Citations

Introduction: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is thesecond leading cause of death globally, accounting for approximately 11% of alldeaths, long-term disability, and functional impairments in survivors. TheCOVID-19 pandemic has raised concerns about its impact on AIS patients. Aim: This study aimed to assess the outcomes,including mortality and severity of disability in AIS hospitalizations withCOVID-19. Methods: We performed a retrospective cross-sectionalanalysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS-2020) in adulthospitalizations for AIS to compare the outcomes [death & APRDRGseverity/disability] in COVID-19 patients using ICD-10 codes. We performedweighted analyses using chi-square, unpaired t-test, and multivariate logisticregression models to evaluate COVID-19-associated poor outcomes amongst AISpatients. Results: Out of 504,460 AIS patients, 7,590 had AIStriggered by COVID-19. Amongst AIS hospitalizations, COVID-19 was more frequentin age group >65 year old 63.2%, male 52.6%, White race (51.4%), patientwith Medicare (58.7%), median household income 0-25 percentile (33.6%), Southzone (43.4%), and hypertensives (83.7%). AIS patients with COVID-19 had ahigher mortality (10.93% vs 3.8%) and severe/extreme disability (93.21% vs37.43%) rates in comparison to patients without COVID-19. (p<0.0001) Inregression analysis COVID-19 was associated with 213% higher odds of mortality(aOR: 3.13, 95% CI: 2.90-3.38, p<0.0001, c:0.671) and higher odds of severe/extreme disability(26.85, 24.53-29.39, p<0.0001, c:0.686) compared to AIS patients withoutCOVID-19. Conclusion: These findings emphasize the substantialimpact of COVID-19 on AIS patients by elevating mortality and risk of severedisability compared to their counterparts. Efforts should be directed towards earlyidentification of stroke population that is at higher risk ofCOVID-19-associated poor outcome and prompt management tomitigate the burden of the both diseases.

Background Up to one third of survivors of AKI that required dialysis (AKI-D) during hospitalization remain dialysis dependent at hospital discharge. Of these, 20%–60%, depending on the clinical setting, eventually recover enough kidney function to stop dialysis, and the remainder progress to ESKD. Methods To describe the challenges facing those still receiving dialysis on discharge, the AKINow Committee conducted a group discussion comprising 59 participants, including physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, pharmacists, and patients. The discussion was framed by a patient who described gaps in care delivery at different transition points and miscommunication between care team members and the patient. Results Group discussions collected patient perspectives of ( 1 ) being often scared and uncertain about what is happening to and around them and ( 2 ) the importance of effective and timely communication, a comfortable physical setting, and attentive and caring health care providers for a quality health care experience. Provider perspectives included ( 1 ) the recognition of the lack of evidence-based practices and quality indicators, the significant variability in current care models, and the uncertain reimbursement incentives focused on kidney recovery and ( 2 ) the urgency to address communication barriers among hospital providers and outpatient facilities. Conclusions The workgroup identified key areas for future research and policy change to ( 1 ) improve communication among hospital providers, dialysis units, and patients/care partners; ( 2 ) develop tools for risk classification, subphenotyping, and augmented clinical decision support; ( 3 ) improve education to providers, staff, and patients/care partners; ( 4 ) identify best practices to improve relevant outcomes; ( 5 ) validate quality indicators; and ( 6 ) assess the effect of social determinants of health on outcomes. We urge all stakeholders involved in the process of AKI-D care to align goals and work together to fill knowledge gaps and optimize the care to this highly vulnerable patient population.

Introduction: Lineage switch (LS) refers to the transformation of acute leukemia from one cell lineage to another (e.g., lymphoid (ALL) to myeloid (AML)). This rare phenomenon, distinct from treatment induced malignancy (i.e., t-AML) and mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL), is increasingly being observed following cell surface antigen targeting. Given challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of LS, Project EVOLVE was developed to globally identify cases of LS following immunotherapy. Methods: A protocol and data collection form for this IRB exempt study was widely disseminated to capture deidentified LS case information across multiple centers and cancer consortia. This included collection of data from published reports of LS, with authors contacted to obtain additional information. For this analysis, LS was defined by the emergence of cell-surface markers warranting reclassification of the original leukemia as a different lineage derivation based on the immunophenotype, including cases of AML emerging alongside the original ALL. “Confirmed” LS cases included those where retention of original cytogenetic or molecular aberrations and/or the clonal immunoglobulin rearrangement patterns were verified to confirm the clonal relationship. “Suspected” LS cases included those where samples to confirm clonality marker retention could not be obtained, but the clinical presentation was consistent with LS. The term “transition” was applied when immunophenotypic shifts were transient. Cases with new cytogenetic abnormalities unrelated to the original diagnosis and compatible with t-AML were excluded. Statistical analysis was primarily descriptive. Data cut-off was July 26, 2023. Results: A total of 58 cases were identified, including 19 cases referenced in prior publications. Of the 58, 11 cases were excluded from this initial analysis, including: 4 cases of t-AML, 2 cases of T-ALL to AML, and 5 “transition” cases. Collectively, 47 cases of LS (43 “confirmed”; 4 “suspected”), spanning across 3 continents and 8 countries, were analyzed. (Fig. 1A) Cases included transition from B-ALL to AML in 36 (76.6%) and to MPAL/biphenotypic/ambiguous lineage in 11 (23.4%). Two likely had MPAL at diagnosis and a third with chronic myeloid leukemia. The median age at initial diagnosis was 8.4 years (range, 1 day-76.5 years); median age at LS presentation was 11.0 years (range 0.4-77.3 years). Twenty-three (48.9%) were male and 19 (40.4%) had prior stem cell transplant (SCT). Baseline cytogenetics showed KMT2A rearrangement in 27 (57.4%). Baseline myeloid antigen co-expression was seen in 22 of 23 patients with submitted data, but variation in degree of expression across patients and antigens was substantial. The most proximal immunotherapy prior to development of LS was CAR T-cells in 23 (48.9%) and blinatumomab in 24 (51.1%). The median time from the most proximal immunotherapy to development of LS was 1.6 months (range, 7 days-36.5 months). In 7 (29.2%) patients receiving blinatumomab, LS developed during the infusion. LS presented as isolated marrow relapse in 27 (57.4%), isolated CNS in 2 (4.3%), isolated non-CNS extramedullary disease in 3 (6.4%), combined relapse in 14 (29.8%) and unreported in 1. First line treatment for LS was chemotherapy induction in 31 (66.0%), palliative care/no therapy in 8 (17.0%), and alternative therapies in the remaining 8 (17.0%). In 35 (74.5%) patients, remission induction was the goal of first line therapy. Fifteen (31.9%) achieved a complete remission (CR) of whom 2 were treated with palliative intent. Across all patients, 8 (17.0%) are alive in remission, the longest being 4.7 years from LS diagnosis; 2 (4.3%) are alive with active LS and 37 (78.7%) died from LS, their original disease, or complications of treatment of LS (Fig 1B). For those alive in CR (n=8), 7 (87.5%) proceeded to a consolidative SCT for treatment of LS and 1 patient, an octogenarian remains in remission after AML directed therapy. Conclusions: LS is emerging as an important mechanism of immune escape following immunotherapy. Project EVOLVE provides the largest dataset of patients with LS to date. This systematic, international effort reveals substantial complexity and variability in diagnosing and managing LS. Unfortunately, outcomes following LS are grim, underscoring the critical need to identify risk factors of and optimal therapies for this leukemia transformation.

Purpose: The discovery of MAPK/ERK pathway mutations has led to the approval of MEK-inhibitor (MEKi) cobimetinib in histiocytic neoplasms. However, the pivotal clinical trial that led to the approval of cobimetinib included only 4 patients with Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH). Therefore, there is a need to define outcomes with MEKi therapy in patients with LCH. We undertook a multi-center collaboration through the Adult LCH Working Group for the Histiocyte Society to address this gap in knowledge. Methods: Adults with LCH who received MEKi therapy were included from five institutions. Objective response rate (ORR) was evaluated using PET/CT criteria, and CT/MRI if PET scan was not available; response categories were categorized into complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD). Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the time of targeted therapy initiation. Risk organ disease was defined as liver, spleen, or bone marrow involvement. Results: 25 adults with LCH were included in this study; median age at MEKi initiation 43y (range, 18-85). Most common systems involved at diagnosis were bone (52%), pituitary (44%), and lung (36%). Risk organ involvement was observed in 7 (28%, 6 liver, 1 liver and spleen) and 2 (8%) patients had intra-axial CNS involvement. Median lines of prior therapy received were 2 (range: 1-5), and 4 (16%) patients received MEKi in first-line. MAPK/ERK pathway status was assessed via target capture next generation sequencing (NGS) in 22 (96%) cases. Amongst those who underwent NGS, alterations identified included: BRAF V600E (2/22, 9%), BRAF deletions (11/22 50%), MAP2K1 or MEK mutations (4/22, 18%), and MAPK1 or ERK2 (n=1, 5%). Overall, 5 patients also received BRAF inhibitors (4 patients as first therapy prior to MEKi and 1 concomitantly due to BRAF V600E positive melanoma). Specific MEKi agents utilized included cobimetinib (n=13) and trametinib (n=12). Among the response evaluable patients (n=23), ORR to MEKi treatment was 78% (9 CR, 9 PR, 4 SD, 1 PD). Among the 7 patients with liver involvement, responses were seen in 2 (29%) cases. ORR did not significantly differ according to mutation status among those with NGS data (78% MAPK mutated vs. 100% unmutated; p=1.0). In this subcohort, all of the 4 cases that did not respond to MEKi had liver involvement; 3 had BRAF deletions (2 SD and 1 PD), and one had MAPK1 mutation (SD). Median follow-up duration after MEKi initiation in the entire cohort was 18 months (95% CI 6 - 30). The median PFS and OS were not reached; 2-year PFS and OS were 78.1% and 79.9%, respectively (Figure 1A). The median PFS was much shorter in those with liver involvement (7 months [95% CI 0 - 14]) compared with those without liver disease (not reached [95% CI 19-not reached] P=0.047; Figure 1B). PFS did not differ significantly between MAPK pathway mutated and unmutated patients (p=0.34) Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 36% (n=9) and most commonly included rash (n=5) and fatigue (n=3). Four patients experienced grade 3-4 AEs including rash, fatigue, and thrombocytopenia. Common causes of MEKi discontinuation included AEs (n=3), progression (n=2), and drug holiday (n=2). At last follow-up, 5 patients died and 18 remained on MEKi. Death was attributable to LCH (n=3), concomitant malignancy (n=1), or unknown causes (n=1). Conclusions: In our multi-institutional study of adults with LCH, we found MEKi therapy to be highly efficacious. However, liver involvement correlated with a lack of response and worse PFS, while mutational status did not. Future studies are needed to evaluate optimum treatment for high-risk subgroups of LCH like liver disease.

Background: Ph-like ALL is a high-risk subset of B-lineage ALL that responds poorly to standard chemotherapy regimens. While allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is routinely recommended for patients with Ph-like ALL, large multicenter data addressing its role is limited. Here, we conducted a multicenter study to evaluate the role of HCT in adolescent and young adult (AYA) and adult patients (pts) with Ph-like ALL and compare their outcomes to pts with Ph-pos and Ph-neg (non-Ph-like) ALL. Methods: The study included pts (age ≥18) with B-lineage ALL who received HCT in first complete remission (CR1) at 3 academic centers (MD Anderson Cancer Center, City of Hope and Mayo Clinic) between 2006 and 2021. Pts were divided into 3 main subgroups: Ph-like, Ph-pos and Ph-neg ALL. Ph-like ALL cases were identified using cumulative data obtained by targeted RNA sequencing, conventional cytogenetics, FISH studies, whole genome chromosomal microarray and flow cytometry. Measurable residual disease (MRD) prior to HCT was measured using flow cytometry with a sensitivity of 0.01% for Ph-neg and Ph-like ALL, and with a PCR assay for BCR::ABL1 for Ph-pos ALL. MRD-negativity was defined as &lt;0.01%. Predictors of relapse were evaluated in univariate and multivariate analysis using Fine-Gray sub-distribution hazard models considering non-relapse mortality (NRM) as a competing risk. Results: 673 patients were identified, 83 (12.3%) had Ph-like ALL, of which 73% had CRLF2-alterations. The remaining patients were classified either as Ph-pos (N=271, 40.3%) or Ph-neg ALL (N=319, 47.4%). Patients with Ph-like ALL were younger (median age 40 years vs 48 and 46 years for Ph-pos and Ph-neg ALL, respectively, p=0.01), more likely to be of Hispanic ethnicity (69% vs 32% and 48% for Ph-pos and Ph-neg ALL respectively, p&lt;0.001). Patients with Ph-like ALL were also more likely to have induction failure (24% vs 2% and 11% for Ph-pos and Ph-neg ALL, respectively, p=0.001). A summary of pts characteristics for each subgroup can be found in Table 1. The median follow-up was 30, 52 and 48 months for patients with Ph-like, Ph-pos and Ph-neg ALL, respectively. In univariate analysis, 3-yr OS and PFS did not differ significantly (66% and 59% vs 59% and 54%, p=0.1) between patients with Ph-like and Ph-neg ALL, respectively. Similarly, the cumulative incidence of relapse was comparable between patients with Ph-like and Ph-neg ALL (22% vs 20%, respectively, p=0.7). In contrast, the 3-yr OS (75%, p&lt;0.001) and PFS (70%, p=0.001) were significantly higher and relapse rate significantly lower (12%, p=0.003) in pts with Ph-pos ALL compared with Ph-like or Ph-neg ALL (Figure 1). The inferior survival in patients with Ph-like and Ph-neg ALL was likely attributable to higher relapse rates (22% and 20% vs 12%, respectively, p=0.003) compared to Ph-pos ALL. Finally, the 3-yr NRM rate in patients with Ph-like ALL was comparable (20% vs 18% and 23%, respectively, p&gt;0.1) to Ph-pos and Ph-neg ALL. We confirmed that the relapse rate in patients with Ph-like ALL was comparable to the rate in pts with Ph-neg ALL (HR=1.02, 95% CI 0.6-1.8, p=0.9) on multivariate analysis (MVA). Ph-pos ALL was associated with a significantly lower relapse rate compared with Ph-neg ALL (HR=0.4, 95% CI 0.3-0.7, p&lt;0.001). MRD positivity prior to allo-HCT was the only additional significant predictor for relapse on MVA (HR=2.9, 95% CI 1.8-4.7, p&lt;0.001). Conclusions: HCT appears to overcome the poor prognosis of patients with Ph-like ALL. Despite higher induction failure rates, patients with Ph-like ALL undergoing HCT in CR1 had similar outcomes to other Ph-neg ALL subsets. The impact of effective salvage therapy leading to MRD-negativity in CR1 in this group is under investigation and will be reported. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of different Ph-like alterations on HCT outcomes. Outcomes for patients with Ph-pos ALL are significantly better than other groups, likely due to the use of TKIs pre- and post-HCT.

Background: Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is a heterogenous Hematopoietic stem cell disorder and standard therapy being intensive chemotherapy (IC) followed by consolidation with either high dose Cytarabine or Allogeneic Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in intermediate and high-risk patients. Though the outcome in younger & fit patients with IC in terms of CR rates and survivability are reasonable, however patients above 60 years may not benefit owing to increasing frailty, co-morbidities, adverse disease risk factors, chemo resistance and toxicities. Newer approaches with Novel/Targeted agents are being incorporated in treatment strategies in order to acheive better results and long-term survival. We report outcome of AML patients treated on standard chemotherapy at our institution. Methods: Total 208 Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) patients were treated at our institution between January 2017 and December 2022 and analyzed after institutional review board (IRB) approval. Data was collected from institutional data base and summarized by medians and Range for continuous variables, numbers and percentages for categorical variables & Survival estimates were obtained by Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Median age of our cohort was 46.5 years (range,17-90), Male patients were 57% (n-118) and 43% (n-90) were Female. Seventy-five (36%) were locals and 133 (64%) of other nationalities. Median WBC 11.5 x10^9/L (range 0.60-381); Hemoglobin 83 g/L (range 27-103), Platelets 53x10^9/L (range 2-791), Median Bone marrow blast were 50% and median LDH 357 U/L. Normal cytogenetics was present in 54.4% (n-111); 19%(n-39) were Core binding Factor (CBF), 3.5% trisomy 8 and 3.5% were complex cytogenetics. Major molecular mutations included FLT3-ITD (21%), NPM1 (18.3%), DNMT3A (11%), IDH1&2 (7%), TET2(5%), TP53(3.5%) and ASXL1(3%). As per European Leukemia Net (ELN 2017) risk stratification, Intermediate risk were 50% (n-104), Favorable 30% (n-63) and Adverse 20% (n-41). Total of 164 (79%) patients received intensive chemotherapy, 13(7%) Azacytidine and Venetoclax, 16(8%) low intensity and 12(6%) best supportive care (BSC). Intensive chemotherapy included Anthracyclines +Cytarabine and FLAG/FLAG-Ida (Fludarabine, Idarubicin, Cytarabine and G-CSF). Total of 136(65%) of patients achieved Complete Remission (CR/Cri) after 1 or 2 inductions. Major adverse events during induction were grade 4 cytopenia's and pneumonias. There were 26(13.6%) deaths during induction. Majority of patients received consolidation therapy with high dose cytarabine 1-3 g/M2 twice a day for 3 days for two to 3 cycles and 28(14%) underwent Allogeneic stem cell Transplantation. At a median follow up of 9.1 months, the 2 year and 5-year overall survival (OS) were 65% and 57% in whole cohort. ELN Favorable Risk group had a better survivability at 2 years (80%). Two-year OS in Patients above 60 and less than 60 years were 37% and 75% respectively. Conclusion: Intensive chemotherapy resulted in significant survival improvement in AML and has been standard of care for more than 3 decades. However significant advances in understanding the biology, risk categorization and development of newer novel therapies has led to alter the treatment strategy with better outcome. Our study underlines the fact that we need to incorporate the newer therapies in treatment plan to achieve these goals.

Abstract Background Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is associated with significant morbidity. Management includes surgery and prolonged antibiotic treatment. Few studies have evaluated rates of acquired antimicrobial resistance in bacteria causing PJI. The aim of this study was to describe antimicrobial resistance profiles of bacteria causing PJI and to assess whether there was any apparent association between acquired resistance and clinical outcome. Methods Patients at Mayo Clinic with first episodes of knee or hip PJI whose implants underwent sonication between January 2012 and December 2021 were studied. Sonicate fluid cultures from cement spacers or cultures yielding more than one microorganism were excluded. PJI was defined according to IDSA guidelines. Multidrug resistance was defined as non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial classes. Outcomes of PJI recurrence, need for further surgery with negative cultures or cultures yielding a new microorganism and amputation were assessed, within one year. Analysis was performed using SAS software version 9.4 (SAS Inc). Results 256 PJI episodes were evaluated, 55% from knees and 45% from hips. Median patient age was 66 years, 52% were men. Resistance profiles are shown in the table. The most frequent microorganisms isolated were S. epidermidis (n=82) and S. aureus (n=50), of which 68% and 30%, respectively, were methicillin resistant. Streptococci, Enterococci, Enterobacterales, and P. aeruginosa were found in 34,16, 8 and 3 cases; none were multidrug-resistant. No differences in PJI recurrence within one year were found in subjects with methicillin-resistant compared to methicillin-susceptible staphylococci (S. aureus, 50% versus 50%, respectively, p, 0.44; S. epidermidis, none), need for further surgery with negative cultures (S. aureus, 20% versus 80%, p, 0.72; S. epidermidis, 80% versus 20%, p, 0.47) or with cultures yielding a new microorganism (S. aureus, none; S. epidermidis, 67% versus 33%, p, 0.96), or amputation (none in any subject with staphylococcal PJI). Conclusion Acquired antimicrobial resistance in PJI was most common in S. epidermidis with methicillin resistance found in 68% and multidrug resistance in 28%. Disclosures Matthew P Abdel, MD, OsteoRemedies: Royalties|Springer: Publishing royalties|Stryker: Royalties reltated to hip and knee implants Robin Patel, MD, Abbott Laboratories: Advisor/Consultant|Adaptive Phage Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Adaptive Phage Therapeutics: Mayo Clinic has a royalty-bearing know-how agreement and equity in Adaptive Phage Therapeutics.|BIOFIRE: Grant/Research Support|CARB-X: Advisor/Consultant|ContraFect: Grant/Research Support|Day Zero Diagnostics: Advisor/Consultant|HealthTrackRx: Advisor/Consultant|Mammoth Biosciences: Advisor/Consultant|Netflix: Advisor/Consultant|Oxford Nanopore Technologies: Advisor/Consultant|PhAST: Advisor/Consultant|See details: Patent on Bordetella pertussis/parapertussis PCR issued, a patent on a device/method for sonication with royalties paid by Samsung to Mayo Clinic|See details: continued, patent on an anti-biofilm substance issued|TenNor Therapeutics Limited: Grant/Research Support|Torus Biosystems: Advisor/Consultant|Trellis Bioscience, Inc.: Advisor/Consultant

Key Points AKI survivors experience gaps in care that contribute to worse outcomes, experience, and cost. Challenges to optimal care include issues with information transfer, education, collaborative care, and use of digital health tools. Research is needed to study these challenges and inform optimal use of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions to promote recovery AKI affects one in five hospitalized patients and is associated with poor short-term and long-term clinical and patient-centered outcomes. Among those who survive to discharge, significant gaps in documentation, education, communication, and follow-up have been observed. The American Society of Nephrology established the AKINow taskforce to address these gaps and improve AKI care. The AKINow Recovery workgroup convened two focus groups, one each focused on dialysis-independent and dialysis-requiring AKI, to summarize the key considerations, challenges, and opportunities in the care of AKI survivors. This article highlights the discussion surrounding care of AKI survivors discharged without the need for dialysis. On May 3, 2022, 48 patients and multidisciplinary clinicians from diverse settings were gathered virtually. The agenda included a patient testimonial, plenary sessions, facilitated small group discussions, and debriefing. Core challenges and opportunities for AKI care identified were in the domains of transitions of care, education, collaborative care delivery, diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, and digital health applications. Integrated multispecialty care delivery was identified as one of the greatest challenges to AKI survivor care. Adequate templates for communication and documentation; education of patients, care partners, and clinicians about AKI; and a well-coordinated multidisciplinary posthospital follow-up plan form the basis for a successful care transition at hospital discharge. The AKINow Recovery workgroup concluded that advancements in evidence-based, patient-centered care of AKI survivors are needed to improve health outcomes, care quality, and patient and provider experience. Tools are being developed by the AKINow Recovery workgroup for use at the hospital discharge to facilitate care continuity.

Abstract Although the majority of HPV (+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) patients exhibit a favorable prognosis, approximately 20% face recurrent or metastatic disease, posing management challenges. Therefore, the identification of robust prognostic markers for risk stratification is essential. Our study focused on the comprehensive characterization of intratumor heterogeneity within the tumor immune microenvironment (TME) in both primary tumors and metastatic lymph nodes. Utilizing computational approaches, we integrated hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and 11 adjacent immunohistochemistry (IHC)-stained slides to investigate the cellular composition and functional characteristics across different regions within the TME. Based on these detailed immune characteristics, we classified patients into specific immune subtypes. Our integrative TME analysis indicated that patients with high tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), increased CD8 + levels, and reduced CD163 + cell counts within their primary tumors were likely to have a more favorable progression-free survival outcome. The integration of H&E and IHC data enhances the functional characterization of immune phenotypes of the TME with biological interpretability and improves patient stratification in HPV(+) OPSCC.