Citations

Abstract Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma; data indicate that blastoid and pleomorphic variants have a poor prognosis. We report characteristics and outcomes of patients with blastoid/pleomorphic variants of MCL. We retrospectively studied adults with newly diagnosed MCL treated from 2000 to 2015. Primary objectives were to describe progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary objectives included characterization of patient characteristics and treatments. Of the 1029 patients with MCL studied, a total of 207 neoplasms were blastoid or pleomorphic variants. Median follow-up period was 82 months (range, 0.1-174 months); median PFS was 38 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 28-66) and OS was 68 months (95% CI, 45-96). Factors associated with PFS were receipt of consolidative autologous hematopoietic transplantation (auto-HCT; hazard ratio [HR], 0.52; 95% CI, 0.31-0.80; P < .05), MCL International Prognostic Index (MIPI) intermediate (HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.2-4.3; P < .02) and high (HR, 3.8; 95% CI, 2.0-7.4; P < .01) scores, and complete response to induction (HR, 0.29 (95% CI, 0.17-0.51). Receipt of auto-HCT was not associated with OS (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.41-1.16; P = .16) but was associated with MIPI intermediate (HR, 5.7; 95% CI, 2.5-13.2; P < .01) and high (HR, 10.8; 95% CI, 4.7-24.9; P < .01) scores. We report outcomes in a large cohort of patients with blastoid/pleomorphic variant MCL. For eligible patients, receipt of auto-HCT after induction was associated with improved PFS but not OS. Higher MIPI score and auto-HCT ineligibility were associated with worse survival.

The NCCN Guidelines for Prostate Cancer provide a framework on which to base decisions regarding the workup of patients with prostate cancer, risk stratification and management of localized disease, post-treatment monitoring, and treatment of recurrence and advanced disease. The Guidelines sections included in this article focus on the management of metastatic castration-sensitive disease, nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), and metastatic CRPC (mCRPC). Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with treatment intensification is strongly recommended for patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. For patients with nonmetastatic CRPC, ADT is continued with or without the addition of certain secondary hormone therapies depending on prostate-specific antigen doubling time. In the mCRPC setting, ADT is continued with the sequential addition of certain secondary hormone therapies, chemotherapies, immunotherapies, radiopharmaceuticals, and/or targeted therapies. The NCCN Prostate Cancer Panel emphasizes a shared decision-making approach in all disease settings based on patient preferences, prior treatment exposures, the presence or absence of visceral disease, symptoms, and potential side effects.

Abstract Disclosure: J.P. Frias: Advisory Board Member; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. Consulting Fee; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. Other; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. R.J. Auchus: Consulting Fee; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. Grant Recipient; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. Speaker; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. Other; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. I. Bancos: None. L. Blonde: Advisory Board Member; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. Other; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. R.S. Busch: Consulting Fee; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. Speaker; Self; Bayer, Inc., Novo Nordisk, Amgen Inc, Eli Lilly & Company, AstraZeneca. J.B. Buse: Advisory Board Member; Self; AstraZeneca, Bayer, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly & Company, Jansen Pharmaceuticals, Mannkind Corporation, Sanofi, Alkahest, Altimmune, Anji, Biomea Fusion Inc, CeQur, Cirius Therapeutics Inc, GentiBio, Glycadia, Glyscend, Mellitus Health, Moderna, Pendulum Therapeutics, Praetego, Stability Health, Valo, Zealand Pharma. Consulting Fee; Self; AstraZeneca, Bayer, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly & Company, Janssen, Mannkind Corporation, Sanofi, Alkahest, Altimmune, Anji, Biomea Fusion Inc, CeQur, Cirius Therapeutics Inc, Dasman Diabetes Center (Kuwait), Fortress Biotech, GentiBio, Glycadia, Glyscend, Mediflix, Medscape, Mellitus Health, Moderna, Pendulum Therapeutics, Praetego, ReachMD, Stability Health, Valo, Zealand Pharma. Grant Recipient; Self; Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, VTV Therapeutics, Nanotype, NIH, NovaTarg, Tolerion, Dexcom. Stock Owner; Self; Glyscend, Mellitus Health, Pendulum Therapeutics, PhaseBio, Praetego, Stability Health. Other; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly & Company, Novo Nordisk, Dasman Diabetes Institute, Zealand, Association for Clinical and Translational Science. R.A. DeFronzo: None. J.W. Findling: Advisory Board Member; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. Consulting Fee; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. V. Fonseca: Advisory Board Member; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. Consulting Fee; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. O. Hamidi: Advisory Board Member; Self; Corcept Therapeutics, Lantheus, Recordati Rare Diseases, Neurocrine Biosciences, Amryt, Novo Nordisk, Strongbridge. Consulting Fee; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. Y. Handelsman: Consulting Fee; Self; Amgen Inc, Applied Therapeutic, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim, Corcept Therapeutics, Esperion, Mannkind Corporation, Merck, Pfizer, Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Vertis. Grant Recipient; Self; Amgen Inc, Applied Therapeutic, Ionis Pharmaceuticals Inc., Regor. Speaker; Self; AstraZeneca, Bayer, Inc., Esperion, Novo Nordisk, Vertis, Amarin. R.E. Pratley: Consulting Fee; Self; Bayer, Inc., Corcept Therapeutics, Gasherbrum Bio, Inc, Hanmi, Hengrui (USA) Ltd, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Inc., Rivus Pharmaceuticals Inc, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Sanofi, Scohia Pharma Inc, Dexcom. Grant Recipient; Self; Hanmi, Metavention, Novo Nordisk, Poxel SA. Speaker; Self; Novo Nordisk. J. Rosenstock: Advisory Board Member; Self; Applied Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly & Company, Hanmi, Novo Nordisk, Oramed, Sanofi, Structure Therapeutics, Zealand. Consulting Fee; Self; Applied Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly & Company, Hanmi, Novo Nordisk, Oramed, Sanofi, Structure Therapeutics, Zealand. Grant Recipient; Self; Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly & Company, Hanmi, Merck, Oramed, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Inc., Sanofi. I. Tudor: Employee; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. Stock Owner; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. A.G. Moraitis: Employee; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. D. Einhorn: Employee; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. Studies suggest that the prevalence of hypercortisolism in persons with difficult-to-control type 2 diabetes (T2D) is higher than is currently appreciated. A recently published meta-analysis suggests that the prevalence of hypercortisolism is higher in persons with T2D who require a greater number of antihyperglycemic agents and/or who have more comorbidities. To better understand the prevalence and whether treatment of hypercortisolism may result in better control of diabetes and other hypercortisolism-associated comorbidities, we describe a 2-part phase 4 study in adults with difficult-to-control T2D (HbA1c 7.5-11.5%) despite receiving multiple antihyperglycemic agents. The study will be conducted at approximately 30 sites in the United States. In Part 1, approximately 1000 persons with difficult-to-control T2D will be screened with a 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test. Those responding with serum cortisol >1.8 µg/dL (50 nmol/L) and dexamethasone levels ≥140 ng/dL (3.6 nmol/L) will have adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, and cortisol measured in fasting blood samples obtained between 7-9 AM and a non-contrast adrenal computed tomography scan. Patients who may have ACTH-dependent hypercortisolism will be discontinued from the study and referred for further evaluation. The primary study endpoint is determining the prevalence of ACTH-independent hypercortisolism and will be evaluated in Part 1. Patients identified to have ACTH-independent hypercortisolism will advance to Part 2, a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment with the glucocorticoid receptor antagonist mifepristone. Patients will be randomized 2:1 to mifepristone or placebo, stratified by the presence or absence of adrenal adenomas on CT, and receive treatment for 24 weeks. The mifepristone dose will be 300 mg once daily for 4 weeks, then increased to 600 mg daily for 20 weeks based on clinical assessment of tolerability and degree of improvement. There will be an option to increase to mifepristone 900 mg. Placebo will be titrated accordingly from 1 up to 3 tablets. Part 2 will assess the secondary endpoint of change in HbA1c from baseline to 24 weeks, as well as changes in hypercortisolism-related comorbidities (e.g., blood pressure, weight, waist circumference, quality of life). This will be the first prospective study to assess the prevalence of ACTH-independent hypercortisolism in persons with difficult-to-control T2D and the first prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to assess the potential benefits and safety of treatment with mifepristone in this patient population. Presentation: Friday, June 16, 2023

Abstract Background Adalimumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody developed against tumor necrosis factor (TNF), used for the treatment of autoimmune and chronic inflammatory diseases. Immunogenicity to this drug may lead to therapeutic failure. Various laboratory assays are used for measuring serum adalimumab and anti-drug antibodies (ADA) to adalimumab, for therapeutic monitoring and evaluation of clinical non-responsiveness. This study compared the performance of 2 clinical assays used by different reference laboratories. Methods In total, 120 residual clinical samples were tested at both laboratories. A sandwich ELISA for adalimumab detecting free drug and a bridging ELISA capable of detecting both free and bound ADA were performed at the Mayo Clinic. A functional cell-based reporter gene assay (RGA) was used at ARUP Laboratories for measuring bioactive serum drug concentrations, and neutralizing ADA. Results Seventy-eight samples had measurable concentrations of adalimumab by both methods and yielded a correlation coefficient r = 0.93, slope = 0.886, and intercept = 0.950. Overall agreement of 92.5% was observed between the assays, with most discrepant drug results being attributed to a higher positivity rate with ELISA (8/9). One outlier positive with RGA and negative with ELISA was confirmed by LC-MS/MS to be attributed to infliximab. Overall agreement of 79.2% was observed between the ADA assays. Differences in ADA results may be due to the bridging ELISA detecting total ADA (free, drug-bound, neutralizing, and non-neutralizing), while RGA detects free, neutralizing ADA only. Conclusions Although the assays are fundamentally different, the results show significant concordance between the clinically validated tests performed in different laboratories.

Abstract Previous studies implicated protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) as a synthetic lethal target for MTAP-deleted (MTAP del) cancers; however, the pharmacologic characterization of small-molecule inhibitors that recapitulate the synthetic lethal phenotype has not been described. MRTX1719 selectively inhibited PRMT5 in the presence of MTA, which is elevated in MTAP del cancers, and inhibited PRMT5-dependent activity and cell viability with >70-fold selecti­vity in HCT116 MTAP del compared with HCT116 MTAP wild-type (WT) cells. MRTX1719 demonstrated dose-dependent antitumor activity and inhibition of PRMT5-dependent SDMA modification in MTAP del tumors. In contrast, MRTX1719 demonstrated minimal effects on SDMA and viability in MTAP WT tumor xenografts or hematopoietic cells. MRTX1719 demonstrated marked antitumor activity across a panel of xenograft models at well-tolerated doses. Early signs of clinical activity were observed including objective responses in patients with MTAP del melanoma, gallbladder adenocarcinoma, mesothelioma, non–small cell lung cancer, and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors from the phase I/II study. Significance: PRMT5 was identified as a synthetic lethal target for MTAP del cancers; however, previous PRMT5 inhibitors do not selectively target this genotype. The differentiated binding mode of MRTX1719 leverages the elevated MTA in MTAP del cancers and represents a promising therapy for the ∼10% of patients with cancer with this biomarker. See related commentary by Mulvaney, p. 2310. This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 2293

Abstract Objectives We investigated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine safety in pregnant and breastfeeding women with autoimmune diseases (AID) in the COVID-19 Vaccination in Autoimmune Diseases (COVAD) study. Methods Delayed-onset (>7 days) vaccine-related adverse events (AE), disease flares and AID-related treatment modifications were analysed upon diagnosis of AID vs healthy controls (HC) and the pregnancy/breastfeeding status at the time of at least one dose of vaccine. Results Among the 9201 participants to the self-administered online survey, 6787 (73.8%) were women. Forty pregnant and 52 breastfeeding patients with AID were identified, of whom the majority had received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine (100% and 96.2%, respectively). AE were reported significantly more frequently in pregnant than in non-pregnant patients (overall AE 45% vs 26%, P = 0.01; minor AE 40% vs 25.9%, P = 0.03; major AE 17.5% vs 4.6%, P < 0.01), but no difference was found in comparison with pregnant HC. No difference was observed between breastfeeding patients and HC with respect to AE. Post-vaccination disease flares were reported by 17.5% of pregnant and 20% of breastfeeding patients, and by 18.3% of age- and disease-matched non-pregnant and non-breastfeeding patients (n = 262). All pregnant/breastfeeding patients who experienced a disease flare were managed with glucocorticoids; 28.6% and 20% of them required initiation or change in immunosuppressants, respectively. Conclusion This study provides reassuring insights into the safety of COVID-19 vaccines administered to women with AID during the gestational and post-partum periods, helping overcome hesitant attitudes, as the benefits for the mother and for the fetus by passive immunization appear to outweigh potential risks.

PURPOSEThere are numerous barriers to enrollment in oncology biomarker-driven studies.METHODSThe ELAINE 2 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04432454 ) is an open-label phase 2 study of lasofoxifene combined with abemaciclib in patients with advanced or metastatic estrogen receptor–positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative breast cancer with an ESR1 mutation. ELAINE 2 opened clinical sites by using a Traditional approach, which activated a site before patient identification, and the Tempus TIME Trial network, which opened a site only after identifying an eligible patient. This manuscript presents the operational metrics comparing the Traditional and TIME Trial site data.RESULTSThe study enrolled patients over 34 weeks and 16 sites (six Traditional and 10 TIME Trial) participated. Duration for full clinical trial agreement execution for Traditional sites and TIME Trial sites averaged 200.5 (range, 142-257) and 7.6 days (range, 2-14), respectively. Institutional review board approval time for Traditional sites and TIME Trial sites was 27.5 (range, 12-71) and 3.0 days (range, 1-12), respectively. Duration from study activation to first consent was 33.3 (range, 18-58) and 8.8 days (range, 1-35) for Traditional and TIME Trial sites, respectively. The first patient on study was at a TIME Trial site 115 days before a Traditional site and the first seven patients enrolled were at TIME Trial sites. Traditional sites consented 23 and enrolled 16 patients, while TIME Trial sites consented 16 and enrolled 13. The trial enrolled 29 patients in 8.5 months with the anticipated enrollment duration being 12-18 months.CONCLUSIONThe TIME Trial network opened earlier and enrolled the first study patients. These results demonstrate that the Just-in-TIME model, along with a Traditional model, can improve enrollment in biomarker-driven studies.

AbstractVulvar lichen planus (VLP) is a chronic inflammatory disease which adversely affects patients' quality of life. The pathogenesis of VLP is unknown although Th1 immune response has been implicated. We aimed to discover specific tissue‐based protein biomarkers in VLP compared to normal vulvar tissue (NVT), vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS) and oral lichen planus (OLP). We used laser capture microdissection‐liquid chromatography‐ tandem mass spectrometry to assess protein expression in fixed lesional mucosal specimens from patients with VLP (n = 5). We then compared proteomic profiles against those of NVT (n = 4), VLS (n = 5), OLP (n = 6) and normal oral mucosa (n = 5), previously published by our group. IL16, PTPRC, PTPRCAP, TAP1 and ITGB2 and were significantly overexpressed in VLP compared to NVT. Ingenuity pathway analysis identified antigen presentation and integrin signalling pathways. Proteins overexpressed in both VLP versus NVT and OLP versus NOM included IL16, PTPRC, PTPRCAP, TAP1, HLA‐DPB1, HLA‐B and HLA‐DRA. This proteomic analysis revealed several overexpressed proteins in VLP that relate to Th1 autoimmunity, including IL16. Overlapping pathways, including those involving IFNγ and Th1 signalling, were observed between VLP, VLS, and OLP.