Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

331 citation(s) found for "Walsh, K".

Prospective Registry of Multiplex Testing (PROMPT): Follow-up.
Brower, Jamie , Symecko, Heather , Harstad, Tricia, Merrill, Margaret S., Walsh, Michael F. , Offit, Kenneth , Hamilton, Jada G. , Balmañà, Judith , Garber, Judy E. , Domchek, Susan M. , Robson, Mark E.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 27, 2019 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 1527-1527

10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.1527 Get It

1527 Background: Prospective Registry of Multiplex Testing (PROMPT) is an online registry for individuals who have had multiplex panel testing for cancer susceptibility. The main objective of this registry is to ascertain families to allow penetrance calculations for mutations in less well characterized genes. Methods: Since September 2014, health care providers and commercial laboratories have given PROMPT information with the test results to eligible individuals. Participants with pathogenic mutations or variants of unknown significance in cancer susceptibility genes have self-enrolled in PROMPT. We have sent annual follow-up surveys to participants to capture updated personal and family histories, additional genetic testing in the family, and changes in cancer screening patterns. Results: To date, 5800 participants have enrolled in PROMPT and 2321 follow-up surveys are completed. Of those eligible for follow-up, 1980 (44%) have completed at least one survey. 134 (5.8%) reported a new cancer diagnosis since baseline. Breast cancer (37, 27.6%) and non-Melanoma skin cancer (35, 26.2%) were the most commonly reported new diagnoses. 5.7% of participants with an ATM variant, 5.2% of those with a BRCA2 variant, and 4.3% of those with a CHEK2 variant and at least one follow-up survey have reported a new primary cancer diagnosis (excluding non-Melanoma skin cancer). In addition, 70 (3%) participants reported a cancer recurrence since time of last follow-up. Bone (9, 12.9%) and liver (8, 11.4%) were the most common recurrence sites. 12.7% of those with a TP53 variant, 7.1% of those with a BARD1 variant, and 3.3% of those with an ATM variant and at least one follow-up survey have reported a recurrence. 59 (2.5%) participants had additional clinical genetic testing, and 555 (24%) participants reported clinical genetic testing of family members. Conclusions: PROMPT collects updated health information from participants to achieve the primary goal of determining cancer incidence among carriers of different mutations. Moreover, PROMPT has increased participant contacts through use of annual follow-up surveys and gene-specific surveys with subsets of participants. Ongoing efforts include obtaining pathology reports of new and recurrent cancer diagnoses on study.
Adolescent male fertility following reduced‐intensity conditioning regimen for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in non‐malignant disorders
Zhao, Jun , Beebe, Kristen , Magee, Kyrie, Salzberg, Dana, Stahlecker, Jennifer, Miller, Holly, Adams, Roberta H. , Lipskind, S.T., Walsh, Alexandra , Mirea, Lucia , Ngwube, Alexander

Pediatric Transplantation | May 24, 2019 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 6 | Pages: No page available

10.1111/petr.13496 | PMID 31124253 Get It

AbstractIntroductionThe effects of RIC for HSCT on male fertility remain unknown. We investigated spermatogenesis and gonadal hormonal status among adolescent male patients who received RIC HSCT for non‐malignant diseases.Patients and MethodsPatients with non‐malignant disease who had undergone a RIC HSCT were recruited and evaluated for spermatogenesis via semen analysis and gonadal hormonal function via serum hormone levels. Those who had received prior chemotherapy or radiation were excluded from the study. We reviewed the charts to record demographic factors, conditioning regimen and complications during and after transplant.ResultsFive patients were enrolled. The median age at the time of transplant was 15 years (range, 11‐19 years), and the median time between bone marrow transplant and semen analysis was 5 years (range, 3‐11 years). Median age of patients was 20 years (range, 18‐25 years) at the time of the study. Serum FSH and LH levels were elevated in four patients, and inhibin B levels were low for age in three patients. Semen analysis showed two patients had azoospermia, and the remaining three patients showed severe oligozoospermia. Normal morphology and motility were seen in only one patient.ConclusionThis case series suggests that RIC transplants may be associated with impaired spermatogenesis and sequential follow‐up is necessary given the potential for either permanent impairment or delayed recovery. Further larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.
0972 Bridging the Gap of Sleep Training for Medical Learners
Dare, David M., Walsh, Meghan M., Irfan, Muna, Dare, David

Sleep | April 13, 2019 | Volume: 42 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: A391-A391

10.1093/sleep/zsz067.969 Get It

AMEE Guide No. 123 – How to read studies of educational costs
Maloney, Stephen , Cook, David A. , Foo, Jonathan , Cleland, Jennifer , Rivers, George , Tolsgaard, Martin G. , Evans, Darrell J. R. , Abdalla, Mohamed Elhassan , Walsh, Kieran , Maloney, S , Cook, D A , Foo, J , Cleland, J , Evans, D , Abdalla, M E , Walsh, K , Tolsgaard, Martin , Golub, Robert

Medical Teacher | February 22, 2019 | Volume: 41 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 497-504

10.1080/0142159x.2018.1552784 | PMID 30794756 Get It

International Triadin Knockout Syndrome Registry
Clemens, Daniel J. , Tester, David J. , Giudicessi, John R. , Bos, J. Martijn , Rohatgi, Ram K., Abrams, Dominic J. , Balaji, Seshadri , Crotti, Lia , Fauré, Julien , Napolitano, Carlo , Priori, Silvia G. , Rooryck, Caroline , Roux-Buisson, Nathalie , Sacher, Frédéric , Silka, Michael J. , Walsh, Mark, Ackerman, Michael J. , Crotti, Lia , Bos, Johan M , Abrams, Dominic J , Probst, Vincent , Schwartz, Peter J. , Priori, Silvia , Rooryck, Caroline

Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine | February 19, 2019 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circgen.118.002419 | PMID 30649896 Get It

Background: Triadin knockout syndrome (TKOS) is a rare, inherited arrhythmia syndrome caused by recessive null mutations in TRDN -encoded cardiac triadin. Based previously on 5 triadin null patients, TKOS has been characterized by extensive T-wave inversions, transient QT prolongation, and severe disease expression of exercise-induced cardiac arrest in early childhood refractory to conventional therapy. Methods: We have established the International Triadin Knockout Syndrome Registry to include patients who have genetically proven homozygous/compound heterozygous TRDN null mutations. Clinical/genetic data were collected using an online survey generated through REDCap. Results: Currently, the International Triadin Knockout Syndrome Registry includes 21 patients (11 males, average age of 18 years) from 16 families. Twenty patients (95%) presented with either cardiac arrest (15, 71%) or syncope (5, 24%) at an average age of 3 years. Mild skeletal myopathy/proximal muscle weakness was noted in 6 (29%) patients. Of the 19 surviving patients, 16 (84%) exhibit T-wave inversions, and 10 (53%) have transient QT prolongation > 480 ms. Eight of 9 patients had ventricular ectopy on exercise stress testing. Thirteen (68%) patients have received implantable defibrillators. Despite various treatment strategies, 14 (74%) patients have had recurrent breakthrough cardiac events. Conclusion: TKOS is a potentially lethal disease characterized by T-wave inversions in the precordial leads, transient QT prolongation in some, and recurrent ventricular arrhythmias at a young age despite aggressive treatment. Patients displaying this phenotype should undergo TRDN genetic testing as TKOS may be a cause for otherwise unexplained cardiac arrest in young children. As gene therapy advances, enrollment into the International Triadin Knockout Syndrome Registry is encouraged to better understand TKOS and to ready a well-characterized cohort for future TRDN gene therapy trials.
Clinical Practice Guideline: Tonsillectomy in Children (Update)
Mitchell, Ron B. , Archer, Sanford M., Coles, Sarah , Finestone, Sandra A., Giordano, Terri , Hildrew, Douglas M. , Lloyd, Robin M. , Parikh, Sanjay R., Shulman, Stanford T., Walner, David L. , Walsh, Sandra A. , Nnacheta, Lorraine C., Ishman, Stacey L. , Rosenfeld, Richard M. , Friedman, Norman R. , Kim, Tae Won Benjamin

Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery | February 5, 2019 | Volume: 160 | Issue: S1 | Pages: No page available

10.1177/0194599818801757 | PMID 30798778 Get It

Objective This update of a 2011 guideline developed by the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation provides evidence‐based recommendations on the pre‐, intra‐, and postoperative care and management of children 1 to 18 years of age under consideration for tonsillectomy. Tonsillectomy is defined as a surgical procedure performed with or without adenoidectomy that completely removes the tonsil, including its capsule, by dissecting the peritonsillar space between the tonsil capsule and the muscular wall. Tonsillectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures in the United States, with 289,000 ambulatory procedures performed annually in children <15 years of age based on the most recent published data. This guideline is intended for all clinicians in any setting who interact with children who may be candidates for tonsillectomy. Purpose The purpose of this multidisciplinary guideline is to identify quality improvement opportunities in managing children under consideration for tonsillectomy and to create explicit and actionable recommendations to implement these opportunities in clinical practice. Specifically, the goals are to educate clinicians, patients, and/or caregivers regarding the indications for tonsillectomy and the natural history of recurrent throat infections. Additional goals include the following: optimizing the perioperative management of children undergoing tonsillectomy, emphasizing the need for evaluation and intervention in special populations, improving the counseling and education of families who are considering tonsillectomy for their children, highlighting the management options for patients with modifying factors, and reducing inappropriate or unnecessary variations in care. Children aged 1 to 18 years under consideration for tonsillectomy are the target patient for the guideline. For this guideline update, the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation selected a panel representing the fields of nursing, anesthesiology, consumers, family medicine, infectious disease, otolaryngology–head and neck surgery, pediatrics, and sleep medicine. Key Action Statements The guideline update group made strong recommendations for the following key action statements (KASs): (1) Clinicians should recommend watchful waiting for recurrent throat infection if there have been <7 episodes in the past year, <5 episodes per year in the past 2 years, or <3 episodes per year in the past 3 years. (2) Clinicians should administer a single intraoperative dose of intravenous dexamethasone to children undergoing tonsillectomy. (3) Clinicians should recommend ibuprofen, acetaminophen, or both for pain control after tonsillectomy. The guideline update group made recommendations for the following KASs: (1) Clinicians should assess the child with recurrent throat infection who does not meet criteria in KAS 2 for modifying factors that may nonetheless favor tonsillectomy, which may include but are not limited to multiple antibiotic allergies/intolerance, PFAPA (periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and adenitis), or history of >1 peritonsillar abscess. (2) Clinicians should ask caregivers of children with obstructive sleep‐disordered breathing and tonsillar hypertrophy about comorbid conditions that may improve after tonsillectomy, including growth retardation, poor school performance, enuresis, asthma, and behavioral problems. (3) Before performing tonsillectomy, the clinician should refer children with obstructive sleep‐disordered breathing for polysomnography if they are <2 years of age or if they exhibit any of the following: obesity, Down syndrome, craniofacial abnormalities, neuromuscular disorders, sickle cell disease, or mucopolysaccharidoses. (4) The clinician should advocate for polysomnography prior to tonsillectomy for obstructive sleep‐disordered breathing in children without any of the comorbidities listed in KAS 5 for whom the need for tonsillectomy is uncertain or when there is discordance between the physical examination and the reported severity of oSDB. (5) Clinicians should recommend tonsillectomy for children with obstructive sleep apnea documented by overnight polysomnography. (6) Clinicians should counsel patients and caregivers and explain that obstructive sleep‐disordered breathing may persist or recur after tonsillectomy and may require further management. (7) The clinician should counsel patients and caregivers regarding the importance of managing posttonsillectomy pain as part of the perioperative education process and should reinforce this counseling at the time of surgery with reminders about the need to anticipate, reassess, and adequately treat pain after surgery. (8) Clinicians should arrange for overnight, inpatient monitoring of children after tonsillectomy if they are <3 years old or have severe obstructive sleep apnea (apnea‐hypopnea index ≥10 obstructive events/hour, oxygen saturation nadir <80%, or both). (9) Clinicians should follow up with patients and/or caregivers after tonsillectomy and document in the medical record the presence or absence of bleeding within 24 hours of surgery (primary bleeding) and bleeding occurring later than 24 hours after surgery (secondary bleeding). (10) Clinicians should determine their rate of primary and secondary posttonsillectomy bleeding at least annually. The guideline update group made a strong recommendation against 2 actions: (1) Clinicians should not administer or prescribe perioperative antibiotics to children undergoing tonsillectomy. (2) Clinicians must not administer or prescribe codeine, or any medication containing codeine, after tonsillectomy in children younger than 12 years. The policy level for the recommendation about documenting recurrent throat infection was an option: (1) Clinicians may recommend tonsillectomy for recurrent throat infection with a frequency of at least 7 episodes in the past year, at least 5 episodes per year for 2 years, or at least 3 episodes per year for 3 years with documentation in the medical record for each episode of sore throat and ≥1 of the following: temperature >38.3°C (101°F), cervical adenopathy, tonsillar exudate, or positive test for group A beta‐hemolytic streptococcus. Differences from Prior Guideline (1) Incorporating new evidence profiles to include the role of patient preferences, confidence in the evidence, differences of opinion, quality improvement opportunities, and any exclusion to which the action statement does not apply. (2) There were 1 new clinical practice guideline, 26 new systematic reviews, and 13 new randomized controlled trials included in the current guideline update. (3) Inclusion of 2 consumer advocates on the guideline update group. (4) Changes to 5 KASs from the original guideline: KAS 1 (Watchful waiting for recurrent throat infection), KAS 3 (Tonsillectomy for recurrent infection with modifying factors), KAS 4 (Tonsillectomy for obstructive sleep‐disordered breathing), KAS 9 (Perioperative pain counseling), and KAS 10 (Perioperative antibiotics). (5) Seven new KASs: KAS 5 (Indications for polysomnography), KAS 6 (Additional recommendations for polysomnography), KAS 7 (Tonsillectomy for obstructive sleep apnea), KAS 12 (Inpatient monitoring for children after tonsillectomy), KAS 13 (Postoperative ibuprofen and acetaminophen), KAS 14 (Postoperative codeine), and KAS 15a (Outcome assessment for bleeding). (6) Addition of an algorithm outlining KASs. (7) Enhanced emphasis on patient and/or caregiver education and shared decision making.
Clinical Practice Guideline: Tonsillectomy in Children (Update)—Executive Summary
Mitchell, Ron B. , Archer, Sanford M., Coles, Sarah , Finestone, Sandra A., Giordano, Terri , Hildrew, Douglas M. , Lloyd, Robin M. , Parikh, Sanjay R., Shulman, Stanford T., Walner, David L. , Walsh, Sandra A. , Nnacheta, Lorraine C., Ishman, Stacey L. , Rosenfeld, Richard M. , Friedman, Norman R. , Kim, Tae Won Benjamin

Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery | February 5, 2019 | Volume: 160 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 187-205

10.1177/0194599818807917 | PMID 30921525 Get It

Objective This update of a 2011 guideline developed by the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation provides evidence‐based recommendations on the pre‐, intra‐, and postoperative care and management of children 1 to 18 years of age under consideration for tonsillectomy. Tonsillectomy is defined as a surgical procedure performed with or without adenoidectomy that completely removes the tonsil, including its capsule, by dissecting the peritonsillar space between the tonsil capsule and the muscular wall. Tonsillectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures in the United States, with 289,000 ambulatory procedures performed annually in children <15 years of age, based on the most recent published data. This guideline is intended for all clinicians in any setting who interact with children who may be candidates for tonsillectomy. Purpose The purpose of this multidisciplinary guideline is to identify quality improvement opportunities in managing children under consideration for tonsillectomy and to create explicit and actionable recommendations to implement these opportunities in clinical practice. Specifically, the goals are to educate clinicians, patients, and/or caregivers regarding the indications for tonsillectomy and the natural history of recurrent throat infections. Additional goals include the following: optimizing the perioperative management of children undergoing tonsillectomy, emphasizing the need for evaluation and intervention in special populations, improving the counseling and education of families who are considering tonsillectomy for their children, highlighting the management options for patients with modifying factors, and reducing inappropriate or unnecessary variations in care. Children aged 1 to 18 years under consideration for tonsillectomy are the target patient for the guideline. For this guideline update, the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation selected a panel representing the fields of nursing, anesthesiology, consumers, family medicine, infectious disease, otolaryngology–head and neck surgery, pediatrics, and sleep medicine. Key Action Statements The guideline update group made strong recommendations for the following key action statements (KASs): (1) Clinicians should recommend watchful waiting for recurrent throat infection if there have been <7 episodes in the past year, <5 episodes per year in the past 2 years, or <3 episodes per year in the past 3 years. (2) Clinicians should administer a single intraoperative dose of intravenous dexamethasone to children undergoing tonsillectomy. (3) Clinicians should recommend ibuprofen, acetaminophen, or both for pain control after tonsillectomy. The guideline update group made recommendations for the following KASs: (1) Clinicians should assess the child with recurrent throat infection who does not meet criteria in KAS 2 for modifying factors that may nonetheless favor tonsillectomy, which may include but are not limited to multiple antibiotic allergies/intolerance, PFAPA (periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and adenitis), or history of >1 peritonsillar abscess. (2) Clinicians should ask caregivers of children with obstructive sleep‐disordered breathing and tonsillar hypertrophy about comorbid conditions that may improve after tonsillectomy, including growth retardation, poor school performance, enuresis, asthma, and behavioral problems. (3) Before performing tonsillectomy, the clinician should refer children with obstructive sleep‐disordered breathing for polysomnography if they are <2 years of age or if they exhibit any of the following: obesity, Down syndrome, craniofacial abnormalities, neuromuscular disorders, sickle cell disease, or mucopolysaccharidoses. (4) The clinician should advocate for polysomnography prior to tonsillectomy for obstructive sleep‐disordered breathing in children without any of the comorbidities listed in KAS 5 for whom the need for tonsillectomy is uncertain or when there is discordance between the physical examination and the reported severity of obstructive sleep‐disordered breathing. (5) Clinicians should recommend tonsillectomy for children with obstructive sleep apnea documented by overnight polysomnography. (6) Clinicians should counsel patients and caregivers and explain that obstructive sleep‐disordered breathing may persist or recur after tonsillectomy and may require further management. (7) The clinician should counsel patients and caregivers regarding the importance of managing posttonsillectomy pain as part of the perioperative education process and should reinforce this counseling at the time of surgery with reminders about the need to anticipate, reassess, and adequately treat pain after surgery. (8) Clinicians should arrange for overnight, inpatient monitoring of children after tonsillectomy if they are <3 years old or have severe obstructive sleep apnea (apnea‐hypopnea index ≥10 obstructive events/hour, oxygen saturation nadir <80%, or both). (9) Clinicians should follow up with patients and/or caregivers after tonsillectomy and document in the medical record the presence or absence of bleeding within 24 hours of surgery (primary bleeding) and bleeding occurring later than 24 hours after surgery (secondary bleeding). (10) Clinicians should determine their rate of primary and secondary posttonsillectomy bleeding at least annually. The guideline update group made a strong recommendation against 2 actions: (1) Clinicians should not administer or prescribe perioperative antibiotics to children undergoing tonsillectomy. (2) Clinicians must not administer or prescribe codeine, or any medication containing codeine, after tonsillectomy in children younger than 12 years. The policy level for the recommendation about documenting recurrent throat infection was an option : (1) Clinicians may recommend tonsillectomy for recurrent throat infection with a frequency of at least 7 episodes in the past year, at least 5 episodes per year for 2 years, or at least 3 episodes per year for 3 years with documentation in the medical record for each episode of sore throat and ≥1 of the following: temperature >38.3°C (101°F), cervical adenopathy, tonsillar exudate, or positive test for group A beta‐hemolytic streptococcus. Differences from Prior Guideline Incorporating new evidence profiles to include the role of patient preferences, confidence in the evidence, differences of opinion, quality improvement opportunities, and any exclusion to which the action statement does not apply. There were 1 new clinical practice guideline, 26 new systematic reviews, and 13 new randomized controlled trials included in the current guideline update. Inclusion of 2 consumer advocates on the guideline update group. Changes to 5 KASs from the original guideline: KAS 1 (Watchful waiting for recurrent throat infection), KAS 3 (Tonsillectomy for recurrent infection with modifying factors), KAS 4 (Tonsillectomy for obstructive sleep‐disordered breathing), KAS 9 (Perioperative pain counseling), and KAS 10 (Perioperative antibiotics). Seven new KASs: KAS 5 (Indications for polysomnography), KAS 6 (Additional recommendations for polysomnography), KAS 7 (Tonsillectomy for obstructive sleep apnea), KAS 12 (Inpatient monitoring for children after tonsillectomy), KAS 13 (Postoperative ibuprofen and acetaminophen), KAS 14 (Postoperative codeine), and KAS 15a (Outcome assessment for bleeding). Addition of an algorithm outlining KASs. Enhanced emphasis on patient and/or caregiver education and shared decision making.
Self-reactive CD4+ IL-3+ T cells amplify autoimmune inflammation in myocarditis by inciting monocyte chemotaxis
Anzai, Atsushi , Mindur, John E. , Halle, Lennard , Sano, Soichi , Choi, Jennifer L. , He, Shun , McAlpine, Cameron S. , Chan, Christopher T. , Kahles, Florian , Valet, Colin, Fenn, Ashley M., Rattik, Sara , Iwamoto, Yoshiko , Fairweather, DeLisa , Nahrendorf, Matthias , Świrski, Filip K. , Fairweather, DeLisa , Libby, Peter , Nahrendorf, Matthias , Swirski, Filip K , Nairz, Manfred , Walsh, Kenneth , Libby, Peter

Journal of Experimental Medicine | January 22, 2019 | Volume: 216 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 369-383

10.1084/jem.20180722 | PMID 30670465 Get It

Acquisition of self-reactive effector CD4+ T cells is a major component of the autoimmune response that can occur during myocarditis, an inflammatory form of cardiomyopathy. Although the processes by which self-reactive T cells gain effector function have received considerable attention, how these T cells contribute to effector organ inflammation and damage is less clear. Here, we identified an IL-3–dependent amplification loop that exacerbates autoimmune inflammation. In experimental myocarditis, we show that effector organ–accumulating autoreactive IL-3+ CD4+ T cells stimulate IL-3R+ tissue macrophages to produce monocyte-attracting chemokines. The newly recruited monocytes differentiate into antigen-presenting cells that stimulate local IL-3+ CD4+ T cell proliferation, thereby amplifying organ inflammation. Consequently, Il3−/− mice resist developing robust autoimmune inflammation and myocardial dysfunction, whereas therapeutic IL-3 targeting ameliorates disease. This study defines a mechanism that orchestrates inflammation in myocarditis, describes a previously unknown function for IL-3, and identifies IL-3 as a potential therapeutic target in patients with myocarditis.
Psychological and Genetic Predictors of Pain Tolerance
Patanwala, Asad E. , Norwood, Charles , Steiner, Heidi E. , Morrison, Daniel, Li, May, Walsh, Keith, Martinez, M. Elena, Baker, Sarah E. , Snyder, Eric M., Karnes, Jason H. , Baker, Sarah E

Clinical and Translational Science | November 23, 2018 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 189-195

10.1111/cts.12605 | PMID 30468309 Get It

Previous studies have shown associations between genetic polymorphisms and pain tolerance, but psychological evaluations are seldom measured. The objective of this study was to determine the independent effects of demographic, psychological, and genetic predictors of cold noxious pain tolerance. Healthy subjects (n = 89) completed the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and Fear of Pain Questionnaire (FPQ‐III), underwent genotyping for candidate single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and completed a cold‐pressor test in a 1–2°C water bath for a maximum of 3 minutes. The primary outcome measure was pain tolerance, defined as the maximum duration of time subjects left their nondominant hand in the cold‐water bath. Cox proportional hazards regression indicated that female sex, Asian race, and increasing PCS and FPQ‐III scores were associated with lower pain tolerance. No candidate SNP was significantly associated with pain tolerance. Future genetic studies should include demographic and psychological variables as confounders in experimental pain models.
Augmenting MRI Safety Screening Processes: Reliable Identification of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices by a Ferromagnetic Detector System
Watson, Robert E. , Walsh, S., Felmlee, Joel P. , Friedman, Paul A. , Keene, Mark N., Walsh, Suson M

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging | September 26, 2018 | Volume: 49 | Issue: 7 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/jmri.26277 | PMID 30257050 Get It

Level of Evidence: 1Technical Efficacy Stage: 5 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:e297–e299.