Herman, Max

Abstract The discovery of pathogenic neuroglial surface-directed autoantibodies (NGSAbs) has fundamentally transformed clinical neurology, by enabling molecular-level diagnoses in potentially treatable, yet previously unrecognized, diseases. Annual descriptions of novel CNS-targeting antibodies create a continuous stream of new conditions in which to evaluate distinct phenotypes, specific tumour associations and immunotherapy responses. Alongside this clinical growth, increasing basic knowledge has highlighted origins and mechanisms underlying disease causation, most comprehensively interrogated in the well-established autoantibody-mediated conditions of autoimmune encephalitis (AE), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD). The corresponding most common ‘big six’ autoantigens are LGI1, the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor, CASPR2, IgLON5, in forms of AE, AQP4 and MOG. Each of these autoantigens associates with a homogenous set of basic clinical features, across age, sex, tumour associations and ethnicities, coupled with partly distinctive profiles of triggers and predispositions, paradigms of immune tolerance escape in the periphery, how cells and autoantibodies gain access to the CNS, and discrete mechanisms by which the CNS autoantibodies induce neuroglial dysfunction. These observations lead us to reconstruct a proposed chronological series of events as the ‘cascade to pathogenicity’, which together culminate in a rare CNS disease. By extension, we hypothesize elucidating the underlying biology of each condition will present differing precision medicine approaches to optimize patient care. Despite distinctions, there are also clinical and biological overlaps between these diseases, collectively creating opportunities to compare and contrast their individual features. Here, in each condition, we review current knowledge regarding the similarities and differences between the triggering events, underlying immunological processes and pathogenic mechanisms of autoantibodies. In some instances, we identify scientific clues that drive hypothetical pathways of pathogenesis and, for others, highlight striking observations that aim to generate hypothesis-driven next steps. Our aim is to construct a model across the major autoantibody-mediated CNS diseases to highlight distinct components of cascades to pathogenicity, which may offer targeted therapeutic approaches to improve patient outcomes, and identify key areas and questions for future research.

ABSTRACT Objective To (1) validate GAD65‐ELISA detection and quantification for type 1 diabetes mellitus and autoimmune neurological diagnoses, (2) correlate ELISA results (reference range < 5 IU/mL) with established radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIA; ≤ 0.02 nmol/L), and (3) define ELISA clinical utility and pitfalls. Methods Serum performance for diabetes (FDA‐cleared, undiluted) was verified, and neurological laboratory‐developed serum and CSF dilution protocols were validated to extend the reportable range beyond > 250 IU/mL. ELISA and RIA values were correlated, including established neurological RIA cut‐offs (serum ≥ 20 nmol/L; CSF any positive). Results ELISA met analytical criteria (precision, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, reference range) in serum and CSF and was clinically equivalent to RIA for autoimmune diabetes. Neurological ELISA cut‐offs were established at 10,000 IU/mL (serum) and 100 IU/mL (CSF). Precision was better below 10,000 IU/mL (CVs < 20%) than above (CVs 30.8% serum; 26.5% CSF). ELISA–RIA correlation and agreement was stronger below the neurological cut‐off (R 2 = 0.89) than above (R 2 = 0.36). Positive agreement for RIA‐defined neurological disease was 100% in serum and CSF; all serums were > 10,000 IU/mL. Clinical specificity was 97.5% in serum and 100% in CSF, exceeding reported RIA specificity. Screen results > 250 IU/mL spanned a wide range of dilution values; many were below the neurological cut‐off. Most patients with paired serum/CSF positivity showed elevated GAD65 IgG indices. Interpretation GAD65 ELISA and RIA have equivalent sensitivity for autoimmune diabetes and neurological testing, with higher specificity for ELISA. A serum cut‐off of 10,000 IU/mL is informative but requires clinical context, and dilution of screen > 250 IU/mL samples is essential for neurological interpretation.