Citations

Abstract Background: Chronic inflammation is implicated in ovarian carcinogenesis, but how different inflammation-related exposures individually or jointly affect histotype-specific associations remains unclear. Materials and Methods: We pooled data from 16 case-control studies in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium to evaluate associations of eight inflammation-related factors (anti-inflammatory: aspirin use, tubal ligation (TL); pro-inflammatory: endometriosis, obesity, lifetime ovulatory cycles (LOC), smoking, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)) with epithelial ovarian cancer (OvC) by histologic subtype. We examined individual associations and clustering of risk factors across histotypes and computed population attributable risk (PAR) for each factor. We assessed additive and multiplicative interactions for exposure combinations. Results: Associations with OvC risk differed by histotype (e.g., high-grade serous: aspirin: OR=0.90; 95%CI 0.82, 0.99; TL: OR=0.80; 95%CI 0.73, 0.88; overall serous: endometriosis: OR=1.17; 95%CI 1.03, 1.31; high LOC: OR=1.42; 95%CI 1.28, 1.58; obesity (low-grade serous): OR=1.50; 95%CI 1.14, 1.98). Clustering analyses showed highly correlated risk profiles in endometrioid and clear cell (r=0.91). High-grade serous and mucinous profiles were moderately correlated with endometrioid and clear cell (r=0.60) tumors. The profile for low-grade serous (r=0.36) tumors was distinct from other histotypes. PAR estimates suggested modifying aspirin use, TL, and LOCs could substantially reduce burdens of endometrioid, clear cell and mucinous tumors. Out of 28 exposure combinations tested in overall OvC and 189 by histotype, we observed 12 interactions. Not using aspirin regularly showed positive additive interactions with obesity and high LOCs, particularly in endometrioid tumors (obesity relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI)=0.74, 95%CI 0.31, 1.18; Pint=0.001 for; LOCs RERI=0.80, 95%CI 0.03, 1.56; Pint=0.04). Not using aspirin regularly also showed a positive additive interaction with endometriosis in clear cell tumors (RERI=1.77, 95%CI 0.03, 3.52; Pint=0.05). Lack of TL showed positive interactions with obesity in endometrioid (RERI=0.86, 95%CI 0.17, 1.53; Pint=0.01) and mucinous (RERI=1.10, 95%CI 0.23, 1.97; Pint=0.01) tumors, while negative additive interactions were observed for smoking and endometriosis in endometrioid tumors (RERI=-1.12, 95%CI -2.19, -0.05; Pint=0.04). A multiplicative interaction was observed between obesity and endometriosis in mucinous tumors (Pint=0.01). Conclusion: The findings suggest ovarian tumorigenesis is strongly shaped by pro- and anti-inflammatory pathways that act largely independently. Further examining these pathways may clarify the origins of histotype heterogeneity and guide prevention strategies. Citation Format: Maxwell Akonde, Britton Trabert, SHELLEY TWOROGER, Allan Jensen, Kathryn L. Terry, Joshua Sampson, Hoda Anton-Culver, David Bowtell, Elisa V. Bandera, Angela Brooks-Wilson, Andrew Berchuck, Daniel William Cramer, Linda S. Cook, Julie M. Cunningham, Jennifer A. Doherty, Ellen L. Goode, Marc T. Goodman, Holly Ruth Harris, Susanne K. Kjaer, Nhu Le, Alice Wen-Ron Lee, Francesmary Modugno, Kirsten B. Moysich, Celeste Pearce, Malcolm C. Pike, Harvey A. Risch, Mary A. Rossing, Joellen M. Schildkrau, Daniel O. Stram, Rebecca Sutphen, David Van Den Berg, Penelope M. Webb, Anna Wu, Argyrios Ziogas, Nicolas A. Wentzensen. Inflammation-related exposures and histotype- specific ovarian cancer risk in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 6261.

OBJECTIVE Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is commonly performed in both inpatient and outpatient settings. In this study, the authors evaluate the influence of surgical setting on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), satisfaction, dysphagia, and complications following ACDF. METHODS A prospectively collected, multi-institutional quality improvement registry was retrospectively reviewed. Patients eligible for study inclusion were those who underwent ACDF without corpectomy or arthroplasty between 2016 and 2023. The patients were stratified by surgery setting, with same-day discharge indicating outpatients and an overnight stay indicating inpatients. PROMs were collected preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Patient satisfaction was measured using the North American Spine Society (NASS) outcome assessment questionnaire, and dysphagia was measured using the 10-item Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Propensity score overlap weighting (average treatment effect in the overlap population) was used to balance baseline covariates. RESULTS Of the 1514 patients who underwent ACDF, 462 were inpatients and 1052 were outpatients. The outpatient cohort was younger (55.1 ± 10.7 vs 60.5 ± 11.0 years, p < 0.001), had higher rates of private insurance (73% vs 52%, p < 0.001), had a lower mean American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status (2.3 ± 0.6 vs 2.6 ± 0.6, p < 0.001), and underwent more single-level surgeries (53% vs 33%, p < 0.001). Propensity weighting resulted in comparable mean ages (58.9, p > 0.9) and ASA classes (2.5, p = 0.8) as well as private insurance rates (56%, p > 0.9) between the cohorts. After weighting, the inpatient cohort had a higher share of single-level fusions (46% vs 37%, p = 0.007). An outpatient status was associated with significantly better 12-month numeric rating scale (NRS) scores for neck pain (2.4 ± 2.7 vs 3.1 ± 3.0, p = 0.006), NRS scores for arm pain (1.7 ± 2.6 vs 2.2 ± 3.0, p = 0.047), and Neck Disability Index (NDI; 7.7 ± 7.8 vs 9.8 ± 9.4, p = 0.004) and greater improvement from baseline to 12 months on the NDI (−12.5 ± 9.7 vs −10.8 ± 10.5, p = 0.017), EQ-5D (0.242 ± 0.220 vs 0.209 ± 0.226, p = 0.047), and EQ visual analog scale (10.6 ± 21.6 vs 7.1 ± 20.8, p = 0.012). Fewer outpatients reported dysphagia at 3 months postoperatively (31% vs 40%, p = 0.010). No differences were observed in readmissions or revision procedures, although fewer outpatients experienced new neurological deficits (1.0% vs 2.6%, p = 0.032) and pneumonia (< 0.1% vs 0.9%, p < 0.001). In terms of the 12-month NASS outcome assessment, a smaller proportion of the outpatient cohort reported the lowest satisfaction score (3.9% vs 8.0%, p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS Outpatient setting was associated with better PROMs at the 12-month follow-up when patients were weighted by baseline health status. These findings support the efficacy of outpatient ACDF in appropriately selected patients.

Summary The American Society of Clinical Psychopharmacology convened a 45-member international expert task force to identify circumstances supporting the deprescribing of core psychotropic medications for major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorders. Three Delphi survey rounds plus a selective literature review identified points of consensus (predefined as ≥75% agreement) about when antidepressant, antipsychotic, mood stabiliser and sedative-hypnotic deprescribing is warranted. Twenty out of 32 statements (63%) achieved consensus across seven thematic areas. In MDD, panellists favoured discontinuing antidepressants when mechanisms of action are duplicative, adequate trials produce ≤25% improvement or loss of prior efficacy cannot be regained through dose increases or augmentations. Indefinite antidepressant maintenance in MDD was favoured after three or more lifetime episodes. In bipolar disorder, antidepressant deprescribing was favoured in the setting of rapid cycling, mixed features or emerging mania/hypomania symptoms; and discouraged if prior antidepressant cessation led to relapse. In nonpsychotic mood disorders, panellists favoured deprescribing antipsychotics that caused significant weight gain or tardive dyskinesia over adding pharmacological antidotes. Deprescribing to achieve an eventual medication-free status was considered inappropriate, in bipolar type 1, but not necessarily bipolar type 2 disorder. Although individualised circumstances necessarily inform psychopharmacology management, clinical presentations that misalign with existing pharmacotherapies may signal the desirability of cautious deprescribing.

Importance There is a need for greater recognition of clinical psychopharmacology endpoints, including instances where specific psychotropic medications may become unnecessary, redundant, contradictory, or otherwise inappropriate and therefore merit deprescribing. Objective To address circumstances warranting psychotropic medication deprescribing. Evidence Review The American Society of Clinical Psychopharmacology convened a panel of 45 international psychopharmacology experts who developed and completed a multiround Delphi survey and conducted a focused literature review between January and May of 2025, in order to identify areas of consensus or disagreement on key aspects of the deprescribing of psychotropic medications. These included collaborative risk-benefit assessments with patients; pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors; pharmacogenomics; distinguishing redundant or conflictual from complementary mechanisms of action; managing adverse effects; assuring medication adherence; drug tolerance or tachyphylaxis; medication misuse; and the psychological context and ramifications of deprescribing. Findings Consensus was achieved on 44 of 50 final Delphi statements (88%). Panelists unanimously agreed that components of a pharmacotherapy regimen should undergo periodic review to ensure that treatments target relevant symptoms and have favorable risk-benefit ratios. Key points of consensus were that deprescribing: (1) should not occur without first assessing medication adherence; (2) merits consideration if less than partial therapeutic response is apparent, or if treatment goals have been reached and relapse prevention is not a long-term objective; (3) involves psychological ramifications that warrant attention; (4) should be followed by close clinical monitoring; and (5) risk-benefit decisions should ideally involve active patient participation within a shared decision-making model. Conclusions and Relevance Through this Consensus Statement, the Task Force identified circumstances in which the selective elimination of certain psychotropic medications may be clinically indicated. Empirical trials are needed to assess the implementation of deprescribing protocols and gauge their safe, effective, and acceptable outcomes.

Background/Objectives: Diagnostic evaluation and management of nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) vary substantially. This systematic review was conducted to inform development of the Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) clinical practice guideline for diagnosis and treatment of ARCO stages I to III ONFH. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, Global Index Medicus, and the Cochrane Library for studies evaluating imaging modalities and treatments for adult ONFH. We assessed risk of bias using the QUADAS-2, the ROB-2, and the ROBINS-I tools; conducted meta-analyses using random-effects regression; and evaluated certainty of evidence using GRADE methodology. Results: Among 36 included studies, 18 addressed diagnostic test accuracy and 18 addressed comparative effectiveness of treatments. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated the highest pooled sensitivity (0.91; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.87 to 0.94) and specificity (0.96; 95% CI, 0.87 to 0.99) for ONFH diagnosis. Bone marrow edema and grade 2+ joint effusion on MRI differentiated symptomatic versus asymptomatic disease. Computed tomography and MRI better detected subchondral fractures than plain radiography. Very low-grade evidence suggested lower rates of femoral head collapse with core decompression plus bone marrow concentrate compared with core decompression alone (pooled relative risk [RR], 0.55; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.83), and with vascularized versus non-vascularized bone grafting (RR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.84) over a ≤5-year follow-up. Based on three non-comparative case series, osteotomies might have a lower risk of collapse over a 10- to 20-year follow-up, but this needs to be evaluated in future comparative research. Inconsistent outcome reporting hindered treatment outcome pooling. There were no comparative studies that evaluated observation only versus intervention in asymptomatic disease or strategies for monitoring treatment response. Conclusions: Evidence supporting optimal imaging modalities and early joint-preserving interventions remains limited and predominantly observational, underscoring the need for high-quality comparative studies with consistently defined core outcomes to guide clinical decision-making.

Abstract Objective To estimate the incidence of de novo chronic rhinosinusitis and identify associated risk factors in kidney and liver transplant recipients without pre‐existing sinonasal complaints. Study design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Multisite study across Mayo Clinic Enterprise locations in Arizona, Florida, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. Methods Records of all patients who underwent kidney or liver transplantation between November 1, 2021, and November 1, 2022 were reviewed. Patients with documented sinonasal complaints prior to transplantation were excluded. Diagnoses were based on ICD‐10 codes assigned by board‐certified otolaryngologists, with follow‐up extending through November 2024. Demographic and clinical variables were collected, and multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of de novo chronic rhinosinusitis. Results Among 1459 transplant recipients (mean age 55.1 years, 59.8% male), the cumulative 2‐year incidence of de novo chronic rhinosinusitis was 2.4% (24/986) in kidney and 2.3% (11/473) in liver transplant recipients ( P = .89). The overall incidence rate was 12.0 cases per 1000 person‐years, exceeding general population estimates. Transplant rejection (OR 3.2, 95% CI 2.5‐3.9, P < .001) and additional organ transplantation (OR 5.0, 95% CI 3.4‐6.5, P = .041) were independently associated with chronic rhinosinusitis development. Conclusion Kidney and liver transplant recipients experience a higher incidence of de novo chronic rhinosinusitis compared to the general population. Transplant rejection and additional organ transplantation significantly increase this risk. Early recognition and management of chronic rhinosinusitis in this population may support improved postoperative outcomes.

Background Individuals with neurologic impairment, such as brain injury, are more likely to have autonomic dysfunction, including POTS, but often experience a lack of treatment options and access to quality care. Objective Examine the feasibility and outcomes of a group-based multimodal rehabilitation training program. Methods Nineteen females, ages 18–53 (M = 28.6) completed the outpatient training program. The intervention included eight 50-min weekly sessions using an interdisciplinary, multimodal approach, including education, movement, and mindful self-compassion. Participants completed demographic and medical history and assessment for baseline orthostatic intolerance. At pre-training, post-training, and follow-up, participants completed the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), Rand 36-Item Health Survey 1.0 (RAND-36), Trail Making Test (A and B) (TMT-A, TMT-B), 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), and grip strength testing. Results At baseline, participants were significantly below norms in daily function (p < 0.001), grip strength (p ≤ 0.001) gait speed (p < 0.001), fatigue (p < 0.001), and quality of life (p < 0.001). Between pre-training and follow-up, participants showed significant improvement across function in daily life tasks (p < 0.01); grip strength in the dominant (p < 0.01) and non-dominant (p < 0.01) hands; gait speed (p < 0.05); levels of fatigue (p < 0.05); cognitive performance (p < 0.05); and quality of life (p < 0.05). Conclusion Individuals with POTS face functional challenges that can be significantly and objectively improved through multimodal rehabilitation. There is a need for provider education and further research to optimize care and quality of life for individuals with POTS.

OBJECTIVE Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are standardized questionnaires used to evaluate patients’ quality of life and health status before and after medical procedures. While worse preoperative health is often associated with worse postoperative outcomes, the role of baseline PROMs in predicting postoperative dysphagia following cervical surgery has been unexplored with Eating Assessment Tool–10 (EAT-10) scores. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between baseline PROMs and the incidence of postoperative dysphagia. METHODS A prospectively collected multi-institutional quality registry of patients undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery was retrospectively reviewed. Eight baseline PROMs were assessed: Neck Disability Index (NDI), modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale, EQ-5D questionnaire, EuroQol visual analog scale, visual analog scales for neck pain (NP-VAS) and arm pain, and 10-item Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Physical Health and Global Mental Health. Including baseline dysphagia as a fixed effect, multivariable logistic regressions were performed to examine the impact of patient-reported baseline PROMs on the incidence of dysphagia. RESULTS Baseline PROMs were collected from 1706 patients. When assessing baseline PROMs independently in multivariable analyses, worse baseline NDI score (OR 1.04, p = 0.001) was a significant predictor of dysphagia at 12 months after surgery, while other PROMs were not. When assessing baseline PROMs together in multivariable analysis, worse baseline NDI score (OR 1.07, p < 0.001) and better NP-VAS score (OR 0.88, p = 0.006) were significant predictors of dysphagia at 12 months, while other PROMs were not. Patients in the severe or complete disability NDI categories (NDI score ≥ 25; 465/1466 patients without baseline dysphagia) experienced significantly more new dysphagia at 1 month (65% vs 50%, p < 0.001), 3 months (30% vs 21%, p < 0.001), and 12 months (32% vs 14%, p < 0.001) after anterior cervical spine surgery. These patients also had no significant difference in baseline EAT-10 scores (0.103 ± 0.386 vs 0.115 ± 0.405, p = 0.6), yet experienced significantly worse EAT-10 score changes between baseline and 12 months (3.369 ± 5.954 vs 1.208 ± 3.332, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Baseline NDI score appears to be the strongest independent predictor of the 8 PROMs in determining whether patients have dysphagia at 12 months after anterior cervical surgery.

OBJECTIVE This study examined the extent to which preoperative depression predicts dysphagia after cervical spine surgery. METHODS A prospectively collected multi-institutional quality registry was retrospectively reviewed. Patients undergoing cervical surgery were categorized based on preoperative depression, and correlations with pre- and postoperative Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) dysphagia questionnaire scores were assessed. Mixed-effects logistic regressions were performed to assess the impact of preoperative depression on the incidence of dysphagia. RESULTS Of 2002 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 524 (26%) reported having preoperative depression. Depression was associated with a higher incidence of dysphagia at baseline (25% vs 12%, p < 0.001) and at 1 (62% vs 54%, p = 0.038), 3 (36% vs 26%, p < 0.001), and 12 months (36% vs 22%, p < 0.001) postoperatively. Including baseline dysphagia as a fixed effect, multivariable analysis revealed that depression is not a significant independent predictor of postoperative dysphagia at 1 (OR 1.14, p = 0.5), 3 (OR 1.09, p = 0.6), or 12 months (OR 1.27, p = 0.2). Patients with depression and no baseline dysphagia (395 of 524) were significantly more likely to report new dysphagia at 12 months (26% vs 18%, p = 0.006), but not at 1 (53% vs 52%, p = 0.7) or 3 months (28% vs 22%, p = 0.06). The average change in EAT-10 scores between baseline and 12 months was significantly worse in patients with preoperative depression and no baseline dysphagia (2.552 [SD 5.041] vs 1.634 [SD 4.095], p < 0.001). Post hoc multivariable analyses excluding those with baseline dysphagia did not significantly affect the results. CONCLUSIONS Although patients with preoperative depression report dysphagia more often at baseline and at 1, 3, and 12 months after cervical surgery, preoperative depression is not an independent predictor of postoperative dysphagia. Preoperative depression may be valuable to consider as a risk factor for developing dysphagia after cervical surgery, but the heightened dysphagia risk in patients with depression may be attributed to secondary factors associated with depression such as comorbid conditions.