Harnois, Denise

Abstract Objective To examine the impact of immunosuppressive regimens on chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) development in kidney and liver transplant recipients. Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Multisite study across Mayo Clinic Enterprise locations in Arizona, Florida, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. Methods Patients who underwent kidney or liver transplantation between November 1, 2021, and November 1, 2022, were included. Patients with documented sinonasal complaints before transplantation were excluded. Diagnoses were based on ICD‐10 codes assigned by board‐certified otolaryngologists, with follow‐up extending through November 2024. Demographic data, relevant comorbidities, CRS diagnoses, and immunosuppressive regimens were collected. Results In total, 1459 transplant recipients (986 kidney, 473 liver) with a mean age of 55.1 years and M:F ratio of 1.5:1 were included. Kidney recipients who received anti‐thymocyte globulin (ATG, Thymoglobulin®) for immunosuppressive induction had a greater risk of CRS compared to those who did not (odds ratio [OR] = 3.0, 95% CI [1.3, 6.9], P = .005). Among liver recipients, patients on cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and corticosteroids had a greater risk of CRS compared to those on tacrolimus‐based regimens (OR = 6.0, 95% CI [1.5, 24.1], P = .027). Cyclosporine use was also associated with an increased rate of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) compared to tacrolimus (4.2% vs 0.3%, P = .015). Conclusion Tacrolimus‐based regimens are associated with significantly decreased rates of CRS compared to cyclosporine, suggesting that immunosuppressive choice is a modifiable risk factor for sinonasal morbidity in this population.

Abstract Objective To estimate the incidence of de novo chronic rhinosinusitis and identify associated risk factors in kidney and liver transplant recipients without pre‐existing sinonasal complaints. Study design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Multisite study across Mayo Clinic Enterprise locations in Arizona, Florida, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. Methods Records of all patients who underwent kidney or liver transplantation between November 1, 2021, and November 1, 2022 were reviewed. Patients with documented sinonasal complaints prior to transplantation were excluded. Diagnoses were based on ICD‐10 codes assigned by board‐certified otolaryngologists, with follow‐up extending through November 2024. Demographic and clinical variables were collected, and multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of de novo chronic rhinosinusitis. Results Among 1459 transplant recipients (mean age 55.1 years, 59.8% male), the cumulative 2‐year incidence of de novo chronic rhinosinusitis was 2.4% (24/986) in kidney and 2.3% (11/473) in liver transplant recipients ( P = .89). The overall incidence rate was 12.0 cases per 1000 person‐years, exceeding general population estimates. Transplant rejection (OR 3.2, 95% CI 2.5‐3.9, P < .001) and additional organ transplantation (OR 5.0, 95% CI 3.4‐6.5, P = .041) were independently associated with chronic rhinosinusitis development. Conclusion Kidney and liver transplant recipients experience a higher incidence of de novo chronic rhinosinusitis compared to the general population. Transplant rejection and additional organ transplantation significantly increase this risk. Early recognition and management of chronic rhinosinusitis in this population may support improved postoperative outcomes.

Despite European colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) transplant trials having been performed entirely using deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT), there has been speculation about whether similar results can be achieved in the United States, given the lack of MELD score prioritization. A formal transplant protocol for unresectable CRLM was implemented in our center at the start of 2022 with the plan to utilize DDLT. Between 2022 and 2025, 86 patients with CRLM were referred to our program, and 19 patients underwent a formal transplant evaluation. Median time from listing until transplant was 31 days (range 3–115 d). Median allocation MELD was 8 (range 6–15). The donor livers were from DCDs, older donors, or National Share livers, which had been declined by all other centers. All but 2 of the cases underwent advanced perfusion. There were no cases of primary nonfunction, postreperfusion syndrome, acute kidney injury, hepatic artery thrombosis, or ischemic cholangiopathy. The length of stay for the median posttransplant was 5 days. Graft and patient survival were 100% at the time of maximal follow-up. Recurrence developed in 3 recipients (25.0%), 1 of whom was treated and has no evidence of disease. These findings support the viability of DDLT for CRLM using advanced perfusion, contingent on strict protocol adherence. Center-specific waitlist dynamics must inform the choice between DDLT and living donor liver transplant (LDLT).