Citations

Brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE) is a common and debilitating symptom of central nervous system (CNS) tumors. The epileptogenic zone, defined as cortex responsible for seizure generation, is located at the peritumoral region for most tumors, and lower-grade intrinsic brain tumors have the highest seizure incidence. Surgery is often the most effective treatment for the reduction in seizures in BTRE. However, surgical decisions have historically often been made exclusively for oncologic reasons, with less emphasis on seizure control. Surgical approaches for all tumor types are reviewed, highlighting relevant risk factors. Adjunctive tools during surgery, such as intraoperative electrocorticography (ECoG), may help identify and remove surrounding brain areas which are epileptogenic. Minimally invasive surgery is also gaining traction, given its utility in treating seizures deep-seated tumors. This review explores epileptogenic brain tumors, surgery for BTRE, and emerging strategies to better achieve seizure control.

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) significantly impacts quality of life (QoL) and is often observed in patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM). Acoramidis achieves near-complete (≥90%) transthyretin (TTR) stabilization and is approved in the USA, the UK, Europe and Japan for the treatment of ATTR-CM in adults. In the phase 3 ATTRibute-CM study (NCT03860935), acoramidis treatment significantly reduced the time to all-cause mortality (ACM) or first cardiovascular-related hospitalization (CVH) at Month 30, and resulted in improved 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Overall Summary (KCCQ-OS) scores and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels relative to placebo. The clinical efficacy of acoramidis has not yet been reported in patients with ATTR-CM and with an AF or atrial flutter (AFL) diagnosis at baseline. Research Question: How does acoramidis treatment affect ACM or first CVH, 6MWD, KCCQ-OS scores, and NT-proBNP levels at Month 30 in participants with ATTR-CM with or without AF/AFL diagnosis at baseline? Methods: The ATTRibute-CM study design has been previously published. This post hoc analysis included participants in the modified intention-to-treat population (N=611) grouped by AF/AFL diagnosis at baseline (defined as recorded AF medical history or the presence of AF or AFL on an ECG at enrollment). The rate of ACM or first CVH at Month 30 was compared between groups using a stratified Cox proportional hazards model. Changes from baseline to Month 30 in 6MWD, KCCQ-OS scores and NT-proBNP levels were summarized descriptively. Results: Overall, 62.8% (384/611) of participants had an AF/AFL diagnosis at baseline (acoramidis: 255/409, placebo: 129/202). These participants had lower mean 6MWD and KCCQ-OS scores and higher median NT-proBNP levels than those without AF/AFL diagnosis at baseline. Treatment with acoramidis reduced ACM or first CVH, slowed the decline in 6MWD and KCCQ-OS scores and blunted the rise in NT-proBNP compared with placebo, regardless of AF/AFL diagnosis at baseline ( Table ). Conclusions: Acoramidis improved clinical outcomes (ACM, CVH), functional status, QoL and NT-proBNP levels relative to placebo in participants with ATTR-CM, regardless of AF/AFL diagnosis at baseline.

Introduction: Transthyretin (TTR) amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) arises from amyloidogenic aggregates of destabilized TTR protein in variant (ATTRv-CM) or acquired wild-type TTR (ATTRwt-CM). The p.V142I (V122I) variant is the most common pathogenic TTR allele in the USA and has higher mortality vs wild type. Acoramidis, an oral TTR stabilizer achieving ≥90% stabilization, is approved in USA, UK, Europe, and Japan for treating ATTR-CM in adults. In ATTRibute-CM (NCT03860935), acoramidis showed a reduction in all-cause mortality (ACM) or first cardiovascular-related hospitalization (CVH) vs placebo (PBO), with consistent benefit in ATTRwt-CM and ATTRv-CM (all variants). We report clinical outcomes in participants with p.V142I ATTRv-CM. Research Question: What was the efficacy of acoramidis for clinical outcomes (ACM, CVH) in participants with p.V142I ATTRv-CM in ATTRibute-CM? Methods: In ATTRibute-CM, 632 participants were randomized 2:1 to receive acoramidis HCl 800 mg or PBO twice daily for 30 months. All participants enrolled in open-label extension (OLE) received acoramidis only. Exploratory post hoc analyses were done in the p.V142I ATTRv-CM subgroup. Time-to-event analyses used a stratified Cox proportional hazards model using treatment group as an explanatory factor and baseline 6MWD as a covariate, stratified by randomization factors: serum NT-proBNP and eGFR. ACM was analyzed at Month 42 (ATTRibute-CM 30 months + 12 months OLE). Results: Of the 59 patients with ATTRv-CM reported at randomization, 35 (59.3%) had p.V142I (23 acoramidis, 12 PBO) with comparable baseline characteristics; 4 were homozygous for p.V142I (1 acoramidis, 3 PBO). Through Month 30, ACM/first CVH occurred in 43.5% (10/23) of acoramidis vs 83.3% (10/12) in PBO (HR 0.311; 95% CI 0.120–0.805; Figure 1 ). Through Month 42, ACM occurred in 26.1% (6/23) of continuous acoramidis vs 66.7% (8/12) in PBO to acoramidis (HR 0.307; 95% CI 0.097–0.973; Figure 2 ). Conclusions: In participants with p.V142I ATTRv-CM, acoramidis use was associated with 69% risk reduction in ACM/first CVH through Month 30 and ACM through Month 42 vs PBO. This is the first report of clinical benefit of this magnitude observed in this high-risk population. These findings have biologic plausibility and may reflect the near-complete stabilization observed experimentally with acoramidis in p.V142I ATTR fibrils. These observations require confirmation in larger cohort studies.

Introduction: Patients with variant transthyretin (TTR) amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTRv-CM) experience early onset disease, rapid progression, and poor outcomes due to amyloid aggregated from destabilized tetrameric TTR. Acoramidis, a highly selective, oral TTR stabilizer, achieves ≥90% TTR stabilization and is approved in the USA, EU, Japan, and UK for adults with wild-type (ATTRwt-CM) or ATTRv-CM. In the phase 3 ATTRibute-CM study and its open-label extension (OLE), acoramidis reduced both the risk of all-cause mortality (ACM) or first cardiovascular-related hospitalization (CVH) through Month 30 and risk of ACM through Month 42 by 36%. Research Question: Is acoramidis efficacy in ATTRv-CM consistent with that observed in the overall ATTRibute-CM population? Methods: In ATTRibute-CM, participants with ATTR-CM were randomized 2:1 to acoramidis HCl 800 mg or PBO, twice daily (BID) for 30 months. After Month 30, all participants enrolled in the OLE received acoramidis HCl 800 mg BID. Genotype (ATTRwt-CM or ATTRv-CM) was captured at randomization; efficacy was analyzed separately in ATTRv-CM. Time-to-event analyses used a stratified Cox model with terms for treatment, baseline 6MWT, genotype, genotype×treatment interaction, stratified by randomization NT-proBNP and eGFR levels. ACM was analyzed at Month 42 (ATTRibute-CM 30 months + OLE 12 months). Results: The ATTRv-CM group comprised 59 patients (39 acoramidis, 20 PBO). Baseline characteristics were mostly similar in both groups ( Table ). The three most common variants reported were p.V142I (n=35), p.I88L (n=7), and p.T80A (n=5). Compared with PBO, acoramidis reduced the risk of ACM/first CVH through Month 30 by 59% (acoramidis, 46.2%; PBO, 75.0%; HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.21–0.81; P =0.011; Fig 1 ) and ACM through Month 42 by 59% (continuous acoramidis, 30.8%; PBO to acoramidis, 60.0%; HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.19–0.93; P =0.032; Fig 2 ) , with Kaplan–Meier curves separating at Months 5 and 10, respectively. Conclusions: In ATTRibute-CM, acoramidis use was associated with clinical benefit in the ATTRv-CM group as demonstrated by a 59% risk reduction in both ACM/first CVH at Month 30, and ACM at Month 42 compared to PBO. These previously unreported findings support the hypothesis that near complete TTR stabilization observed experimentally with acoramidis across multiple TTR mutations translates into improvement in long-term outcomes. Further validation by individual TTR variant is warranted.

Introduction: Patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) typically have low serum transthyretin (sTTR) levels, worsening heart failure, and increased mortality. A recent study has shown the association of sTTR levels ≥20mg/dL with reduced risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality (CVM). It has also been shown that regardless of baseline sTTR level, greater increases in sTTR levels are associated with greater improvements in cardiovascular outcomes. Acoramidis, a near-complete (≥90%) TTR stabilizer, demonstrated a rapid and sustained increase from baseline in sTTR by Day 28 and reduced risk of cardiovascular outcomes in patients with ATTR-CM. Hypothesis: Acoramidis-mediated early increase in sTTR levels ≥20 mg/dL (lower limit of normal) at Day 28 reduces risks of CVM and cardiovascular-related hospitalizations (CVH) in patients with ATTR-CM. Methods: Analyses were conducted in the ATTRibute-CM modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population (acoramidis: 409; placebo: 202). The sTTR concentrations (normal range is 20-40 mg/dL) were assessed using an immunoturbidimetric method (Abbott ARCHITECT system) in a central laboratory. The proportion of participants with sTTR levels below normal at baseline and Day 28 were determined. The relationship between sTTR levels <20 or ≥20 mg/dL, at Day 28 across the pooled acoramidis and placebo treatment groups, and subsequent risk of CVM and of CVH over 30 months were analyzed using a stratified log-rank test. Results: At baseline about 25% of study participants had sTTR levels below normal in both treatment groups. At Day 28, less than 2% of participants had sTTR levels <20 mg/dL in the acoramidis arm compared with 26% in the placebo arm ( Table 1 ). When acoramidis and placebo treatment groups were pooled based on sTTR levels <20 or ≥20 mg/dL at Day 28, participants with sTTR ≥20 mg/dL were associated with a lower risk of the composite endpoint of CVM or first CVH at Month 30 in comparison with <20 mg/dL ( p <0.0001) ( Figure 1A ). Comparable findings were observed for the individual components (CVM, first CVH) ( Figure 1B and C ). Conclusion: Across treatment groups, sTTR levels above normal range (≥20 mg/dL) at Day 28 were associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular outcomes at Month 30, when compared with sTTR levels below normal range (<20 mg/dL). Thus, these observations demonstrate that higher sTTR levels over time may have the potential for clinical benefits in both CVM and CVH.

Introduction: Acoramidis, an oral transthyretin (TTR) stabilizer achieving near-complete (≥90%) TTR stabilization, is now approved in the USA, EU, Japan, and UK for the treatment of TTR amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM). In the 30-month phase 3 ATTRibute-CM study, acoramidis reduced all-cause mortality (ACM) or first cardiovascular-related hospitalization (CVH) vs placebo. Through Month 42 (M42) of the open-label extension (OLE; 30 months ATTRibute-CM + 12 months OLE), the clinical benefit of acoramidis was sustained, resulting in a 36% and 43% risk reduction in ACM and ACM/first CVH, respectively, compared with the placebo to acoramidis group Research Question: Are the long-term clinical benefits of acoramidis on ACM and ACM/first CVH in ATTR-CM over 42 months consistent across patient subgroups? Methods: ATTRibute-CM study design has been previously described. At the end of the 30-month double-blind period, patients enrolled into OLE continued acoramidis or switched from placebo to acoramidis; all patients received open-label acoramidis HCI 800 mg BID. Data cut was performed after 12 months in OLE. Subgroup analysis for ACM and ACM/first CVH through M42 were conducted for randomization stratification factors (genotype, NT-proBNP, and eGFR levels) and other pre-specified subgroups. ACM included death due to any cause, cardiac mechanical assist device placement, and heart transplant. CVH included CV hospitalizations (≥24 h) and urgent visits (<24 h) for decompensated heart failure requiring IV diuretics and was adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee. Results: Overall, 389 patients enrolled in the OLE (263 continuous acoramidis and 126 placebo to acoramidis). The analyses of ACM/first CVH ( Figure 1 ) and ACM ( Figure 2 ) through M42 consistently favored patients initially randomized to acoramidis across all patient subgroups, including those based on sex, age, country, ATTR-CM genotype, baseline NT-proBNP, baseline eGFR, NYHA class, and NAC stage. The largest effect size for the reduction in ACM/first CVH (HR <0.50) was observed in the following subgroups: female, non-Caucasian patients, variant ATTR-CM, or NAC stage 2. Conclusions: The long-term benefit of acoramidis was consistently shown in patients initially randomized to acoramidis treatment compared with placebo to acoramidis switch after 30 months across multiple clinically relevant subgroups, underscoring the importance of early initiation of acoramidis to reduce the long-term risk of ACM or CVH.

Abstract Purpose: AXL, a receptor tyrosine kinase related to oncogenic processes, is aberrantly expressed in various cancers and associated with treatment resistance. Enapotamab vedotin (EnaV), a novel anti-AXL human IgG1 and monomethyl auristatin E antibody–drug conjugate, demonstrated antitumor activity in preclinical models, including non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This phase 1/2 study assessed the safety and preliminary efficacy of EnaV in solid tumors. Patients and Methods: This study comprised dose-escalation and dose-expansion phases; both phases investigated EnaV once every 3 weeks (Q3W) and EnaV on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle (3Q4W). Primary objectives determined the maximum tolerated dose (dose escalation) and safety (dose expansion). Pharmacokinetic profile, antitumor activity, and AXL expression were also assessed. Results: During dose escalation, 32 patients received EnaV Q3W; 15 received EnaV 3Q4W. The maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase 2 dose were 2.2 mg/kg in Q3W and 1.0 mg/kg in 3Q4W schedules. In dose expansion, 189 patients received EnaV Q3W; 70 received EnaV 3Q4W. Common adverse events in dose expansion included fatigue, constipation, nausea, decreased appetite, and diarrhea. Overall response rates ranged from 4.5% to 12.5% with Q3W dose schedule and from 9.1% to 11.5% with 3Q4W dose schedule. Disease control rates for NSCLC cohorts were 40.9% to 50.0%. NSCLC subset analysis demonstrated correlation between radiomics signature and disease control. The relationship between clinical activity and AXL expression was not apparent. Conclusions: EnaV had an acceptable safety profile; however, because the evaluation of antitumor activity did not show clinically meaningful responses, clinical development of EnaV was discontinued. Significance: EnaV, an anti-AXL human IgG1 and monomethyl auristatin E antibody–drug conjugate, showed single-agent antitumor activity in preclinical models. This phase 1/2 study of EnaV demonstrated a manageable safety profile and antitumor activity in selected tumor types. Further studies exploring alternative targeting modalities, patient selection, and/or combinations are needed.

Abstract Importance Voice-based health technologies are growing rapidly, but they lack standardized terminology, which hinders interdisciplinary collaboration, research quality, and clinical translation. Objective The objective of this work is to develop universally accepted definitions in the rapidly evolving field of vocal biomarkers, as part of the VOCAL ( V ocal Biomarker Guidelines for O ntology, C lassification, A pplication, and L ogistics) initiative, a structured, international consensus-based framework that aims to provide standards, and guidelines. Design VOCAL is a rigorous, international, multi-stage consensus-building study conducted in 2024-2025. Setting Multi-institutional collaboration between representatives from the Bridge2AI-Voice Consortium (North America) and the eVoiceNet Network (European Union), culminating in an in-person workshop at the 2025 Bridge2AI Voice Symposium. Participants A group of 24 international experts in medicine, clinical research, speech and language, audio signal processing, statistics, methodology, regulation, ethics. Methods VOCAL’s iterative process involved five rounds of review, feedback, and an in-person workshop at the international 2025 Bridge2AI Voice Symposium, ensuring the incorporation of diverse perspectives and achieving a robust agreement on the proposed definitions. Main outcomes and measures Consensus-based definitions for vocal biomarkers, spanning from broad concepts (biomarker, digital biomarker, vocal biomarker) to domain-specific measures (cardio-respiratory acoustic, voice, speech/articulatory, cognitive/language). Results A hierarchical continuum model of vocal biomarkers was established. We first distinguished between the concepts of vocal measures and vocal biomarkers. We then defined terms from broad, overarching concepts (Level 0: Biomarker, Digital Biomarker, Vocal Biomarker) to more specific physiological and cognitive domains (Level 1: Cardio-Respiratory Acoustic; Level 2: Voice; Level 3: Speech/Articulatory; Level 4: Cognitive/Language, including linguistic and paralinguistic subtypes). Conclusions and Relevance This work provides a shared vocabulary that is essential for fostering communication through interdisciplinary collaboration, improving the quality and efficiency of research and development, and ensuring the ethical, reliable, and scalable deployment of future voice-based health technologies. It lays foundational groundwork for upcoming guidelines and standards, which are crucial for advancing the field of vocal biomarkers into widespread clinical utility. Key points Question Can we establish an international consensus on the definitions related to vocal biomarkers? Findings Through a multi-stage international consensus process involving expert representatives from the Bridge2AI-Voice Consortium and eVoiceNet Network, a hierarchical model of vocal biomarkers was developed, defining terms from broad concepts (biomarker, digital biomarker, vocal biomarker) to specific physiological and cognitive domains (cardio-respiratory acoustic, voice, speech/articulatory, cognitive/language). Meaning Standardized definitions for vocal biomarkers provide an essential shared vocabulary for interdisciplinary collaboration and lay the foundational groundwork for future guidelines needed to advance the implementation of voice-based health technologies into clinical practice and clinical research.