Citations

Importance Pathologic complete response (pCR) is increasingly used as a surrogate end point for survival in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in the field of gastrointestinal oncology. Although this approach has been endorsed by the US Food and Drug Administration, it is still novel and incompletely verified. Objective To evaluate the trial-level association between pCR and survival in rectal cancer RCTs examining the effectiveness of neoadjuvant therapy. Data Sources A meta-analysis was conducted to identify eligible RCTs in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases published between database inception to January 3, 2024. Study Selection RCTs evaluating neoadjuvant therapies in patients with rectal cancer who underwent subsequent surgical resection and reported pCR, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were included. Data Extraction and Synthesis Two investigators extracted the data, which were verified by a third author. The risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence were evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, version 2, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tool, respectively. Adjusted odds and hazard ratios with their 95% CIs were extracted. Weighted linear regression was used to assess the correlation between pCR and both OS and DFS. Main Outcomes and Measures Trial-level correlation between pCR and both OS and DFS. Results Twenty-five RCTs, including 11 882 patients, met the inclusion criteria. On meta-regression analysis, pCR was not correlated with OS (β = 0.37; 95% CI, −0.98 to 1.71; P = .57). Similarly, pCR was not correlated with DFS (β = −0.84; 95% CI, −2.55 to 0.87; P = .32). Two studies (8%) used in the meta-analysis had high risk of bias. On sensitivity analysis excluding these studies, pCR was still not associated with OS or DFS. Subgroup analysis of RCTs using total neoadjuvant therapies was not possible due to limited sample size. Conclusions and Relevance In this systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs comparing neoadjuvant therapies in rectal cancer, there was no trial-level association between pCR and survival. These results suggest that the use of pCR as a surrogate end point for survival should be reexamined and used more cautiously.

Objective: To develop an artificial intelligence–based pipeline to assess and triage patient-submitted postoperative wound images. Background: The rise of outpatient surgeries, remote monitoring, and patient-submitted wound images via online portals has contributed to a growing administrative workload on clinicians. Early identification of surgical site infection (SSI) is essential for reducing postoperative morbidity. Methods: Patients ≥18 years old who underwent surgery at 9 affiliated Mayo Clinic hospitals (2019-2022) and were captured by the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) were included. Eligibility required submission of one image via the patient portal within 30 days after surgery. Images were independently screened in duplicate to determine the presence of an incision. SSI outcomes were obtained from NSQIP. The developed model consisted of 2 stages: incision detection and SSI detection in images with incisions. Four pretrained architectures were evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation, with upsampling and data augmentation to mitigate class imbalance. An end-to-end pipeline, image quality assessment and sensitivity analysis stratified by race were also performed. Results: Among 6060 patients, the median age was 54 years (interquartile range: 40–65), 61.4% (n=3805) were female, and 92.5% (n=5731) identified as White. SSIs were confirmed in 6.2% (n=386) images. Vision Transformer outperformed all others, achieving an incision detection accuracy of 0.94 (area under the curve=0.98) and an SSI detection accuracy of 0.73 (area under the curve=0.81). In addition, it demonstrated strong performance in assessing image quality. Sensitivity analysis revealed comparable performance across racial subgroups. Conclusion: This artificial intelligence pipeline demonstrates promising performance in automating wound image assessment and SSI detection, reducing clinical workload and improving postoperative care.

Abstract Introduction The objective of the study was to investigate the characteristics of patients who underwent surgery for dysplasia detected during chromoendoscopy (CE) surveillance for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and the incidence of cancer in the surgical specimen. Methods A retrospective review of medical records of all patients with dysplasia on a background of underlying IBD diagnosed through CE was carried out at a tri-site enterprise tertiary referral center between 2006 and 2019. We aimed to assess the clinical characteristics of patients requiring surgery for dysplasia and the incidence of cancer in the surgical specimen. Results Out of 219 patients with dysplasia on CE, 35 underwent surgery for dysplasia (16%). Indications for surgery were multifocal disease (n = 6), endoscopically unresectable lesions (n = 13), visible HGD (n = 7) and unifocal invisible LGD (n = 9). Out of 35 patients requiring surgery, 5 were found to have adenocarcinoma, one of whom with stage IIIB disease received postoperative chemotherapy. No patient with a pathologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma had any evidence of recurrent disease after a mean postoperative follow-up of 32 months. Conclusions While the incidence of cancer at the time of surgery for IBD-related dysplasia is not negligible, the rate of node-positive disease is low.

Objective: To characterize the relationship between surgeon-staff familiarity and the time required to perform an operation. Summary Background Data: The clinical and operational efficiency of operating rooms is a driver of hospital finances and patient outcomes. Surgeon-staff familiarity is an important focus for quality improvement and process optimization. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed analyzing operations performed at 4 academic hospitals between July 1, 2019 and December 31, 2023. Exclusion criteria (urgent operations, 2-specialty cases, low surgeon/specialty volume in data set, scheduled length > 8 hours) were applied to limit heterogeneity. The exposure of interest was familiarity between the surgeon and the allied health staff (scrub technicians and circulating nurses) present during an operation (represented as the median staff experience with the index surgeon in the previous 180 d). The primary outcome was whether the actual case length was (vs. was not) 10% shorter than the scheduled case length (“shorter case length”). A secondary outcome was the quantification of the difference between the observed and expected case length and whether the surgical time (cut-close) was shorter. Results: A total of 257,645 operations performed by 25 different specialties comprised the analyzed cohort. Higher levels of surgeon-staff familiarity were associated with a higher likelihood of a shorter case length (observed:expected ratio = 1.16 [1.14–1.18] for high/high levels of familiarity, compared with 0.90 [0.88–0.91] for low/low levels of familiarity). Greater familiarity was also associated with case lengths that were shorter relative to scheduled case length (high/high levels of familiarity 8.7% shorter than low/low levels, P < 0.001). Within the 4 most common types of cases, those operations performed by teams with higher levels of familiarity had shorter surgical times (cut-to-close). Conclusions: This study found that operations were more efficiently performed when the scrub technician and circulating nurse staff had a greater recent experience with the primary surgeon. Surgical team familiarity should be considered a focus of operational and clinical excellence.

BACKGROUND: Within the US, there has been an overall increase in cost of malpractice insurance for surgeons and decrease in federal reimbursement for surgical work. This study aimed to analyze state-to-state variability to understand differences in costs relative to reimbursement for surgeons and temporal trends. STUDY DESIGN: This study uses publicly available data to conduct a cross-sectional evaluation of surgeon medical malpractice premium rates and surgical reimbursement between 2013 and 2023. Surgeon reimbursement was represented in terms of the unit reimbursement rate for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The ratio of surgeon reimbursement to malpractice cost was calculated and considered as the number of LCs required in each state to cover the cost of malpractice insurance. RESULTS: Inflation-adjusted reimbursement for LC decreased in all states with a mean decrease of 24%. Although there was an overall decrease in inflation-adjusted medical malpractice premium cost, some states experienced an increase of up to 22% (Rhode Island), whereas other states experienced a decrease in cost of 62% (Oregon). For the year 2023, there was significant variability in the number of LCs needed to afford malpractice insurance premiums across states, ranging from 21 (Minnesota) to 163 (Illinois). Rhode Island experienced the greatest increase in change from 2013 to 2023 (63%), whereas Oregon experienced the greatest decrease (50%). CONCLUSIONS: This study finds significant variation in Medicare-based surgeon compensation relative to malpractice insurance costs across the US. This discrepancy highlights the challenges faced by surgical practices due to inconsistent insurance cost and decreases in reimbursement rates.

Background: Despite numerous potential benefits of outpatient surgery, there is currently a lack of national benchmarking data available for hospitals and surgeons to compare their own outcomes as they transition toward outpatient surgery. Materials and methods: Patients who underwent 14 common general surgery operations from 2016 to 2020 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. Operations were selected based on frequency and the ability to be performed both inpatient and outpatient. Postoperative complications and readmissions were compared between patients who underwent inpatient vs outpatient surgery. After adjusting for patient comorbidities, multivariable models assessed the effect of patient characteristics on the odds of experiencing postoperative complications. A separate multi-institutional study of 21 affiliated hospitals assessed practice variation. Results: In 13 of the 14 studied procedures, complications were lower for patients who were selected for outpatient surgery (all P<0.01); minimally invasive (MIS) adrenalectomy showed no difference (P=0.61). Multivariable analysis confirmed these findings; the odds of experiencing any adverse events were lower following outpatient surgery in all operations but MIS adrenalectomy (OR 0.97; 95% CI: 0.47–2.02). Analysis of institutional practices demonstrated variation in the rate of outpatient surgery in certain breast, endocrine, and hernia repair operations. Conclusions: Institutional practice patterns may explain the national variation in the rate of outpatient surgery. While the present data does not support the adoption of outpatient surgery to less optimal candidates, addressing unexplained practice variations could result in improved utilization of outpatient surgery.

ImportanceCancer is one of the leading causes of death in the United States, with the obesity epidemic contributing to its steady increase every year. Recent cohort studies find an association between bariatric surgery and reduced longitudinal cancer risk, but with heterogeneous findings.ObservationsThis review summarizes how obesity leads to an increased risk of developing cancer and synthesizes current evidence behind the potential for bariatric surgery to reduce longitudinal cancer risk. Overall, bariatric surgery appears to have the strongest and most consistent association with decreased incidence of developing breast, ovarian, and endometrial cancers. The association of bariatric surgery and the development of esophageal, gastric, liver, and pancreas cancer is heterogenous with studies showing either no association or decreased longitudinal incidences. Conversely, there have been preclinical and cohort studies implying an increased risk of developing colon and rectal cancer after bariatric surgery. A review and synthesis of the existing literature reveals epidemiologic shortcomings of cohort studies that potentially explain incongruencies observed between studies.Conclusions and RelevanceStudies examining the association of bariatric surgery and longitudinal cancer risk remain heterogeneous and could be explained by certain epidemiologic considerations. This review provides a framework to better define subgroups of patients at higher risk of developing cancer who would potentially benefit more from bariatric surgery, as well as subgroups where more caution should be exercised.

Objectives: We aimed to quantify the contributions of patient characteristics (PC), hospital structural characteristics (HC), and hospital operative volumes (HOV) to in-hospital mortality (IHM) after major surgery in the United States (US). Background: The volume-outcome relationship correlates higher HOV with decreased IHM. However, IHM after major surgery is multifactorial, and the relative contribution of PC, HC, and HOV to IHM after major surgery is unknown. Study Design: Patients undergoing major pancreatic, esophageal, lung, bladder, and rectal operations between 2006 and 2011 were identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample linked to the American Hospital Association survey. Multilevel logistic regression models were constructed using PC, HC, and HOV to calculate attributable variability in IHM for each. Results: Eighty thousand nine hundred sixty-nine patients across 1025 hospitals were included. Postoperative IHM ranged from 0.9% for rectal to 3.9% for esophageal surgery. Patient characteristics contributed most of the variability in IHM for esophageal (63%), pancreatic (62.9%), rectal (41.2%), and lung (44.4%) operations. HOV explained < 25% of variability for pancreatic, esophageal, lung, and rectal surgery. HC accounted for 16.9% and 17.4% of the variability in IHM for esophageal and rectal surgery. Unexplained variability in IHM was high in the lung (44.3%), bladder (39.3%), and rectal (33.7%) surgery subgroups. Conclusions: Despite recent policy focus on the volume-outcome relationship, HOV was not the most important contributor to IHM for the major organ surgeries studied. PC remains the largest identifiable contributor to hospital mortality. Quality improvement initiatives should emphasize patient optimization and structural improvements, in addition to investigating the yet unexplained sources contributing to IHM.

ImportanceThe American College of Surgeons (ACS) has advocated for the expansion of outpatient surgery to conserve limited hospital resources and bed capacity, while maintaining surgical throughput, during the COVID-19 pandemic.ObjectiveTo investigate the association of the COVID-19 pandemic with outpatient scheduled general surgery procedures.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis multicenter, retrospective cohort study analyzed data from hospitals participating in the ACS National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019 (before COVID-19), and from January 1 to December 31, 2020 (during COVID-19). Adult patients (≥18 years of age) who underwent any 1 of the 16 most frequently performed scheduled general surgery operations in the ACS-NSQIP database were included.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was the percentage of outpatient cases (length of stay, 0 days) for each procedure. To determine the rate of change over time, multiple multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the independent association of year with the odds of outpatient surgery.ResultsA total of 988 436 patients were identified (mean [SD] age, 54.5 [16.1] years; 574 683 women [58.1%]), of whom 823 746 underwent scheduled surgery before COVID-19 and 164 690 had surgery during COVID-19. On multivariable analysis, the odds of outpatient surgery during COVID-19 (vs 2019) were higher in patients who underwent mastectomy for cancer (odds ratio [OR], 2.49 [95% CI, 2.33-2.67]), minimally invasive adrenalectomy (OR, 1.93 [95% CI, 1.34-2.77]), thyroid lobectomy (OR, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.32-1.54]), breast lumpectomy (OR, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.23-1.46]), minimally invasive ventral hernia repair (OR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.15-1.27]), minimally invasive sleeve gastrectomy (OR, 2.56 [95% CI, 1.89-3.48]), parathyroidectomy (OR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.14-1.34]), and total thyroidectomy (OR, 1.53 [95% CI, 1.42-1.65]). These odds were all greater than those observed for 2019 vs 2018, 2018 vs 2017, and 2017 vs 2016, suggesting that an accelerated increase in outpatient surgery rates in 2020 occurred as a consequence of COVID-19, rather than a continuation of secular trends. Despite these findings, only 4 procedures had a clinically meaningful (≥10%) overall increase in outpatient surgery rates during the study period: mastectomy for cancer (+19.4%), thyroid lobectomy (+14.7%), minimally invasive ventral hernia repair (+10.6%), and parathyroidectomy (+10.0%).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cohort study, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with an accelerated transition to outpatient surgery for many scheduled general surgical operations; however, the magnitude of percentage increase was small for all but 4 procedure types. Further studies should explore potential barriers to the uptake of this approach, particularly for procedures that have been shown to be safe when performed in an outpatient setting.