Patel, Neelkumar

Abstract Aims Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) has become increasingly recognized. It accounts for <1-4% of acute coronary syndrome presentations. Overall, however, it makes up over 40% of pregnancy-associated myocardial infarction. Furthermore, pregnancy-associated spontaneous coronary artery dissection (P-SCAD) is described to have a greater degree of clinical manifestations, including left ventricular dysfunction, shock, and left main or multivessel involvement. The findings are disconcerting, though many studies evaluating P-SCAD are based on case series data or are single centre studies. Methods and results The aim of this study was to evaluate a larger national dataset to evaluate the outcomes of SCAD and specifically P-SCAD in an attempt to better characterize the severity and clinical nature of this condition. To conduct this study, we analysed the National Readmission Database from January 2016 to December 2020. Propensity matching was done using the Greedy 1:1 method. Multivariate logistics and time-to-event Cox regression analysis models were built by including all confounders significantly associated with the outcome on univariable analysis with a cut-off P-value of 0.2. In multivariate regression analysis, P-SCAD patients had a non-propensity matched odds ratio (OR) of 0.21 (0.3-1.54, P = 0.123) of dying and a propensity matched OR of 0.11 (0.02-0.61, P = 0.012) of dying. Thirty-day readmission rate for P-SCAD was 15.8% (n = 93) and for non-pregnant spontaneous coronary artery dissection (NP-SCAD) was 11.2% (n = 2286); non-propensity matched OR for readmission for PSCAD patients was 1.68 (1.24-2.29, P = 0.001) and propensity matched OR was 3.39 (1.93-5.97, P < 0.001). Conclusion Among hospitalized patient, P–SCAD was associated with similar clinical outcomes and reduced incidence of death when compared with NP–SCAD, though had higher rates of 30–day readmission. Larger–scale observational data will be needed to ascertain the true incidence of cardiovascular complications as it relates to P–SCAD.

Background: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is defined as a non-traumatic separation of the epicardial coronary artery walls that creates a false lumen. SCAD poses a difficult challenge in management, as decisions regarding revascularization and medical management seem to be tailored to the individual patient. We evaluated and compared outcomes based on cardiogenic shock in patients with SCAD utilizing Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) between January 1, 2016, to December 30, 2020. Methods: We utilized the NRD 2016–2019 to carry out this study. We evaluated demographics (e.g., age, gender), conventional risk factors, comorbidities present on the index admission, and in-hospital outcomes using their specific ICD-10-CM codes. The primary outcomes were In-hospital mortality and 30-day readmission, and the secondary outcome was to compare the complications in SCAD patient with cardiogenic shock (CS) compared to those without CS. Results: We analyzed 2473 individuals with SCAD, 2199 of these individuals did not have cardiogenic shock whereas 274 of these individuals did have cardiogenic shock. When comparing SCAD with cardiogenic shock to SCAD without cardiogenic shock, there was a statistically significant increased odds ratio (OR) for death (propensity matched OR 24.93 (7.49–83.05), use of mechanical circulatory support (propensity matched OR 15.30 (6.87–34.04), ventricular tachycardia (propensity matched OR 4.45 (1.92–10.34), utilization of blood transfusions (propensity matched OR 3.82 (1.86–7.87), acute kidney injury (propensity matched OR 4.02 (1.45–11.13), need for mechanical ventilation (propensity matched OR 8.87 (3.53–22.31), and respiratory failure (propensity matched OR 4.95 (1.83–13.41)))))))). There was no statistically significant difference in 30-day readmission rates between the two groups. Conclusions: SCAD is a unique condition that can lead to many complications. In our analysis, we showed that SCAD associated with cardiogenic shock compared to SCAD not associated with cardiogenic shock results in greater odds of complications including death, use of mechanical circulatory support, need for blood transfusions, ventricular tachycardia, acute kidney injury, use of mechanical ventilation, and respiratory failure. SCAD with cardiogenic shock represents a significantly critical clinical scenario that requires a multi-disciplinary approach to prevent the many potential complications associated with this disease process.

Introduction: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is thesecond leading cause of death globally, accounting for approximately 11% of alldeaths, long-term disability, and functional impairments in survivors. TheCOVID-19 pandemic has raised concerns about its impact on AIS patients. Aim: This study aimed to assess the outcomes,including mortality and severity of disability in AIS hospitalizations withCOVID-19. Methods: We performed a retrospective cross-sectionalanalysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS-2020) in adulthospitalizations for AIS to compare the outcomes [death & APRDRGseverity/disability] in COVID-19 patients using ICD-10 codes. We performedweighted analyses using chi-square, unpaired t-test, and multivariate logisticregression models to evaluate COVID-19-associated poor outcomes amongst AISpatients. Results: Out of 504,460 AIS patients, 7,590 had AIStriggered by COVID-19. Amongst AIS hospitalizations, COVID-19 was more frequentin age group >65 year old 63.2%, male 52.6%, White race (51.4%), patientwith Medicare (58.7%), median household income 0-25 percentile (33.6%), Southzone (43.4%), and hypertensives (83.7%). AIS patients with COVID-19 had ahigher mortality (10.93% vs 3.8%) and severe/extreme disability (93.21% vs37.43%) rates in comparison to patients without COVID-19. (p<0.0001) Inregression analysis COVID-19 was associated with 213% higher odds of mortality(aOR: 3.13, 95% CI: 2.90-3.38, p<0.0001, c:0.671) and higher odds of severe/extreme disability(26.85, 24.53-29.39, p<0.0001, c:0.686) compared to AIS patients withoutCOVID-19. Conclusion: These findings emphasize the substantialimpact of COVID-19 on AIS patients by elevating mortality and risk of severedisability compared to their counterparts. Efforts should be directed towards earlyidentification of stroke population that is at higher risk ofCOVID-19-associated poor outcome and prompt management tomitigate the burden of the both diseases.