Citations

Abstract Background: Pancreatic cancer is the fourth-leading cause of cancer death in both men and women in the United States. The currently identified common susceptibility loci account for a small fraction of estimated heritability. We sought to estimate overall heritability of pancreatic cancer and partition the heritability by variant frequencies and functional annotations. Methods: Analysis using the genome-based restricted maximum likelihood method (GREML) was conducted on Pancreatic Cancer Case-Control Consortium (PanC4) genome-wide association study (GWAS) data from 3,568 pancreatic cancer cases and 3,363 controls of European Ancestry. Results: Applying linkage disequilibrium- and minor allele frequency-stratified GREML (GREML-LDMS) method to imputed GWAS data, we estimated the overall heritability of pancreatic cancer to be 21.2% (SE = 4.8%). Across the functional groups (intronic, intergenic, coding, and regulatory variants), intronic variants account for most of the estimated heritability (12.4%). Previously identified GWAS loci explained 4.1% of the total phenotypic variation of pancreatic cancer. Mutations in hereditary pancreatic cancer susceptibility genes are present in 4% to 10% of patients with pancreatic cancer, yet our GREML-LDMS results suggested these regions explain only 0.4% of total phenotypic variance for pancreatic cancer. Conclusions: Although higher than previous studies, our estimated 21.2% overall heritability may still be downwardly biased due to the inherent limitation that the contribution of rare variants in genes with a substantive overall impact on disease are not captured when applying these commonly used methods to imputed GWAS data. Impact: Our work demonstrated the importance of rare and common variants in pancreatic cancer risk.

Abstract Objective: To elucidate the genetic architecture of gene expression in pancreatic tissues. Design: We performed expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) and allele specific expression (ASE) analyses using RNA-sequence data and 1000 Genomes (1000G) imputed GWAS genotypes from 95 fresh frozen histologically normal pancreatic tissue samples. Data from 115 pancreatic tumor-derived tissue samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) was included for comparison. Results: We identified 38,615 cis-eQTLs (corresponding to 484 Genes) in histologically normal tissues and 39,713 cis-eQTL (corresponding to 237 Genes) in tumor tissues (FDR<0.1), with the strongest effects seen near transcriptional start sites (TSS). Approximately 23% and 42% of genes with significant cis-eQTLs (eGenes) appeared to be specific for tumor and normal derived tissues, respectively. Significant enrichment of cis-eQTL variants was noted in noncoding regulatory regions marked by modified histones, DNAse hypersensitivity and bound transcription factors, in particular for pancreatic tissues (1.53-3.12 fold, P≤0.0001), indicating tissue-specific functional relevance. A common pancreatic cancer risk locus on 9q34.2 in the ABO gene (rs687289) was associated with ABO expression in histologically normal (P=5.8x10-8) and tumor-derived (P=8.3x10-5) pancreatic tissues. The high linkage disequilibrium (LD) between this variant and the O blood group generating deletion variant in exon 6 of ABO suggested that nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) of the “O” mRNA could explain the eQTL. However, knock-down of crucial NMD regulators did not influence decay of the ABO “O” mRNA, indicating that a gene regulatory element influenced by pancreatic cancer risk alleles may underlie the eQTL. Conclusions: We have identified cis-eQTLs representing potential functional regulatory variants in the pancreas and generated a rich dataset for further studies on gene expression and regulation in pancreatic tissues. Citation Format: Laufey T. Amundadottir, Soren Lykke Andresen, Wenming Xiao, Jason Hoskins, Ashley Jermusyk, Lauren Rost, Irene Collins, Jinping Jia, Michael Mobaraki, Bin Zhu, Robert Kurtz, Hemang Parikh, Lei Song, Meredith Yeager, Torben Jensen, William Bamlet, Nilanjan Chatterjee, Brian Wolpin, Jill Smith, Sara Olson, Gloria Petersen, Jianxin Shi, Mingfeng Zhang. Analysis of cis-eQTLs in normal and tumor-derived pancreatic tissues reveals functional insights, including for the 9q34.1 ABO pancreatic cancer risk locus [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1442. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-1442

Objective To elucidate the genetic architecture of gene expression in pancreatic tissues. Design We performed expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) analysis in histologically normal pancreatic tissue samples (n=95) using RNA sequencing and the corresponding 1000 genomes imputed germline genotypes. Data from pancreatic tumour-derived tissue samples (n=115) from The Cancer Genome Atlas were included for comparison. Results We identified 38 615 cis -eQTLs (in 484 genes) in histologically normal tissues and 39 713 cis -eQTL (in 237 genes) in tumour-derived tissues (false discovery rate <0.1), with the strongest effects seen near transcriptional start sites. Approximately 23% and 42% of genes with significant cis -eQTLs appeared to be specific for tumour-derived and normal-derived tissues, respectively. Significant enrichment of cis -eQTL variants was noted in non-coding regulatory regions, in particular for pancreatic tissues (1.53-fold to 3.12-fold, p≤0.0001), indicating tissue-specific functional relevance. A common pancreatic cancer risk locus on 9q34.2 (rs687289) was associated with ABO expression in histologically normal (p=5.8×10 −8 ) and tumour-derived (p=8.3×10 −5 ) tissues. The high linkage disequilibrium between this variant and the O blood group generating deletion variant in ABO (exon 6) suggested that nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) of the ‘O’ mRNA might explain this finding. However, knockdown of crucial NMD regulators did not influence decay of the ABO ‘O’ mRNA, indicating that a gene regulatory element influenced by pancreatic cancer risk alleles may underlie the eQTL. Conclusions We have identified cis -eQTLs representing potential functional regulatory variants in the pancreas and generated a rich data set for further studies on gene expression and its regulation in pancreatic tissues.

Abstract Pancreatic cancer is projected to become the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States by 2020. A familial aggregation of pancreatic cancer has been established, but the cause of this aggregation in most families is unknown. To determine the genetic basis of susceptibility in these families, we sequenced the germline genomes of 638 patients with familial pancreatic cancer and the tumor exomes of 39 familial pancreatic adenocarcinomas. Our analyses support the role of previously identified familial pancreatic cancer susceptibility genes such as BRCA2, CDKN2A, and ATM, and identify novel candidate genes harboring rare, deleterious germline variants for further characterization. We also show how somatic point mutations that occur during hematopoiesis can affect the interpretation of genome-wide studies of hereditary traits. Our observations have important implications for the etiology of pancreatic cancer and for the identification of susceptibility genes in other common cancer types. Significance: The genetic basis of disease susceptibility in the majority of patients with familial pancreatic cancer is unknown. We whole genome sequenced 638 patients with familial pancreatic cancer and demonstrate that the genetic underpinning of inherited pancreatic cancer is highly heterogeneous. This has significant implications for the management of patients with familial pancreatic cancer. Cancer Discov; 6(2); 166–75. ©2015 AACR. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 109

Abstract Purpose: To explore the effects of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) on pancreatic cancer risk and overall survival (OS). Experimental Design: The germ line DNA of 531 pancreatic cancer cases and 305 healthy controls from a hospital-based study was genotyped at SNPs previously reported to be associated with pancreatic cancer risk or clinical outcome. We analyzed putative risk SNPs for replication of their reported effects on risk and tested for novel effects on OS. Similarly, we analyzed putative survival-associated SNPs for replication of their reported effects on OS and tested for novel effects on risk. Finally, we conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of OS using a subset of 252 cases, with two subsequent validation sets of 261 and 572 patients, respectively. Results: Among seven risk SNPs analyzed, two (rs505922 and rs9543325) were associated with risk (P &lt; 0.05). Among 24 survival-associated SNPs analyzed, one (rs9350) was associated with OS (P &lt; 0.05). No putative risk SNPs or putative survival-associated SNPs were found to be associated with OS or risk, respectively. Furthermore, our GWAS identified a novel SNP [rs1482426, combined stage I and II, P = 1.7 × 10−6, per-allele HR, 1.74; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.38–2.18] to be putatively associated with OS. Conclusions: The effects of SNPs on pancreatic cancer risk and OS were replicated in our study, although further work is necessary to understand the functional mechanisms underlying these effects. More importantly, the putative association with OS identified by GWAS suggests that GWAS may be useful in identifying SNPs associated with clinical outcome in pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 18(14); 3942–51. ©2012 AACR.