Citations

ABSTRACT Blood culture contamination can lead to false-positive blood culture results, potentially contributing to increased costs and unneeded antibiotic utilization. Initial specimen diversion devices (ISDD) have been proposed to reduce blood culture contamination rates. A single-center, observational study conducted at Mayo Clinic Rochester compared blood culture contamination rates using Steripath or Kurin ISDDs versus standard blood culture collection protocols. Over 255 phlebotomists were trained in the use of the ISDDs, with 31,215 blood cultures, 410 of which were contaminated, collected from adults in the emergency department and inpatient wards. Baseline contamination rates were 1.29%–2.53% with standard collection methods. The Steripath ISDD with direct-to-media inoculation of blood culture bottles (Steripath-DTM) reduced blood culture contamination compared to standard practice (0.34% vs. 1.43%, respectively, P < 0.001). Follow-up studies with the alternative Steripath configuration with an integrated syringe (Steripath-syringe), and then the Kurin ISDD with syringe collection (Kurin-syringe), did not meet the primary endpoint of <0.5% contamination (Steripath-syringe: 1.28%; Kurin-syringe: 1.76%). All three ISDD configurations failed to meet our goal of >75% utilization, with an average measured utilization of 26% for the Steripath-DTM, 26.4% for the Steripath ISDD (combined DTM and syringe) in a follow-up study, and 41.5% in the Kurin study. Additionally, a survey of phlebotomists revealed low staff satisfaction with both Steripath ISDD configurations. Staff reported multiple ergonomic barriers limiting the Steripath ISDD’s utility, which precluded implementation of the Steripath-DTM in routine clinical practice. IMPORTANCE We conducted a very large, real-world study of two blood diversion devices to determine whether either would meet goals for reduced blood culture contamination and a high rate of utilization by phlebotomists.

Introduction Correct inhaler technique is of utmost importance in the optimal delivery of therapeutics utilized for respiratory illnesses. Previous research suggests that the ability of both patients and providers to correctly use these inhalers is sub-optimal and is associated with poorer patient outcomes. Further education about inhaler types and technique as part of residency education could serve to correct these trends. Methods Family medicine residents were taught correct inhaler technique with an inhaler training device (In-Check TM DIAL G16) using a didactic lecture with hands-on teaching exercise utilizing pharmacy interprofessional teaching. We assessed pre- and post-intervention comfort and knowledge of correct inhaler technique. Results Twenty of twenty-seven eligible family medicine residents attended an interdisciplinary workshop with clinical pharmacists with the purpose of improving inhaler technique comfort level and knowledge. A pre- and post-knowledge test and comfort questionnaire were provided to those participating. Comfort levels with prescribing different inhaler types increased after the intervention and knowledge of different inhalers improved. Conclusion Use of an inhaler training device coupled with an interdisciplinary lecture format improved provider knowledge of correct inhaler technique and comfort with prescribing inhalers.

ABSTRACT Colony stimulating factor‐1 receptor–related disorder (CSF1R‐RD) is a rare, autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disease caused by loss‐of‐function variants in the CSF1R gene, leading to microglial dysfunction and progressive white matter degeneration. Therapeutic strategies targeting microglial pathways, including activation of triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2), have been proposed to compensate for impaired CSF1R signaling. Iluzanebart (VGL101), a monoclonal antibody TREM2 agonist, has shown promise in preclinical models. We report a longitudinal clinical course, neuroimaging findings, genetic analysis, and postmortem neuropathological examination of a 52‐year‐old patient with genetically confirmed CSF1R‐RD (c.2507G>A, p.Ser836Asn). The patient received iluzanebart as part of a Phase 2 clinical trial. Clinical progression, MRI changes, and histopathological features at autopsy were systematically analyzed. Despite treatment, the patient experienced progressive cognitive decline, neuropsychiatric symptoms, motor impairment, and seizures, culminating in death. Serial neuroimaging demonstrated worsening white matter degeneration and brain atrophy without evidence of therapeutic response. Neuropathological examination revealed characteristic features of CSF1R‐RD, including severe myelin loss, axonal spheroids, infiltration of Iba1‐positive cells with macrophage‐like morphology, and cortical neuronal abnormalities. There was no histological evidence of treatment‐related benefit or harm. This case represents the first clinicopathological assessment of iluzanebart in CSF1R‐RD and demonstrates no observable clinical, radiological, or neuropathological improvement. These findings highlight the challenges of targeting microglial dysfunction in advanced disease and suggest that TREM2 activation alone may be insufficient to alter disease progression.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Women are increasingly entering the dementia research workforce, but they frequently fail to attain senior leadership positions in academia. Discrepancies in academic research outputs were investigated to guide equity‐focused policy recommendations. METHODS Bibliometrics was conducted on 400,482 original research articles (2003–2022) followed by surveying the AD/ADRD research community, to quantitatively and qualitatively evaluate discrepancies in publication and authorship trends. In addition, an unsupervised learning algorithm was developed to analyze underlying relationships between author groups. RESULTS Male author gender was consistently predictive of better publication and citation metrics across all bibliometrics outcomes, with senior male authors outperforming all other subgroups and fewer senior female authors in most research areas. Female survey respondents reported more barriers, but comparable productivity and citation strategies as male authors. DISCUSSION Multi‐pronged approaches by stakeholders across institutions, funders, and journals are necessary to provide career support for early‐career scientists working to transition to senior research roles.

e24089 Background: Pancreatic cancer is associated with high symptom burden and frequent acute care utilization. Although early palliative care improves quality of life in advanced malignancies, real-world data describing its timing and downstream impact in pancreatic cancer remain limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Epic Cosmos (2015–2025). Adults (≥18 years) with pancreatic cancer were identified using ICD-10 code C25.*. Early palliative care was defined as a documented palliative care encounter (ICD-10 Z51.5) within 0–2 months of cancer diagnosis. Patients were categorized as early palliative care versus not-early palliative care (late or no palliative care). A landmark approach was applied, with outcomes assessed beginning 2 months after diagnosis to mitigate immortal time bias. Outcomes included opioid use, antiemetic use, occupational/physical therapy (OT/PT) utilization, emergency department (ED) encounters resulting in inpatient admission, and inpatient length of stay. Results: Among 4,641 patients with pancreatic cancer, 464 (10.0%) received early palliative care, 365 (7.9%) received palliative care later, and 3,812 (82.1%) had no documented palliative care encounter. Compared with patients without early palliative care, early palliative care recipients demonstrated higher utilization of symptom-directed interventions, including opioids (40.6% vs 22.5%), antiemetics (37.2% vs 20.3%), and occupational/physical therapy services (6.2% vs 3.2%). Early palliative care was associated with a higher proportion of emergency department encounters resulting in inpatient admission (52.5% vs 23.6%), consistent with earlier consolidation of symptom-driven care. Mean inpatient length of stay was similar between groups (6.0 vs 6.2 days). Overall survival appeared comparable between groups; however, survival estimates in EHR-based analyses are limited by residual confounding and timing constraints. Conclusions: In a large national EHR cohort, early palliative care within two months of pancreatic cancer diagnosis was infrequently used but was associated with greater engagement in symptom-directed medications and supportive services, as well as a distinct downstream pattern of acute care utilization. These findings suggest that earlier integration of palliative care may improve coordination of symptom-focused care and represent an actionable quality-of-care target in pancreatic cancer.

e19559 Background: Timely initiation of systemic therapy is critical in multiple myeloma (MM), yet real-world variation in time to treatment initiation (TTI) and its association with clinical outcomes, treatment-related toxicities, and supportive care utilization remain incompletely characterized. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Epic Cosmos database (2015–2025). Adults with MM were identified using ICD-10-CM code C90. TTI was defined as days from MM diagnosis to first exposure to systemic anti-myeloma therapy, including proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, or anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies. Patients were stratified into TTI < 30 days (n = 90015), 30–60(n = 81190), and > 60 days(119,245). Primary outcomes included mortality, infection (sepsis or pneumonia), AKI within 30 days, DVT/PE, and bone marrow transplant (BMT). Secondary outcomes included hemodialysis initiation, febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, herpes zoster reactivation, and use of bone-protective therapy (zoledronic acid, pamidronate, or denosumab) and antiviral prophylaxis (acyclovir/valacyclovir). Outcomes are presented as unadjusted percentages with 95% confidence intervals. Results: Mortality demonstrated a U-shaped association with TTI, occurring in 22.99%, 21.32%, and 21.32% of patients in the < 30-day, 30–60-day, and > 60-day cohorts, respectively. Infection rates were 16.42%, 17.11%, and 17.30%, while AKI < 30 occurred in 16.01%, 16.38%, and 16.49%. BMT utilization was highest in the 30–60-day cohort (19.14%) compared with < 30 days (18.28%) and > 60 days (18.21%). VTE rates increased modestly with delayed treatment (9.39%, 9.82%, and 10.10%). HD occurred in 3.15%, 3.08%, and 3.07% of patients. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 17.15%, 18.03%, and 17.55%, thrombocytopenia in 13.34%, 13.93%, and 13.86%, and herpes zoster reactivation in 1.21%, 1.29%, and 1.42%. Antiviral prophylaxis use was highest in the 30–60-day cohort (91.25%) compared with < 30 days (88.48%) and > 60 days (88.23%). Bone-protective therapy use was also highest in the 30–60-day cohort (31.68%) versus < 30 days (28.90%) and > 60 days (23.79%). Conclusions: In this large real-world analysis, initiation of systemic therapy within 30–60 days of MM diagnosis was associated with lower mortality, higher transplant utilization, and greater use of guideline-recommended supportive care compared with both earlier and delayed treatment initiation. Patients treated within 30 days appeared to represent a higher-acuity phenotype, while delays beyond 60 days were associated with lower supportive care uptake and higher thrombotic risk. These findings suggest that time to treatment initiation may reflect both disease severity and care delivery quality, and identify a potentially actionable window to optimize treatment pathways and supportive care in multiple myeloma.