Back to Authors

Stites, Shana D.

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3994-4343

Mayo Clinic

University of Pennsylvania

Citations 2

Authorship and citation trends in dementia research: A path to equitable career development for scientists
Viswanathan, Jayalakshmi , Thakur, Lokendra S., Sawan, Mouna, Gomez‐Arboledas, Angela, Moreno‐Gonzalez, Ines, Shaaban, C, Milani, Sadaf A., Wuestefeld, Anika , Govindarajan, Sindhuja T., Carello‐Collar, Giovanna, Shreshta, Hom L., Kenowsky, Sunnie , Suemoto, Claudia K., Stites, Shana D., Karamacoska, Diana , Sawan, Mouna J. , Gómez-Arboledas, Ángela , Moreno‐González, Inés , Shaaban, C. Elizabeth , Milani, Sadaf Arefi , Milinkeviciute, Giedre , Loi, Samantha M. , Govindarajan, Sindhuja Tirumalai , Low, Audrey , Carello‐Collar, Giovanna , Suemoto, Cláudia Kimie , Mielke, Michelle M. , Stites, Shana D.

Alzheimer's & Dementia | June 19, 2026 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 6 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.71597 Get It

Abstract INTRODUCTION Women are increasingly entering the dementia research workforce, but they frequently fail to attain senior leadership positions in academia. Discrepancies in academic research outputs were investigated to guide equity‐focused policy recommendations. METHODS Bibliometrics was conducted on 400,482 original research articles (2003–2022) followed by surveying the AD/ADRD research community, to quantitatively and qualitatively evaluate discrepancies in publication and authorship trends. In addition, an unsupervised learning algorithm was developed to analyze underlying relationships between author groups. RESULTS Male author gender was consistently predictive of better publication and citation metrics across all bibliometrics outcomes, with senior male authors outperforming all other subgroups and fewer senior female authors in most research areas. Female survey respondents reported more barriers, but comparable productivity and citation strategies as male authors. DISCUSSION Multi‐pronged approaches by stakeholders across institutions, funders, and journals are necessary to provide career support for early‐career scientists working to transition to senior research roles.
Consideration of sex and gender in Alzheimer's disease and related disorders from a global perspective
Aggarwal, Neelum T. , Vila‐Castelar, Clara , Brugulat‐Serrat, Anna , Foldi, Nancy S. , Gilsanz, Paola , Li, Wei , McManus, Alison J. , Lent, Debora Melo van , Milani, Sadaf Arefi , Shaaban, C. Elizabeth , Stites, Shana D. , Trani, Jean‐Francoise, Turner, Arlener D. , Vonk, Jet M. J. , Quiroz, Yakeel T. , Group, for the Diversity and Disparity Professional Interest Area Sex and Gender Special Interest, Mielke, Michelle M. , Agarwal, Puja , Arenaza‐Urquijo, Eider M. , Brett, Benjamin L. , DuBose, Lyndsey Elisabeth , Eikelboom, Willem S. , Flatt, Jason D. , Franzen, Sanne , Sundermann, Erin E. , Suryadevara, Vidyani , Babulal, Ganesh M. , Group, for the Diversity and Disparity Professional Interest Area Sex and Gender Special Interest

Alzheimer's & Dementia | April 8, 2022 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 2707-2724

10.1002/alz.12662 Get It

Abstract Sex or gender differences in the risk of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) differ by world region, suggesting that there are potentially modifiable risk factors for intervention. However, few epidemiological or clinical ADRD studies examine sex differences; even fewer evaluate gender in the context of ADRD risk. The goals of this perspective are to: (1) provide definitions of gender, biologic sex, and sexual orientation. and the limitations of examining these as binary variables; (2) provide an overview of what is known with regard to sex and gender differences in the risk, prevention, and diagnosis of ADRD; and (3) discuss these sex and gender differences from a global, worldwide perspective. Identifying drivers of sex and gender differences in ADRD throughout the world is a first step in developing interventions unique to each geographical and sociocultural area to reduce these inequities and to ultimately reduce global ADRD risk. Highlights The burden of dementia is unevenly distributed geographically and by sex and gender. Scientific advances in genetics and biomarkers challenge beliefs that sex is binary. Discrimination against women and sex and gender minority (SGM) populations contributes to cognitive decline. Sociocultural factors lead to gender inequities in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) worldwide.