Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

164 citation(s) found for "Ta, Randy".

Rituximab-CHOP Versus CHOP Alone or With Maintenance Rituximab in Older Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Weller, Edie, Morrison, Vicki A., Gascoyne, Randy D. , Cassileth, Peter A., Cohn, Jeffrey, Dakhil, Shaker R. , Woda, Bruce A., Fisher, Richard I., Horning, Sandra J., Habermann, Thomas M. , Peterson, Bruce A.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | June 5, 2006 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 19 | Pages: 3121-3127

10.1200/jco.2005.05.1003 | PMID 16754935 Get It

Purpose To address early and late treatment failures in older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), we designed a two-stage randomized trial of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) versus rituximab plus CHOP (R-CHOP), with a second random assignment to maintenance rituximab (MR) or observation in responding patients. Patients and Methods Untreated DLBCL patients who were 60 years or older were randomly assigned to R-CHOP (n = 318) or CHOP (n = 314); 415 responders were randomly assigned to MR (n = 207) or observation (n = 208). The primary end point was failure-free survival (FFS). All P values were two sided. Results Three-year FFS rate was 53% for R-CHOP patients and 46% for CHOP patients (P = .04) at a median follow-up time of 3.5 years. Two-year FFS rate from second random assignment was 76% for MR compared with 61% for observation (P = .009). No significant differences in survival were seen according to induction or maintenance therapy. FFS was prolonged with MR after CHOP (P = .0004) but not after R-CHOP (P = .81) with 2-year FFS rates from second random assignment of 77%, 79%, 74%, and 45% for R-CHOP, R-CHOP + MR, CHOP + MR, and CHOP, respectively. In a secondary analysis excluding MR patients, R-CHOP alone reduced the risks of treatment failure (P = .003) and death (P = .05) compared with CHOP alone. Conclusion Rituximab administered as induction or maintenance with CHOP chemotherapy significantly prolonged FFS in older DLBCL patients. After R-CHOP, no benefit was provided by MR. These results, which are consistent with an additive effect of rituximab, suggest that future studies could focus on maintenance strategies with novel agents as well as new induction therapies.
Noncontact modal analysis of a pipe organ reed using airborne ultrasound stimulated vibrometry
Huber, Thomas M. , Fatemi, Mostafa , Kinnick, Randy, Greenleaf, James F. , Fatemi, Mostafa

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | March 29, 2006 | Volume: 119 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 2476-2482

10.1121/1.2171516 | PMID 16642860 Get It

The goal of this study was to excite and measure, in a noncontact manner, the vibrational modes of the reed from a reed organ pipe. To perform ultrasound stimulated excitation, the audio-range difference frequency between a pair of ultrasound beams produced a radiation force that induced vibrations. The resulting vibrational deflection shapes were measured with a scanning laser vibrometer. The resonances of any relatively small object can be studied in air using this technique. For a 36mm×6mm brass reed, displacements and velocities in excess of 5μm and 4mm∕s could be imparted at the fundamental frequency of 145Hz. Using the same ultrasound transducer, excitation across the entire range of audio frequencies was obtained. Since the beam was focused on the reed, ultrasound stimulated excitation eliminated background effects observed during mechanical shaker excitation, such as vibrations of clamps and supports. The results obtained using single, dual and confocal ultrasound transducers in AM and two-beam modes, along with results obtained using a mechanical shaker and audio excitation using a speaker are discussed.
Phase III Double-Blind Study of Glutamine Versus Placebo for the Prevention of Acute Diarrhea in Patients Receiving Pelvic Radiation Therapy
Kozelsky, Timothy F., Meyers, Gregory E., Sloan, Jeff A. , Shanahan, Thomas G., Dick, Stephen J., Moore, Randy L. , Engeler, George P., Frank, Albert R., McKone, Timothy K., Urias, Rodolfo E., Pilepich, Miljenko V., Novotny, Paul J. , Martenson, James A.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | April 29, 2003 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1669-1674

10.1200/jco.2003.05.060 | PMID 12721240 Get It

Purpose: A phase III, randomized, double-blind study was conducted by the North Central Cancer Treatment Group to determine the efficacy and toxicity of oral glutamine for the prevention of acute diarrhea in patients receiving pelvic radiation therapy (RT). Patients and Methods: All 129 patients enrolled from 14 institutions between February 1998 and October 1999 were eligible. Patients received 4 g of glutamine or placebo orally, twice a day, beginning with the first or second day of RT and continuing for 2 weeks after RT. During treatment, patients were assessed weekly for toxicity, and a bowel function questionnaire was administered. The primary measures of treatment efficacy were diarrhea levels measured by maximum grade of diarrhea, incidence of diarrhea, and average diarrhea score. After completion of RT, the bowel function questionnaire was administered weekly for 4 weeks and at 12 and 24 months. Toxicity was measured by National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria. Results: The median age of patients was 69 years (range, 34 to 86 years). The two treatment arms were balanced with respect to all baseline factors. There were no significant differences in toxicity by treatment. Quality-of-life scores and the mean number of problems reported on the bowel function questionnaire were virtually identical for both treatment groups. The incidence of grade 3 or higher diarrhea was 20% for the glutamine arm and 19% for the placebo arm (P = .99). The maximum number of stools per day was 5.1 for the glutamine arm and 5.2 for the placebo arm (P = .99). Conclusion: There is no evidence of a beneficial effect of glutamine during pelvic RT.
Duration of acidosis and recovery determine preretinal neovascularization in the rat model of acidosis-induced retinopathy
Chen, Yi , Leske, David A. , Zhang, Shuichen, Karger, Randy A., Lanier, William L. , Holmes, Jonathan M. , Holmes, Jonathan M.

Current Eye Research | March 4, 2003 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 281-288

10.1076/ceyr.24.4.281.8410 | PMID 12324867 Get It