Citations

Abstract Patient derived xenografts (PDX) mouse models for many types of cancer have been developed recapitulating therapeutic responses in the patient for which the PDX model was derived. Essentially, live surgically resected or biopsy tumor tissues are directly implanted into immune incompetent mice to develop in vivo models to test therapies, follow tumor progression (gene mutations that occur with patient tumor progression do so in mice) or to better understand drug resistance. However, the use of PDX models also has its limitations and challenges. Our laboratory has attempted to develop PDX models in athymic nude mice for numerous cancer histotypes such as bladder, brain, breast, colon, kidney, lung, melanoma, ovarian, pancreas, sarcoma and thyroid. While melanoma and colon cancers have very high tumor take rates (73 - 100%), the other cancer histotypes do not (14 - 50%). We share our experience for each cancer histotype and the techniques used to enhance the success rates in athymic nude mice. We also address the other challenges that include expansion of tumors after cryopreservation and conversion of human tumors to mouse tumors and spontaneous lymphomas. We provide methods to test for human versus mouse content that include QPCR and immunohistochemistry Citation Format: Laura A. Marlow, James L. Miller, Brandy Edenfield, Adam C. Mathias, Louis K. Dawson, William F. Durham, Robert J. Mullin, Daniel L. Small, Aidan J. Synnott, Kevin Wu, John A. Copland. Methods for developing patient derived xenografts in athymic nude mice. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 1453. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-1453

Abstract The success of clinical trials for patients with malignant melanoma (MM) designed from the “promising” results using pre-clinical models is minimal. With its increase in incidence, there is a dire need to develop both pre-clinical models comparable to clinical practice that have the capability to translate from bench-to-bedside and novel therapeutic agents for this life-threatening form of skin cancer. To address this concern, we have developed a panel of pre-clinical MM models including patient matched cell lines, patient cell-line derived xenograft models and patient tumor tissue-derived xenograft models. Patient derived xenograft (PDX) models are purported to most closely replicate a patient's response to therapy. Since the development of patient-derived cell lines and tumors grown in mice were more efficacious, their genetic, phenotypic, and therapeutic responses were compared to those of their corresponding patient-matched PDX model. Each model was molecularly characterized to confirm a match to that of the originating patient tumor tissue via protein immunohistochemistry (IHC), mRNA quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), DNA short tandem repeat (STR) analysis, and Sanger sequencing. Each pre-clinical model provided a genetic match to their respective patient tumor sample. All pre-clinical models were positive for the melanoma-specific markers (S-100 beta, HMB-45, and Melan-A) confirming a melanoma phenotype. Soft agar studies and tumor growth of our PDX and patient cell-line derived xenograft models confirmed tumorigenicity within our models providing the foundation to perform therapeutic studies. Mutation status data (i.e. BRAF, RAS), patient therapeutic clinical history and oncogene overexpression analysis (pERK, pAKT, PI3K, pmTOR, etc.) provide the platform and rationale behind the use of specific therapeutic agents per model. BRAF, NRAS and KRAS mutations were identified along with elevated pERK, pAKT and pmTOR in the models. Targeted therapies (trametinib/MEK inhibitor; vemurafenib/BRAF inhibitor; MK-2206/pAKT inhibitor; and everolimus/mTOR inhibitor) demonstrated dose dependent inhibition of cell proliferation in each of the models based upon oncogenic expression or mutations. In vivo experiments are in progress, which will allow comparison of the three models. The next steps include combination therapy to identify antitumor synergy targeting oncogenic signaling pathways. Citation Format: Antoneicka L. Harris, Laura Marlow, Adam Mathias, Louis Dawson, William Durham, Kenneth Meshaw, Robert Mullin, Daniel Small, Aidan Synnott, Kevin Wu, Dragana Milosevic, Brian Netzel, Stefan Grebe, Svetomir Markovic, John Copland. Characterization of novel patient derived melanoma xenografts and cell lines in response to targeted therapies. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 2417. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-2417

Abstract Introduction: A significant number of histologically triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells express substantial estrogen receptor (ER) mRNA but do not express ER protein as a result of rapid proteolytic degradation. Here we assessed whether proteasome inhibitors could sensitize such cells to tamoxifen-induced growth suppression. Methods: Data from the Katzenellenbogen laboratory elegantly demonstrate that in high ER mRNA MDA-MB-468 cells, ER protein is rapidly degraded via proteosomal degradation (Bhatt et al. MCB, 2012).Utilizing established human TNBC cell lines that express high ER mRNA (BT-20, MDA-MB-468, and newly established human TNBC cell lines from our laboratory MCJB2 and MCJB11), we defined a therapeutic strategy using the proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib in combination with the antiestrogen tamoxifen that demonstrates antitumor synergy. Results: We found that administration of carfilzomib in TNBC cell lines with high ER mRNA restored ER protein expression, and that combining this treatment with tamoxifen treatment led to enhanced growth suppression. We found that the TNBC MDA-MB-231 cells, which express no ER mRNA, show some growth suppression, but that tamoxifen provided no further growth suppression with these cells. We have previously shown that combined epigenetic therapy [methyltransferase inhibitor (decitabine) plus a histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi; romidepsin)] provided antitumor synergy in MDA-MB-231 cells via upregulation of the soluble Wnt suppressor, secreted frizzled protein 1 (sFRP1; Cooper et al. CCR, 2012). In addition, we show that this epigenetic therapy restores silenced ER mRNA and protein levels in MDA-MB-231 cells, and that combination of this epigenetic therapy with tamoxifen in MDA-MB-231 cells led to enhanced growth suppression by tamoxifen. We are currently testing these therapeutic strategies in vivo using established TNBC cell lines and our newly developed patient derived xenograft (PDX) mouse models that express either ERhigh or ERlow mRNA. Conclusions: If validated in animal models, we propose that ER mRNA expression level in TNBC patients could guide therapeutic choice, whereby, ERlow mRNA TNBC tumors could respond to epigenetic therapy followed by antiestrogen while ERhigh mRNA TNBC tumors could respond to a proteosome inhibitor followed by antiestrogen therapy. These results identify a novel epigenetic biomarker as predictive of therapeutic response. Citation Format: Christina A. von Roemeling, Laura A. Marlow, James Miller, Adam Mathias, Louis Dawson, Steadman Harrison, Beth A. Hollister, Derek C. Radisky, John Alton Copland. Estrogen receptor mRNA-directed therapy for triple-negative breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-95. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-LB-95

Abstract— We evaluated whether droxidopa, a prodrug converted to norepinephrine, is beneficial in the treatment of symptomatic neurogenic orthostatic hypotension, which results from failure to generate an appropriate norepinephrine response to postural challenge. Patients with symptomatic neurogenic orthostatic hypotension and Parkinson disease, multiple system atrophy, pure autonomic failure, or nondiabetic autonomic neuropathy underwent open-label droxidopa titration (100–600 mg, 3× daily). Responders then received an additional 7-day open-label treatment at their individualized dose. Patients were subsequently randomized to continue with droxidopa or withdraw to placebo for 14 days. We then assessed patient-reported scores on the Orthostatic Hypotension Questionnaire and blood pressure measurements. Mean worsening of Orthostatic Hypotension Questionnaire dizziness/lightheadedness score from randomization to end of study (the primary outcome; N=101) was 1.9±3.2 with placebo and 1.3±2.8 units with droxidopa ( P =0.509). Four of the other 5 Orthostatic Hypotension Questionnaire symptom scores and all 4 symptom-impact scores favored droxidopa, with statistical significance for the patient’s self-reported ability to perform activities requiring standing a short time ( P =0.033) and standing a long time ( P =0.028). Furthermore, a post hoc analysis of a predefined composite score of all symptoms (Orthostatic Hypotension Questionnaire composite) demonstrated a significant benefit for droxidopa ( P =0.013). There was no significant difference between groups for standing systolic blood pressure ( P =0.680). Droxidopa was well tolerated. In summary, this randomized withdrawal droxidopa study failed to meet its primary efficacy end point. Additional clinical trials are needed to confirm that droxidopa is beneficial in symptomatic neurogenic orthostatic hypotension, as suggested by the positive secondary outcomes of this trial. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00633880.

Abstract Introduction: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common subtype of RCC, which is the most prevalent kidney cancer among adults. Of the patients who develop this disease, over 1/3 will already present with advanced or metastatic disease during initial diagnosis due to the lack of symptoms in early stages. RCC demonstrates considerable resistance to radiation and traditional chemotherapeutics. Despite advances in the development of targeted anti-cancer treatments, no current drug therapy leads to significant improvement in long term survival in patients with advanced disease with the rare exception of those who respond to immunotherapy. Additionally, patients inevitably develop drug resistance. Therefore new molecular targets for therapy are sorely needed. Our group has identified stearoyl coA desaturase (SCD1) as a novel molecular target in ccRCC. We examined its role in tumor cell growth and viability in vitro and in vivo independently as well as in combination with current FDA approved regimens. Methods: Patient normal and ccRCC tissue samples and cell lines were examined for SCD1 expression. Genetic knockdown models and targeted inhibition of SCD1 through use of a small molecule inhibitor were analyzed for growth, apoptosis, and alterations in gene expression using gene array analysis. Therapeutic models of synergy were evaluated utilizing pharmacologic inhibition of SCD1 with the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) sunitinib and pazopanib, and the mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus. Results: Our studies identify increased SCD1 expression in all stages of ccRCC. Both genetic knockdown and pharmacologic inhibition of SCD1 decrease tumor cell proliferation and induce apoptosis in vitro and in vivo. Upon gene array, quantitative real-time PCR, and protein analysis of SCDi treated or SCD1 lentiviral knockdown samples, induction of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response signaling was observed, providing mechanistic insight for SCD1 activity in ccRCC. Furthermore, combinatorial application of SCDi with temsirolimus synergistically inhibits tumor growth in vitro and in vivo. Conclusions: Increased SCD1 expression supports ccRCC viability and therefore we propose it as a novel molecular target for therapy either independently or in combination with an mTOR inhibitor for patients whose disease cannot be remedied with surgical intervention, such as in cases of advanced or metastatic disease. These findings support the further evaluation of targeting SCD1 as an anti-cancer strategy in a phase I clinical trial. Citation Format: Christina A. von Roemeling, Laura Marlow, Thomas Caulfield, Kevin Wu, Winston Tan, Han Tun, John A. Copland, Adam Mathias, Chuck Harrison, Louis Dawson, Beth Hollister. Stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 is a novel molecular therapeutic target for clear cell renal cell carcinoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-210. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-LB-210

Abstract Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a distinct B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder for which clearly defined criteria for the diagnosis, initiation of therapy, and treatment strategy have been proposed as part of the consensus panels of International Workshops on WM (IWWM). As part of the IWWM-7 and based on recently published and ongoing clinical trials, the panels updated treatment recommendations. Therapeutic strategy in WM should be based on individual patient and disease characteristics (age, comorbidities, need for rapid disease control, candidacy for autologous transplantation, cytopenias, IgM-related complications, hyperviscosity, and neuropathy). Mature data show that rituximab combinations with cyclophosphamide/dexamethasone, bendamustine, or bortezomib/dexamethasone provided durable responses and are indicated for most patients. New monoclonal antibodies (ofatumumab), second-generation proteasome inhibitors (carfilzomib), mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, and Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors are promising and may expand future treatment options. A different regimen is typically recommended for relapsed or refractory disease. In selected patients with relapsed disease after long-lasting remission, reuse of a prior effective regimen may be appropriate. Autologous stem cell transplantation may be considered in young patients with chemosensitive disease and in newly diagnosed patients with very-high-risk features. Active enrollment of patients with WM in clinical trials is encouraged.

BackgroundThe cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers amyloid β (Aβ)‐42, total‐tau (T‐tau), and phosphorylated‐tau (P‐tau) demonstrate good diagnostic accuracy for Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, there are large variations in biomarker measurements between studies, and between and within laboratories. The Alzheimer's Association has initiated a global quality control program to estimate and monitor variability of measurements, quantify batch‐to‐batch assay variations, and identify sources of variability. In this article, we present the results from the first two rounds of the program.MethodsThe program is open for laboratories using commercially available kits for Aβ, T‐tau, or P‐tau. CSF samples (aliquots of pooled CSF) are sent for analysis several times a year from the Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory at the Mölndal campus of the University of Gothenburg, Sweden. Each round consists of three quality control samples.ResultsForty laboratories participated. Twenty‐six used INNOTEST enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay kits, 14 used Luminex xMAP with the INNO‐BIA AlzBio3 kit (both measure Aβ‐(1‐42), P‐tau(181P), and T‐tau), and 5 used Meso Scale Discovery with the Aβ triplex (AβN‐42, AβN‐40, and AβN‐38) or T‐tau kits. The total coefficients of variation between the laboratories were 13% to 36%. Five laboratories analyzed the samples six times on different occasions. Within‐laboratory precisions differed considerably between biomarkers within individual laboratories.ConclusionsMeasurements of CSF AD biomarkers show large between‐laboratory variability, likely caused by factors related to analytical procedures and the analytical kits. Standardization of laboratory procedures and efforts by kit vendors to increase kit performance might lower variability, and will likely increase the usefulness of CSF AD biomarkers.

OBJECTIVE The metabolic syndrome (MetS) is defined as concomitant disorders of lipid and glucose metabolism, central obesity, and high blood pressure, with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. This study tests whether common genetic variants with pleiotropic effects account for some of the correlated architecture among five metabolic phenotypes that define MetS. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Seven studies of the STAMPEED consortium, comprising 22,161 participants of European ancestry, underwent genome-wide association analyses of metabolic traits using a panel of ∼2.5 million imputed single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Phenotypes were defined by the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) criteria for MetS in pairwise combinations. Individuals exceeding the NCEP thresholds for both traits of a pair were considered affected. RESULTS Twenty-nine common variants were associated with MetS or a pair of traits. Variants in the genes LPL, CETP, APOA5 (and its cluster), GCKR (and its cluster), LIPC, TRIB1, LOC100128354/MTNR1B, ABCB11, and LOC100129150 were further tested for their association with individual qualitative and quantitative traits. None of the 16 top SNPs (one per gene) associated simultaneously with more than two individual traits. Of them 11 variants showed nominal associations with MetS per se. The effects of 16 top SNPs on the quantitative traits were relatively small, together explaining from ∼9% of the variance in triglycerides, 5.8% of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, 3.6% of fasting glucose, and 1.4% of systolic blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS Qualitative and quantitative pleiotropic tests on pairs of traits indicate that a small portion of the covariation in these traits can be explained by the reported common genetic variants.