Alexander, Megan

Abstract Background Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with a reduced quality of life. Minority patients with IBD specifically report more impairing symptoms compared with nonminority patients. Sleep quality, a key component of quality of life, is significantly compromised in minority patients compared with nonminority patients. Nevertheless, subjective and objective sleep assessments in minority patients with IBD have not explicitly been assessed. The purpose of this prospective cohort study is to assess and compare objective sleep parameters utilizing wrist actigraphy between minority and nonminority IBD patients. Methods In this institutional review board approved study, 74 patients with IBD were recruited and stratified into 2 cohorts by self-identification: white nonminority patients and minority patients. Patients in the minority cohort included black and Hispanic individuals (black and nonblack). Exclusion criteria included significant comorbidity, a history of an underlying sleep disorder, or patients who did not self-identify into categorized cohorts. Sleep was measured not only through wrist-based actigraphy but also with sleep surveys. Sleep parameters were compared between minority and nonminority cohorts. Regression analyses were performed to assess for factors independently associated with parameters of poor sleep quality. Results Sixty-four patients (86.4%) were included in the final analysis. Thirty-one individuals (48.4%) were categorized into the nonminority cohort, and 33 (51.6%) patients were in the minority cohort. A significantly higher number of minority patients had poorer sleep efficiency and fragmented sleep compared with nonminority patients (90.9% vs 67.7%; P = 0.03 and 87.8% vs 61.3%; P = 0.02). In the adjusted analysis, minority status was independently associated with poor sleep efficiency (odds ratio = 6.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.48-28.17; P = 0.0139) and fragmented sleep (odds ratio = 4.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-22.89; P = 0.0389). Conclusions Minority patients with IBD were shown to have poorer objective measures of sleep as assessed through wrist actigraphy compared to nonminority patients. Cultural competency in the care of minority patients with IBD, specifically focusing on the management of psychosocial issues, is needed to address these disparities in sleep. The inclusion of minority patients with IBD in studies investigating sleep and other psychosocial issues are warranted not only to assess potential disparities in disease course but also to determine the etiologies of poor sleep in minority patients with IBD.

INTRODUCTION: Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is associated with a reduced quality of life, including a high incidence of poor sleep. Minority patients with IBD describe poorer subjective symptoms of disease. Minority patients are more likely to report poorer sleep quality compared to Caucasian patients. There are limited data on the assessment of sleep in minority patients with IBD. In this prospective cohort study, we aim to compare objective sleep parameters assessed by wrist actigraphy in minority IBD patients compared to Caucasian IBD patients. METHODS: 73 patients with a diagnosis of IBD were recruited to take part in this IRB approved study. Subjects were stratified into two cohorts by self-identification: minority subjects (Blacks and Non-Black Hispanic subjects) and Caucasian, non-minority individuals. Subjects were excluded based on significant co-morbidity, a history of a sleep disorder, or demographics which did not fit into categorized cohorts. Subjects completed sleep surveys and were provided with an accelerometer that estimated sleep patterns. Comparisons of actigraphic parameters were performed between minority and non-minority cohorts. Regression analyses were performed to determine whether minority status was independently associated with poorer sleep parameters assessed by actigraphy. Predictors that were found to be different by < 0.1 between cohorts were included in the models. RESULTS: Of the recruited subjects, 64 subjects completed 3 days of actigraphy data. 33 subjects were minority patients and 31 individuals were non-minority patients. The demographics of the cohorts are provided in Table 1. Table 2 details the univariate analyses. A higher proportion of minority patients had poorer sleep efficiency (SE) and fragmented sleep compared to Caucasian patients (90.9% vs. 67.7%, P = 0.03 and 87.8% vs. 61.3%, P = 0.02). Minority status was independently associated with both poor SE (OR: 6.41 CI: 1.48-28.17, P = 0.0139) and fragmented sleep (OR: 4.98, CI: 1.09-22.89, P = 0.0389), (Tables 3.0A and 3.0B). CONCLUSION: In our study minority subjects were found to have poorer objective measures of sleep assessed by actigraphy compared to non-minority subjects. Culturally relevant care addressing psychosocial issues, including sleep are important in the care of minority patients with IBD. Further studies investigating the role of sleep in diverse populations with IBD are warranted to determine the etiologies of poor sleep in these patients.