Citations

Study ObjectiveTo develop and validate a predictive model for glucose change and risk for new‐onset impaired fasting glucose in hypertensive participants following treatment with atenolol or hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ).DesignRandomized multicenter clinical trial.PatientsA total of 735 white or African‐American men and women with uncomplicated hypertension.Measurements and Main ResultsPharmacogenomic Evaluation of Antihypertensive Responses (PEAR) is a randomized clinical trial to assess the genetic and nongenetic predictors of blood pressure response and adverse metabolic effects following treatment with atenolol or HCTZ. To develop and validate predictive models for glucose change, PEAR participants were randomly divided into a derivation cohort of 367 and a validation cohort of 368. Linear and logistic regression modeling were used to build models of drug‐associated glucose change and impaired fasting glucose (IFG), respectively, in the derivation cohorts. These models were then evaluated in the validation cohorts. For glucose change after atenolol or HCTZ treatment, baseline glucose was a significant (p<0.0001) predictor, explaining 13% of the variability in glucose change after atenolol and 12% of the variability in glucose change after HCTZ. Baseline glucose was also the strongest and most consistent predictor (p<0.0001) for development of IFG after atenolol or HCTZ monotherapy. The area under the receiver operating curve was 0.77 for IFG after atenolol and 0.71 after HCTZ treatment, respectively.ConclusionBaseline glucose is the primary predictor of atenolol or HCTZ‐associated glucose increase and development of IFG after treatment with either drug.

AbstractThe number of available genetic testing options and the nuances associated with these options continue to expand. In addition, the scope of genetic testing has broadened to areas and specialties beyond Medical Genetics. In response to these changes, diagnostic laboratories have employed genetic counselors to help navigate the increasing complexity of genetic testing, given their expertise and training in human genetics. However a largely unrecognized aspect of this role involves the use of counseling skills. Counseling skills are used by laboratory genetic counselors in a variety of situations to convey information and facilitate understanding among clinicians and medical staff. This helps to reduce test ordering errors, promote optimal test utilization, and ensure best patient care practices. The specific counseling skills used by laboratory counselors will be explored using three fictional case vignettes, followed by a discussion of the applicability of these skills in other contexts. Exploration of the unique ways in which laboratory genetic counselors apply their counseling skills can be useful for professional development and instructive for graduate training programs.

Abstract There is a significant unmet medical need to develop more effective treatments for cancers of the central and peripheral nervous systems. Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common form of brain cancer, and successful long-term treatment has not been realized. Neuroblastomas (NB) arise in the sympathetic nervous system and are the most common extracranial solid tumor of childhood. Survival of children with disseminated, high-risk NB tumors is less than 50%, even with intensive multimodal treatment. To improve treatment outcome, inhibition of murine double minute 2 (MDM2) function in the context of front-line therapy is being explored. MDM2 is a multi-functional protein that plays a critical role in controlling cell growth and migration. MDM2 is a negative regulator of p53 and p73 and, under low stress conditions, sequesters them in the cytoplasm. However, inhibition of MDM2 interactions with p53 and p73 by the MDM2 antagonist nutlin3a can lead to activation of p53/p73-mediated cell-death in tumor cells. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the extent to which blockade of MDM2-p53/p73 interactions by nutlin3a, alone or in combination with front-line therapies, could augment cell death in GBM and NB cells with a variety of molecular profiles. Using the median effect model, we found that temozolomide (TMZ) and nutlin3a were synergistic in increasing cell death in wtp53 U87 and U373 but were predominantly additive in mtp53 U118 cells. Primary patient GBM cells were typically resistant to TMZ relative to established cell lines. However, resistance to TMZ was decreased in the presence of nutlin3a. Further, TMZ and nutlin3a were synergistic in primary GBM10 and GBM43 but not in recurrent primary IU-GBM16, IU-GBM23, IU-GBM27, and IU-GBM32 cells. Moreover, in NB cells with wtp53, nutlin3a and cisplatin were synergistic in MYCN nonamplified SK-N-SH and additive in MYCN amplified IMR5. In mtp53 NB cells, nutlin3a and cisplatin were synergistic in MYCN nonamplified SK-N-FI as well as in MYCN amplified SK-N-DZ. Nutlin3a alone produced dose-related increases in cell death of all GBM and NB cell lines irrespective of p53 status, suggesting that p53-independent mechanisms play a role in inhibition of cell growth produced by blockade of MDM2-mediated signaling. Consistent with this hypothesis, nutlin3a increased p73 protein levels in mtp53 GBM43 cells that were exposed to TMZ. Inhibition of MDM2 function also inhibited repair of TMZ-mediated DNA damage in GBM. In comet assays, nutlin3a+TMZ decreased DNA repair relative to TMZ alone in wtp53 U87 and GBM10 and in mtp53 GBM43 cells. The present results demonstrate that MDM2 is a valid therapeutic target in GBM and NB cells with varying genetic profiles. In conclusion, inhibition of MDM2 signaling by nutlin3a is generally synergistic to additive in combination with front-line chemotherapeutics used to treat cancers of the central and peripheral nervous systems. Citation Format: Harlan E. Shannon, Haiyan Wang, Shanbao Cai, Wei Michael Liu, Lawrence M. Gelbert, Aaron A. Cohen-Gadol, Jann N. Sarkaria, Lindsey D. Mayo, Karen E. Pollok. MDM2 as a therapeutic target: improving upon front-line chemotherapy for nervous system tumors. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3435. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-3435