Citations

Abstract Background Observational studies indicate that periodontal disease may increase the risk of colorectal, lung, and pancreatic cancers. Using a 2-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis, we assessed whether a genetic predisposition index for periodontal disease was associated with colorectal, lung, or pancreatic cancer risks. Methods Our primary instrument included single nucleotide polymorphisms with strong genome-wide association study evidence for associations with chronic, aggressive, and/or severe periodontal disease (rs729876, rs1537415, rs2738058, rs12461706, rs16870060, rs2521634, rs3826782, and rs7762544). We used summary-level genetic data for colorectal cancer (n = 58 131 cases; Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium, Colon Cancer Family Registry, and Colorectal Transdisciplinary Study), lung cancer (n = 18 082 cases; International Lung Cancer Consortium), and pancreatic cancer (n = 9254 cases; Pancreatic Cancer Consortia). Four MR approaches were employed for this analysis: random-effects inverse-variance weighted (primary analyses), Mendelian Randomization-Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier, simple median, and weighted median. We conducted secondary analyses to determine if associations varied by cancer subtype (colorectal cancer location, lung cancer histology), sex (colorectal and pancreatic cancers), or smoking history (lung and pancreatic cancer). All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results The genetic predisposition index for chronic or aggressive periodontitis was statistically significantly associated with a 3% increased risk of colorectal cancer (per unit increase in genetic index of periodontal disease; P = .03), 3% increased risk of colon cancer (P = .02), 4% increased risk of proximal colon cancer (P = .01), and 3% increased risk of colorectal cancer among females (P = .04); however, it was not statistically significantly associated with the risk of lung cancer or pancreatic cancer, overall or within most subgroups. Conclusions Genetic predisposition to periodontitis may be associated with colorectal cancer risk. Further research should determine whether increased periodontitis prevention and increased cancer surveillance of patients with periodontitis is warranted.

Abstract Background Incidence of early-onset (younger than 50 years of age) colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing in many countries. Thus, elucidating the role of traditional CRC risk factors in early-onset CRC is a high priority. We sought to determine whether risk factors associated with late-onset CRC were also linked to early-onset CRC and whether association patterns differed by anatomic subsite. Methods Using data pooled from 13 population-based studies, we studied 3767 CRC cases and 4049 controls aged younger than 50 years and 23 437 CRC cases and 35 311 controls aged 50 years and older. Using multivariable and multinomial logistic regression, we estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the association between risk factors and early-onset CRC and by anatomic subsite. Results Early-onset CRC was associated with not regularly using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (OR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.21 to 1.68), greater red meat intake (OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.16), lower educational attainment (OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.16), alcohol abstinence (OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.08 to 1.39), and heavier alcohol use (OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.50). No factors exhibited a greater excess in early-onset compared with late-onset CRC. Evaluating risks by anatomic subsite, we found that lower total fiber intake was linked more strongly to rectal (OR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.14 to 1.48) than colon cancer (OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.27; P = .04). Conclusion In this large study, we identified several nongenetic risk factors associated with early-onset CRC, providing a basis for targeted identification of those most at risk, which is imperative in mitigating the rising burden of this disease.

Aims. Mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs) are cystic neoplasms with mucinous epithelium surrounded by ovarian-like stroma. Extraovarian MCN occurring in the liver and pancreas have been well characterized. However, only rare case reports of MCN arising outside of these locations have been reported. MCNs arising in unusual locations should enter the differential diagnosis of mucinous intra-abdominal tumors and must be distinguished from more common mimics. Therefore, we aimed to examine a series of MCNs of the retroperitoneum and mesentery to characterize the clinicopathologic features of this entity. Methods and results. Seven MCNs arising in the abdominal mesentery or retroperitoneum were retrospectively identified. A clinicopathologic, histologic, and immunohistochemical (keratin 7, keratin 19, keratin 20, calretinin, inhibin-α, steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1), estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), PAX8, CDX2, and CD10) analysis was performed. All 7 MCNs were from females with a median age of 41 years old and a median size of 8 cm. All cases demonstrated mucinous with or without concomitant non-mucinous epithelium overlying spindle cell ovarian-like stroma. Luteinized cells were noted. The epithelium was positive for keratin 7 and keratin 19 in all 7 cases, while the stroma expressed ER, PR, and SF-1 in all cases stained. Calretinin was focally positive in the stroma of 3 of 7 cases, while inhibin-α was focally expressed in 5 of 6 cases. Conclusions. These results highlight the clinicopathologic, histologic, and immunophenotypic similarities between MCNs of the mesentery, retroperitoneum, pancreas, and liver. Overlapping features suggest a common histogenesis for all MCNs, which could include periductal fetal mesenchyme, aberrant migration of primordial germ cells, or abnormal differentiation or metaplasia of the embryonic coelomic epithelium.

Abstract It was not known whether the polygenic risk scores (PRSs) that predict colorectal cancer could predict colorectal cancer for people with inherited pathogenic variants in DNA mismatch repair genes—people with Lynch syndrome. We tested a PRS comprising 107 established single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with colorectal cancer in European populations for 826 European-descent carriers of pathogenic variants in DNA mismatch repair genes (293 MLH1, 314 MSH2, 126 MSH6, 71 PMS2, and 22 EPCAM) from the Colon Cancer Family Registry, of whom 504 had colorectal cancer. There was no evidence of an association between the PRS and colorectal cancer risk, irrespective of which DNA mismatch repair gene was mutated, or sex (all 2-sided P > .05). The hazard ratio per standard deviation of the PRS for colorectal cancer was 0.97 (95% confidence interval = 0.88 to 1.06; 2-sided P = .51). Whereas PRSs are predictive of colorectal cancer in the general population, they do not predict Lynch syndrome colorectal cancer.

Abstract Background and Aims To correlate histologic activity in surveillance colonoscopies with the development of colorectal neoplasia in ulcerative colitis [UC]. Methods Colorectal biopsies during surveillance [N = 764] from 52 UC patients with colorectal neoplasia were compared to 122 patients without neoplasia enrolled in a prospective natural history registry. All biopsies were scored using validated histologic scoring systems (Geboes score, Nancy histopathologic index [NHI], and Robarts histopathologic index [RHI]). Clinical, endoscopic, and histologic data were correlated with the development of colorectal neoplasia. Results In multivariable analysis, mean RHI (hazard ratio [HR] 1.07 for each 1-unit increase in RHI, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03–1.12, p = 0.002) and mean NHI [HR 1.89 for each 1-unit increase in NHI, 95% CI 1.34–2.67, p = 0.002] for the entire surveillance period were significantly associated with colorectal neoplasia development. Shorter surveillance interval and increasing age were associated with increased risk of neoplasia development whereas mean Mayo endoscopic score was not significant. To generate a clinically useful measure of neoplasia risk, mean histologic activity in the preceding 5 years before the study endpoint was correlated with neoplasia development. In the preceding 5 years of surveillance, a mean RHI ≥ 8 had a 7.53-fold increased risk [95% CI 2.56–12.16, p < 0.001] and mean NHI ≥ 1.9 had a 5.89-fold increased risk [95% CI 2.18–15.92, p < 0.001] of developing colorectal neoplasia. Conclusions Persistent histologic activity during multiple surveillance episodes is an independent predictor of colorectal neoplasia. Mean RHI and mean NHI during a 5-year colonoscopic surveillance period can be used to assess risk for colorectal neoplasia and optimize UC surveillance.

Abstract Background: Inherited susceptibility is an important contributor to colorectal cancer risk, and rare variants in key genes or pathways could account in part for the missing proportion of colorectal cancer heritability. Methods: We conducted an exome-wide association study including 2,327 cases and 2,966 controls of European ancestry from three large epidemiologic studies. Single variant associations were tested using logistic regression models, adjusting for appropriate study-specific covariates. In addition, we examined the aggregate effects of rare coding variation at the gene and pathway levels using Bayesian model uncertainty techniques. Results: In an exome-wide gene-level analysis, we identified ST6GALNAC2 as the top associated gene based on the Bayesian risk index (BRI) method [summary Bayes factor (BF)BRI = 2604.23]. A rare coding variant in this gene, rs139401613, was the top associated variant (P = 1.01 × 10–6) in an exome-wide single variant analysis. Pathway-level association analyses based on the integrative BRI (iBRI) method found extreme evidence of association with the DNA repair pathway (BFiBRI = 17852.4), specifically with the nonhomologous end joining (BFiBRI = 437.95) and nucleotide excision repair (BFiBRI = 36.96) subpathways. The iBRI method also identified RPA2, PRKDC, ERCC5, and ERCC8 as the top associated DNA repair genes (summary BFiBRI ≥ 10), with rs28988897, rs8178232, rs141369732, and rs201642761 being the most likely associated variants in these genes, respectively. Conclusions: We identified novel variants and genes associated with colorectal cancer risk and provided additional evidence for a role of DNA repair in colorectal cancer tumorigenesis. Impact: This study provides new insights into the genetic predisposition to colorectal cancer, which has potential for translation into improved risk prediction.

AimsTo develop and validate a deep learning algorithm to quantify a broad spectrum of histological features in colorectal carcinoma.Methods and resultsA deep learning algorithm was trained on haematoxylin and eosin‐stained slides from tissue microarrays of colorectal carcinomas (N = 230) to segment colorectal carcinoma digitised images into 13 regions and one object. The segmentation algorithm demonstrated moderate to almost perfect agreement with interpretations by gastrointestinal pathologists, and was applied to an independent test cohort of digitised whole slides of colorectal carcinoma (N = 136). The algorithm correctly classified mucinous and high‐grade tumours, and identified significant differences between mismatch repair‐proficient and mismatch repair‐deficient (MMRD) tumours with regard to mucin, inflammatory stroma, and tumour‐infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). A cutoff of >44.4 TILs per mm2 carcinoma gave a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 73% in classifying MMRD carcinomas. Algorithm measures of tumour budding (TB) and poorly differentiated clusters (PDCs) outperformed TB grade derived from routine sign‐out, and compared favourably with manual counts of TB/PDCs with regard to lymphatic, venous and perineural invasion. Comparable associations were seen between algorithm measures of TB/PDCs and manual counts of TB/PDCs for lymph node metastasis (all P < 0.001); however, stronger correlations were seen between the proportion of positive lymph nodes and algorithm measures of TB/PDCs. Stronger associations were also seen between distant metastasis and algorithm measures of TB/PDCs (P = 0.004) than between distant metastasis and TB (P = 0.04) and TB/PDC counts (P = 0.06).ConclusionsOur results highlight the potential of deep learning to identify and quantify a broad spectrum of histological features in colorectal carcinoma.

Abstract Background: Multiple studies have identified an association between diagnosis of breast cancer and post-diagnosis psychological distress. Some have taken a step further, identifying predictive markers of distress in diagnosed patients and interventions to minimize post-diagnosis distress. Data regarding pre-diagnosis psychological distress and its impact on surgical decision making and clinical outcomes in the breast cancer population are limited. Here, we assessed pre-diagnosis major life stressors and breast cancer outcomes in a single-center population. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed stage 0-3 breast cancer seen at Mayo Clinic Florida between June 11, 2018, and October 7, 2019, were included. Prior to their initial visit, patients were administered a voluntary telephone survey regarding the incidence of major life events and stressors during the 18 months preceding their diagnosis. Demographic data including age and ethnicity were also included. Subsequent clinical outcomes were obtained through retrospective chart review. Clinical outcomes were assessed with descriptive statistics. Chi-square tests were used to compare subgroups, with p &lt; 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Of 469 patients seen for a new breast cancer diagnosis, 222 patients completed the intake survey and met inclusion criteria. Median age was 60 (27-84) years. 80.6% of patients were white, 7.7% were black, 5.4% were Asian/Pacific Islander, and 2.3% were Latino. Over 95% endorsed having some form of social support. 51.3% reported experiencing a major life event prior to breast cancer diagnosis. Of these patients (n = 114), 43.9% denoted this stressor as family-related, as compared to 20.2% citing non-breast cancer illness, 14.9% claiming relationship stress, and 14% describing employment-related stress. Only 1.8% endorsed stress caused by financial concerns. Multiple major life events were reported by 10.8% of all included patients. Subgroup analysis of the patients with pre-diagnosis stress revealed a similar demographic distribution to the overall sample. Compared to the subgroup without pre-diagnosis stress (n = 108), there were more patients with carcinoma in situ and stage T3/T4 disease (21.1% versus 13.0%, p = 0.11) and 11.4% versus 10.2%, p = 0.77), respectively) in the subgroup with pre-diagnosis stress, although these differences were not statistically significant. More patients with pre-diagnosis stress elected to undergo mastectomy (34.2% versus 22.2%, p = 0.048) as compared to the group without stress. Conclusions: With over half of sample patients reporting pre-diagnosis major life stressors, psychological distress is prevalent prior to breast cancer diagnosis and should be considered as a factor for early intervention, such as psychological and financial counseling, during breast cancer evaluation. The sample population was predominantly white and resource-rich in terms of financial and social support, highlighting a need for characterization of pre-diagnosis psychological distress in more ethnically diverse and/or resource-limited settings. Although additional study is recommended, current data suggest possible associations between pre-diagnosis psychological distress and treatment decision making, particularly the decision to pursue mastectomy. Citation Format: Tanmayi Pai, Laura Vallow, Danushka Seneviratne, Dawn Mussallem, Lauren Cornell. Pre-diagnosis major life stressors and breast cancer outcomes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS9-46.