Citations

Abstract Introduction The International Prognostic Index (IPI) is widely used to stratify risk in large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) across all ages, with age-adjusted (aa)IPI applied to younger patients. While there have been efforts to develop prognostic indices (PIs) tailored to older patients, few are adopted in clinical practice due to their complexity and reliance on functional assessments, which are not routinely collected in real-world registry datasets. Recently proposed SENIOR-IPI (Dubois, ASH 2024) was developed for older patients with LBCL receiving anthracycline (A)-based therapy. We assessed the performance of standard and novel PIs in patients aged 80+ years and externally validated the SENIOR-IPI. Methods We harmonized and pooled data of patients aged 80+ years with newly diagnosed LBCL from a national registry and two prospective cohorts: NiHiL (Czech Republic, enrolled 2010–2023), LEO (USA; n=222, 2015–2020), and MER (USA; n=77, 2010–2015), forming a cohort of 819 individuals. We included 536 individuals with complete data on IPI components and albumin, including 485 treated with chemotherapy and 397 with A-based regimens (primary cohort). Following PIs were evaluated: IPI, NCCN-IPI, (aa)IPI, and SENIOR-IPI (age per year, aaIPI components, LDH >3x ULN as extra point, and albumin, all weighted six-fold; extranodal involvement excluded due to lack of prognostic significance). Multivariable hazard ratios (HR) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models; discriminative ability was assessed using C-index and calibration plots. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); event-free survival results were consistent (230/357 events were deaths) and are not reported here. Results Among the 397 A-treated patients (median age 82 years, range 80–99), ECOG performance status (PS) 2–4 was observed in 35% of patients, clinical stage III–IV in 67%, elevated LDH in 65% (8% with >3x ULN), >1 extranodal (EN) site in 32%, and albumin levels < 3.5 g/dL in 27%. In multivariable modeling, only age per year (HR=1.07, P<0.01), and clinical stage (HR=1.36, P=0.048) were independent predictors of OS, whereas ECOG PS (HR=1.27, P=0.12), trichotomized LDH by ULN (HR=1.23, P=0.08) and albumin (HR=1.17, P=0.35) were not significant. SENIOR-IPI had the highest discrimination (C-index 0.631) in A-treated patients, outperforming IPI (0.617), NCCN-IPI (0.591), and aaIPI (0.620), with consistent results across cohorts: NiHiL (0.633), LEO (0.619), and MER (0.621). SENIOR-IPI stratified patients into low- (L-Risk, 0–9 points, 28%), low-intermediate (L-Int, 10–19 points, 42%), high-intermediate (H-Int, 20–29 points, 23%), and high-risk (H-Risk, 30–40 points, 7%) categories, with OS medians of 6.3, 3.8, 2.4, and 1.4 years, respectively (P<0.01), and significant separation between L-Int and H-Int (HR=1.47, P=0.02). By comparison, IPI categorized patients as L-Risk (12%), L-Int (24%), H-Int (27%), and H-Risk (37%), with median OS of 8.7, 4.6, 4.8, and 1.9 years, resp. (P<0.01). aaIPI yielded following distributions: 13%, 29%, 37%, and 21%; and median OS: 8.7, 5.3, 3.4, and 1.5 years; P<0.01. NCCN-IPI stratified patients into three groups: L-Int (13%), H-Int (49%), and H-Risk (39%), with respective OS medians of 8.7, 4.1, and 2.5 years (P<0.01). All PIs showed modest overestimation of mortality (calibration slopes: SENIOR-IPI 1.36; IPI 1.24; aaIPI 1.30; NCCN-IPI 1.26; intercept: -0.97, -0.87, -0.92, -0.87, resp.). In the entire cohort (n=536), SENIOR-IPI showed highest C-index (0.651 vs IPI 0.622, aaIPI 0.631, NCCN-IPI 0.606), and stratified patients into L-Risk (26%, 2-year OS: 6.4 years), L-Int (40%, 3.2 years), H-Int (24%, 1.5 years), and H-Risk (10%, 0.6 years). Calibration slope was 1.18 (intercept -0.33). Among patients not receiving chemotherapy, SENIOR-IPI also performed best (C-index 0.759 vs IPI 0.738, aaIPI 0.757, NCCN-IPI 0.728). Conclusion SENIOR-IPI enables effective risk stratification of patients aged 80+ years with LBCL into four prognostically distinct groups, outperforming traditional indices (IPI, NCCN-IPI, aaIPI) in patients receiving A-based therapy, as well as in the entire cohort and in patients not receiving chemotherapy. While its discrimination is superior, modest miscalibration suggests that future recalibration may improve precision. These findings support SENIOR-IPI as a clinically relevant prognostic tool for the elderly LBCL patient population. Funding: NU21-03-00411, P50 CA97274, U01 CA195568.

Abstract Chimeric antigen receptor T (CART) cell therapy has shown unprecedented success in the treatment of hematological malignancies. However, the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment of both solid and liquid tumors is a major barrier for CART efficacy. Immunosuppressive myeloid cells inhibit CART efficacy. Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) promotes macrophage proliferation, survival, and anti-inflammatory response and is upregulated on myeloid cells in many cancers, making CSF1R an appealing therapeutic target. We aimed to test the interactions between CSF1R, myeloid cells, and CART response, and to study CSF1R targeting in the context of CART cell therapy. We utilized CD19-targeted CART cell therapy (CART19) in lymphoma preclinical models and thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR)-targeting CART cell therapy (TSHR-CART) in thyroid cancer models. We first measured CSF1R expression on myeloid cells in vitro. Suppressive myeloid cells, polarized from healthy donor monocytes using an anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) cell line, 8505c, or mantle cell lymphoma cell line, JeKo-1, significantly upregulate CSF1R (p=0.0002) compared to media control. After polarization, myeloid cells significantly inhibit TSHR-CART and CART19 antigen-specific proliferation compared to freshly isolated monocytes (p=0.012, p<0.01, respectively) indicating that suppressive myeloid cells contribute to CART failure in multiple tumor types. We then performed single cell RNA sequencing on peripheral blood taken at baseline from patients with mantle cell lymphoma treated with CART19. We found a significant increase of CSF1R on monocyte subsets in CART19 non-responders vs responders (padj=0.0037). Next, we determined the impact of CSF1R blockade on CART cell therapy in vivo. Using lymphoma models, B6 mice were engrafted with the luciferase+ CD19+ murine lymphoma cell line TBL-12 (1x106 cells i.v. 1 day after 250 mg/kg cyclophosphamide). Tumor burden was significantly reduced after 7 days of treatment with low dose CART19 (0.5x106 i.v.) + anti-mouse CSF1R antibody (16mg/kg i.p. twice weekly) vs CART19 + IgG control (p=0.0146). We then tested the impact of CSF1R blockade in mice experiencing tumor relapse. After TBL-12 engraftment, mice were treated with anti-mouse CSF1R or IgG control antibody followed two days later with high dose CART19 (1x106 i.v.) to induce remission. Mice were re-challenged with TBL-12 14 days later. Mice treated with anti-mouse CSF1R antibody showed increased tumor control and significantly higher survival (p=0.0416). Using thyroid cancer models, first we identified high macrophage infiltration in biopsy specimens of patients with ATC compared to normal thyroid tissue and benign thyroid tumors through immunohistochemistry (IHC) of patient samples (p<0.01, p<0.0001, respectively). To test if macrophages are associated with CART failure in ATC, NSG mice were subcutaneously engrafted with 1x106 TSHR+ THJ529 tumors, an ATC cell line derived from patient biopsy samples from the Mayo Clinic thyroid cancer biobank, followed by i.v. treatment with 1x107 TSHR-CART or untransduced T cell control (UTD). IHC staining of tumor tissue collected at experimental endpoints revealed a dose-dependent, significant infiltration of human CD3+ T cells into the tumors which inversely correlated with murine F4/80+ myeloid cell and murine YM-1+ M2 macrophage infiltration. This led us to hypothesize that myeloid cell targeting with CSF1R blockade can improve TSHR-CART efficacy. We utilized the same ATC model described above to test CSF1R targeting. When TSHR+ THJ529 tumors reached approximately 100 mm3, mice were randomized by tumor volume and treated with CSF1R inhibitor PLX5622 (600mg/kg) or vehicle control, followed by either UTD or TSHR-CART cells 5x106 i.v. Mice treated with TSHR-CART + PLX5622 showed significantly improved tumor control vs TSHR-CART + vehicle control (p<0.0001) or UTD + PLX5622 (p<0.0001). Together, our results highlight immunosuppressive myeloid cells which express CSF1R as a major cell type limiting CART efficacy in both solid and liquid tumors. We also identified a strategy to overcome myeloid-mediated suppression of CART cells by targeting CSF1R with antibody or small molecule inhibitors.

Abstract Introduction: The Duffy null variant (genotype or phenotype) is associated with lower circulating absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) without increased risk for infection. It is found in ~66% of people identifying as Black or African American vs <1% of people of Asian or European ancestry. Many ANC reference intervals (RI) are not representative of the Duffy null population. There are no adult Duffy null WBC RI and no pediatric Duffy null ANC or WBC RI. Thus, we aimed to assess Duffy null ANC and WBC distributions as well as develop WBC and ANC RI for adults and pediatrics. Methods: Twenty-three sites across the United States collected samples with all sites excluding participants with conditions or medications that could impact ANC or WBC. Only Duffy null participants were included. Sex, race, ethnicity, age, sample collection type, practice setting, Duffy testing method, ANC, and WBC were recorded. The non-parametric method for determining lower limit of normal (LLN), upper limit of normal (ULN), and 90% confidence intervals (CI) around the limits was performed according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Specific ULN and LLN are not reported as these are preliminary data. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare sex and prior data; differences by age groups were assessed with Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: 316 participants 18+ years-old (y/o) were assessed of whom 62.3% (n=197) are female, 97.5% (n=308) identified as Black or African American, and 94.9% (n=300) identified as non-Hispanic. Median age was 47 y/o (IQR: 32-60.5). Median ANC was 2600/uL (IQR: 1860-3530; range: 400-7400); 28.6% (n=90) of participants had ANC <2000/uL, 13.6% (n=43) had ANC <1500/uL, and 2.5% (n=8) had <1000/uL. The 90% CI around the LLN was 810-1070/uL and 5570-7130/uL around the ULN. Consistent with prior data, there was a difference in median ANC by sex (male: 2400/uL; female: 2710/uL; p=0.02). There was no significant difference between this ANC data and previously published Duffy null ANC data (p=0.28). Median WBC was 5.4x109/L (IQR: 4.4-6.5; range: 2.10-11.64) with 4.1% (n=13) of participants with WBC <3.0x109/L. The 90% CI around the LLN is 3.68-4.30x109/L and 11.02-12.97x109/L around the ULN. 515 participants between 0-17 y/o were assessed with 51.8% (n=267) females, 94.8% (n=488) identified as Black or African American, and 94.0% (n=484) identified as non-Hispanic. Among pediatric participants, 56.8% (n=291) had ANC <2000/uL, 38.7% (n=198) had ANC <1500/uL, and 14.4% (n=74) had ANC <1000/uL. For those <1 y/o (n=29), median ANC was 950/uL (IQR: 840-1360; range: 111-3910). There are currently too few samples to predict ULN and LLN. Median WBC was 8.85x109/L (IQR: 7.03-10.16; range: 4.17-13.53). For those 1-5 y/o (n=143), median ANC was 1735/uL (IQR: 1100-2550; range: 207-5810) with a 90% CI around the LLN of 207-820/uL and 4020-5810/uL around the ULN. Median WBC was 6.72x109/L (IQR: 5.64-8.25; range: 3.68-12.97). For those 6-11 y/o (n=128), median ANC was 1590/uL (IQR: 1090-2470; range: 420-5490) with a 90% CI around the LLN of 420-910/uL and 4340-5490/uL around the ULN. Median WBC was 5.42x109/L (IQR: 4.45-6.70; range: 2.80-10.50). For those 12-17 y/o (n=215), median ANC was 2190/uL (IQR: 1460-2930; range: 204-5850) with a 90% CI around the LLN of 540-930/uL and 4350-5510/uL around the ULN. Median WBC was 5.06x109/L (IQR: 4.26-6.20; range of 2.04-9.91). There is a significant difference in ANC by age category (p<0.0001). Conclusion: This is the first report of healthy pediatric Duffy null ANC and WBC data and the first large-scale verification of adult Duffy null ANC and WBC data. Final RI are expected in September 2025. Among adults with the Duffy null phenotype, ANC LLN are likely between 810-1070/uL. Pediatric ANC LLN are likely as low as 207-820/uL (1-5 y/o), 420-910/uL (6-11 y/o), and 540-930/uL (12-17 y/o). These findings redefine “normal” as a significant proportion of healthy participants have ANC or WBC below current RI or below thresholds typically defined as disease. Limitations include heterogeneous sample populations and collection methods. Future analyses will assess differences between collection sites or methods. Ultimately, this work lays the foundation for a more scientifically sound and equitable approach to medical care by ensuring that RI accurately reflects health for the entire community. Healthcare systems are strongly encouraged to adopt Duffy null-specific ANC and WBC RI.

Abstract Introduction: Somatic mutations in UBA1, encoding an E1 ubiquitin activating enzyme, have recently been linked to an adult-onset, severe inflammation syndrome called VEXAS (Vacuoles, E1-enzyme, X-linked, Autoinflammatory, Somatic). VEXAS is characterized by systemic inflammation and hematologic abnormalities. While the majority of identified mutations in UBA1 are located in exonic regions, the role of non-coding and intronic mutations in the pathogenesis of VEXAS remains largely unexplored. In this study, we investigated the potential contribution of intronic mutations to VEXAS pathogenesis. Methods: To investigate mutations affecting UBA1 outside the region typically covered in targeted panels (exon 3), whole exome (WES) and genome sequencing (WGS) was performed on peripheral blood of patients with VEXAS-associated clinical presentation previously negative for UBA1 mutations per clinical testing. 265 patients were profiled by WES (~100X) and 36 patients were profiled by WGS (~55X). Clinical history was reviewed for these patients for VEXAS-associated presentation including a combination of hematologic and rheumatologic disease in adults. Participants with known pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in UBA1 or other genetic causes of systemic autoinflammatory disease were excluded. UBA1 transcript and protein expression were assessed by PCR and western blot, respectively, in one case where peripheral blood mononuclear cells were available. Results: We identified 7 patients with VEXAS-like presentation with intronic single nucleotide variants or deletions. Five patients had a recurrent point mutation (median VAF: 0.78; range: 0.38-0.97). 5 patients had been diagnosed with MDS, and bone marrow biopsy revealed vacuolated progenitor cells in 3 patients. The most frequent clinical manifestations included skin rash (n=6), joint pain (n=4), vasculitis (n=4), and chondritis (n=2). One patient had been diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia related changes, with co-mutations in IDH1 and SRSF2. Two additional patients had mutations in ASXL1 of which one also had a ZRSR2 mutation. No co-occurring myeloid driver gene mutations were found in the other cases. Noncoding mutations, similar to canonical UBA1 disease causing mutations, were shown to be lineage restricted to myeloid cells. To assess the functional impact of mutations, CD14+ monocytes were isolated from the peripheral blood. Compared to the CD14- fraction, the CD14+ fraction revealed a decrease in the UBA1 transcript as well as UBA1 protein level. One patient demonstrated loss of novel UBA1 mutation after hypomethylating agent treatment, and allogeneic transplant, placing the patient in remission.Conclusions:Our findings of intronic and non-coding UBA1 mutations in patients with VEXAS-associated clinical presentation suggests these variants may affect the regulation of UBA1 transcription, representing a potential new mechanism of pathogenesis. Further functional studies are underway to understand how these variants contribute to impaired UBA1 activity and VEXAS disease pathogenesis. Collectively, our results advocate for a broader approach in genetic testing for UBA1 mutations and pave the way for improved diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for VEXAS syndrome.

Abstract Introduction: Targeted therapy yields deep and durable response in histiocytic neoplasms.However, relapse rate following interruption is high at 75-77%, with a median time to relapse 6-9 months in previous studies. Outcomes after discontinuation in those who have already achieved a durable response are not well understood and are the focus of this study. Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective study, including 4 US centers, including patients with histiocytic disorders treated with BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi), MEK inhibitor (MEKi), or combination BRAF/MEKi, and whose therapy was interrupted after ≥12 months of therapy following a best response of partial (PR) or complete response (CR). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression was performed to identify clinical and molecular factors that are associated with PFS. Results: 26 patients were included (median age 55 [range 12-72]; male 53.8%; Caucasian 69.2%). Most predominant histology was Erdheim-Chester Disease (ECD) (n=15, 57.5%), followed by mixed histiocytosis (n=5, 19.2%). Rosai-Dorfman Disease (RDD) (n=4, 15.4%), and Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH) (n=2, 7.7%). All had BRAF V600E analysis and 10 (38.5%) were positive. 19 patients underwent additional molecular testing; alternative mutations identified included MAP2K1/2 (n=6, 23.1%), NRAS (n=1, 3.8%), RAF1 (n=1, 3.8%), ASXL1 (n=1, 3.8%), and SRSF2 (n=1, 3.8%). Targeted therapy was given as frontline therapy (n=8, 30.8%) or in the relapsed refractory setting (n=18, 69.2%) with median 1 prior line of therapy (range 0-7). Targeted therapies include BRAFi (n=5, 19.2%; 2 dabrafenib, 3 vemurafenib), MEKi (n=17, 65.4%; 14 cobimetinib, 3 trametinib), and BRAF/MEKi (n=4, 15.4%; 3 dabrafenib/trametinib, 1 vemurafenib/cobimetinib). PR and CR occurred in 8 (30.8%) and 18 (69.2%) patients, respectively. The median duration of treatment was 32 months (range 13-60) (12-24 months: 9 [34.6%]; 24-36 months: 7 [26.9%]; >36 months: 10 [38.5%]). Median time from initiation of targeted therapy to best response was 6 months (<6 months: 14 [53.8%]; 6-12 months: 5 [19.2%]; >12 months: 7 [26.9%]). Median duration from best response to drug discontinuation was 19 months (12-24 months: 14 [53.8%]; 24-36 months: 7 [26.9%]; >36 months: 5[19.2%]). Reasons for drug discontinuation include toxicity (n=8, 30.8%), patient preference (n=13, 50.0%), cost prohibition (n=1, 3.8%), and other critical medical conditions (n= 4,15.4%). Eleven patients (42.3%) experienced disease progression after discontinuation of targeted therapy, 5 patients progressed within 6 months. Systemic and CNS progression were captured by PET/CT and MRI brain, respectively. At median follow-up of 33.0 months (95%CI 24.3-47.1), median PFS, defined by time from targeted therapy discontinuation to progression or death, was 29 months (95% confidence interval [CI] not estimable). Median OS was not reached. In Cox regression model, BRAF V600E mutation (hazard ratio [HR] 4.16, 95% CI 1.10-15.70, p 0.036) and CNS involvement (HR 4.64, 95% CI 1.21-17.67, p 0.025) were associated with inferior PFS. MEKi containing regimen trended toward improved PFS (HR 0.35, 95%CI 0.10-1.21, p 0.097). There was no difference in PFS when assessing demographics, histology, prior therapies, best response to targeted therapy, treatment duration, or time from best response to discontinuation. Of the 11 patients with progression, 9 were re-challenged with targeted therapy (7 switched class), 2 did not receive next line therapy (1 transitioned to hospice and passed from progression, 1 has pending evaluation for next line therapy). Of 6 with response assessments, all recaptured response (1 CR, 5 PR), and none had progressed by data cutoff. Conclusions: In patients with histiocytic neoplasm and prior durable response to targeted therapy, ~40% experienced disease progression after treatment discontinuation. BRAF V600E mutation and CNS disease are associated with inferior PFS, suggesting these subgroups may not be appropriate for limited duration of treatment. Novel approaches are needed in these high-risk patients.

Abstract Introduction: HMA monotherapy (HMAm) continues to be the standard of care for HR-MDS. While the addition of VEN to azacitidine (AZA) improved overall survival (OS) and complete remission (CR) rates among older pts with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) over AZA monotherapy, the recently completed phase III VERONA trial of AZA+/-VEN in HR-MDS failed to show an OS benefit for AZA/VEN over AZA monotherapy. Using the icMDS VALIDATE database, we compared outcomes of pts with HR-MDS treated with HMA or HMA/VEN as frontline therapy. Methods: The icMDS VALIDATE database includes over 4000 adult MDS pts who received HMA-based therapy from 32 international centers in 9 countries. For this analysis, we included pts with HR-MDS defined by International Prognostic Scoring System [IPSS] ≥1.5 or IPSS-revised [IPSS-R] ≥4 (at diagnosis or HMA initiation) and treated with HMAm or HMA/VEN as frontline therapy for HR-MDS. We assessed responses based on IWG 2023 criteria (Zeidan A et al, Blood 2023). Composite complete remission (cCR) was defined as CR+CRbi+CRuni+CRh+CRequivalent. We calculated OS from time of HMA initiation to date of death from any cause. Pts lost to follow-up were censored at the date they were last known to be alive. We used Kaplan-Meier methods to calculate OS and compared OS between different groups using the log-rank test. We used Cox and logistic regression models to adjust for baseline prognostic variables as appropriate. The study was funded by an independent grant from Abbvie. Results: A total of 1907 pts met eligibility and were included (1552 AZA, 221 decitabine, 134 HMA+VEN). 479 pts subsequently underwent allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT; 430 after HMAm [32.6%]; 49 after HMA/VEN [37.1%]). Our cohort was enriched for pts with adverse disease characteristics including complex karyotype (33.6%) and TP53 mutations (28.7%). Compared to pts treated with HMA/VEN, pts treated with HMAm were more likely to be male (p=0.012), have lower baseline platelet counts (p=0.037), peripheral blood (PB) blasts (p=0.004), or bone marrow blasts (p<0.001), and were less likely to have very high risk IPSS-M (p<0.001), TP53 mutations (p<0.001), or complex karyotype (p=0.020). In unadjusted analyses, the rate of cCR was significantly lower in HMAm treated pts compared to HMA/VEN treated pts (27.7% vs. 48.8%, p<0.001). However, CR rate was not significantly different (11.7% vs. 17.1% for HMAm and HMA/VEN, respectively, p=0.22). After adjusting for age, sex, and IPSS-M, pts treated with HMA/VEN were more likely to achieve cCR compared to HMAm with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.49 (95% CI: 1.56-3.96, p<0.001). When separated by TP53 mutation status, the OR for cCR for HMA/VEN vs HMAm was 4.17 (95%CI: 2.14-8.31; p<0.001) and 1.27 (95%CI: 0.54-2.86; p=0.57) for TP53 wild-type and TP53-mutant pts, respectively. In unadjusted analyses, median OS was 17.4 months for HMAm and 19.6 months for HMA+VEN, and OS did not differ significantly by treatment type (p=0.33). For HMAm treated pts, the OS rates at year 1, 2, 3 were 0.65 (95%CI: 0.63-0.67), 0.38 (95%CI: 0.36-0.40), and 0.27 (95%CI: 0.25-0.29), respectively. For HMA/VEN treated pts, the OS rates at year 1, 2, 3 were 0.64 (95%CI: 0.56-0.73), 0.45 (95%CI: 0.36-0.56), and 0.37 (95%CI: 0.27-0.51), respectively. In a multivariate analysis adjusting for age, sex, PB blast, IPSS-M and allo-SCT as a time-varying covariate, treatment with HMA/VEN vs HMAm did not significantly influence OS (hazard ratio (HR) of OS for HMA/VEN vs HMAm: 0.89, 95%CI: 0.69-1.13, p=0.33). When stratified by TP53 mutation status, HR of HMA/VEN vs. HMAm was favorable for TP53 wild-type (HR: 0.47; 95%CI: 0.29-0.74) but not TP53-mutant pts (HR=0.96; 95%CI: 0.66-1.41). Adjusting for other variables in the model, HR for pts who underwent vs. those who did not undergo allo-SCT were 0.65 (95% CI: 0.49-0.85) and 0.36 (95%CI: 0.24-0.53) in TP53 wild-type and mutant patients, respectively. Conclusion: In this large, international retrospective analysis from the icMDS VALIDATE database, HMA/VEN was associated with higher cCR rates—but not CR rates—compared to HMAm among pts with HR-MDS, though we observed no significant differences in OS. In our analysis, clinical benefit from the addition of VEN was most clear in TP53 wild-type pts, and allo-SCT was associated with improved OS regardless of baseline TP53 status. Our analysis was limited by the relatively small number of HMA/VEN-treated pts and heterogeneous real-world treatment patterns.

Abstract Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is marked by wide variability in clinical phenotypes and severity due to environmental, clinical, and genetic factors. Variants in iron-regulatory genes are well described modifiers of clinical presentation in different diseases, but their role in modulating SCD phenotype has been sparsely studied in African populations. In this cross-sectional study, we investigated the role of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in iron-regulatory genes in SCD severity and lifetime transfusion(Tx) requirement. Methods: The study was approved by the institutional review board of Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria. Clinical data were abstracted from medical records and patient interviews using a structured questionnaire. Participants were recruited in steady state and were stratified according to the severity score previously described by Shah et al. (Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2020;12:625). Biochemical analyses included serum transferrin and serum iron; transferrin saturation (TS) was calculated. Genotyping was performed using the Axiom Precision Medicine Research Array (PMRA; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Seventy-one single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes implicated in iron metabolism were analyzed, including SLC40A1 (ferroportin), HFE (homeostatic iron regulator), HJV (hemojuvelin), HAMP (hepcidin), and TFR2 (transferrin receptor 2). SNPs whose variants were not represented in this cohort, including HFE C282Y and H63D, were excluded. Ensembl and NCBI databases were used to describe the wild-type (WT)/variant alleles and gene consequences. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze binary outcomes, and age-adjusted linear regression for Tx burden. Odds ratios (OR) and regression coefficients (β) were estimated using the WT as the reference. Multiple-testing correction was performed as necessary. Statistical analyses were conducted in R version 4.4.1, with p<0.05 considered significant. Results: We included 60 genotyped, confirmed HbSS patients; median age was 22 years (range: 18–43), 22 (37.3%) were female, 42 (70.0%) were classified as mild severity (Class I), 5 (8.0%) as Class II, and 13 (22.0%) as severe (Class III). Twenty-seven (45.0%) had never received a blood Tx, while 33 (55.0%) had received Tx, median of 2units (range: 1-10). On univariate analysis (UVA), five SNPs (rs10218795, rs10188230, rs114250626, rs4287798, and rs634349) were significantly associated with severe phenotype; three of these remained significant on multivariable analysis (MVA). Two were associated with higher odds of severe phenotype: rs10177654 (OR = 28.9, 95% CI: 3.0–100.0, p = 0.03) and rs10218795 (OR = 15.0, 95% CI: 2.4–327.0, p<0.01), while rs10188230 was associated with lower odds (OR = 0.03, 95% CI: 0.008–0.28, p<0.01). Results remained consistent after adjusting for age. For lifetime transfusion burden, both UVA and MVA identified two significant SNPs: rs4667289, associated with higher transfusion burden (β = 2.6, 95% CI: 0.04–5.2, p = 0.047) and rs11568344, associated with lower transfusion burden (β = –1.8, 95% CI: –3.5 to –0.36, p = 0.02). Genotype distributions for the five significant SNPs were as follows: rs10177654 (SLC40A1, transcription factor binding site), TT(WT) 12 (20.3%), TC 30 (50.8%), CC 17 (28.8%); rs10188230 (SLC40A1, intron variant), TT (WT) 32 (54.2%), TC 22 (37.3%), CC 5 (8.5%); rs10218795 (HJV, intron variant), CC (WT) 22 (37.3%), TC 29 (49.2%), TT 8 (13.6%); rs4667289 (SLC40A1 proximal intergenic), GG (WT) 46 (78.0%), AG 10 (16.9%), AA 3 (5.1%); rs11568344 (SLC40A1 splice region variant), GG (WT) 47 (79.7%), AG 9 (15.3%), AA 3 (5.1%). Compared with the homozygous WT, patients with rs10188230 had a lower median TS (21.65% vs. 43.3%, p = 0.04), while those with rs4667289 had a higher median TS (83% vs. 31%, p<0.01). When adjusted for age and lifetime Tx, rs4667289 remained significant (β = 47.8, 95% CI 3.6-82.8, p = 0.03). No other SNPs showed association with TS. Conclusion: We present novel genetic data on iron-regulatory variants in African patients with sickle cell disease, identifying SNPs in SLC40A1 and HJV associated with disease severity. Most of these are yet to be fully described in the literature, and their intronic locations suggest possible regulatory roles. We hope to further validate these findings in larger cohorts and through functional studies to clarify their impact on iron metabolism and clinical significance.

Abstract Introduction: The introduction of the Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor acalabrutinib combined with bendamustine and rituximab (ABR) as first-line (1L) therapy for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) in older patients (pts) is reshaping the approach to treatment sequencing in this disease. The primary analysis of the phase 3 ECHO trial (NCT02972840) with data cutoff Feb 15, 2024 (median time on study 44.9 mo) demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS) with ABR vs placebo plus BR (PBR; hazard ratio [HR] 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57–0.94; P=0.0160) in pts ≥65 y with treatment-naive (TN) MCL. Here we present updated results after 50 mo of follow-up, including time to next treatment 2 (TTNT2; ie, initiation of third-line [3L] therapy). Methods: Pts aged ≥65 y with TN MCL and ECOG performance status ≤2 were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive ABR or PBR. Randomization was stratified according to geographic region and simplified MIPI score. BR was given for 6 cycles followed by rituximab maintenance for 2 y in pts achieving a partial or complete response (CR). Acalabrutinib (100 mg twice daily) or placebo was administered at study start until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. Crossover to acalabrutinib was permitted at PD. The primary endpoint was PFS per independent review committee. TTNT2, which was used as a surrogate for PFS2 (time from initial treatment to second disease progression), was defined as time from randomization to second subsequent (3L) antilymphoma therapy after discontinuation of randomized treatment or death. Results: In total, 299 pts were randomized to each arm; median age was 71 y. At data cutoff (February 15, 2025), median (range) time on study was 51.86 (0.03–93.04) mo and median (range) follow-up through reverse Kaplan-Meier method for PFS was 60.8 (0–88.5) mo. Median TTNT2 was not reached (NR) in the ABR arm and 73.8 mo in the PBR arm, establishing a 24% reduction in the risk of initiating 3L therapy or death with ABR vs PBR (stratified HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.59–0.98). In total, 33 (11.0%) and 100 (33.4%) pts received second-line [2L] treatment (median time to 2L therapy, 26.3 vs 19.6 mo) and 10 (3.3%) and 37 (12.4%) received 3L treatment in the ABR and PBR arms, respectively. When COVID-19 deaths were censored (in alignment with prespecified analyses from the primary study), the HR further improved (stratified HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.50–0.89; median TTNT2 NR in any arm). In total, 71.6% and 78.3% of pts discontinued acalabrutinib and placebo, respectively; the most common reasons (>5%) for discontinuation were adverse events (AEs; 44.5%, ABR; 32.4%, PBR) and objective PD (12.7%, ABR; 30.8%, PBR). Median PFS was 72.5 and 47.8 mo in the ABR and PBR arms, respectively (stratified HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.53–0.87; P=0.002). In total, 108 (36.1%) and 116 (38.8%) pts in each arm died; median overall survival (OS) was NR in both arms (stratified HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.67–1.13), with a 36-mo OS rate of 73.8% with ABR vs 68.3% with PBR. With 1 additional year of follow-up since the primary analysis, rates of grade ≥3 AEs and serious AEs in the ABR arm were comparable to previously reported rates, indicating that prolonged acalabrutinib exposure does not appear to result in cumulative toxicities. Three new cases of grade 3/4 neutropenia were reported, with no marked changes in the rates of grade ≥3 or serious infections. The rate of grade ≥3 cardiac events remained consistent with the primary analysis. In the ABR arm, 1 new case of grade 3/4 atrial fibrillation and 1 new case of grade 3/4 hypertension were reported. Rates of thrombocytopenia, major hemorrhage, and ventricular tachyarrhythmia remain unchanged. Conclusion: In this updated analysis of the ECHO trial, despite crossover to acalabrutinib being permitted in the PBR arm, fewer pts in the ABR arm were in need of subsequent treatment (2L and 3L), with longer TTNT2 in the ABR arm. These results suggest that 1L treatment with ABR provides a 24% reduction in risk of initiating 3L therapies or death. Further follow-up has demonstrated that ABR offers improved efficacy (ie, PFS) vs PBR, with no long-term safety concerns with acalabrutinib maintenance. The updated safety findings further support the favorable benefit–risk profile of acalabrutinib in TN MCL. Altogether, these data support the potential of acalabrutinib in combination with BR as 1L treatment, rather than in later lines, to modify long-term treatment outcomes in pts with TN MCL.

Abstract Introduction TP53MT are associated with poor outcomes in MDS, especially in the context of biallelic MT. We have previously reported on outcomes of pts with HR-MDS with TP53MT who received HMA in the VALIDATE dataset (Kewan T et al, ASH 2023). Here we provide expanded analyses focusing on outcomes post allo-HCT, and we explore the prognostic significance of different classification methods for biallelic TP53MT. Methods The VALIDATE database includes 4,732 pts with MDS who received HMA-based frontline therapy from 32 international centers in 9 countries. For this study, only pts with HR-MDS with molecular data at time of diagnosis were included. Biallelic TP53MT status was assessed using three classification schemes: WHO 2022, ICC 2022, and a VAF-based Cleveland Clinic Foundation (CCF) method.1TP53 copy neutral loss of heterozygosity (CN-LOH) was evaluable in 386 pts (118 had TP53MT). Treatment responses were evaluated using IWG 2023 criteria (Zeidan A et al, Blood 2023). Composite complete remission (cCR) was defined as CR+CRbi+CRuni+CRh+CRequivalent. We calculated OS from time of HMA initiation to date of death or last follow up. Unsupervised clustering (MOSAIC framework) was applied to identify molecular subgroups within the TP53MT cohort. The study was funded by an independent grant from Abbvie. Results A total of 1,485 pts were included. Median age was 69 years (IQR: 62–76), with 66% male pts. Median bone marrow blast was 7%, and 28% had a complex karyotype. Treatment regimens included azacitidine (68%), decitabine (15%), HMA/Venetoclax (8%), and other HMA combinations (9%); 34% underwent allo-HCT. Overall, 392 (26%) had TP53MT with 430 TP53 mutations (missense: 316; truncating: 89). Biallelic TP53MT % varied by classification: 72% (WHO), 84% (ICC), and 85% (CCF). Compared to TP53 wild-type (TP53WT) pts, pts with TP53MT had worse OS (median: 11.5 vs. 23.9 months [mo], p< 0.001), were younger (68 vs. 70 years, p=0.039), and had lower counts at diagnosis. Complex karyotype (81% vs. 14%) and chromosomal abnormalities were more frequent in TP53MT pts. Pts with TP53MT also had fewer co-mutations in other genes. Response to HMA was evaluable in 1,094 pts: cCR and CR were 32% and 13%, respectively. TP53MT pts had higher cCR (39% vs. 29%, p=0.001) than TP53WT, but similar CR rates (16% vs. 12%, p=0.093). According to WHO 2022, biallelic TP53MT had higher CR rates than monoallelic TP53MT (18% vs. 8%, p=0.03), but similar cCR. ICC and CCF classifications did not differentiate response rates. Median OS did not differ by TP53MT allelic status using WHO or ICC definitions. However, using the CCF method, pts with biallelic TP53MT had shorter OS than monoallelic TP53MT (10.4 vs. 17.2 mo, p=0.038). In multivariable models adjusted for age, gender, and allo-HCT, only the CCF-defined biallelic TP53MT group had significantly worse OS (HR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.1–2.4). TP53MT pts undergoing allo-HCT had improved OS regardless of allelic status. Median OS for TP53MT pts with allo-HCT was 18.9 vs. 9.2 mo without all-HCT. This benefit was observed across WHO, ICC, and CCF classifications. However, a TP53MT VAF ≥19% predicted worse OS even post allo-HCT (14.6 vs. 47.1 mo, p<0.001). At 1 year, the survival rate was 78% (95%CI: 69-89%) in TP53MT pts who underwent allo-HCT and had cCR vs. 68% (95%CI: 55-84%) in pts who did not have cCR. However, 1 year survival rate was significantly higher for pts with TP53MT who did not have allo-HCT and achieved cCR (60%, 95%CI: 48-76%) vs. no cCR (26%, 95%CI: 20-35%). Unsupervised clustering of 335 TP53MT pts identified 9 molecular clusters (MCs). MC2, characterized by low TP53MT VAF (median 17%), fewer co-mutations, and frequent del17p, was associated with significantly improved OS (17.9 mo) and predicted favorable outcome (HR for death: 0.6; 95% CI: 0.4–0.8). Other clusters were enriched for adverse features (e.g., high VAF, multi-hit TP53MT).Conclusions The CCF method appears to best classify biallelic TP53MT pts with worse survival in the absence of accurate assessment of LOH status. Treatment response per IWG 2023 for TP53MT pts was associated with OS only in non-transplanted pts. Allo-HCT improved survival across TP53MT subsets, but TP53 VAF ≥19% at diagnosis remained a strong negative prognostic factor. Integrative clustering revealed a less aggresive molecular subset among TP53MT pts, suggesting refined risk stratification may guide therapy in this high-risk population. Ref: 1.Bahaj et al. J Hematol Oncol 2023.

Abstract Introduction: Marrow complete remission (mCR) in 2006 IWG criteria for MDS (Cheson B et al, Blood 2006) reflects achieving bone marrow (BM) blast percentage below 5% but is frequently not associated with meaningful count recovery. While mCR + hematologic improvement (HI) does reflect wide ranges of count improvement or transfusion reductions, HI is difficult to measure accurately in routine clinical practice. The 2023 International Working Group (IWG) response criteria (Zeidan A et al, Blood 2023) eliminated the mCR category without meaningful count recovery and reclassified mCR associated with meaningful count recovery into specific “less-than-CR” categories. Still, many clinical trials continue to use mCR as a secondary efficacy endpoint or as a part of overall response rate (ORR). Within the icMDS VALIDATE database, we assessed the association of mCR with OS in hypomethylating agent (HMA)-treated higher risk (HR)-MDS patients among both (1) transplanted and (2) non-transplanted patients. Methods We included patients with HR-MDS (defined as IPSS ≥1.5 and/or IPSS-R >3.5) who received HMA-based therapies from the international icMDS VALIDATE dataset. We evaluated the best response by IWG 2006 criteria into CR, mCR, or no CR/mCR. We then reclassified patients with mCR per IWG 2023 criteria into either (A) having achieved a composite CR (cCR) defined as CR + CR equivalent (CRequ) + CR with bilineage count recovery (CRbi) + CR with unilineage count recovery (CRuni) + CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) or (B) not having achieved cCR (no cCR). OS was calculated from time of HMA initiation to date of death or last follow-up by using 6-month landmark analyses. We used Kaplan-Meier methods to estimate OS, and the Log-rank test to compare OS. VALIDATE is supported by an independent grant from AbbVie. Results A total of1049 patients met eligibility.Median age of patients was 69 (range 21-95), 64% were men. While 61% received azacitidine, 17% received decitabine, and 22% received HMA-based combination therapy. In total, 37% underwent subsequent allogenic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Based on IWG 2006 criteria, 17%, 33%, and 50% achieved CR, mCR, and no CR/mCR as their best response, respectively. Patients achieving CR had superior median OS (25 months, 95% CI: 21-34 months) compared to those with mCR (16 months, 95% CI: 13-18 months; p=0.038) and no CR/mCR (15 months, 95% CI: 12-17 months; p=0.001). In patients who received a subsequent allo-HCT, the median OS for patients with mCR (30 months, 95% CI: 21-54 months; 1 year OS: 71%, 2 year OS: 55%) did not significantly differ compared to patients with CR (59 months, 95% CI: 25 months-not reached, p=0.80; 1 year OS: 73%, 2 year OS 62%) and patients with no CR/mCR (32 months, 95% CI: 21-45 months, p=0.46; 1 year OS: 69%, 2 year OS 54%). In contrast, in patients treated with HMA therapy alone without subsequent allo-HCT, median OS for patients with mCR (11 months, 95% CI: 9-15 months; 1 year OS: 46%, 2 year OS: 23%) did not significantly differ compared to patients with no CR/mCR (11 months, 95% CI: 9-14 months, p=0.85; 1 year OS: 47%, 2 year OS: 22%) but was significantly shorter compared to patients with CR (20 months, 95% CI: 17-28 months, p<0.001; 1 year OS: 69%, 2 year OS: 46%). Patients with mCR by IWG 2006 (N=347) were reclassified per IWG 2023 into having either achieved a cCR (N=219, 63%) or no cCR (N=128, 37%). Specifically, patients with mCR were reclassified per IWG 2023 into CR (4.9%), CRequ (0.6%), CRbi (26.8%), CRuni (29.4%), CRh (1.4%), PR (0%), HI (10%), no response (21.9%) and PD (4.9%). Patients with mCR who were reclassified into cCR had an improved median OS (16 months, 95% CI: 15-26 months; 1 year OS: 62%; 2 year OS: 43%) compared to patients reclassified into no cCR per IWG 2023 (13 months, 95% CI: 11-17 months, p=0.023; 1 year OS: 52%; 2 year OS: 31%). Conclusions Using the large icMDS VALIDATE dataset, we found that achievement of mCR by 2006 IWG criteria was not associated with improved OS compared to patients who did not achieve CR/mCR. Reclassification of mCR using IWG 2023 highlights the heterogeneity within the mCR group and suggests that IWG 2023 criteria stratifies outcomes in patients previously labeled as mCR by IWG 2006. IWG 2023 should be the standard used for ORR assessment in all future clinical trials involving patients with HR-MDS.