Citations

PURPOSE Patients with advanced, well-differentiated extrapancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (epNETs) have limited systemic treatment options. Pazopanib, an oral multikinase inhibitor with activity against vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-2 and -3, PDGFR-alpha and-beta, and c-Kit, was tested for efficacy in epNET. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase II study of pazopanib (800 mg once daily) versus placebo in low- to intermediate-grade epNET with radiologic progressive disease (PD) within 12 months of study entry. Previous somatostatin analog (SSA) was required for midgut tumors, and concurrent SSA was allowed. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review. Unblinding and crossover were allowed if PD was confirmed by central review. RESULTS One hundred seventy-one patients (97 pazopanib and 74 placebo) were randomly assigned between September 2013 and October 2015. The majority had a midgut primary site (75%) and previous SSA treatment (93%). About half (49%) of the patients had functional tumors. The median follow-up was 61 months (95% CI, 60 to 63). Median PFS was 11.8 versus 7.6 months in pazopanib versus placebo, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.37 to 0.79]; P < .001); 49 placebo patients crossed over to pazopanib. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the treatment arms. Rates of grade 3 or greater adverse events (regardless of attribution) were higher in pazopanib versus placebo (84% v 47%; P < .001), as were grade 5 death events (8% v 0%, P = .017). CONCLUSION Pazopanib compared with placebo significantly improves PFS in patients with progressive epNET, confirming that the VEGF signaling pathway is a valid target for therapy in epNET. However, after integrating the associated risks relative to the benefits, further development of pazopanib in this clinical context is not planned.

ABSTRACT Background To explore the prevalence of serious adverse events ( SAEs ) associated with retinal viral gene therapy and to examine trends influencing SAE occurrences in human gene therapy surgeries and pre‐clinical animal trials. Methods Literature review was performed to identify peer‐reviewed human and animal studies relevant to viral gene therapy, subretinal injections, and intravitreal injections. For clinical trials and post‐approval LUXTURNA studies, only those that examined SAEs were included. Results Of included clinical trial studies ( n = 31), SAEs were recorded in 51 out of 438 eyes (11.6%) that received subretinal injections and in 11 out of 348 eyes (3.2%) that received intravitreal injections. There were fewer intravitreal‐related SAEs and less vision loss compared to subretinal gene therapy. Inflammation was the predominant SAE following intravitreal injections, whereas unexplained vision loss was the most common for subretinal injections. Clinical trials utilising subretinal injections met primary or secondary efficacy endpoints more than intravitreal trials. Eighteen studies (429 eyes) of post‐approval LUXTURNA were reviewed, and SAEs were reported in 24.7% of eyes, retinal degeneration being most common (20.7%). For 58 animal studies, SAEs were recorded in 17.3% of eyes that received subretinal injections and 8.7% of eyes that received intravitreal injections. Conclusions Subretinal injections show higher efficacy than intravitreal injections but are associated with more serious adverse events. Consistent adverse event patterns in humans and large animals highlight their predictive value for safety. There is a need for optimised delivery methods, refined dosing protocols, and improved post‐treatment monitoring to improve safety and effectiveness in gene therapy.

Abstract Background Direct measurement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is widely used and recommended by professional society guidelines despite its potential limitations in patients with hypertriglyceridemia and low LDL-C. This study evaluated the performance of 3 direct LDL-C (LDL-CD) assays, 2 modern LDL-C calculation methods [LDL-C Martin (LDL-CM), LDL-C modified Sampson (LDL-CS)] and the conventional Friedewald (LDL-CF) method against the reference method, beta-quantification (LDL-CBQ). Methods A total of 181 remnant sera from patients with standard lipid panel orders or from patients with LDL-CBQ orders with triglycerides (TG) ≥ 400 mg/dL (4.5 mmol/L), or with TG ≥ 150 mg/dL (1.69 mmol/L) and LDL-C &lt; 70 mg/dL (1.8 mmol/L) were included. LDL-CD and lipid panel data were gathered from Abbott Alinity, Roche Cobas, and Siemens Atellica platforms. Results LDL-CD among the 3 platforms showed a median CV of 11.2%. In patients with TG &lt;400 mg/dL, LDL-CM and LDL-CS demonstrated less bias and less misclassification at the clinical decision LDL-C levels than LDL-CF or LDL-CD. In the 400 to 800 mg/dL (9.0 mmol/L) TG group, LDL-CS was superior to LDL-CD or LDL-CM in accuracy. When TG is ≥ 800 mg/dL, LDL-CD (Roche) showed substantial bias from LDL-CBQ while LDL-CS (Roche) showed smaller but significant bias. Conclusions In summary, LDL-CD or LDL-CF showed little advantage over the 2 modern LDL-C calculation methods. LDL-CS showed the best overall correlation with LDL-CBQ and therefore is recommended to replace LDL-CF and potentially LDL-CD when making clinical decisions in patients with low LDL-C and hypertriglyceridemia.

ABSTRACTIntroductionConventional weight‐loss strategies often result in inadequate fat loss, poor sustainability, and unintended lean mass loss. Prolonged water‐only fasting followed by dietary change may offer an effective alternative, but its impact on body composition remains underexplored.MethodsThis secondary analysis utilized dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) to assess changes in fat‐free mass (FFM), fat mass (FM), and bone mineral content (BMC) in adults [median (IQR) age: 62 (15) years with overweight or obesity. Participants underwent a median (IQR) of 14 (6) days of water‐only fasting, followed by 6 (3) days of food reintroduction with a whole‐plant‐food diet and a subsequent maintenance period of 45 (5) days. Study visits occurred at baseline and at the end of each period.ResultsAt end of fasting, FFM accounted for 74% of total BW lost during fasting. However, at the follow‐up visit, the median (IQR) percentage change in total BW, FFM, FM, and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) mass from baseline was −8.2 (5.2), −4.4 (5.6), −14.7 (8.9), −15.8 (12.8) %, respectively. At follow‐up, FM loss accounted for 67% of the total BW lost. BMC remained unchanged across all study visits.ConclusionsThis protocol produced sustained FM loss, specifically VAT mass, and FFM recovery, suggesting it may support effective weight management.

Intronic GGGGCC hexanucleotide repeat expansions in C9orf72 are the most common genetic cause of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Despite its intronic location, this repeat avidly supports synthesis of pathogenic dipeptide repeat (DPR) proteins via repeat-associated non-AUG (RAN) translation. However, the template RNA species that undergoes RAN translation endogenously remains unclear. Using long-read based 5′ RNA ligase-mediated rapid amplification of cDNA ends (5′ Repeat-RLM-RACE), we identified C9orf72 transcripts initiating within intron 1 in a C9BAC mouse model, patient-derived iNeurons, and iNeuron-derived polysomes. These cryptic m 7 G-capped mRNAs are at least partially polyadenylated and are more abundant than transcripts derived from intron retention or circular intron lariats. In RAN translation reporter assays, intronic template transcripts–even those with short (32 nucleotide) leaders–exhibited robust expression compared to exon–intron and repeat-containing lariat reporters. To assess endogenous repeat-containing lariat RNA contributions to RAN translation, we enhanced endogenous lariat stability by knocking down the lariat debranching enzyme Dbr1. However, this modulation did not impact DPR production in patient-derived iNeurons. These findings identify cryptic, linear, m 7 G-capped intron-initiating C9orf72 mRNAs as an endogenous template for RAN translation and DPR production, with implications for disease pathogenesis and therapeutic development.

PURPOSE Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality have decreased since the 1970s, but the incidence in young adults (<50 years, named early-onset CRC [eoCRC]) has been increasing. PATIENTS AND METHODS Individual patient data on 13,365 patients with metastatic CRC enrolled between 2000 and 2012 in 17 first-line randomized trials in the Aide et Recherche en Cancérologie Digestive database were pooled. The distribution of demographics, clinicopathologic features, biomarkers, and outcome data were summarized and compared by age groups. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox models stratified by treatment arms within studies, adjusting for potential confounders. Predictive value of age group on clinical outcomes was evaluated by testing interaction effect between treatment and age variables. RESULTS Overall, 2,045 patients with eoCRC (median age, 42.5) and 11,320 patients with average-onset CRC (aoCRC; median age, 63.8) were included in this analysis. Within the eoCRC population, treatment with bevacizumab in addition to chemotherapy improved PFS (9.9 v 6.8 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.66 [95% CI, 0.54 to 0.80]; P < .0001), which was similar to the findings in aoCRC population (9.4 v 7.3 months; HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.67 to 0.80]; P < .001; interaction P = .5415). However, epithelial growth factor receptor inhibitor (EGFRi) did not improve PFS in RAS wild-type (WT) patients with eoCRC who had left-sided primary tumors (8.3 v 8.9 months; HR, 1.20 [95% CI, 0.81 to 1.77]; P = .36), whereas EGFRi significantly improved PFS in the aoCRC population (9.9 v 8.5 months; HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.64 to 0.86]; P < .0001; interaction P = .083). CONCLUSION Treatment-naïve patients with metastatic eoCRC appear to derive similar benefit from bevacizumab as patients with aoCRC. However, patients with eoCRC with left-sided RAS/RAF WT tumors did not appear to derive benefit from first-line EGFRi.

Purpose To develop an expert consensus statement on the diagnosis, management, and rehabilitation of medial meniscal root tears (MMRTs) using a modified Delphi technique. Methods A working group developed statements on MMRT diagnosis, nonoperative management, surgical indications, surgical management, alignment, and rehabilitation using modified Delphi techniques. Fifty‐six experts were surveyed over 3 rounds to reach consensus, with agreement measured on a 5‐point Likert scale. Statements were included, revised, or excluded on the basis of predefined thresholds (≥75% agreement, <20% disagreement). Experts suggested revisions or new statements in the first 2 rounds, and final consensus statements were included. Results All 56 experts completed 3 survey rounds. Experts agreed that root tears may occur with no known history of trauma, typically in older patients, and that it should be diagnosed with an magnetic resonance imaging. In symptomatic patients with MMRTs without advanced osteoarthritis should be repaired using an anatomic transtibial pull‐out technique (performing a pie‐crusting technique can be helpful for visualization). Nonoperative management is advised for patients with advanced osteoarthritis. High tibial osteotomy may be considered for significant varus malalignment during MMRT repair. The only statement without consensus was the management of asymptomatic MMRTs with mild medial compartment cartilage wear, indicating ongoing debate. Conclusions Overall, 98% of statements reached consensus. There is agreement that magnetic resonance imaging is the gold standard for diagnosis. Symptomatic MMRTs without advanced osteoarthritis should be repaired early using an anatomic transtibial pull‐out technique. End‐stage knee osteoarthritis warrants nonoperative management of MMRTs, and a structured postoperative protocol with limited weightbearing and range of motion is essential after repair. No agreement was reached on managing asymptomatic MMRTs in patients without significant medial compartment degeneration. Meniscal centralization sutures may help in cases of substantial extrusion, but their routine use is debated. Level of Evidence Level V, consensus of expert opinion.

Oncogene expression can cause replication stress (RS), leading to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) that require repair through pathways such as homologous recombination, nonhomologous end-joining, and microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ). Cyclin D1 (encoded by CCND1 ) is a well-known oncoprotein overexpressed in cancer; however, its role in RS is unknown. Using mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) as a naturally occurring model of cyclin D1 overexpression, we examined the impact of cyclin D1 on RS and DSB repair mechanisms. Cyclin D1 overexpression elevated RS, increased DNA damage, especially during mitosis, and caused specific upregulation of MMEJ. Furthermore, cyclin D1 activated polymerase theta ( POLQ ) transcription by binding its promoter loci, driving POLΘ-mediated MMEJ that is essential to withstand cyclin D1–induced RS. Moreover, concurrent ATM deficiency further intensified RS, enhanced POLQ expression, and heightened reliance on MMEJ-mediated DNA damage repair. Consequently, inhibition of POLΘ in cyclin D1–overexpressed settings further exacerbated RS, causing single-strand DNA gap accumulations and chromosomal instability, ultimately leading to apoptosis, an effect amplified in ATM-deficient cells. Targeting MMEJ via POLΘ inhibition is therefore an effective strategy in the context of cyclin D1 overexpression and ATM deficiency and may provide a unique therapeutic approach for treating MCL and other malignancies characterized by similar alterations.