Citations

Abstract Abstract 2918 Background: Monosomal karyotype (MK) is defined as the presence of two or more distinct autosomal chromosome monosomies or a single autosomal monosomy associated with at least one structural abnormality (Breems DA et al. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 4791). In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), MK has been associated with a worse prognosis than otherwise complex karyotype, regardless of the specific type of autosomal chromosome involved (Breems DA et al. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 4791). Whether or not these observations also hold true for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is currently unknown. Objective: To determine if MDS with complex karyotype can be prognostically sub-stratified further based on the presence or absence of MK and if prognosis in MDS with MK is in addition affected by the presence or absence of monosomy 7 or monosomy 5. Methods: The Mayo Clinic database for MDS was used to identify consecutive patients with complex karyotype, defined as the presence of three or more numerical or structural cytogenetic abnormalities. World Health Organization (WHO) criteria were used for MDS diagnosis and leukemic transformation (Vardiman JW et al. Blood 2009; 114: 937). Overall and leukemia-free survivals were calculated from the time of initial cytogenetic studies documenting complex karyotype. Results: A total of 127 MDS patients (median age 70 years; 79 males) with complex karyotype were identified. Amongst them, 106 (83%) met the above-stipulated criteria for MK and 21 (17%) had complex karyotype without monosomies. The MK in the 106 patients included monosomy 7 and/or monosomy 5 in 73 cases. The three complex karyotype subsets (i.e. complex without monosomies vs. MK that included monosomy 7 and/or 5 vs. MK excluding monosomy 7 or 5) were not significantly different in terms of age and sex distribution, hemoglobin level, leukocyte or platelet count, bone marrow blast percentage or International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) risk score. However, survival was significantly inferior in patients with MK compared to those with complex karyotype without monosomies (p=0.01; HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1–3.3). Multivariable analysis identified MK (p=0.002), advanced age (p=0.0004), increased bone marrow blast percentage (0.04), but not IPSS risk category (p=0.34), as independent risk factors for survival. Interestingly, there was no difference in survival among MK patients further sub-stratified by the presence or absence of monosomy 7 and/or monosomy 5 (Figure 1). Although not statistically significant, leukemia-free survival was also worse in patients with MK compared to those with complex karyotype (p=0.11; HR 2.7, 95% CI 0.8–9.0); none of the aforementioned variables significantly affected leukemia-free survival. Conclusions: Monosomal karyotype in MDS identifies a prognostically worse subgroup of patients with complex karyotype. Furthermore, in the context of MK, autosomal monosomies other than monosomy 7 or monosomy 5 are prognostically as detrimental. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Introduction CC-292, an oral, highly selective, small-molecule irreversible-inhibitor of Btk is under investigation for the treatment of CLL and other B-cell malignancies. This phase 1 trial investigated the safety, dose limiting toxicities (DLT), and clinical activity of CC-292 monotherapy in subjects with relapsed or refractory (R/R) CLL or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. This interim analysis focused on the safety and clinical activity in subjects with CLL and small cell lymphocytic leukemia (SLL). Methods Eligible subjects with R/R (≥ 1 prior therapy) CLL/SLL were treated with monotherapy CC-292 in a dose-escalation study with doses ranging from 125 mg to 1000 mg QD and BID dose levels of 375 mg and 500 mg. As a maximum tolerated dose was not established, CLL patients have been enrolled in an early dose expansion cohort of 750 mg QD and preliminary recommended phase 2 dose expansion cohort at 500 mg BID. All subjects received continuous dosing in 28-day cycles until progressive disease or intolerable toxicity. Clinical activity was investigator assessed per the 2008 iwCLL criteria. Results 83 subjects with R/R CLL/SLL have been enrolled as of June 30, 2013. Baseline characteristics include median age of 67 years (34-89), 52% Rai stage 3/4 disease, median 3 prior therapies (1-12), and 34% refractory to last treatment. Poor-risk factors were present in 67% of subjects, including del11q (22%), del17p (24%), and unmutated IgVH (54%). 67% of subjects remain on study. Subjects have received a median of 6 treatment cycles (0.2-21.6). The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) included neutropenia (21%), thrombocytopenia (15%), pneumonia (10%), and anemia (8%). Rates of febrile neutropenia were low (4%). The most common treatment-emergent AEs (≥ 10% of subjects) were diarrhea (59.7%), fatigue (37.5%), neutropenia (26.4%), thrombocytopenia (26.4%), nausea (26.4%), pyrexia (22.2%), headache (19.4%), cough (19.4%), upper respiratory infection (16.7%), peripheral edema (15.3%), abdominal pain (15.3%), dizziness (13.9%), muscle spasms (13.9%), contusion (13.9%), anemia (12.5%), pneumonia (12.5%), sinusitis (12.5%), and urinary tract infection (11.1%). One CLL patient at the 500 mg BID dose level has experienced a drug-related adverse event of grade 4 thrombocytopenia during Cycle 1 that was assessed as a DLT. The number of patients discontinuing study treatment due to AEs was low (2.4%). Results are summarized for efficacy-evaluable patients treated at the 4 dose levels where at least a partial response (PR) was achieved (750 mg, 1000 mg, 375 mg bid and 500 mg bid) (n = 55). During cycle 1, 89% experienced a ≥ 25% increase in absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), which usually resolved with continued treatment. The table below details the best responses achieved to date. In subjects with del11q, del17p, unmutated IgVH, and no high-risk genomic factors, the PR rate was 42% (5/12), 25% (3/12), 44% (7/16), and 47% (7/15), respectively. Importantly, nodal responses were induced in the majority of subjects receiving BID dosing (375 mg: 67%; 500 mg: 62%) with an overall PR rate of 40%. When achieved, nodal responses were typically observed by cycle 2 and were sustained with continued treatment. Although the sample size is small, subjects treated at 375 mg or 500 mg BID showed continued lymph node size reduction over time from cycle 2 (mean reduction of 42% and 45%, respectively) to cycle 7 (mean reduction of 60% and 71%, respectively). Conclusion CC-292 is well tolerated as an oral daily therapy. Single-agent therapy with CC-292 is sufficient to achieve high nodal and partial response rates in relapsed/refractory CLL subjects, including those with high-risk genomic features. These results support continued development of CC-292 for the treatment of patients with CLL/SLL. Disclosures: Brown: Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Emergent: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Sanofi Aventis: Consultancy; Vertex: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Genzyme: Research Funding. Off Label Use: The abstract shows scientific information on CC292 which is an investigational product developed by Celgene. This investigational product is not approved by any health authority for any indication. Harb:Celgene: Research Funding. Hill:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Sharman:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cylene Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Avila Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Barr:Celgene: Consultancy. Foran:Celgene: Research Funding. Burger:Pharmalytics: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Mahadevan:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Speakers Bureau. Ma:Genentech: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy. Barnett:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Marine:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Nava-Parada:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Azaryan:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mei:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kipps:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 460 Background: SF3B1 mutations were recently reported to occur in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), especially in the presence of ring sideroblasts (RS) (Papaemmanuil et al. Leukemia Research 2011, Volume 35, Supplement 1, page S18). We sought to accurately define the interaction between SF3B1 mutations, bone marrow morphology, karyotype and prognosis in MDS with ≥15% RS (MDS-RS). Methods: Mayo Clinic databases and cell banks were queried to identify patients with MDS and ≥15% RS (MDS-RS). All study patients were required to have undergone bone marrow examination and cytogenetic evaluation at diagnosis. Pathology slides, including iron stains, were centrally re-reviewed to accurately quantify bone marrow RS percentage and confirm World Health Organization (WHO) morphologic categories. Detailed analysis of clinical and cytogenetic parameters was performed to risk stratify patients according to the revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) (Greenberg et al. Leukemia Research 2011, Volume 35, Supplement 1, page S6). All patients were annotated for their mutational status involving JAK2, MPL and IDH. PCR sequencing was used to identify SF3B1 mutations. Results I: Baseline patient information: The study is currently ongoing; to date, results are availab1e in 88 patients (median age 72 years, 69% males) including 36 (41%) patients with refractory anemia with RS (RARS), 36 (41%) with refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia and ≥15% RS (RCMD-RS), 11 (12%) with refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB)-1 and ≥15% RS (RAEB1-RS) and 5 (6%) with RAEB2-RS. Median (range) values were 9.1 g/dL (5.8–15.7) for hemoglobin, 4.1 × 109/L (1.2–35.2) for leukocytes and 164 × 109/L (6–585) for platelets. IPSS-R risk categories were 20% very good, 49% good, 11% intermediate, 3% poor and 16% very poor. Karyotype was normal in 60%, other very good/good risk 16%, intermediate-risk 2%, and poor/very poor in 22%; 14% had monosomal karyotype (MK). Six (7%), four (5%) and zero (0%) patients displayed IDH, JAK2 or MPL mutations. Red cell transfusion need was documented in 27 (31%) patients. Results II: Prevalence and distribution of SF3B1 mutations and clinical correlates: SF3B1 mutations (all heterozygous) were detected in 40 (∼46%) of all 88 study patients: 25 (63%) K700E, 6 (15%) K666N/Q/R, 3 (8%) E622D, 2 (5%) H662D/Q, 2 (5%) Y623C, 1 (3%) R625C, and 1 (3%) T663I. One patient each displayed both SF3B1K700E and IDH2R140Q or SF3B1K700E and JAK2V617F. SF3B1 mutational frequencies were 69% for RARS, 36% for RCMD-RS, 18% for RAEB1-RS and 0% for RAEB2-RS (p=0.0007). SF3B1 mutations clustered with normal (59%) and other very good/good risk (57%) karyotype and were infrequent in poor/very poor karyotype (5%; p=0.0004). Additional significant correlations were noted between SF3B1 mutations and lower IPSS-R risk category (p=0.0004), advanced age (p=0.006), higher platelet count (p=0.0003). Results II: SF3B1 mutations and prognostic relevance in MDS-RS: To date, 68 (∼77%) deaths and 10 (∼11%) leukemic transformations have been documented. Median follow-up for living patients was 82 months. Univariate survival analysis considering all 88 study patients identified the following as strongly significant risk factors: IPSS-R (p<0.0001), WHO morphologic categories (p<0.0001), cytogenetic risk categories (p<0.0001), and transfusion need (p=0.0003). In multivariable analysis, only IPSS-R and transfusion need remained significant. In univariate analysis, the presence of SF3B1 mutations was significantly associated with better overall (p=0.04) and leukemia-free (p=0.03) survival; however, in both instances, significance was completely accounted for by WHO morphologic risk categorization and the morphology-adjusted p values were 0.6 and 0.2, respectively. In other words, when RARS and RCMD were analyzed separately, there was no additional prognostic value from the presence or absence of SF3B1 mutations (Figures 1 and 2; p=0.67 and 0.44, respectively). Conclusions: SF3B1 mutations are prevalent in RARS and RCMD-RS but do not provide additional, WHO morphology-independent or IPSS-R-independent, prognostic information. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 1711 Background: Mutations in genes of the splicing machinery, such as SF3B1, SRSF2 and U2AF35 are common in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes [MDS] (Nature 2011;478:64) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia [CMML] (Haematologica 2012;Epub). In MDS, SRSF2 gene mutations are an independent risk factor for shortened over-all (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) (Blood 2012;119:3578). In MDS with ring sideroblasts (RS), SF3B1 mutations have a high prevalence (∼50%), but do not influence either, the OS or the LFS (Blood 2012;119:569). We carried out this study to evaluate the prevalence, clinical correlates and prognosis of the aforementioned spliceosome mutations in CMML. Methods: The study included 227 patients with WHO defined CMML who were seen at the Mayo Clinic from 1997 through 2007. All patients underwent bone marrow (BM) examination and cytogenetic evaluation at diagnosis. DNA was interrogated in the three most frequent spliceosome genes with somatic mutations; SRSF2, SF3B1 and U2AF35. Results I: Prevalence and clinical correlates Among the 227 study patients, 153 (67%) were male, median age was 71 years (range, 17–90 years) and 192 (85%) met the WHO criteria for CMML-1. Ninety (40%) patients had SRSF2 mutations (86% CMML-1), 13 (6%) had SF3B1 mutations (75% CMML-1) and 20 (9%) had U2AF35 mutations (95% CMML-1). One-hundred and twenty three (54%) patients had at least one of three spliceosome mutations (86% CMML-1). Mutational hot spots were P95 for SRSF2 (P95L-n=36/H-n=32/R-n=13/A-n=1), K700E (n=7) and H662Q (n=2) for SF3B1, and Q157 (Q157R-n=5/P-n=5/G-n=1) and S34F (n=7) for U2AF35. Seven patients (54%) with SF3B1 mutations had ≥1% RS, with 5 (38%) showing ≥15% RS. Mutations involving all three spliceosome genes were mutually exclusive. The cytogenetic distribution based on the Spanish risk stratification system (Haematologica 2011;96:375) was; SRSF2 mutations: 69 (77%) low risk, 11 (12%) intermediate risk, and 10 (11%) high risk (+8-n=3, del/monosomy 7-n=2, monosomal karyotype-n=5); SF3B1 mutations: 8 (62%) low risk and 5 (38%) intermediate risk; U2AF35 mutations: 15 (75%) low risk, 3 (15%) intermediate risk and 2 (10%) high risk (p=0.89). The distribution of mutations according to the MD Anderson prognostic scoring system [MDAPS] (Blood 2002;99:840) was; SRSF2 - low-n=41, intermediate-1-n=26, intermediate-2-n=18, high-n=5, SF3B1- low-n=7, intermediate-1-n=3, intermediate-2-n=2, high-n=1, and U2AF35- low-n=11, intermediate-1-n=5, intermediate-2-n=3, high-n=1 (p=0.73). There was no statistically significant difference, among the three mutation groups, in prognostically relevant parameters, including gender distribution, median age, hemoglobin values, platelet counts, peripheral blood (PB) and BM blast counts, absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) and absolute monocyte counts (AMC). The only notable difference was that patients with the SF3B1 mutation had a lower median white blood cell count (p=0.04) and a lower absolute lymphocyte count (p=0.045). Results II: Prognostic impact of spliceosome mutations At a median follow-up of 15 months, 166 (73%) deaths and 33 (14.5%) leukemic transformations were documented. Median survivals for patients with mutations involving SRSF2, SF3B1 and U2AF35 were 24, 17 and 12 months, respectively. In univariate analysis, the presence of SRSF2 (p=0.67), SF3B1 (p=0.96) or U2AF35 (p=0.49) mutations had no prognostic impact on OS. Similarly, none of the three spliceosome mutations affected LFS; corresponding p values were 0.55 for SRSF2, 0.9 for SF3B1 and 0.38 for U2AF35 mutations respectively. We then examined possible prognostic value of having none of these mutations (n=104) vs otherwise (n=123) and the results were once again negative (p=0.87). Conclusions: SRSF2 is the most frequently mutated spliceosome gene in CMML, but neither it nor SF3B1 or U2AF35 mutations affect overall or leukemia-free survival in CMML. Furthermore, the current study suggests limited genotype-phenotype association, save for the already established association between SF3B1 mutations and RS. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 2803 Background: Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorder with overlapping features between myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and myeloproliferative neoplasms. Ring sideroblasts (RS) represent abnormal mitochondrial iron accumulation in MDS; with ≥15% RS necessary for the conventional diagnosis of MDS-RS. Somatic spliceosome mutations are recurrent in MDS, with SF3B1 mutations being the most frequent in MDS-RS (∼75%) and SRSF2 in CMML (∼28%). The distribution of these mutations in the presence of both RS and monocytosis is unknown and their prognostic relevance, in the particular setting, undetermined. Methods: Using the Mayo Clinic database for myeloid malignancies (1997–2007), we identified patients who met the 2008 WHO criteria for CMML, and who also displayed at least 1% RS in their bone marrow (BM). All patients underwent BM examination and cytogenetic evaluation at diagnosis and the pathology slides, including iron stains, were centrally re-reviewed to accurately quantify BM RS. DNA was interrogated in the three most frequent spliceosome genes with somatic mutations; SF3B1, SRSF2 and U2AF35. Results: Sixty four patients met the above stipulated criteria for CMML with ≥1% RS; 46 (72%) were males and median age was 71 years (range, 17–90 years). Fifty three (83%) had CMML-1 and the remainder CMML-2. The percentage of patients with ≥15% RS was 41%: 30% had 15–49% RS and 11% had >50% RS. Thirty patients (47%) displayed SRSF2 mutations (mutational frequencies were 58% in the presence of <15% RS, 42% with 15–49% RS and 0% with >50% RS), 9 (14%) SF3B1 mutations (3% with <15% RS, 26% with 15–49% RS and 43% with >50% RS), and 5 (8%) U2AF35 mutations (8% with <15% RS, 11% with 15–49% RS and 0% with >50% RS). Mutational hotspots were P95 for SRSF2 (93%), K700 for SF3B1 (67%) and Q157 for U2AF35 (60%). The three spliceosome mutations were mutually exclusive. At a median follow-up of 26 months, 49 (77%) deaths and 11 (17%) leukemic transformations were documented. In univariate analysis, significant risk factors for survival included increased levels of white blood cell (WBC), absolute neutrophil (ANC), absolute monocyte (AMC), absolute lymphocyte (ALC) counts, the Spanish cytogenetics risk stratification system (Haematologica 2011;96:375), and the presence of circulating blasts. Neither the presence of spliceosome mutations (SF3B1/SRSF2/U2AF35) nor the percentage of RS (considered both as a continuous and a categorical variable), had an impact on either overall or leukemia-free survival. Conclusions: Among spliceosome mutations in CMML, those involving SRSF2 are by far the most frequent, even in the presence of ring sideroblasts. However, in patients with >50% RS, only SF3B1 mutations were seen whereas in those with 15–49% RS, SRSF2 mutations were more common. These observations suggest that SF3B1 mutations play a dominant but not exclusive role in the pathogenesis of RS. Regardless, the current study did not suggest prognostic impact from either the presence of the spliceosome mutations studied or the percentage of RS. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 5045 Observation remains the standard approach to patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and asymptomatic multiple myeloma (AMM) who lack end-organ impairment characteristic of symptomatic MM. Institution of early MM therapy has not been shown to improve survival or alter the natural progression of the disease. Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) inhibitors inhibit proliferation and induce apoptosis in drug resistant MM cell lines. 23 asymptomatic adult patients with a serum monoclonal protein >1g/dL, from Cleveland Clinic, Mayo Clinic, or University of Arkansas Medical Center between August 2005 and April 2008 were randomized to either celecoxib or placebo in a double-blind, 1:1 fashion. The primary end point was change in the monoclonal protein concentration after 6 months. Correlative biomarkers, including IL6 and IL-6R, CD4/CD8+ T-cell ratios, and beta-2 microglobulin, were examined before and after treatment. Celecoxib had no significant effect on the median monoclonal protein concentration, which went from a median of 1. 44 to 1. 65 g/dL with placebo and 2. 42 to 2. 24 g/dL with Celecoxib (p=0. 36), or on any of the analyzed correlative markers (all p-values >0. 34). One patient's monoclonal protein concentration increased on placebo, but he did not require treatment for symptomatic MM. There were no adverse events of Grade 2 or higher. Celecoxib was well tolerated in contrast to previous reports when given in higher doses and in combination with thalidomide. Although accrual was limited we conclude that celecoxib has no clinical or immunologic effect on high risk asymptomatic plasma cell disorders. This study does not support using celecoxib for preventing progression to symptomatic MM. Future studies on progression of MGUS to symptomatic MM would require more patients and a longer follow-up period. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Celecoxib for chemoprophylaxis. Hussein:Celgene: Employment. Reu:Celgene: Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 423 Background: Cytogenetic abnormalities at diagnosis are seen in 20–70% of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). The International Prognostic Scoring System -revised (IPSS-R) classifies these cytogenetic abnormalities into five prognostic groups: very good (del(11q), ΠY with overall survival (OS) of 61 months); good (normal, del(20q), del(5q), del(12p) with OS 49 months); intermediate (+8,7q-, i(17q),+19,+21 with OS 26 months); poor (der(3)q21/q26, −7, complex with 3 abnormalities with OS 16 months); and very poor (complex with >3 abnormalities with OS of 6 months) (Schanz J, JCO 2012, Greenberg P, Blood 2012). Monosomal karyotype (MK) is defined as the presence of two or more autosomal monosomies or a single monosomy associated with a structural abnormality. We have previously shown that MK identifies a prognostically worse subgroup of MDS patients with a complex karyotype (Patnaik M, Leukemia 2010). Objectives: Methods: The Mayo Clinic database for MDS was used to identify patients in whom bone marrow histologic and cytogenetic information was obtained at the time of diagnosis. WHO criteria were used for MDS diagnosis and leukemic transformation. Results: i) Patient characteristics: A total of 1,014 patients met the above-stipulated criteria. Median age of the cohort was 71 years (range: 18–98 years) with 684 (67%) males. 819 patients (81%) had primary MDS with 195 cases (19%) of therapy-related MDS. 759 patients (75%) are dead at a median follow-up of 18 months (range: 0–223 months) with leukemic transformation documented in 125 cases (12%). IPSS-R risk distribution was as follows: very low (n=149, 15%), good (n=261, 26%), intermediate (n=221, 22%), high (n=131, 13%), and very high (n=252, 25%). ii) IPSS-R karyotype (Entire cohort; n=1,014): The five cytogenetic groups by IPSS-R were as follows: very good (n=43, 4%), good (n=577, 57%), intermediate (n=187, 18%), poor (n=83, 8%), and very poor (n=124, 12%). We evaluated the prognostic impact of the above groups by Kaplan Meier and Cox proportional hazards analysis. OS for the five cytogenetic groups was as follows: good (36 months), very good (28 months), intermediate (20 months), poor (13 months), and very poor (6 months) (Figure 1). OS of patients with very good karyotype was significantly better than patients with very poor and poor karyotype (p<0.0001, RR 3.2 and p=0.04, RR 1.6 respectively) but similar to patients with intermediate and good karyotype (p=0.22 and 0.28 respectively). iii) IPSS-R karyotype (Primary MDS; n=819): Cytogenetic risk groups by IPSS-R were as follows: very good (n=38, 5%), good (n=512, 63%), intermediate (n=153, 19%), poor (n=46, 6%), and very poor (n=70, 9%). OS of the five groups was as follows: good (39 months), very good (23 months), intermediate (21.5 months), poor (14.5 months), and very poor (6.5 months). OS of patients with very good karyotype was significantly better than patients with very poor karyotype (p=0.0002, RR 2.5) but similar to patients with poor, intermediate and good karyotype (p=0.23, 0.26 and 0.18 respectively). iv) Monosomal karyotype: MK was identified in 153 (15%) cases of which 4 cases were intermediate, 42 poor, and 107 very poor by IPSS-R. OS of patients with MK was similar to those with very poor karyotype (6 months). In addition, OS of patients with very poor without MK was akin to patients with poor without MK (p=0.21). Furthermore, among primary MDS we identified 83 (8%) cases of MK of which 4 were intermediate, 21 were poor, and 58 very poor by IPSS-R. We confirmed that OS of patients with MK was similar to patients with very poor karyotype (6.5 months). Moreover, survival of patients with very poor without MK was similar to patients with poor without MK (p=0.51). Conclusions: In this independent analysis of 1,014 patients with MDS, IPSS-R cytogenetic risk characterization failed to discriminate between very good, good and intermediate prognostic groups. In addition, patients with very poor without MK have a similar prognosis to patients with poor without MK and should be included in the poor category whereas the presence of MK should warrant inclusion into the very poor risk category. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 3790 Background: Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clonal stem cell disorder characterized by: persistent peripheral blood (PB) monocytosis (>1 × 10(9)/L), absence of BCR-ABL1 fusion, absence of rearrangement of the PDGFRA/B genes, <20% bone marrow (BM) & PB blasts, and dysplasia involving one or more myeloid cell lines. It is clinically considered to be an overlapping syndrome with myelodysplastic and myeloproliferative features. The natural history and prognostic features of CMML are not well defined with the MD Anderson prognostic score (MDAPS) and the Spanish risk stratification by cytogenetics being the two major prognostic tools currently being used in clinical practice. Methods: 227 patients with WHO defined CMML were seen at the Mayo Clinic from 1997 through 2007. All patients underwent bone marrow (BM) examination and cytogenetic evaluation at diagnosis. We evaluated the prognostic relevance of several clinical and laboratory parameters including those previously identified by the MDAPS (Blood 2002;99:840) and the Spanish cytogenetic risk stratification (Haematologica 2011;96:375). Results: Among the 227 study patients, 153 (67%) were males and median age was 71 years (range, 17–90 years). There were 192 (85%) patients with CMML-1 & the remainder had CMML-2. At a median follow-up of 15 months, 166 (73%) deaths and 33 (14.5%) leukemic transformations were documented. Median survivals were 22 months for CMML-1 and 14 months for CMML-2. In univariate analysis, significant risk factors for survival included decreased hemoglobin level, decreased platelet count and increased levels of white blood cells (WBC), absolute neutrophils (ANC), absolute monocytes (AMC), absolute lymphocytes (ALC), PB blasts, BM blasts and presence of circulating immature myeloid cells (IMC; inclusive of PB blasts). However, on multivariable analysis that included the aforementioned Spanish cytogenetic risk stratification, only increased AMC (>10 × 10(9)/L, RR 2.5, 95% CI 1.7–3.8), presence of circulating IMC (RR 2.0, 95% CI 1.4–2.7), decreased hemoglobin (<10 g/dL; RR 1.6, 99% CI 1.2–2.2), and decreased platelet count (<100 × 10(9)/L; RR 1.4, 99% CI 1.0–1.9) retained significance. Using these four independent risk factors, we prepared a new prognostic risk model that performed better than both the MDAPS and the Spanish cytogenetic risk models (Figure). The Mayo risk model was also predictive of leukemic transformation: high risk RR 4.9 (95% CI 1.9–12.8) and intermediate risk RR 2.6 (1.1–5.9). Individual parameters of independent significance for leukemic transformation included PB blast count and AMC >10 × 10(9)/L. Conclusions: Absolute monocyte count is the strongest predictor of survival in CMML. Other independent risk factors include circulating immature myeloid cells, anemia and thrombocytopenia. A risk model based on these four risk factors is effective in predicting both overall and leukemia-free survival and outperforms both the MDAPS and risk stratification by cytogenetics. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

INTRODUCTION: Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is associated with a reduced quality of life, including a high incidence of poor sleep. Minority patients with IBD describe poorer subjective symptoms of disease. Minority patients are more likely to report poorer sleep quality compared to Caucasian patients. There are limited data on the assessment of sleep in minority patients with IBD. In this prospective cohort study, we aim to compare objective sleep parameters assessed by wrist actigraphy in minority IBD patients compared to Caucasian IBD patients. METHODS: 73 patients with a diagnosis of IBD were recruited to take part in this IRB approved study. Subjects were stratified into two cohorts by self-identification: minority subjects (Blacks and Non-Black Hispanic subjects) and Caucasian, non-minority individuals. Subjects were excluded based on significant co-morbidity, a history of a sleep disorder, or demographics which did not fit into categorized cohorts. Subjects completed sleep surveys and were provided with an accelerometer that estimated sleep patterns. Comparisons of actigraphic parameters were performed between minority and non-minority cohorts. Regression analyses were performed to determine whether minority status was independently associated with poorer sleep parameters assessed by actigraphy. Predictors that were found to be different by < 0.1 between cohorts were included in the models. RESULTS: Of the recruited subjects, 64 subjects completed 3 days of actigraphy data. 33 subjects were minority patients and 31 individuals were non-minority patients. The demographics of the cohorts are provided in Table 1. Table 2 details the univariate analyses. A higher proportion of minority patients had poorer sleep efficiency (SE) and fragmented sleep compared to Caucasian patients (90.9% vs. 67.7%, P = 0.03 and 87.8% vs. 61.3%, P = 0.02). Minority status was independently associated with both poor SE (OR: 6.41 CI: 1.48-28.17, P = 0.0139) and fragmented sleep (OR: 4.98, CI: 1.09-22.89, P = 0.0389), (Tables 3.0A and 3.0B). CONCLUSION: In our study minority subjects were found to have poorer objective measures of sleep assessed by actigraphy compared to non-minority subjects. Culturally relevant care addressing psychosocial issues, including sleep are important in the care of minority patients with IBD. Further studies investigating the role of sleep in diverse populations with IBD are warranted to determine the etiologies of poor sleep in these patients.

Distress is defined in the NCCN Guidelines for Distress Management as a multifactorial, unpleasant experience of a psychologic (ie, cognitive, behavioral, emotional), social, spiritual, and/or physical nature that may interfere with the ability to cope effectively with cancer, its physical symptoms, and its treatment. Early evaluation and screening for distress leads to early and timely management of psychologic distress, which in turn improves medical management. The panel for the Distress Management Guidelines recently added a new principles section including guidance on implementation of standards of psychosocial care for patients with cancer.