Citations

Motor learning principles guide treatment of childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). Previous studies found children to benefit from higher-intensity conditions; however, they did not control for the total amount of therapy time. The aims of the article are to examine the effects of high versus low treatment frequency in intervention for CAS in German-speaking children. An alternating single-subject design with multiple baselines was applied to compare frequent, short sessions with fewer, longer sessions in terms of speech production accuracy in four children with CAS while keeping the total therapy time constant. We administered a version of integral stimulation treatment. Despite inter-individual differences, changes under both treatment conditions showed similar positive trajectories for all four children. Untreated control targets also improved across participants and conditions. Maintenance and generalization to untreated targets were observed two weeks and three months post treatment, independent of treatment intensity. Our results show no significant advantage of more intensive treatment when the total therapy time is held constant. This study contributes to the evidence base for the use of integral stimulation in treating children with CAS, and in particular those who speak languages other than English.

Purpose Assessing children with hearing loss and co-occurring medical disorders can be challenging. The purpose of this clinical focus article is to highlight multidisciplinary decision making and evaluation considerations when assessing communication skills of children with hearing loss and co-occurring disorders: velopharyngeal insufficiency, childhood apraxia of speech, and autism spectrum disorder. Method Case examples are described to illustrate multidisciplinary decision-making processes for assessing the communication skills of children with hearing loss who have co-occurring velopharyngeal insufficiency, childhood apraxia of speech, or autism spectrum disorder. Conclusions Clinicians must have knowledge of speech sound development, language development, and social communication for differential diagnosis and treatment planning for children with hearing loss and co-occurring disorders. A team-based approach is recommended when assessing and treating children with hearing loss. Speech-language pathologists and audiologists should feel comfortable recommending other professionals to help with differential diagnosis and treatment considerations when appropriate. Continued assessment and monitoring by a multidisciplinary team for individuals with hearing loss is recommended across the life-span.

Objective: To compare language and audiological outcomes among infants (<9 and <12 mo) and older children receiving cochlear implantation (CI). Study design: Retrospective chart review. Setting: Tertiary academic referral center. Patients: Pediatric patients receiving CI between October 1995 and October 2019. Intervention: Cochlear implantation Main Outcome Measures: Most recent language and audiological assessment scores were evaluated by age group. Results: A total of 118 children were studied, including 19 who were implanted <9 months of age, 19 implanted 9 to <12 months of age, and 80 implanted 12 to <36 months of age. The mean duration of follow-up was 7.4 ± 5.0 years. Most recent REEL-3 receptive (88 ± 12 vs. 73 ± 15; p = 0.020) and expressive (95 ± 13 vs. 79 ± 12; p = 0.013) communication scores were significantly higher in the <9 months group compared to the 9 to <12 months group. PLS and OWLS auditory comprehension and oral expression scores were significantly higher in the <12 months group compared to the 12 to <36 months group. The difference in NU-CHIPS scores between <12 and 12 to <36 months was statistically significant (89% ± 6 vs. 83% ± 12; p = 0.009). LNT scores differed significantly between <9 and 9 to <12 months (94% ± 4 vs. 86% ± 10; p = 0.028). Conclusions: The recent FDA expansion of pediatric CI eligibility criteria to include infants as young as 9 months of age should not serve as a strict clinical cutoff. Rather, CI can be pursued in appropriately selected younger infants to optimize language and audiological outcomes.

Abstract Mesothelioma is a universally lethal cancer lacking effective therapy. The spindle poison vinorelbine exhibits clinical activity in the relapsed setting, and in preclinical models requires BRCA1 to initiate apoptosis. However, the mechanisms underlying this regulation and the clinical implications have not been explored. Here, we show that BRCA1 silencing abrogated vinorelbine-induced cell-cycle arrest, recruitment of BUBR1 to kinetochores, and apoptosis. BRCA1 silencing led to codepletion of MAD2L1 at the mRNA and protein levels consistent with its status as a transcriptional target of BRCA1. Silencing of MAD2L1 phenocopied BRCA1 and was sufficient to confer resistance to vinorelbine. This was recapitulated in cell lines selected for resistance to vinorelbine, which acquired loss of both BRCA1 and MAD2L1 expression. Following ex vivo vinorelbine in 20 primary tumor explants, apoptotic response rate was 59% in BRCA1/MAD2L1-positive explants compared with 0% in BRCA1/MAD2L1-negative explants. In 48 patients, BRCA1 and/or MAD2L1 loss of expression was not prognostic; however, in a subset of patients treated with vinorelbine, survival was shorter for patients lacking BRCA1/MAD2L1 expression compared with double-positive patients (5.9 vs. 36.7 months, P = 0.03). Our data implicate BRCA1/MAD2L1 loss as a putative predictive marker of resistance to vinorelbine in mesothelioma and warrant prospective clinical evaluation.

Abstract Mesothelioma affects mostly older individuals who have been occupationally exposed to asbestos. The global mesothelioma incidence and mortality rates are unknown, because data are not available from developing countries that continue to use large amounts of asbestos. The incidence rate of mesothelioma has decreased in Australia, the United States, and Western Europe, where the use of asbestos was banned or strictly regulated in the 1970s and 1980s, demonstrating the value of these preventive measures. However, in these same countries, the overall number of deaths from mesothelioma has not decreased as the size of the population and the percentage of old people have increased. Moreover, hotspots of mesothelioma may occur when carcinogenic fibers that are present in the environment are disturbed as rural areas are being developed. Novel immunohistochemical and molecular markers have improved the accuracy of diagnosis; however, about 14% (high‐resource countries) to 50% (developing countries) of mesothelioma diagnoses are incorrect, resulting in inadequate treatment and complicating epidemiological studies. The discovery that germline BRCA1‐asssociated protein 1 ( BAP1 ) mutations cause mesothelioma and other cancers (BAP1 cancer syndrome) elucidated some of the key pathogenic mechanisms, and treatments targeting these molecular mechanisms and/or modulating the immune response are being tested. The role of surgery in pleural mesothelioma is controversial as it is difficult to predict who will benefit from aggressive management, even when local therapies are added to existing or novel systemic treatments. Treatment outcomes are improving, however, for peritoneal mesothelioma. Multidisciplinary international collaboration will be necessary to improve prevention, early detection, and treatment.

Introduction: Aneurysm rupture is associated with high mortality and morbidity, including both intracranial aneurysms (IA) and abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Despite potential preemptive treatment in those identified prior to IA or AAA rupture, the evidence for whom to screen remains limited. IA and AAA share both environmental and genetic risk, and prior cost-effectiveness models suggest the potential efficacy of screening in these high-risk individuals. We hypothesized that reciprocal screening in those presenting with IA for AAA would yield positive results. Methods: The BAAS study sought to establish the co-prevalence of IA and AAA. In this arm of BAAS, we recruited patients presenting with IA and screened them for AAA using abdominal ultrasound (aU/S) at two sites: Mayo Clinic and the University of Virginia (UVA). All participants underwent a detailed interview to collect demographic, radiographic, and clinical data. At UVA, participants also received genetic counseling. Results: At Mayo Clinic, we enrolled and screened 81 consecutive patients with aSAH (3 patients with known AAA were excluded) with 3 (3.7%) positive aU/S for AAA. At UVA, we recruited 195 consecutive patients presenting with ruptured or unruptured IA and completed screening aU/S in 178 (93%). Only one (0.6%) had an AAA. Conclusion: The lower positive screening at UVA (0.6%) which enrolled both ruptured and unruptured IA compared to the 3.7% positive results at Mayo suggests that future efforts to identify who with IA might benefit from AAA screening should focus on those with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH).

Introduction: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture has a mortality rate of 64% and intracranial aneurysm (IA) rupture has a mortality rate of 50%. Despite the high mortality rates, early detection and treatment of these vascular lesions prior to rupture can prevent devastating clinical outcomes, underscoring the need to identify high-risk populations for screening. Current evidence demonstrates shared genetic and environmental risk factors for both AAA and IA. Methods: The BAAS study sought to establish the co-prevalence of AAA and IA. In one arm of BAAS, we recruited patients presenting with AAA and screened them for IA. All participants underwent a detailed interview to collect demographic, radiographic, and clinical data and also had genetic counseling. Results: Of the 126 individuals with an AAA enrolled, 65% (82/126) completed the MRA. Difficulty with logistics of obtaining the research MRA with long distance travel to clinic was the principal reason for failure to obtain MRA. We identified 20.7% (17/82) with one or more IA, including 21 aneurysms found during systematic screening. IA ranged in size from 1.5-14 mm (height) x 1.4-7 mm (width) and varied in location. 9.5% (2/21) had a maximum diameter of 7 mm or more. One participant with a positive MRA underwent early coil embolization with the remainder undergoing continued clinical surveillance. Of the 15 individuals completing the genetic counseling screening, two underwent recommended clinical genetic testing, revealing one negative screen and one variant of unknown significance in the MYH11 gene. Conclusion: Consistent with our prior cost effectiveness models, these prospective data support the clinical utility of routine screening for IA in patients presenting with AAA.