays were seen in all endometrial cancer cell lines tested, but varied significantly between individual cell lines (IC50 range: 0.42µM – 3.06 µM). The three most sensitive endometrial cancer cell lines demonstrated activating FGFR2 mutations (MFE296: N549K, IC50 0.42µM; AN3CA: N549K and K310R, IC50 0.50µM; MFE280: S252W, IC50 0.66µM). Assessment of TKI258 responses in 3D assays demonstrated similar results to those observed in 2D culture assays in that the 3 cell lines harboring FGFR2 mutations were the most sensitive to TKI258 achieving 100% growth inhibition at a concentration of 1µM. AN3CA and MFE296 endometrial cancer cells formed xenografts in nude mice and antitumor activity was studied in both models. Inhibition of p-FGFR, p-PDGFR, p-VEGFR-2, pAKT and p-ERK1/2 were observed. Comprehensive data on the pattern of PI3K, PTEN and FGFR mutations in endometrial cancer will be provided. Conclusion: TKI258 demonstrates significant antitumor activity in endometrial cancer cells with FGFR2 mutations. This study provides a strong rationale for the clinical evaluation of TKI258 in patients with endometrial cancer, specifically in those harboring FGFR2 mutations. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3589. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-3589

Abstract Background: Cell cycle dysregulation is a common molecular finding in ovarian cancer and the cyclin-D kinases (CDK) represent an attractive target in this pathway. PD 0332991 (Pfizer Inc.) is an orally active potent and highly selective inhibitor of CDK 4 and CDK6 kinases with the ability to block pRb phosphorylation at serine 780 and 795 in the low nanomolar range. To identify predictors of response to PD 0332991, we determined the in vitro sensitivity to PD 0332991 in a large panel of molecularly characterized ovarian cancer cell lines, and then used baseline expression profiles and Western blot analyses to identify biomarkers associated with response to PD 0332991. These biomarkers were then validated in a large cohort of 324 ovarian cancer patients by immunohistochemistry. Methods: 40 human ovarian cancer cell lines were treated with PD 0332991 using two-fold dilutions over 12 concentrations. Dose response curves were generated using a cell count assay to calculate the IC50 across the panel. These data were then analyzed against baseline gene expression data to identify genes associated with sensitivity to PD 0332991. Western blot analysis was performed to validate these markers and to study the effects of PD 0332991 on pRb phosphorylation. Cell cycle analysis was performed using flow-cytometry. Combination studies were performed to analyze the interaction between PD 0332991 and paclitaxel or carboplatin chemotherapy. Tissue microarrays were constructed from 324 ovarian cancer patients and IHC was performed for p16 and Rb expression. Long-term clinical follow up was available for all patients. Results: Concentration-dependent anti-proliferative effects of PD 0332991were seen in all ovarian cancer cell lines tested, but varied significantly between individual cell lines with up to a 3 log-fold difference in the IC50s (IC50 range: 0.02 to >20 μmol/L). Cell lines with high Rb expression and low p16 expression by gene expression array and Western blot analyses were most sensitive to inhibition by PD 0332991. Cell lines treated with PD 0332991 showed clear G0/G1 arrest and a decrease in S-phase fraction in sensitive but not in resistant cell lines. In addition, Western blot showed that pRb phosphorylation is blocked in a concentration and time dependent manner. IHC for Rb and p16 allows the identification of ovarian cancer patients most likely to benefit from CDK4/6 inhibition. Outcome analyses are ongoing. Conclusion: PD 0332991 shows promising biologic activity in ovarian cancer cells. Assessment of Rb and p16 expression may help select patients who benefit from therapeutic strategies targeting CDK4/6 in ovarian cancer. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 25.

Abstract Purpose: PD-0332991 is a selective inhibitor of the CDK4/6 kinases with the ability to block retinoblastoma (Rb) phosphorylation in the low nanomolar range. Here we investigate the role of CDK4/6 inhibition in human ovarian cancer. Experimental Design: We examined the effects of PD-0332991 on proliferation, cell-cycle, apoptosis, and Rb phosphorylation using a panel of 40 established human ovarian cancer cell lines. Molecular markers for response prediction, including p16 and Rb, were studied using gene expression profiling, Western blot, and array CGH. Multiple drug effect analysis was used to study interactions with chemotherapeutic drugs. Expression of p16 and Rb was studied using immunohistochemistry in a large clinical cohort of ovarian cancer patients. Results: Concentration-dependent antiproliferative effects of PD-0332991 were seen in all ovarian cancer cell lines, but varied significantly between individual lines. Rb-proficient cell lines with low p16 expression were most responsive to CDK4/6 inhibition. Copy number variations of CDKN2A, RB, CCNE1, and CCND1 were associated with response to PD-0332991. CDK4/6 inhibition induced G0/G1 cell cycle arrest, blocked Rb phosphorylation in a concentration-and time-dependent manner, and enhanced the effects of chemotherapy. Rb-proficiency with low p16 expression was seen in 97/262 (37%) of ovarian cancer patients and was independently associated with poor progression-free survival (adjusted relative risk 1.49, 95% CI 1.00–2.24, P = 0.052). Conclusions: PD-0332991 shows promising biologic activity in ovarian cancer cell lines. Assessment of Rb and p16 expression may help select patients most likely to benefit from CDK4/6 inhibition in ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 17(6); 1591–602. ©2011 AACR.