Citations

Abstract Systemic amyloidosis is a rare, multisystem disorder that is often challenging to diagnose due to vague and nonspecific symptoms that frequently overlap with other disorders. By the time patients are diagnosed, irreversible organ impairment from amyloid deposition occurrs, contributing to substantial morbidity and mortality. Although developing the American Society of Hematology (ASH) guidelines on systemic amyloidosis, we identified a critical knowledge gap in the recognition of the clinical presentation of its most common subtypes. Therefore, we conducted a scoping review of 117 studies following PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines to identify clinical “red flags” for light chain (AL) and transthyretin (ATTR; wild-type [ATTRwt] and hereditary [ATTRv]) amyloidosis. Studies were identified from the comprehensive systematic review through the ASH amyloidosis diagnosis guideline panel, data mining, and gray literature review. Data were extracted and synthesized by systems to characterize the earliest and most frequently overlooked clinical red flags for the different types of amyloidosis. Shortness of breath and fatigue, the earliest symptoms of AL amyloidosis, contrast with the carpal tunnel syndrome occurring years before ATTRwt cardiac amyloidosis is diagnosed. Weight loss, unexplained abdominal pain, and early satiety were overlooked red flags for AL amyloidosis, compared to the preceding arrhythmias often missed in evaluation for ATTRwt amyloidosis. Sensory loss was the predominant neuropathic presentation for AL amyloidosis compared to the painful length-dependent neuropathy of ATTRv amyloidosis. Awareness of the early symptoms and distinct patterns across subtypes can enhance cross-specialty awareness and support earlier diagnosis and intervention of AL and ATTR amyloidosis.

Background Light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare disease caused by the misfolding of immunoglobulin light chains produced by a plasma cell dyscrasia. Patients can present with involvement of many organs, including the heart, kidneys, liver, nerves, and other sites, resulting in a high symptom burden. Timely and accurate diagnosis is important to prevent organ failure and improve patient survival. Objective These evidence-based guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) are intended to support patients and clinicians in the timely and effective diagnosis of AL amyloidosis. Methods ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel that included 22 individuals representing various medical specialties (academic and community hematology, nephrology, neurology, cardiology, internal medicine, and pathology) as well as 1 patient representative. The group was balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The University of Kansas Medical Center supported the guideline development process, including updating or performing systematic evidence reviews (up to 6 March 2023). The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The panel used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, including GRADE evidence-to-decision frameworks, to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subject to public comment. Results The panel agreed on 12 recommendations. Conclusions The use of serum immunofixation, urine immunofixation, and serum free light chains enhances the clinical suspicion of AL amyloidosis. The diagnosis of AL amyloidosis can be made effectively through surrogate biopsies, which require both a bone marrow biopsy and fat-pad sampling; however, target organ biopsies may be favored in certain clinical situations.

ABSTRACT Background Despite histologic remission (HR) being important in management of ulcerative colitis, the impact of endoscopic sampling on newer scoring systems remains uncertain. This study examines the outcome of applying PICaSSO Histologic Remission Index (PHRI) scoring on biopsies collected during routine clinical care and investigates the impact of endoscopic sampling variation on PHRI scoring and HR status. Methods A retrospective survey of UC endoscopic biopsies ( N = 128, 559 bites, 1–13 bites/biopsy) was evaluated using standard H&E stain and myeloperoxidase (MPO) immunohistochemistry to aid neutrophil identification. Convolutional neural networks (CNN), trained on colonic tissue architecture and cytomorphology features, were deployed alongside pathologist interpretations. In silico modeling of bite‐derived virtual biopsies ( N = 19,760) was investigated to determine the impact of sampling variation on PHRI scores and compared with ground truth clinical samples. Results PHRI MPO scoring displayed improved sensitivity and specificity for identifying neutrophils, compared with PHRI H&E . CNN‐derived PHRI scoring was most accurate for chronic active and chronic active with ulceration categories, with greatest variability observed in chronic inactive biopsies. Virtual patient biopsies comprised of < 5 endoscopic bites were impacted most by sampling permutations. Limited variability in PHRI scores was observed in samples consisting of ≥ 5 bites. Conclusions HR status (PHRI = 0) determination was slightly impacted by sampling. Biopsies consisting of < 5 endoscopic bites exhibited the most variability. Conservative sampling of 5–7 endoscopic bites may produce more accurate assessments of microscopic heterogeneity in clinical studies employing quantitative histologic measurements to assess disease activity and remission. Additionally, incorporating MPO increased the sensitivity and specificity of detecting active inflammation for PHRI scoring.

ABSTRACT Neurodegenerative diseases are characterised by the assembly of a limited number of disease-specific proteins into amyloid filaments, which form intracellular inclusions or extracellular deposits in the central nervous system (CNS) 1,2 . We previously found that amyloid filaments of TATA-binding protein-associated factor 15 (TAF15) characterise a subtype of frontotemporal lobar degeneration with FET protein-immunoreactive inclusions (FTLD-FET) 3 , termed atypical FTLD with ubiquitin-positive inclusions (aFTLD-U) 4 , which causes early-onset, rapidly progressive behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (FTD). However, it was not clear if TAF15 proteinopathy was more widespread in neurodegenerative diseases. Two additional FTLD-FET subtypes have been proposed, neuronal intermediate filament inclusion body disease (NIFID) and basophilic inclusion body disease (BIBD) 5,6 , which have more heterogenous clinical presentations including FTD, motor neuron diseases (MND) and movement disorders. Here, we used electron cryo-microscopy (cryo-EM) to determine a total of 32 amyloid filament structures from the brains of 17 individuals encompassing all three proposed subtypes of FTLD-FET and their diverse clinical presentations. All cases were characterised by TAF15 filaments, in the absence of filaments of the other FET proteins, fused in sarcoma (FUS) and Ewing’s sarcoma (EWS). All three aFTLD-U cases had the previously-reported TAF15 fold 3 . Unexpectedly, we found four distinct TAF15 folds among 11 NIFID cases. Eight of these cases shared a common fold, while the remaining three were each distinct. Furthermore, we found distinct TAF15 folds for each of the three BIBD cases. Neuropathological reassessment of the neocortical TAF15 inclusion pathology of these cases distinguished the NIFID cases with the common fold from the others. Thus, TAF15 filament structures form the basis of a new, expanded classification of FTLD-FET subtypes. Moreover, we discovered a TAF15 Y38C variant in the filament fold of one of the individuals with BIBD. The structure is unable to incorporate wild-type TAF15, despite the individual being heterozygous, suggesting that this variant drives TAF15 filament assembly. This study provides structural and genetic evidence that TAF15 amyloid filaments underlie the diverse group of neurodegenerative diseases currently termed FTLD-FET, which we therefore rename FTLD-TAF15.

Objective: To gain firsthand accounts from female physician leaders in academic medicine to better understand the challenges and success factors they have encountered in order to provide insights to early-career female physicians and inform organizations about the challenges faced by female physicians to build better systems and processes to support them in achieving more satisfying and fulfilling careers within an academic setting. Method: This qualitative research study is based on interviews with female physician leaders. Participants were selected based on their scores in multi-rater leadership assessments taken within the past three years, all ranking in the top 30% across four capabilities: Inspiring Values, Engaging Colleagues, Bold and Forward Thinking, and Driving Results. Coding and thematic analysis were used to categorize the challenges and success factors. Results: Data analysis revealed challenges experienced by these female physician leaders, including gender bias, time constraints, family responsibilities, change and innovation, self-doubt, and exclusion from networking. The strategies identified for navigating these challenges and achieving high performance included support from family and colleagues, building relationships and networking, maintaining a positive attitude, making powerful choices, seizing opportunities, finding value, meaning, and purpose, continuous learning, strategic planning, and gaining recognition. Conclusion: Challenges for female leaders in academic medicine are prevalent and evolve alongside changes in health care. Success factors can be generated at an individual level, such as attitudes, making powerful choices, and networking. However, societal and organizational support, including assistance with family responsibilities and providing opportunities, feedback, and mentorship, has also been identified as crucial.

Abstract Background Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a neurodegenerative disorder marked by early impairments in executive function and altered prefrontal neural circuitry. These traits are also observed in Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), suggesting the possibility of shared mechanisms and a role for developmental neurocognitive factors in the onset of FTD. High‐penetrance mutations in GRN, C9orf72, and MAPT increase FTD risk and are suspected to influence neurodevelopment. This study hypothesizes that pre‐symptomatic carriers of these mutations exhibit cognitive and behavioral traits that overlap with those observed in ADD/ADHD. Method This cross‐sectional study analyzed participants from the ARTFL‐LEFFTDS Longitudinal FTLD (ALLFTD) Study. Inclusion criteria restricted the sample to mutation carriers with pathogenic variants in GRN, C9orf72, or MAPT while excluding individuals with prior psychiatric diagnoses (e.g., bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder) and those taking antipsychotic or anxiolytic medications to avoid potential confounding effects on test validity and interpretation. The final sample included N = 338 participants, categorized as pre‐symptomatic mutation carriers ( N = 227) or asymptomatic noncarriers ( N = 111). To assess potential overlaps with ADD/ADHD traits, a targeted subset of measures reflecting executive function, working memory, attention, social behavior, and hyperactivity were extracted from validated cognitive and neuropsychiatric assessments. Mutation carriers were further classified as either converters ( N = 20) who progressed to symptomatic FTD (CDR ≥ 1) or non‐converters ( N = 95) who remained asymptomatic. Only pre‐conversion scores were analyzed for converters. Group comparisons were conducted using general linear models adjusted for age and sex. Result Pre‐symptomatic mutation carriers showed significantly lower verbal fluency ( p = 0.004) and a trend toward reduced working memory ( p = 0.05) compared to noncarriers. Converters exhibited poorer overall cognitive performance ( p <0.0001), verbal fluency ( p = 0.001), and memory and attention ( p = 0.04) compared to non‐converters. Converters demonstrated higher Neuropsychiatric Inventory scores ( p = 0.0001), particularly in hyperactivity ( p = 0.003), reflecting greater behavioral disturbances. Conclusion Baseline impairments in cognitive function, memory, and neuropsychiatric profiles distinguish converters from non‐converters, highlighting overlaps between ADD/ADHD traits and prodromal FTD. These findings suggest shared neurobiological mechanisms and underscore the need for mutation‐specific studies to further explore the neurodevelopmental factors driving FTD progression.

Abstract Background Agitation is a clinically significant symptom contributing to behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) but is poorly understood across the different syndromes related to Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (FTLD). This study investigates sex differences in agitation across FTLD‐related syndromes and its relationship to various neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS). Method We analyzed data from 1,654 participants (916 males, 738 females; average ages 65.8 and 65.9, respectively) from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) and ARTFL‐LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ALLFTD) study with a FTLD‐related syndrome: behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD), Primary Progressive Aphasia (non‐fluent variant (nfvPPA), semantic variant (svPPA)), Corticobasal syndrome (CBS) and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP). Participants’ symptoms were assessed using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). Prevalence ratios and odds ratios were computed to assess the likelihood of NPS comorbidities when agitation was present in males and females. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed to identify NPS associated with agitation and how they varied by sex. Result Males were more likely to experience anxiety (bvFTD: p <0.001, CBS: p <0.01, PSP: p <0.0001), apathy (nfvPPA: p <0.01, PSP: p <0.01), depression (bvFTD: p <0.0001, PSP<0.01), disinhibition (nfvPPA: p <0.0001), PSP: p <0.001), and motor symptoms (bvFTD: p <0.01, CBS: p <0.01) when agitation was present. In contrast, females had a higher likelihood of experiencing disinhibition in svPPA ( p <0.001). These findings suggest that agitation is associated with a wider range of NPS in males than in females. Agitation and NPS are especially prominent in males with PSP. Conclusion This study reveals significant sex differences in NPS in FTLD‐related syndromes when agitation is present. Males and especially PSP, are more likely to experience a broader range of NPS in association with agitation. These findings underscore the need for further investigation into the underlying mechanisms driving these sex differences, particularly focusing on the neurobiological impact of agitation, the recognition of symptoms in the presence of greater behavioral disturbances, and potential variations from informant reports. Understanding these factors will provide valuable insights into the role of agitation in the presentation of NPS across FTLD‐related syndromes. Ultimately, addressing these gaps will enhance our ability to effectively treat and manage agitation in both male and female patients with FTLD‐related syndromes.

Abstract Background Staging disease severity in dementia research requires input from an informant. The Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR) is the most used instrument for staging in Alzheimer's Disease (AD); but has been expanded to stage patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) with the CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD. An informant effect on the CDR has been reported in AD. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether informant characteristics influence the CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD in a large cohort of participants with frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Method We included participants with a FTLD‐related syndrome from the ALLFTD study. We included participants with a CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD higher than 0, information on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores, and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI‐Q). We performed a conditional growth model using multilevel linear regression analysis. We performed an exploratory stratified analysis by patient sex. Result We included 1411 participants, totalling 2063 visits. The patient's age at the initial visit was 64.7±9.4 years and 44.0% were females. Females were 69.2% of the informants, and the relationship was 79.1% spouse or partner, 10.6% children, 4.1% were siblings and 6.2% other. The CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD scores were affected by informant characteristics. The CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD scores were 0.41 (CI 95%:0.08 to 0.75) higher with female informants. The frequency of visits was associated with a CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD score 0.86 higher (CI 95%:0.17 to 0.56) when visiting at least once a week, 1.46 higher (CI 95%:0.46 to 2.47) when visiting daily, and 0.83 higher (CI 95%:0.06 to 1.60) when living with the patient compared with visiting less than once a week. As expected, CDR‐FLTD scores increased with lower MoCA and higher NPI‐Q scores. In the stratified analysis by sex, we found that female informant was associated with higher CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD scores only when patients were male. Conclusion We found that the CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD is influenced by informant sex and frequency of visits in patients with FTLD‐related syndromes. These results are similar to those observed in AD patients and underscore the need to recognize that informant characteristics may impact dementia severity scales.

Importance Molecular analyses of biospecimens collected from study participants are essential for identifying biomarkers that can tailor treatments to specific subsets of patients who are most likely to benefit. Sharing of data and biospecimens from clinical trials enables personalized, patient-centric use of cancer therapies and accelerates the development of new treatments. Objective To describe obstacles to sharing data and biospecimens and to propose strategies to enhance access and collaboration. Evidence Review This is a Special Communication authored by 53 academic investigators and patient representatives from the breast cancer community with extensive experience in conducting clinical and translational research. The article also evaluates the impact of biomarker research on specifying responsive subpopulations in the 29 registrational clinical trials that have led to approval of a new drug for treatment of breast cancer between 2017 and 2024. Findings Clinical trial participants are increasingly asked to provide tissue and/or body fluid biospecimens for biomarker research that is typically controlled by the sponsoring pharmaceutical company, but published biomarker studies are rare. Among 29 breast cancer registrational studies reported in the past 8 years, none resulted in biomarker research that restricted a drug’s approved indication. Herein, strategies to maximize the value of clinical data and biospecimens contributed by participants are proposed, thereby supporting the shared goals of the pharmaceutical industry and academia to improve patient care. These strategies include (1) establishing coleadership structures involving academia and patients in clinical trial design and conduct, (2) ensuring that informed consent forms state that data and biospecimens will be shared with academia for future research, (3) requiring the sharing of clinical data as a condition for regulatory approval, and (4) enabling access to biospecimens and translational research data for independent studies on biomarkers that may indicate drug efficacy and toxicity. Conclusions and Relevance Data and biospecimen sharing from registrational trials has been suboptimal. Improving clinical data, biospecimens, and biospecimens’ related data sharing requires concrete actions and a multidimensional stakeholder approach to accelerate the impact of clinical cancer research on the quality of patient care.