Citations

Background: Zanubrutinib and acalabrutinib are next-generation Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors used in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). They have demonstrated lower cardiotoxicity compared to first-generation BTK inhibitor ibrutinib. However, there is limited data comparing cardiovascular outcomes between zanubrutinib and acalabrutinib. This study aims to investigate the cardiovascular risks associated with these two agents in a real-world setting. Method: A retrospective, propensity score-matched study was conducted using the TriNetX database, which includes de-identified electronic health records from over 101 million individuals across 70 healthcare organizations. Patients with CLL and SLL treated with either zanubrutinib or acalabrutinib were included, excluding those who received ibrutinib. The primary outcome of interest was major cardiovascular adverse events, composed of heart failure, myocardial infarction, and cardiac arrest. Other outcomes of interest were new-onset hypertension, new-onset atrial fibrillation/flutter, ventricular arrhythmia, myocardial infarction, new-onset heart failure, conduction block, and stroke within 18 months of therapy initiation. Propensity score matching accounted for demographics, comorbidities, disease status, other CLL/SLL-directed therapies, and concomitant cardiovascular agents. Relative risk and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to assess the outcomes. Results: A total of 907 patients treated with zanubrutinib were matched to 907 patients treated with acalabrutinib. At 18 months, the zanubrutinib group experienced 106 major cardiovascular adverse events, compared to 144 in the acalabrutinib group (RR (relative risk), 0.73 [95% CI: 0.58-0.93]; p=0.009). New-onset hypertension occurred in 35 zanubrutinib and 31 acalabrutinib patients (RR, 1.14 [95% CI: 0.72-1.82]; p=0.579). New-onset atrial fibrillation/flutter occurred in 15 zanubrutinib and 30 acalabrutinib patients (RR, 0.49 [95% CI: 0.27-0.91]; p=0.020). Ventricular arrhythmia occurred in 13 zanubrutinib and 9 acalabrutinib patients (RR, 1.44 [95% CI: 0.62-3.36]; p=0.402). Myocardial infarction occurred in 18 zanubrutinib and 25 acalabrutinib patients (RR, 0.72 [95% CI: 0.40-1.31]; p=0.286). New-onset heart failure occurred in 34 zanubrutinib and 40 acalabrutinib patients (RR, 0.82 [95% CI: 0.52-1.28]; p=0.385). Conduction block occurred in 43 zanubrutinib and 48 acalabrutinib patients (RR, 0.90 [95% CI: 0.60-1.34]; p=0.593). Stroke occurred in 20 zanubrutinib and 19 acalabrutinib patients (RR, 1.05 [95% CI: 0.57-1.96]; p=0.873). Conclusion: Zanubrutinib was associated with a 27% lower risk of major cardiovascular adverse events and a 51% lower risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation/flutter compared to acalabrutinib, suggesting its preference for patients with high cardiovascular risks. The risks of new-onset hypertension, ventricular arrhythmia, myocardial infarction, new-onset heart failure, conduction block, and stroke were similar between the two groups. Further studies with long-term follow-up data will be valuable for evaluating the safety of next-generation BTK inhibitors.

Background: Patients with immunocompromising conditions, including those affected by hematologic malignancies, have a disproportionately high burden of morbidity and mortality related to COVID-19 compared to individuals without such conditions.Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) recommend the use of remdesivir, a broad-spectrum antiviral, for treatment of mild to severeCOVID-19 in immunocompetent patients not requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. While the CPGs issued by the World Health Organization (WHO, 2023), National Institutes of Health (NIH, 2023) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA, 2022) also recommended the use of remdesivir in patients with immunocompromising conditions at high risk for severe disease, there was limited evidence available at the time the recommendations were communicated, more than two years after the start of the pandemic. The European Conference on Infections in Leukemia (ECIL, 2022) guidelines include remdesivir among the treatment options for mild to moderate COVID-19 patients with hematologic malignancies. The lack of evidence for treatment efficacy and safety in patients with immunocompromising conditions, a population underrepresented or excluded from clinical trials, was mentioned in CPGs as a knowledge gap and as need for further research. In this research, we summarize the evidence for remdesivir efficacy and safety for treatment of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients with hematologic malignancies accumulated since the start of the pandemic. Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases from January 2019 through December 2023 for interventional and observational studies examining remdesivir efficacy and safety. Case reports and case studies were excluded. A dual-reviewer approach was used for screening and data extraction. Results: Of the 7,654 references retrieved through the implementation of the extensive search strategy 59 (0.8%) reporting on patients with hematologic malignancies, unspecified cancers, or immunodeficiencies were identified and reviewed in full text. Only eight unique studies (8 of 59) were conducted in patients with hematologic malignancies, of which two reported remdesivir use in a minority of participants (n<5) and were excluded from further analyses. The remaining six studies, of which four were peer-reviewed original articles, one was a letter to editor and the last was a conference abstract, used a retrospective cohort design and reported efficacy outcomes for a combined total of 1,579 individuals across the studies. Three of the six studies were conducted during the pre-Omicron variant era (November 2021) while the remaining three started data collection in December 2021. There were four studies reporting number of deaths or the mortality rate, while a fifth study based on medical chart reviews of 313 patients in Israel found a significantly reduced risk of mortality among remdesivir recipients compared to patients not receiving remdesivir (OR: 0.297; 95% CI: 0.105, 0.834). In addition, a study including 466 patients from the Spanish Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cell Therapy Registry reported mortality among remdesivir treated group related to baseline disease progression, use of corticosteroids for COVID-19 therapy and the presence of coinfections while B-cell malignancy as underlying disease, severe COVID-19, late antiviral initiation (≥5 days after first positive PCR) and longer treatment duration (≥5 days) were factors significantly associated with prolonged viral shedding. The same Spanish study reported safety outcomes indicating that adverse events of grade 3 or above were rare, occurring in 0.5% of remdesivir treated patients. Conclusion: Despite the call for research to fill the knowledge gap signaled by the CPGs, our comprehensive systematic literature review identified only a few publications conducted since the start of the pandemic in patients with hematological malignancies. In the current endemic era, these patients are among the most at risk for severe outcomes and COVID-19 related hospitalizations. While the limited evidence suggests that remdesivir use can reduce mortality in patients with hematologic malignancies, additional research will be instrumental to inform development and updating of evidence-based recommendations to support and guide clinical management of oncology patients.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable plasma cell (PC) malignancy. Despite therapeutic advances that have vastly improved survival, all patients are expected to relapse. Current standard of care includes autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) with high-dose melphalan (HDM) administered as a conditioning agent. Cytotoxic chemotherapies such as melphalan have been shown to drive therapy-induced senescence (TIS) in several tissues. We hypothesize that HDM activates TIS pathways in surviving MM cells and that this may correlate with patient outcomes post-ASCT. We developed an in vitro HDM model using 5TGM1 mouse MM cells treated with vehicle (Veh) or HDM (10µM, IC90) for 6h, followed by co-culture with primary mouse bone marrow stromal cells. Image analysis was performed to quantify proliferation by cumulative population doublings (CPDs) over 10 days, after which 5TGM1 cells were evaluated for cell size, telomere-associated DNA damage foci (TAFs), sensitivity to senolysis, and senescence gene expression (scRNA-seq and RT-qPCR). The effect of HDM on CPDs and cell size was also evaluated in human MM cell lines RPMI-8226 and H929. scRNA-seq was used to analyze CD138+ PCs from MM patients at various timepoints post-ASCT. Longitudinal MM patient iliac crest biopsies (diagnosis, post-ASCT; N=20) were stained for CD138+ PCs; PC burden was quantified by AI-assisted histology. Lastly, we established an in vivo model of induction therapy (bortezomib) followed by HDM/SCT in Vk*MYC mouse MM engrafted C57BL/6 mice. Tumor burden was tracked by serum protein electrophoresis for M-spike using submandibular bleeds. Bone marrow was then flushed from long bones and analyzed by flow cytometry and immunofluorescence. HDM-5TGM1 showed decreased CPDs (HDM 0.32±0.31, Veh 6.72±0.69, p<0.0001, N=3), increased size (median pixel size: HDM 413.2±99.98, Veh 207±8.88, p<0.05, N=3), and increased TAF+ cells (Percent TAF+ cells: HDM 34.77%±10.74%, Veh 11.41%±1.58%, p<0.05, N=3) consistent with known TIS features. Preliminary assessment (N=1) of human MM cell lines showed similar growth arrest (RPMI-8226 CPDs: HDM 0.058±0.101, Veh 4.185±0.358; H929 CPDs: HDM 0±0, Veh 4.61±0.243) and size increase (RPMI-8226 mean pixel size: HDM 804.1±6.048, Veh 526.9±2.115; H929 mean pixel size: HDM 371.2±26.95, Veh 130.3±41.43), suggesting a translatable mechanism. HDM-5TGM1 cells were more sensitive to senolysis by dasatinib+quercetin (viability: HDM 54.9%±0.09%, Veh 76.0%±0.05%, N=2). scRNA-seq analysis showed that HDM-5TGM1 were enriched for gene sets related to senescence pathways, including the published set SenMayo (FDR<0.25). HDM-5TGM1 cells also exhibited myeloid gene expression consistent with previous publications on MM dormancy. RT-qPCR confirmed significant increases in HDM-5TGM1 (p<0.001, N=3) in senescence markers (Cdkn1a, Cdkn1c, Glb1), senescent cell anti-apoptosis pathway genes (SCAPs, Bcl2l1), senescence associated secretory phenotype (SASP) genes (Ccl5, Icam1, Mmp13), and myeloid markers (Axl, Fcer1g, Mpeg1). scRNA-seq of patient CD138+ PCs confirmed a myeloid-like cluster that gained prominence in relapsed patients with resistant disease. CD138+ PCs were detected in patient bone biopsies post-ASCT. Interestingly, patients who relapsed (≤3 years, N=9) had a greater percent reduction in PC burden from diagnosis to post-ASCT when compared to patients that did not relapse (N=11) in that time (p=0.02). Further, CD138+ PC burden post-ASCT positively correlated with time in remission in relapsed patients (R=0.697, p=0.03). Bortezomib reduced serum M-spike in Vk*MYC-engrafted mice (p=0.0003); M-spike was further reduced by HDM/SCT compared to Veh-treated mice (p=0.0007). Flow cytometry confirmed a decrease in Vk*MYC cells after HDM/SCT (p=0.0043), and the percentage of Vk*MYC cells with greater size and complexity was increased compared to Veh-treated mice (p=0.0043), consistent with our in vitro data. Vk*MYC cells from HDM-treated mice also trended for more TAF+ cells (>3 TAFs) compared to Veh-treated mice (p=0.0714). Our findings suggest that HDM can induce a TIS and myeloid signature in surviving MM cells. Greater MM burden post-ASCT appears to be associated with longer durable response, again suggesting that these cells may be in growth arrest consistent with TIS. Finally, senolytics may be a novel approach to eliminate surviving MM cells and prevent relapse.

Background Blast or accelerated phase myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN-BP/AP) carries a dismal prognosis, with 3-year survival estimates of <5% (BCJ 2023;108). Patients with MPN-BP/AP were excluded from venetoclax (Ven) plus hypomethylating agent (HMA) clinical trials for acute myeloid leukemia (NEJM 2020;383:617). In the current retrospective study, we examined response patterns and long-term survival of newly-diagnosed MPN-BP/AP patients who received treatment with Ven+HMA, outside of clinical trials. Methods Newly-diagnosed patients with MPN-BP/AP treated with Ven+HMA at the Mayo Clinic, between March 2019 and May 2024, were retrospectively reviewed. Diagnostic criteria were according to the International Consensus Classification (Blood 2022;140:1200). Cytogenetic and molecular studies were performed by conventional karyotype and next-generation sequencing, respectively. All patients received at least one cycle of Ven+HMA (azacitidine 75 mg/m2 days 1-7 or decitabine 20 mg/m2 days 1-5). Response was assessed according to the 2022 European Leukemia Net criteria (Blood 2022;140:1345). Standard statistical analyses were performed using JMP Pro (Version 17.1.0). Results Patient characteristics 70 patients (median age 73 years, 59% males, 48% splenomegaly >14 cm, 4% isolated myeloid sarcoma) with newly-diagnosed MPN-BP (n=58) or AP (n=12) received Ven+HMA with (n=13) or without (n=57) concomitant JAK2 inhibitor. Driver mutation distribution was 69% JAK2, 21% CALR, 6% MPL, and 4% triple negative. Mutations involved ASXL1 (31%), TP53 (28%), TET2 (28%), RUNX1 (25%), SRSF2 (18%), IDH2 (12%), U2AF1 (11%), DNMT3A (9%), IDH1 (7%), and K/NRAS (7%). Karyotype was abnormal in 50 (76%) of 66 informative cases, of which 28 (56%) were complex (CK). Median TP53 mutation variant allele frequency (VAF) was 30% (8-96%) and all evaluable cases displayed CK (n=18). Response and Survival Complete remission (CR; 21%) or CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi; 19%) was documented in 28 (40%) patients with residual MPN in 18 (64%) patients. Median response duration was 5.5 months (1-60 months). After a median follow up of 7 months (1-62 months), 48 (69%) deaths, 13 relapses (46%), and 15 (21%) allogeneic stem cell transplants (ASCT; 12 in CR/CRi) were recorded. Median overall survival (OS) was 9 months and was superior with ASCT (median 22 vs. 8 months; p=0.01). In univariate analysis, transplant-censored survival was superior with CR/CRi (12 vs. 5 months; p<0.01) and IDH1 mutation (33 vs. 8 months; p=0.04) and inferior with CK (7 vs. 10 months; p=0.05), TP53 mutation (5 vs. 10 months; p<0.01), post polycythemia vera myelofibrosis (post-PV MF) (3 vs. 9 months; p=0.01), and splenomegaly >14 cm (5 vs. 16 months; p<0.01). Multivariable analysis confirmed the negative survival impact of not achieving CR/CRi (HR 3.8; p<0.01) and presence of TP53 mutation (HR 4.0; p<0.01); median survival (1/3-year survival rate) was 3 months (10%/0%) in TP53 mutated patients not achieving CR/CRi (n=11) vs. 27 months (65%/28%) in TP53 unmutated cases achieving CR/CRi (n=19) (p < 0.01). Median survival in patients with TP53 mutations or CK who achieved CR/CRi (n=7; 7 months) was inferior to that in treatment responders without TP53 mutations or CK (n=18; 23 months; p=0.01). CR/CRi rates in the presence vs. absence of TP53 mutations were 42% vs. 39% (p=0.80) and of CK (25% vs. 50% (p=0.04). Importantly, responses in the presence of TP53 mutations or CK were too short-lived to allow successful bridging to ASCT (median 2 vs. 9 months; p<0.01). Additional predictors of inferior treatment response included splenomegaly >14 cm (24% vs. 53%; p=0.01), and post-PV MF (0% vs. 46%; p<0.01) while SRSF2 (67% vs. 34%; p=0.04) and IDH2 mutations (75% vs. 35%; p=0.03) were associated with favorable response. In multivariable analysis, CK (p=0.04) and splenomegaly >14 cm (p=0.01) remained independent predictors of inferior response. The use of concomitant JAK2 inhibitor therapy did not impact treatment response (CR/CRi 46% vs. 39%; p=0.62) or survival (median 9 vs. 8 months; p=0.71). Conclusions TP53 mutations and CK undermine the value of Ven+HMA, with or without concomitant JAK2 inhibitor, in enabling successful bridging of newly-diagnosed MPN-BP/AP to ASCT. An alternative treatment approach is advised, in the particular scenario, while the observed 3-year survival rate of 28%, in treatment responders without TP53 mutations, is encouraging.

Background: Treatment of symptomatic splenomegaly in myelofibrosis (MF) was revolutionized by JAK2 inhibitors (JAKi), with ruxolitinib inducing a >35% spleen volume reduction in 42% of patients at 24 weeks (N Engl J Med 2012;366). However, the benefit is often transient with a median duration of spleen response of three years (N Engl J Med. 2011;365). Treatment modalities for the management of MF-associated splenomegaly resistant to JAKi treatment includes surgical resection and involved-field radiotherapy. In the current study, we describe our experience with the former. Methods: Study patients were retrospectively recruited from Mayo Clinic (USA) databases based on the following criteria: i) diagnosis according to the International Consensus Classification (Blood 2022;140:1200); ii) documentation of JAKi therapy exposure followed by splenectomy; iii) availability of information before and after splenectomy. Splenectomy was performed as an open (n=29) or laparoscopic (n=5) surgery. Conventional statistical methods were employed for data analysis (JMP Pro 17.0.0, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Results: A total of 34 patients (median age 62.5 years, range 43-79; 59% males) were identified with splenectomies performed between 2011-2024. Mutation distribution included JAK2 62%, CALR 26%, MPL 3%, and triple negative 9%. ASXL1 mutation was present in 37% and SRSF2 mutation was present in 26% of 19 informative cases. Karyotype was very high risk in 15% and unfavorable in 12%. Median time from diagnosis to JAKi initiation was 7.5 years (0-31). Majority (76%) were treated with one JAKi; 18% had been exposed to 2 different JAKi and 6% with three JAKi. JAKi included ruxolitinib (n=27), momelotinib (n=5), pacritinib (n=3), fedratinib (n=3), and BMS-911543 JAKi (n=5). Two patients underwent allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) three and six months prior to splenectomy. Prior treatment included splenic radiation in 4 patients (median 0.6 years (0.2-1.2)). Pre-operative splenic embolization was performed in 4 patients on same day of splenectomy; one patient had embolization 10 months prior to splenectomy. Median interval from diagnosis to splenectomy was 10.3 years (1.0-35.4) and from initiation of JAKi therapy to splenectomy 1.8 years (0.03-12.1). Most patients had multiple indications for splenectomy including 76% with symptomatic splenomegaly, 50% with significant cytopenia, and 18% in preparation of ASCT. At time of splenectomy, median spleen size on imaging was 25.1 cm (14.7-36) and 55% were red cell transfusion-dependent (Revised international working group criteria). Postoperative complications were reported in 22 (65%) of patients. Major bleeding occurred in 11 (32%) (of which 7 (64%) required repeat surgical exploration) and thrombosis in 9 (26%); 5 patients experienced both major bleeding and thrombosis. Other complications included infection (n=5), renal injury (n=3), and pneumothorax (n=2). At a median follow up of 1.7 years (0.01-10.2) post-splenectomy, 12 (35%) ASCT were documented at a median of 2.3 years (1.5-26.4) post-procedure. Median post-splenectomy survival was 4.3 years (5-year survival 44%) and significantly longer in transplanted patients (median not reached vs 2.6 years; 5-year survival 65% vs 22%; p=0.02). Among patients without post-splenectomy ASCT (n=22), 12 (55%) deaths (including 2 from post-operative complications) and 3 leukemic transformations were recorded. Additionally, 13 of the 22 had transfusion-dependent anemia at splenectomy and subsequently 6 (46%) became transfusion-independent (TI) (≥12 weeks without transfusion) with median TI response duration of 2.8 years (0.3-7.1). In addition, among 5 non-transplanted patients with baseline thrombocytopenia (< 50 x 109/L (16-42 x 109/L)), 4 (80%) had platelet count > 100 x 109/L (median; 170 x 109/L, range: 119-279 x 109/L) within 3 months post-procedure. Conclusions: Splenectomy following JAKi-resistant or intolerant MF is associated with improvement of transfusion-dependent anemia (46% response), resolution of severe thrombocytopenia (80%), and may allow for successful transition to ASCT (35%). However, the procedure is associated with significant perioperative complications occurring in the majority of patients and underscores the need for future collaborative studies to develop selection criteria and evaluate alternative treatment modalities.

Introduction: As therapeutic options for cancer increase at an unprecedented rate, understanding patient's awareness and attitudes is imperative to optimize their participation in shared decision making. Patient surveys are a powerful tool to gain insight into patient awareness but are cumbersome to administer on a large scale. With the advent of technology and virtual care, electronic surveys are being utilized more widely but their validity compared to approaching the patients in-person has not been established. We conducted a survey regarding awareness and preferences for clinical trials in-person and electronically and compared results systematically in a matched cohorts of patients with MM. Methods: A 52-question survey (including the domains: knowledge, trust, fear, external influence and optimism) was administered in-person to cancer patients at Mayo Clinic campuses (NCT04630431), of which patients with MM were identified for this analysis. The same survey was administered to MM patients enrolled in the online portal HealthTree® Cure Hub. Observations from the in-person and online cohorts were matched and weighted based on coarsened exact matching utilizing the “MatchIt” package based on age, gender, race, ethnicity, education, and marital status. Question responses were converted to an agreeance score scaled from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree). Mean and standard deviation measurements were calculated. Weighted t-tests were conducted using these numeric scores and the matched weights. Results: Final matched cohorts included 83% (n=65) of the in-person and 69% (n=149) of the online participants. Mean age was 63.5 (± 8.5) years with 52% females for in-person vs. 65.9 (± 7.5) years and 54% females in the online participants. In-person cohort included 83% White, 14% Black and 12% Hispanic participants while online cohort had 94% White, 5% Black and 13% Hispanics/Latinos. Education level with 4-year degree or higher was reported by 66% in-person and 75% online participants. Both cohort respondents on average rated a strong likelihood of participating in a clinical trial (in-person 4.04, CI: 3.73-4.35; online 4.34, CI: 4.19-4.5). There was significant agreeance between the 2 cohorts on majority of the questionnaire domains. For basic knowledge about clinical trials, while none of the individual questions in the category were significantly different, the online group had a higher aggregate agreeance score of 3.91 vs. 3.73 for the in-person group with a significant difference of 0.18 (CI: 0.5-0.31, p=0.008). For external influence, the online group had a higher aggregate agreeance score (3.52) than the in-person group (3.15; Difference: 0.37, CI: 0.22-0.52, p<0.001), with the only question-level significant difference being for the question that regulatory agencies effectively control what is being advertised by the pharmaceutical industry (4.46 ± 0.64 vs. 3.48 ± 0.76, p<0.001). Conclusions: Online surveys are an effective tool for gaining insight into patient understanding, attitudes and awareness on a variety of topics and can be conducted efficiently on a larger scale than in-person studies, which may be more time and resource intensive. Our study provides evidence of general agreeance between a matched cohort of in-person and online survey respondents, providing validity to carefully conducted, planned online survey tools. The online cohort in our study overall had better knowledge about clinical trials and a better understanding about external influences on available clinical trial result information. These results will help boost studies to collect patient-level responses such that their beliefs and awareness can be better understood and incorporated in optimizing healthcare resource utilization.

Background Bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) have gained momentum during the last several years in the treatment of hematological malignancies. Their novel mechanism of action has resulted in improvement in outcomes of patients with hematological malignancies refractory and/or relapsing after conventional therapies. This resulted in 7 regulatory approvals of bsAbs by the US FDA to treat hematological malignancies. Excluding blinatumomab, all have gained accelerated approval through phase II trials to treat relapsed/refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL); primarily diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL and follicular lymphoma (FL), and R/R multiple myeloma (MM). Although these agents are associated with overall response rates (ORR) of greater than 50% in heavily treated patients, the real-world eligibility and response to these therapies in the United States is not known. Methods We aimed to estimate the number of US patients with NHL and MM who are eligible for and may respond to FDA approved bsAbs for R/R NHL and MM. A person was considered to be eligible for treatment with a bsAb if they had the FDA approved indication and inclusion criteria. We defined response based on the best available response rate for that indication from the FDA drug label. We used the incidence rate of NHL and MM from American Cancer Society's Cancer Facts and Figures during the years each bsAb had an approval. We made assumptions to estimate eligibility by incorporating attrition rates between lines of therapy according to what is published in the literature. For NHL, we assumed 75% of NHL diagnoses are DLBCL, while 20% are FL. For DLBCL, we assumed that 30% (10% primary refractory and 20% in relapse) of newly diagnosed DLCBL would receive a second-line therapy; of these patients, we assumed that 50% would proceed to receive a bsAb as third-line therapy. For FL, we assumed that 75% of newly diagnosed FL patients are grade 1-3A; of these, 85% will require first-line treatment, and 13% of these patients will eventually relapse to receive a bsAb as third-line therapy. For MM, we assumed that 14% of newly diagnosed MM will eventually be triple class refractory (refractory to a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory drug, and a monoclonal antibody) patients potentially eligible to receive a bsAb. The calculated number of people eligible was multiplied by the overall response rate (ORR) reported in the trial that led to the bsAb approval for each year a therapy had an approval, using the highest calculated response, to estimate the population who would potentially benefit of these therapies. Results Six bsAbs were approved in the US since 2022 to treat NLH and MM: epcoritamab and glofitamab in 2023 to treat R/R DLBCL and other mature B-cell neoplasms, mosunetuzumab in 2022 and epcoritamab in 2024 to treat R/R grade 1-3A FL, and for MM, teclistamab in 2022, and elranatamab and talquetamab in 2023. All of them were authorized via accelerated approval after a phase II trial. There were 80550 and 80620 new NHL cases in 2023 and 2024, respectively, and 12640, 12590, and 12540 new MM cases in 2022, 2023, and 2024, respectively. Of these, we estimated 21033 DLCBL patients would be potentially eligible to receive bsAbs since 2023, 2733 FL patients potentially eligible to receive bsAbs since 2023, and 5666 MM patients potentially eligible to receive bsAbs since 2022. The percentage of patients per year that were potentially eligible for bsAbs was 13% for DLCBL, 8.5% for FL, and 15% for MM. Based on best available response rates from registration trials, we estimated that 9.6% and 10.5% newly diagnosed NHL and MM patients, respectively, would potentially benefit from bsAbs. Conclusions Even though CR and ORR of bsAbs are high for highly pretreated patients, we found the percentage of newly diagnosed NHL and MM patients who would become potentially eligible and would respond to these therapies to be quite low (approximately only 1 out of 10). Even though these conclusions are driven by best-case scenario assumptions and have a risk of bias, they provide insights of the actual impact and reach of these newer therapies.

Background: Follicular dendritic cell sarcoma (FDCS) is a rare low- to intermediate-grade sarcoma, typically presenting as a slowly growing, painless mass composed of spindle-shaped cells in a whorled pattern. First described in 1986, FDCS has since been identified in several hundred cases. FDCS originates from mesenchymal dendritic cells and is distinct from other histiocytic neoplasms. Its management aligns more with soft tissue sarcomas. Epidemiologically, FDCS is exceedingly rare, constituting less than 0.4% of soft tissue sarcomas. Methods: With IRB approval, we identified patients with biopsy-proven FDCS treated at Mayo Clinic. Chart review extracted clinical characteristics, laboratory testing, treatment data, and clinical outcomes, compiled into Excel. Data analysis was performed through RStudios. Descriptive statistics of patient characteristics, such as gender and stage of disease, were summarized in tables. We compared overall survival (OS) through Kaplan Meier curves, stratifying patients into cohorts based on topics of interest, such as differences in survival in nodal vs. extranodal disease or differences in survival among different chemotherapy regimens. Results: Forty patients met the inclusion criteria, of biopsy proved FCDS. Median age at diagnosis was 57.7 years (SD 14). Men comprised 45% of patients. Locations of malignancy were abdomen and pelvis (32.5%), thoracic and pulmonary regions (32.5%), lymph nodes and neck (20.0%), musculoskeletal (2.5%), and other locations (12.5%). Primary therapies included surgical resection (42.5%), systemic chemotherapy (32.5%), no treatment (10.0%), radiation (2.5%), with data missing for 12.5% of cases. Concurrent or preceding Castleman's Disease was seen in 7.5% (3/40) of patients; one case preceded FCDS, and two were concurrent. Of these patients with Castleman's Disease, one was resected and the other two were not. Two cases were unicentric, and one was multicentric. First-line systemic chemotherapy was most often gemcitabine and docetaxel, with 9/40 patients receiving this regimen. Ifosfamide and doxorubicin were utilized in 3/40 patients. 2/4 patients had received doxorubicin alone. 2/4 patients had received CHOP. The response rate for patients with gemcitabine and docetaxel was complete response for 2/9 (22%) patients, partial response for 2/9 (22%), stable disease for 2/9 (22%), progressive disease for 1/9 (11%), and missing for 2/9 (22%), giving an overall response rate of 67%. For ifosfamide and doxorubicin, one patient had partial response (33%), another had stable disease (33%), and the last patient's data was missing (33%), adding up to a 66% overall response rate. For CHOP, one patient had progressive disease, and the other had partial response. For doxorubicin, both patients had stable disease. At a median follow-up of 29.5 months (IQR 9.2-75.2 months), the median OS was 160.68 months for the group with both nodal and extranodal disease versus 39.95 months for the extranodal disease-only group. The median OS of the nodal disease alone was not reached, with an estimated 2-year OS of 75%. To evaluate the impact of various primary therapies on outcomes in patients with advanced disease, we conducted a survival analysis by therapy used (no treatment, radiation, surgical resection, and systemic chemotherapy). Patients receiving no treatment had a median survival time of 28.9 months, while those treated with radiation had a median survival time of 19.3 months. Patients undergoing surgical resection had an undetermined median survival time, but notably, 80% were alive at the end of the time period analyzed in this study with a median follow-up time of 60.7 months. Those receiving systemic chemotherapy had a median survival time of 30.7 months. Conclusions: This project is one of the largest known single-center studies dedicated to FDCS. We show that the incidence of preceding or concurrent Castleman's Disease is relatively low. Gemcitabine and docetaxel was the most utilized chemotherapy regimen, but there weren't enough data to conclude if this regimen had a better response rate compared to others. Surgical resection of advanced disease is associated with superior outcomes. When systemic therapy is needed, the median survival was lower.

Introduction: Cyclin D1, encoded by the CCND1 gene, is primarily known as a major regulator of cell cycle progression. Emerging studies have demonstrated a role for cyclin D1 in regulating gene transcription. In mantle cell lymphoma with t(11;14), cyclin D1 strongly binds to the promoters of highly transcribed genes and its overexpression led to genome-wide transcriptional downregulation. However, the transcriptional role for cyclin D1 in t(11;14) MM remains undefined. This study aims to elucidate the global chromatin and transcriptional changes induced by cyclin D1 in t(11;14) MM. Methods: Knockout (KO) of CCND1 in U266B1, a MM cell line carrying t(11;14), was performed by the Synthego (Redwood City, CA) using CRISPR/Cas9, which generated a frameshift insertion of base pair (bp) “A” after 69,641,478 bp within exon 1. Two independent KO clones were used for downstream analysis. ChIP-seq and ATAC-seq were performed for KO (n=2) and wild-type clones (WT, n=2). ChIP-seq used antibodies against H3K4me3 (promoter) and H3K4me1 and H3K27ac (enhancer). Libraries were sequenced to 2x51 bp on the Illumina NextSeq 2000 platform. Total RNA libraries (in triplicate) were sequenced to 2x150 bp. ChIP-seq and ATAC-seq reads were mapped to hg38 with BWA, and peaks were identified by MACS2 at FDR 0.01. RNA-seq reads were mapped to hg38 with STAR and gene raw counts were estimated using featureCounts. Differential peaks and differentially expressed genes between KO and WT were identified using edgeR at FDR 0.05 and fold-change 2. Only peaks present in at least 2 samples and genes having reads-per-million value 0.1 in at least 1 sample were included, excluding those from chrY. Pathway analysis was performed with the Enrichr package. Results: Differential expression analysis identified 2-fold more genes that were down-regulated than up-regulated in KO compared to WT (467 vs. 233). Pathway analysis revealed an enrichment of TNF-alpha signaling via NF-kappaB, inflammatory response, and apoptosis in association with down-regulated genes, while up-regulated genes are enriched in myogenesis, KRAS signaling, and epithelial mesenchymal transition pathway. In parallel, differential chromatin analysis identified 2.5% (1,161) of the peaks from H3K27ac and 0.5-1% (359-610) of the peaks for the other 3 marks that showed significant changes of signal levels between KO and WT. For the promoter mark H3K4me3, there are largely a comparable number of peaks showing increased (191 peaks) and decreased (168 peaks) signals, respectively, in KO compared to WT. However, for ATAC-seq and H3K4me1, about 70% of the differential peaks showed an increased signal in KO, in contrast with H3K27ac for which 60% of differential peaks showed decreased signal in KO. The preferential loss of H3K27ac occupancy is consistent with the observation of a higher proportion of genes being down-regulated in KO. These results indicated that knockout of CCND1 led to a global increase of chromatin accessibility, but a reduction of H3K27ac and gene expression. Further annotation revealed that, for H3K27ac and H3K4me1/ATAC-seq, 92% and 97% of the differential peaks were located >2kb away from the transcription start sites (TSSs) of expressed genes. Even for H3K4me3, 88% of the differential peaks are >2kb away from TSSs. The results suggest that the changes of chromatin upon CCND1 knockout predominantly occurred at distal regulatory regions. For up- and down-regulated genes, we estimated ChIP-seq and ATAC-seq signals in the TSS 2kb regions, revealing that up-regulated genes were overall associated with increased signals. Further analysis found that, for ATAC-seq and H3K4me3, 44% and 59% of the differential peaks located in the promoter regions were associated with differentially expressed genes, which dropped to ~20% for the two enhancer marks. These data indicate that changes in chromatin state impact the expression of the associated genes. Conclusion: Knockout of CCND1 impacts local chromatin state, particularly at enhancer regions, and the transcriptional program. In promoter-proximal regulatory regions, the changes of chromatin accessibility and H3K4me3 are strongly correlated with the expression changes of nearby genes. Further studies will identify the genes targeted by the differential enhancers and their possible roles in MM pathogenesis mediated by cyclin D1 following the t(11;14) event.

Introduction Oligomonocytic chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (OM-CMML) is defined by relative monocytosis ≥ 10% and an absolute monocyte count (AMC) between ≥ 0.5 and < 1.0 x109/L. The 5th ed WHO and International Consensus Classifications lowered the AMC threshold to ≥ 0.5 x10/9L for CMML diagnosis, thereby incorporating OM-CMML (Khoury, 2022; Arber, 2022). However, prior reports differ as to whether OM-CMML is a distinct CMML subtype. This multi-center study compares the clinical, molecular, and survival features of OM-CMML with myelodysplastic (MD, WBC < 13.0 x109/L) and myeloproliferative (MP, WBC ≥ 13.0 x109/L) CMML with an AMC ≥1.0. Methods After IRB approval, patients with CMML from Mayo Clinic (n = 400, 47%) and MD Anderson Cancer Center (n = 449, 53%) were identified retrospectively. Analyses considered clinical, laboratory, and next generation sequencing parameters at diagnosis or first referral (in chronic phase). Categorical variables were compared by Fisher exact or Pearson χ2 tests and continuous variables by Mann-Whitney U or ANOVA tests. Survival was assessed via the Kaplan-Meier method with outcomes censored at allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). P < 0.05 was considered significant. Calculations used BlueSky Statistics (v10.3.1). Results A molecularly annotated cohort of 849 patients with CMML (median age 71 years, 32% female, 90% white, median follow up 31 months [mo]) was categorized as OM-CMML (n = 57, 7%), MD-CMML (n = 394, 46%), and MP-CMML (n = 391, 46%). There were no differences in age or sex across subtypes. No clinical differences were observed between OM-CMML and MD-CMML, with similar hematologic parameters, karyotype distributions, Mayo-Molecular (Patnaik, 2014) or CPSS-Molecular (Elena, 2016) risk stratifications, and rates of leukemic transformation (12% vs 12%, p = 0.98) and death (35% vs 43%, p = 0.27). Cases of OM-CMML had lower WBC counts (median 4.4 vs 24.7 x109/L, p < 0.0001), fewer circulating immature myeloid cells (23% vs 57%, p < 0.0001) and fewer marrow blasts (median 3% vs 4%, p = 0.0065) than MP-CMML. Comparatively, OM-CMML cases were overrepresented in the lower-risk groups of the CPSS-Molecular and Mayo-Molecular models (p < 0.0001). Leukemic transformation (12% vs 20%, p = 0.015) and death (35% vs 52%, p = 0.034) rates were higher in the MP-CMML cohort. Molecular profiles were similar between OM-CMML and MD-CMML, including median number of genes mutated (3 vs 3, p = 0.88). Frequencies of ASXL1 (39% vs 38%, p = 0.91), SRSF2 (48% vs 43%, p = 0.49), DNMT3A (7% vs 5%, p = 0.60), and SF3B1 (4% vs 7%, p = 0.48) mutations were also similar. TET2 mutation frequency was higher in OM-CMML (70% vs 55%, p = 0.031) and occurred in isolation more frequently (12% vs 6%, p = 0.048) compared to MD-CMML. Neither median number of TET2 mutations (1 vs 2, p = 0.87), nor TET2 variant allele fractions (41% vs 44%, p = 0.19) were different between the two groups. Compared to OM-CMML, patients with MP-CMML were more likely to have mutations in ASXL1 (39% vs 56%, p = 0.017), EZH2 (0% vs 9%, p = 0.019), JAK2 (0% vs 9%, p = 0.019), NRAS (7% vs 25%, p = 0.0024), and SETBP1 (2% vs 13%, p = 0.021). RAS family (CBL, BRAF, KRAS, NRAS, PTPN11; 25% vs 54%, p < 0.0001) and signaling pathway (CSF3R, FLT3, JAK2, SH2B3; 2% vs 14%, p = 0.0078) mutations were also more frequent whereas spliceosome mutations (SF3B1, SRSF2, U2AF1, ZRSR2; 61% vs 46%, p = 0.033) were less frequent in MP-CMML. The median (95% CI) overall survival (OS) of OM-CMML patients was 44 (38 - not reached) mo compared to 45 (34 - 60) mo in MD-CMML (p = 0.76) and 23 (20 - 29) mo in MP-CMML (p < 0.0032). Similar results were obtained when comparing the acute leukemia-free survival (LFS) of the OM-CMML (41 mo), MD-CMML (39 mo), and MP-CMML (19 mo) groups. At last follow up (medians 42 and 62 mo, respectively), 33% of evaluable OM-CMML patients had progressed to MD-CMML and 28% of MD-CMML patients had progressed to MP-CMML. No patient with OM-CMML progressed directly to MP-CMML. Conclusions These data show that OM-CMML and MD-CMML are a relatively homogenous subset of patients with similar clinicomolecular profiles and survival outcomes. Although OM-CMML patients are more likely to have TET2 mutations in comparison to other CMML subtypes, they have similar rates of disease progression as MD-CMML. This validates recent modifications to CMML classification criteria, in which OM-CMML cases are included as bona fide CMML.