Citations

AbstractBackgroundLenalidomide maintenance after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) results in superior progression‐free survival and overall survival. However, patients with high‐risk multiple myeloma (HRMM) do not derive the same survival benefit from lenalidomide maintenance compared with standard‐risk patients. The authors sought to determine the outcomes of bortezomib‐based maintenance compared with lenalidomide maintenance in patients with HRMM undergoing ASCT.MethodsIn total, the authors identified 503 patients with HRMM who were undergoing ASCT within 12 months of diagnosis from January 2013 to December 2018 after receiving triplet novel‐agent induction in the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database. HRMM was defined as deletion 17p, t(14;16), t(4;14), t(14;20), or chromosome 1q gain.ResultsThree hundred fifty‐seven patients (67%) received lenalidomide alone, and 146 (33%) received bortezomib‐based maintenance (with bortezomib alone in 58%). Patients in the bortezomib‐based maintenance group were more likely to harbor two or more high‐risk abnormalities and International Staging System stage III disease (30% vs. 22%; p = .01) compared with the lenalidomide group (24% vs. 15%; p < .01). Patients who were receiving lenalidomide maintenance had superior progression‐free survival at 2 years compared with those who were receiving either bortezomib monotherapy or combination therapy (75% vs. 63%; p = .009). Overall survival at 2 years was also superior in the lenalidomide group (93% vs. 84%; p = .001).ConclusionsNo superior outcomes were observed in patients with HRMM who received bortezomib monotherapy or (to a lesser extent) in those who received bortezomib in combination as maintenance compared with lenalidomide alone. Until prospective data from randomized clinical trials are available, post‐transplant therapy should be tailored to each patient with consideration for treating patients in clinical trials that target novel therapeutic strategies for HRMM, and lenalidomide should remain a cornerstone of treatment.

Importance Physical abuse is a common but preventable cause of long-term childhood morbidity and mortality. Despite the strong association between abuse in an index child and abuse in contact children, there is no guidance outlining how to screen the latter, significantly more vulnerable group, for abusive injuries. Consequently, the radiological assessment of contact children is often omitted, or variably performed, allowing occult injuries to go undetected and increasing the risk of further abuse. Objective To report an evidence-based and consensus-derived set of best practices for the radiological screening of contact children in the context of suspected child physical abuse. Evidence Review This consensus statement is supported by a systematic review of the literature and the clinical opinion of an internationally recognized group of 26 experts. The modified Delphi consensus process comprised 3 meetings of the International Consensus Group on Contact Screening in Suspected Child Physical Abuse held between February and June 2021. Findings Contacts are defined as the asymptomatic siblings, cohabiting children, or children under the same care as an index child with suspected child physical abuse. All contact children should undergo a thorough physical examination and a history elicited prior to imaging. Contact children younger than 12 months should have neuroimaging, the preferred modality for which is magnetic resonance imaging, and skeletal survey. Contact children aged 12 to 24 months should undergo skeletal survey. No routine imaging is indicated in asymptomatic children older than 24 months. Follow-up skeletal survey with limited views should be performed if abnormal or equivocal at presentation. Contacts with positive findings should be investigated as an index child. Conclusions and Relevance This Special Communication reports consensus recommendations for the radiological screening of contact children in the context of suspected child physical abuse, establishing a recognized baseline for the stringent evaluation of these at-risk children and providing clinicians with a more resilient platform from which to advocate for them.

Abstract Background: Data on the oncologic safety of omission of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in node positive (N+) patients who downstage to ypN0 with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is sparse. Additionally, there is no consensus on which axillary staging procedure should be used in this setting, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone or in combination with localization and retrieval of the clipped positive node, also known as targeted axillary dissection (TAD). Whether the reduction in the false negative rate observed with TAD translates into a significant reduction in the rate of axillary recurrence is unknown. We sought to evaluate oncologic outcomes after omission of ALND in a large, real-world cohort of breast cancer (BC) patients and to compare rates of axillary recurrence after SLNB with dual tracer mapping vs. TAD. Methods: Data were collected from 19 centers in the Oncoplastic Breast Consortium (OPBC) and EUBREAST networks. Patients with T1-4 biopsy-proven N1-3 BC who underwent NAC followed by axillary staging with either SLNB with dual tracer mapping or TAD and who were pathologically node negative (ypN0) were included. ypN0 was defined as the absence of any tumor or isolated tumor cells. Competing risk analysis was performed to assess the cumulative incidence rates of axillary recurrence, locoregional recurrence, and any invasive (locoregional or distant) recurrence. Two-year cumulative incidence rates were compared between TAD and SLNB using the Gray’s test. Type I error rate was set to 0.05 (α). Results: We included 785 patients (565 treated with SLNB and 220 with TAD) treated with NAC followed by surgery from 01/2014-12/2020. Median patient age was 50 years. The majority (57%) of patients had clinical T2 tumors, and 95% had N1 disease. Most (55%) were HER2+, and 21% were triple negative. Most patients (81%) received anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy regimens, but NAC regimens differed between patients treated with TAD and those treated with SLNB (Table 1). All patients with HER2+ tumors received anti HER2 therapy. Nodal radiotherapy was administered to 76% of patients, and was more common in patients who underwent TAD (82% TAD vs 74% SLNB, p=0.017). Breast pathologic complete response (ypT0/is) was more frequent among those patients that had TAD (80% TAD vs. 66% SLNB, p&lt; 0.001). TAD localization was with wire in 46%, radioactive seed in 40%, ultrasound in 5%, tattoo in 2%, and with a combination of these techniques in 7%. The clipped node was successfully retrieved in 94% of TAD cases. The median number of lymph nodes removed was lower in the TAD group compared to the SLNB group [3 (IQR 3-5) vs 4 IQR 3-5), p&lt; 0.001], as was the median number of sentinel lymph nodes [3 (IQR 2-4) vs 4 IQR 3-5), p&lt; 0.001] (Table 1). The 5-year rates of any axillary recurrence, locoregional recurrence, and any invasive recurrence in the entire cohort were 1.1% (95%CI 0.39-2.4%), 3.1% (95%CI 1.6-5.3%) and 10% (95%CI 7.6-13%), respectively. The two-year cumulative incidence of axillary recurrence did not differ between patients treated with TAD compared to SLNB (0% vs 0.9%, p=0.19). Conclusion: Early axillary recurrence after omission of ALND in patients who successfully downstage from N+ to ypN0 with NAC is a rare event following both SLNB or TAD, and was not significantly lower in TAD than SLNB. Although longer follow-up is needed to confirm these findings, the main advantage of TAD seems to be a reduction in the number of lymph nodes removed. Overall, these results support omission of ALND in patients who successfully downstage to node negative disease after NAC. Table 1: Clinicopathological Features of the Study Cohort, Stratified by Axillary Staging Technique Citation Format: Giacomo Montagna, Mary Mrdutt, Astrid Botty, Andrea V. Barrio, Varadan Sevilimedu, Judy C. Boughey, Tanya L. Hoskin, Laura H. Rosenberger, E Shelley Hwang, Abigail Ingham, Bärbel Papassotiropoulos, Bich Doan Nguyen-Sträuli, Christian Kurzeder, Danilo Diaz Aybar, Denise Vorburger, Dieter Michael Matlac, Edvin Ostapenko, Fabian Riedel, Florian Fitzal, Francesco Meani, Franziska Fick, Jacqueline Sagasser, Jörg Heil, Konstantin J. Dedes, Laszlo Romics, Maggie Banys-Paluchowski, Maria Del Rosario Cueva Perez, Marcelo Chavez Diaz, Martin Heidinger, Mathias K. Fehr, Mattea Reinisch, Nadia Maggi, Nicola Rocco, Nina Ditsch, Oreste Davide Gentilini, Regis Resende Paulinelli, Sebastian Sole Zarhi, Sherko Küemmel, Simona Bruzas, Simona Di Lascio, Tamara Parissenti, Uwe Güth, Valentina Ovalle, Christoph Tausch, Monica Morrow, Thorsten Kühn, Walter P. Weber. Oncological Outcomes Following Omission of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Node Positive Patients Downstaging To Node Negative with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: the OPBC-04/EUBREAST-06/OMA study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-02.

Abstract The overall survival (OS) has improved significantly in multiple myeloma (MM) over the last decade with the use of proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory drug-based combinations, followed by high-dose melphalan and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) and subsequent maintenance therapies in eligible newly diagnosed patients. However, clinical trials using auto-HSCT followed by lenalidomide maintenance have shown an increased risk of second primary malignancies (SPM), including second hematological malignancies (SHM). We evaluated the impact of SPM and SHM on progression-free survival (PFS) and OS in patients with MM after auto-HSCT using CIBMTR registry data. Adult patients with MM who underwent first auto-HSCT in the United States with melphalan conditioning regimen from 2011 to 2018 and received maintenance therapy were included (n = 3948). At a median follow-up of 37 months, 175 (4%) patients developed SPM, including 112 (64%) solid, 36 (20%) myeloid, 24 (14%) SHM, not otherwise specified, and 3 (2%) lymphoid malignancies. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that SPM and SHM were associated with an inferior PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.62, P &lt; .001 and HR 5.01, P &lt; .001, respectively) and OS (HR 3.85, P &lt; .001 and HR 8.13, P &lt; .001, respectively). In patients who developed SPM and SHM, MM remained the most frequent primary cause of death (42% vs 30% and 53% vs 18%, respectively). We conclude the development of SPM and SHM leads to a poor survival in patients with MM and is an important survivorship challenge. Given the median survival for MM continues to improve, continued vigilance is needed to assess the risks of SPM and SHM with maintenance therapy post–auto-HSCT.

AbstractBackground EM Talk is a communication skills training program designed to improve emergency providers’ serious illness conversational skills. Using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework, this study aims to assess the reach of EM Talk and its effectiveness. Methods EM Talk is one of the components of Primary Palliative Care for Emergency Medicine (EM) intervention. It consisted of one 4-hour training session during which professional actors used role-plays and active learning to train providers to deliver serious/bad news, express empathy, explore patients’ goals, and formulate care plans. After the training, emergency providers filled out an optional post-intervention survey, which included course reflections. Using a multi-method analytical approach, we analyzed the reach of the intervention quantitatively and the effectiveness of the intervention qualitatively using conceptual content analysis of open-ended responses. Results A total of 879 out of 1,029 (85%) EM providers across 33 emergency departments completed the EM Talk training, with the training rate ranging from 63–100%. From the 326 reflections, we identified meaning units across the thematic domains of improved knowledge, attitude, and practice. The main subthemes across the three domains were the acquisition of discussion tips and tricks, improved attitude toward engaging qualifying patients in serious illness (SI) conversations, and commitment to using these learned skills in clinical practice. Conclusion Effectively engaging qualifying patients in serious illness conversations requires appropriate communication skills. EM Talk has the potential to improve emergency providers’ knowledge, attitude, and practice of SI communication skills.Trial registration:NCT03424109

Abstract Lithium is regarded as the first-line treatment for bipolar disorder (BD), a severe and disabling mental disorder that affects about 1% of the population worldwide. Nevertheless, lithium is not consistently effective, with only 30% of patients showing a favorable response to treatment. To provide personalized treatment options for bipolar patients, it is essential to identify prediction biomarkers such as polygenic scores. In this study, we developed a polygenic score for lithium treatment response (Li+PGS) in patients with BD. To gain further insights into lithium's possible molecular mechanism of action, we performed a genome-wide gene-based analysis. Using polygenic score modeling, via methods incorporating Bayesian regression and continuous shrinkage priors, Li+PGS was developed in the International Consortium of Lithium Genetics cohort (ConLi+Gen: N=2,367) and replicated in the combined PsyCourse (N=89) and BipoLife (N=102) studies. The associations of Li+PGS and lithium treatment response — defined in a continuous ALDA scale and a categorical outcome (good response vs. poor response) were tested using regression models, each adjusted for the covariates: age, sex, and the first four genetic principal components. Statistical significance was determined at P<����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

Abstract Background Vedolizumab (VDZ) is a gut-selective humanised monoclonal anti-α4β7 integrin antibody for treatment of UC and CD. This post-authorization safety study (PASS) compared long-term safety in patients (pts) treated with VDZ or other biologics for UC or CD. Methods This was a prospective, observational, multicentre, cohort study in pts with UC or CD starting treatment with VDZ or other biologics (NCT02674308, EUPAS6469). Pts were biologic naïve (VDZ=35%, Other biologic=65%) or had prior exposure to biologics other than VDZ and were followed for up to 7 yrs. Pts were treated under usual standard of care as directed by their physician with no discontinuation from the study due to physician-directed treatment changes. The primary safety outcome was serious infections and was compared between cohorts using a Cox proportional hazards model adjusted by propensity score (with other biologics as reference). Secondary safety outcomes were adverse events (AE) of special interest (AESI) as listed in Tables 2 and 3. Results In total, 5208 patients were enrolled across 21 countries between Mar 2015 and Jul 2019. The full analysis set comprised 5008 pts (VDZ=2502; other biologic=2506) and mean (SD) study duration was 37.4 (14.1) months. Consistent with the observational nature of the study and the current standard of care, the baseline characteristics in the two cohorts were imbalanced (Table 1). The overall treatment-emergent Adverse Event (AE) rate was 61.3% (VDZ) and 59.5% (other biologic), with serious AEs in 27.5% (VDZ) and 25.7% (other biologic), respectively. In UC pts, the incidence rate (IR) of serious infections were: 0.014 (95% CI: 0.010, 0.019) [VDZ] and 0.015 (0.010, 0.023) [other biologic], with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.018 (0.931, 1.114), p=0.70 (Table 2). In CD pts, corresponding findings were 0.012 (95% CI: 0.008, 0.017) [VDZ] and 0.006 (95% CI: 0.004, 0.009) [other biologic] with HR of 1.035 (0.959, 1.117), p=0.38 (Table 3). The incidence of primary and secondary safety outcomes is reported in Table 2 for UC and Table 3 for CD. There were no safety issues relating to pregnancy and no cases of PML observed. There were 19 deaths in the VDZ cohort (1 case of pneumonia deemed as treatment-related); and 13 deaths in the other biologic cohort, 2 cases deemed treatment-related (one case septic shock and pneumonia; one case non-small cell lung cancer). Clinical outcomes and quality of life (QoL) measures were comparable between cohorts. Conclusion In this long-term, prospective, real-world observational study of a large multinational population under routine standard of care there was no new safety signal identified in relation to VDZ. Results are consistent with the known safety profile of VDZ.

255 Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, Twitter has been instrumental in accelerating knowledge dissemination and forging collaborations within the medical community and amongst patient advocates. Tweetchats within Twitter are scheduled conversations on a specific topic. In oncology, Tweetchats have been used by cancer advocates to spread awareness and for patient and caregiver education. A colorectal cancer (CRC) specific tweetchat did not previously exist. This abstract describes the creation, and experiences with a CRC specific tweetchat. Methods: The #CRCTrialsChat tweetchat was created by a patient advocate for colorectal cancer patients, caregivers and clinicians to meet and exchange clinical trial-related information. Two gastrointestinal (GI) medical oncologists and two radiation oncologists were enlisted as moderators. The topic for each session is chosen by the patient advocate, who creates an outline and divides the content, which is designed to last a one hour session. The idea is to create engaging, technical, but easy to understand content. Each moderator then works on the answers to their assigned section, which is edited to fit tweet character limit. Sessions may also have guest moderators with expertise on a specific topic. Through tweeting, moderators answer specific questions that come up during the session and later. Results: To date, we have had four sessions covering the following topics: Clinical trial basics, CRC Updates from ASCO22, ClinicalTrialFinders and BRAF-mutated tumors. The content created has been simple and engaging, the format has functioned smoothly, and the reach of #CRCTrialsChat has been steadily increasing. After the most recent session on BRAF in September 2022, the @CRCTrialsChat has 281 followers, 17K impressions and 14.6K profile visits, a reflection of its excellent content. From a clinician perspective, this is a great format to interact with colleagues, discuss enrolling trials and also become familiar with using Twitter. Conclusions: A CRC clinical trial focused tweetchat is an engaging way to deliver trial-related content to an audience of clinicians, patients and caregivers. The current format appears to be an effective way to create and disseminate information. Future sessions will focus on ctDNA, molecular markers such as KRAS and HER2, and rectal cancer trials. Our hope is that #CRCTrialsChat will stimulate continued patient and clinician engagement, increase awareness of clinical trials, enhance trial participation and initiate patient-centric research and collaborations.