Citations

ABSTRACT Objective To (1) validate GAD65‐ELISA detection and quantification for type 1 diabetes mellitus and autoimmune neurological diagnoses, (2) correlate ELISA results (reference range < 5 IU/mL) with established radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIA; ≤ 0.02 nmol/L), and (3) define ELISA clinical utility and pitfalls. Methods Serum performance for diabetes (FDA‐cleared, undiluted) was verified, and neurological laboratory‐developed serum and CSF dilution protocols were validated to extend the reportable range beyond > 250 IU/mL. ELISA and RIA values were correlated, including established neurological RIA cut‐offs (serum ≥ 20 nmol/L; CSF any positive). Results ELISA met analytical criteria (precision, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, reference range) in serum and CSF and was clinically equivalent to RIA for autoimmune diabetes. Neurological ELISA cut‐offs were established at 10,000 IU/mL (serum) and 100 IU/mL (CSF). Precision was better below 10,000 IU/mL (CVs < 20%) than above (CVs 30.8% serum; 26.5% CSF). ELISA–RIA correlation and agreement was stronger below the neurological cut‐off (R 2 = 0.89) than above (R 2 = 0.36). Positive agreement for RIA‐defined neurological disease was 100% in serum and CSF; all serums were > 10,000 IU/mL. Clinical specificity was 97.5% in serum and 100% in CSF, exceeding reported RIA specificity. Screen results > 250 IU/mL spanned a wide range of dilution values; many were below the neurological cut‐off. Most patients with paired serum/CSF positivity showed elevated GAD65 IgG indices. Interpretation GAD65 ELISA and RIA have equivalent sensitivity for autoimmune diabetes and neurological testing, with higher specificity for ELISA. A serum cut‐off of 10,000 IU/mL is informative but requires clinical context, and dilution of screen > 250 IU/mL samples is essential for neurological interpretation.

Objective To estimate the prevalence, incidence, and disease burden of autoimmune seizures and epilepsies in Olmsted County. Methods We conducted a retrospective, population‐based study using the Rochester Epidemiology Project (1996–2019). Age‐ and sex‐standardized rates (2019 United States standard population) per 100,000 were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Temporal trends in incidence were assessed over 3 consecutive 8‐year intervals (1996–2003, 2004–2011, and 2012–2019) using Poisson regression to estimate rate ratios per period and trend. Disability‐adjusted life years (DALYs), years of life lost (YLL), and years lived with disability (YLD) and 95% uncertainty intervals (95% UIs) were estimated for 2019. Results Twenty‐three patients were identified between 1996 and 2019. In 2019, the standardized prevalence of all autoimmune seizures and epilepsies was 9.81 (95% CI, 5.59–15.21) per 100,000, including autoimmune‐associated epilepsy (AAE) 7.27 (3.74–11.95) and acute symptomatic seizures secondary to autoimmune encephalitis (ASSAE) 2.55 (0.69–5.60). From 1996 to 2019, the standardized incidence was 0.50 (0.29–0.77) per 100,000 person‐years overall, with AAE 0.36 (0.19–0.59) and ASSAE 0.15 (0.05–0.30). By period, the standardized incidence of all autoimmune seizures and epilepsies suggested a rising trend from 0.28 (95% CI, 0.06–0.68) in 1996 to 2003 to 0.60 (95% CI, 0.24–1.12) in 2004–2011, then plateaued at 0.53 (95% CI, 0.21–1.00) in 2012 to 2019 (rate ratio per 8‐year interval 1.30, 95% CI, 0.71–2.38), largely driven by the seropositive subgroup. The standardized DALY rate was 26.27 (95% Uncertainly intervals [UI], 5.30–67.09) per 100,000 (YLL 20.07 [0.00–60.21] and YLD 6.20 [5.06–7.39]). Interpretation Although autoimmune seizures and epilepsies remain rare, they result in a disproportionately high disease burden. ANN NEUROL 2026;100:74–83

Abstract BACKGROUND Mixed histiocytic neoplasms with overlapping features of Erdheim-Chester Disease (ECD) and Rosai-Dorfman Disease (RDD) are extremely rare and diagnosis may be delayed due to lack of awareness and complex histology features. METHODS We report a case of mixed ECD/RDD misdiagnosed as IgG4-related disease and review the literature. RESULTS A 50-year-old man presented for evaluation of spastic paraparesis in the context of a thoracic dural lesion. Two years prior he developed an inflammatory monoarthritis concerning for rheumatoid arthritis unresponsive to methotrexate. Six months prior he developed leg spasms, gait spasticity, and urinary incontinence. MRI demonstrated a T2 hypointense enhancing epidural mass with spinal cord compression. Epidural biopsy showed fibrosis and non-specific inflammation. Given elevated serum IgG4 (170 mg/dL) and clinical findings, he was diagnosed with IgG4-related disease. He received high dose prednisone and etanercept without radiographic or clinical improvement. He then presented to our institution. Given high concern for RDD, he underwent FDG-PET CT which demonstrated an infiltrative process and FDG avid regions in the upper thoracic spinal cord, paranasal sinus, renal hilum, perivascular abdominal vessels, testicle, and multiple joint effusions. Biopsy of left testicle demonstrated CD163-positive histiocytes which coexpressed S100, cyclin D1, and OCT2, consistent with RDD. Biopsy of the left shoulder synovium demonstrated an atypical CD163-positive histiocytic infiltrate expressing Factor XIIIa, cyclin D1 and S100 (partial), and appeared negative for OCT2, consistent with ECD. The atypical histiocytes in both biopsies were negative for CD1a and BRAF V600E by immunohistochemistry. Genomic sequencing of the testicular tissue demonstrated a MAP2K1 (Q56P) alteration. He was treated with radiation therapy targeting the dural lesion with temporarily worsening symptoms improved with steroids and started on cobimetinib. DISCUSSION This case expands on the phenotypic description of mixed ECD/RDD. Histiocytic neoplasms should be considered in the differential diagnosis of dural based lesions.

ABSTRACT Objective We sought to characterize the sixth most common finding in our neuroimmunological laboratory practice (tissue assay‐observed unclassified neural antibodies [UNAs]), combining protein microarray and phage immunoprecipitation sequencing (PhIP‐Seq). Methods Patient specimens (258; 133 serums; 125 CSF) meeting UNA criteria were profiled; October 2022–September 2023. Top‐ranking candidate antigens were validated in silico, by dual‐staining confocal microscopy, and ≥ 1 protein‐specific assay. Clinical data were reviewed. Results Among 21 patients, 11 autoantibodies were characterized (serum, 19; CSF, all 9 available). Autoantigens were CACNA1I, 1; CAMK2B, 2; CLIP2, 1; FMN2, 2; MAP1A, 2; MAP2, 5; NECAB1, 1; SNAP91, 3; SRCIN1, 1; SYNJ1, 1; SYT3, 2. Analytical validation was by confocal TIIFA (all), western blot (10/10 available), and cell‐based assay (5/5 performed). Clinical accompaniments were: encephalitis, 6; brainstem encephalitis, 2; encephalomyelitis, 2; cerebellar ataxia, 2; longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM), 2; sensory neuronopathy, 1; peripheral neuropathy, 4, and movement disorders, 2. Inflammatory MRI abnormalities were identified in 5/16 patients (31%) with CNS disorders: T2 signal change (2), LETM (2), leptomeningeal enhancement (1). Seven of 8 (88%) had inflammatory CSF (pleocytosis, 5 [median 25.5 cells, range 7–294]; elevated IgG index/synthesis rate, 4; CSF‐exclusive oligoclonal bands, 4). Six had paraneoplastic causation (lung cancer, 2; other, 4); 3 were postinfectious (1 each of COVID‐19, HSV‐1, and post‐Group A streptococcal infection). Of 9 immunotherapy‐treated patients, 5 improved. Interpretation UNAs are partly accounted for by a repertoire of diverse mostly intracellular synaptic antigens. Their characterization is expedited by protein arrays and PhIPSeq. Further individual studies are needed to assess them as disease biomarkers.

This cohort study examines the oncological, neurological, and serological profiles of adult male patients with testicular germ cell tumors and paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes.

Abstract Background To develop and validate a sensitive live cell-binding assay using flow cytometry to detect a3ß4-ganglionic nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (gnAChR) antibodies for diagnosis of autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy (AAG, a subset of autoimmune autonomic neuropathies). The current radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) method has high false positive rate and utilizes radioactivity. Methods HEK293 cells were transiently transfected to express human a3ß4-gnAChR subunits, along with NACHO and RIC3 chaperons, and GFP for detection. Transfected cells were treated with 1mM nicotine liquid for 18-22 hours prior to lifting cells for flow cytometry. The IBI (IgG Binding Index) was then calculated as the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of AF647 of the a3ß4-gnAChR subunits expressing cells divided by the MFI of the AF647 HEK293 expressing cells. Humanized AChR-specific monoclonal antibody (mAb03) was used as a single-point calibrator. The cut-off index (COI) ratio is calculated by dividing the IBI obtained from a sample by the established IBI cut-off value of the mAB03 calibrator set by the assay. A ratio &gt;1 indicates a positive result, while a ratio below 1 is negative. The study tested sera from 83 Mayo Clinic patients suspected of having autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy (AAG), with a total of 100 samples collected over several years (40 from patients with clinically confirmed AAG, and 60 from patients without AAG), all previously positive for a3-gnAChR antibodies by RIPA. Additionally, 130 control samples were included: 90 from healthy individuals, 22 with hypergammaglobulinemia, and 18 with systemic lupus erythematosus. Results Median RIPA a3ß4-gnAChR value among 40 AAG patient samples was 2.58 nmol/L (range, 0.06-29.1 nmol/L) and among 60 non-AAG patients was 0.14 nmol/L (range, 0.01-4.43 nmol/L). The mAB03 calibrator median IBI value across assays was 2.1 (range, 1.6-2.7). The COI ratio was calculated using the calibrated IBI values. Thirty-eight of 40 AAG patient samples were considered positive, resulting in median IBI of 3.10 (range, 1.29-6.71); sensitivity 95%. None of non-AAG patients and controls were considered positive; median IBI of 0.38 (range, 0.14-0.51); specificity 100%. The two negative AAG patient samples (IBI, 0.43 and 0.43) were from patients in remission (treated with immune suppressants), and had RIPA titers of 0.06 nmol/L and 0.74 nmol/L. Conclusion The a3ß4-gnAChR-IgG flow cytometry assay has high sensitivity and specificity for AAG-related a3-AChR antibodies. It was able to distinguish AAG patients from non-AAG patients and controls effectively. The flow cytometry assay’s cut-off index ratio effectively identifies AAG patients while remaining negative for non-AAG and control samples.